Quote:
Originally Posted by billinkansas /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I find the midrange ambience of the modded YH-1, and even my unmodded YH-2 absolutely seductive. I have not heard that in any stat, and I've had many of them now. The orthos don't have the treble clarity and "sparkle" of the stats, but they do trump them on the bottom end.
|
And this from someone with
two SR-X Mk 3s!
I wouldn't have thought the orthos had an edge in midrange reproduction, but if that's the case, that's the case. I'll only slip in one more suggestion to try a reflex dot to crank up the top octave to 'stat level. Isodynamic treble isn't quite as smooth as 'stat treble, but it
can sparkle and it's demonstrably smoother and clearer than any dynamic (upper limit: $350) I've heard. All isodynamics droop in the high treble (including my Monsoons), so this is not a suggestion strictly for us oldsters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by facelvega
The ortho soundstage problem is real, but maybe smeggy is on to something with his new frame concept.
|
Most of this is due to the vented-closed back design all the manufacturers stubbornly used except of course for Fostex's perverse T30 and antiperverse T50. The Eagle is the only one of vented-closed designs that makes any sense, and as you pointed out, even it, clever as it is, isn't necessary. All power to The Smegster and anything he (or anyone else) can do to come up with a 'phone that simply exhausts into free air.
Quote:
Originally Posted by facelvega
I don't get it-- why is every ortho except the PMB100 and the last-gasp Yamaha so deathly afraid of just having an open back?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericj
the old T50 as well - but i'm as puzzled as you are. maybe they thought that a sparsely vented enclosure would help keep up the SPL?
|
Why were they afraid of the open back? I think the mfrs. listened to the bassy droopy sound of the middle-range drivers in free air and found that a closed, reflective back had the nice quick cheap effect of boosting the treble, so they said "To hell with it! it's cheap and it's quick! Make it!"
As JadeEast found when he went to Stage Two with his Pro 30, further damping/tinkering was necessary to reflatten the sound once the back was opened.
Quote:
Originally Posted by scompton
If I had something that could drive them well at work, it'd probably be true there as well. I need to find an inexpensive, small amp for work.
|
Interesting that you prefer the ortho to the SR-5. How small an amp do you need? Would something like a panasonic
SA-XR10 be too big, keeping in mind that you can tip it up on its side? 17" wide, about 1.5" thick. I've heard the T-amp isn't suitable for driving headphones because of a DC offset problem too small to affect speakers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDOT
I got a pair of Yamaha HP-3. I’ll try to mod it.
|
Excellent! Eagerly awaiting your results and impressions.
By the way, have you ever owned or listened to an
Echo H-16?
Quote:
Originally Posted by spritzer
Another ESP [electrostatic headphone] idea that has never been tried (AFAIK) is wire stators.
|
Ah, yes, using insulated wire, like the original JansZens and Acoustats. Good point-- why, other than cost, was this rational, proven, arcproof design never used for other electrostats, much less 'phones? A rant for another forum..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markse
There's an interesting sort of wave guide to redirect the back waves out the holes in the side of the back housing, and a small disk of foam as damping.
|
Wow, that's evidence of someone doing some cost-effective thinking. Thanks for the pictures, and jeez, did Fostex make that driver (just kidding-- it looks like the capsule in the T50, only smaller), and where can we get about a dozen of these?
.