aamefford
I have a custom title!
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Posts
- 3,914
- Likes
- 661
Wow - this thread has gone for a walk on the wild side...
I like the DT1350's. Mine sound like the early ones were described - decently deep bass, articulate, pretty detailed, pretty accurate. Excellent for a $300 on ear portable.
I am disturbed that 3 out of 3 pairs are all over the map. I wonder about position sensitivity, seal, etc. in the testing, but I don't discount Purrin's testing, just would like a full description. As for requiring "Scientists" before you believe it - those who feel this way give "scientists" far too much credit. I did several years as a rocket scientist - we are bright guys, but hey, humans build tests, and as far as I know, Purrin is human. Heck, he could be a scientist. A scientist after all is one who uses the scientific method. State a hypothesis - all DT1350's sound alike. Test, and evaluate the results. Purrin has done this, and disproved the hypothesis.
However - the next step is repeatability and verification by peers. We need his method, and someone else with similar equipment, who cares enough to bother.
OK, I'm out of here for a while...
I like the DT1350's. Mine sound like the early ones were described - decently deep bass, articulate, pretty detailed, pretty accurate. Excellent for a $300 on ear portable.
I am disturbed that 3 out of 3 pairs are all over the map. I wonder about position sensitivity, seal, etc. in the testing, but I don't discount Purrin's testing, just would like a full description. As for requiring "Scientists" before you believe it - those who feel this way give "scientists" far too much credit. I did several years as a rocket scientist - we are bright guys, but hey, humans build tests, and as far as I know, Purrin is human. Heck, he could be a scientist. A scientist after all is one who uses the scientific method. State a hypothesis - all DT1350's sound alike. Test, and evaluate the results. Purrin has done this, and disproved the hypothesis.
However - the next step is repeatability and verification by peers. We need his method, and someone else with similar equipment, who cares enough to bother.
OK, I'm out of here for a while...