Rank the IEM's you've heard
post-6550010
Post #91 of 2,341

grokit

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Nov 1, 2009
Messages
11,631
Reaction score
391
Location
The North
Joined
Nov 1, 2009
Location
The North
Posts
11,631
Likes
391
e-Q7 > RE1 > Triple.Fi 10 > Super.Fi5 Pro = RE0 > ER6i > Apple IEM (1st version) > other cr@ppy OEM type IEMs

edit: I added a couple I forgot about, and I want to add that my ranking combines SQ and enjoyment.
 
     Share This Post       
post-6550137
Post #93 of 2,341

Bennyboy71


Aka: Ben Clayton
Aka: Cold Pizza
Aka: Bennyboy71
Aka: Visions66
Aka: TheloniSphere
Aka: Muzeick
Aka: Frankleemydear
Aka: Canofcant
And many more
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Messages
1,299
Reaction score
37
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Posts
1,299
Likes
37
CK10>ER4S>ER4P>X5>lots of rubbishy bass-heavy jobs invariably bought from Argos with no idea what I was doing>stock Apple earphones>the ones I got free the other day with a cd storage case. They should carry a health warning.
 
     Share This Post       
post-6550168
Post #94 of 2,341

javajive

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
154
Likes
0
ck10>fx700>e-q7>ck100>er4p>se530>ie8>ie7>x10>x5>custom3>tf10>fx 500>c710>mdr-ex700>ck90pro (umodded)...and a bunch of other mostly sub $100 ones not worth mentioning.
 
     Share This Post       
post-6550203
Post #95 of 2,341

jaw2ek

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 11, 2007
Messages
170
Reaction score
11
Joined
Apr 11, 2007
Posts
170
Likes
11
TF10>RE0>HF5>Klipsch C2>marshmallows>cx300>ibuds>koss plug>$2 buds bought at grocery.

(Although not IEM, I would put ksc-75 about equal with the klipsch.)
 
     Share This Post       
post-6550367
Post #96 of 2,341

koonhua90

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 1, 2009
Messages
1,551
Reaction score
65
Joined
Jun 1, 2009
Posts
1,551
Likes
65
In terms of enjoyment when listening to music:
IE8 > UE TF10 > Shure 210 > Ety HF5 > Klipsch Image S4 > Sennheiser CX-300

In terms of details alone:
Ety HF5 > UE TF10 > IE8 > Shure 210 > S4 > CX-300
 
     Share This Post       
post-6550380
Post #97 of 2,341

ASilva

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Dec 19, 2009
Messages
152
Reaction score
12
Joined
Dec 19, 2009
Posts
152
Likes
12
Sennheiser IE7 > Shure E2c > Sennheiser CX400-II > Sennheiser CX 300-II > V-Moda Vibe > Sennheiser CX300 > Sony MDR-EX71
 
     Share This Post       
post-6550385
Post #98 of 2,341

average_joe

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Dec 5, 2008
Messages
5,394
Reaction score
293
Joined
Dec 5, 2008
Posts
5,394
Likes
293
Quote:

Originally Posted by javajive /img/forum/go_quote.gif
ck10>fx700>e-q7>ck100>er4p>se530>ie8>ie7>x10>x5>custom3>tf10>fx500>c710> ck90pro (umodded)...and a bunch of other mostly sub $100 ones not worth mentioning.


Wow! CK10 trumps the FX700, e-Q7, and CK100 for you!

I won't do a full ranking, but here is my current ranking (for SQ) of what I think is the top of what I own (and have on hand):

GR8 = Copper = CK90Pro (modded) = RE252 = CK10

All are very different, but very good at what they do, and I don't have a consistent preference, but like to switch between them often!
 
     Share This Post       
post-6550431
Post #100 of 2,341

rawrster

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 22, 2008
Messages
10,565
Reaction score
205
Joined
Oct 22, 2008
Posts
10,565
Likes
205
well for those who like the CK10 they seem to really like it joe myself included of course
 
     Share This Post       
post-6550443
Post #101 of 2,341

average_joe

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Dec 5, 2008
Messages
5,394
Reaction score
293
Joined
Dec 5, 2008
Posts
5,394
Likes
293
Quote:

Originally Posted by rawrster /img/forum/go_quote.gif
well for those who like the CK10 they seem to really like it joe myself included of course



I hear ya, and I am a CK10 supporter (as I am sure you know). My post has been edited. I can listen to the CK10 for extended periods of time, but initially didn't put it there due to the GR8/e-Q7s better transparency, while offering much the same. To my ears, of course.
 
     Share This Post       
post-6550490
Post #102 of 2,341

KLS

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Dec 31, 2008
Messages
1,585
Reaction score
19
Joined
Dec 31, 2008
Posts
1,585
Likes
19
Just have a quick glance through from the first post, and I realised that most posted their ranking without stating whether it is based on sound quality or preferance
The title doesn't mention whether to rank IEMs in sound quality or personal preference too...

@ethan961, sorry to use yours as example without permission
In my opinion @ethan961's ranking is the best example, to rank in both preference and sound quality.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ethan961 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Well, this is an old thread, but I might as well.

Fischer Audio DBA-02 > Westone 2 >= Fischer Audio Eterna ~ Phonak PFE >= RE0 ~ Fischer Audio SBA-01 ~ Fischer Audio Sigma V.2 > Atrio M5 > JVC Air Cushions.

Note that this is in order of preference, not SQ. SQ would be:

Fischer Audio DBA-02 ($160) > Westone 2 ($215-250) > Phonak PFE ($130) > RE0 ($79) > Fischer Audio SBA-01 ($85) > Fischer Audio Eterna ($67.49) > Atrio M5 ($200 retail, $100 street) > Fischer Audio Sigma V.2 ($30) >> JVC Air Cushions ($20).



As for me, for sound preference:
IE8>TF10>CK10

Sound quality wise:
CK10>IE8=>TF10
 
     Share This Post       
post-6550556
Post #103 of 2,341

MKang25

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Mar 20, 2010
Messages
286
Reaction score
11
Joined
Mar 20, 2010
Posts
286
Likes
11
Haven't really owned much but,

HJE900(CZs) > S4i > ADDIEM > JBUDS J2 > Stock Apple
 
     Share This Post       
post-6550641
Post #104 of 2,341

javajive

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
154
Likes
0
average_joe-


From an objective SQ perspective, both the FX700 and the e-q7 probably do more things better than the CK10 than the other way around but only by a relatively narrow margin IMO.

But SQ alone should not be the sole factor in determining ranking IMO. I also think that comfort and fatigue are also important factors as what good is SQ if one can`t enjoy it fully for as long as one wants? And for my ears, the CK10 beats the e-q7 in terms of comfort and forgetting that there is a physical object in one`s ears by a very wide margin just as it beats the FX700 in being non or less fatigueing also by a very wide margin.
 
     Share This Post       
post-6550760
Post #105 of 2,341

Bennyboy71


Aka: Ben Clayton
Aka: Cold Pizza
Aka: Bennyboy71
Aka: Visions66
Aka: TheloniSphere
Aka: Muzeick
Aka: Frankleemydear
Aka: Canofcant
And many more
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Messages
1,299
Reaction score
37
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Posts
1,299
Likes
37
Quote:

Originally Posted by Louis8ball /img/forum/go_quote.gif
@BennyBoy: LOL --- I think you're in the wrong thread, man. Ummmm, well you know there actually IS a discussion thread which highlights the top WORST IE's you've ever listened to. . .but I don't think this is supposed to be that forum =]


Ha. Yeah, I saw that thread. But my ranking stands - until I got those X5s, my ears were pretty much victims of abuse by what passes for acceptible earphones these days. Now I have the majestic CK10s, I realise the error of my ways and lie awake at night crying for all the violence I have inflicted on my poor canals over the years. There should be a confession booth in this forum.
 
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top