Quote:
Would you deem the gr01 or er4p an upgrade from hf5s? I currently have a CMoyBB amp and the hf5 set up is pretty good. I was looking to see if any iem would be considered an upgrade. I tried the gr07 but didn't like the sound leakage and the over the ear application .
Any upgrades you would suggest to the hf5 in terms of non-leakage and wire down use? $250 max. Any different sound sig is appreciated.
AWESOME reviews btw.
If you're looking for a different sound signature you probably shouldn't be looking at the ER4 at all. The GR01 is a little different and may be considered an upgrade if you'd give up some of the transparency of the HF5/ER4 sound for a slightly fuller sound and better deep bass presence.
Quote:
Hey joker!
Wondering if you've heard the XBA-3 yet and how would you compare them to the XBA-4?
Yes, I have one here. I tried it and wasn't really impressed (much the same story as with the XBA-4) so back on the shelf it went. It wasn't as bassy as the XBA-4 but otherwise has pretty similar characteristics and some of the same issues. If I ever have a chunk of spare time I'll come back to it.
Quote:
I smell a VC02 review coming out soon
Yes. Received it, tried it, liked it, put it back on the shelf due to lack of time and haven't had a chance to get back to it yet
. I'll definitely get to it in a week or two.
Quote:
This is a pretty general question, but of these iems, which would work best for someone who listens to a lot of metal? I don't really have a preferred sound, but I do like the way my brainwavz HM3's sound.
Gr06
Am90
Brainwavz M2
Anything you would recommend under $100
The AM90 may not have enough bass and the M2 might have too much. I'd go for the GR06 out of those but you can also get a better BA earphone than the AM-90 in that price range - the Rock-It Sounds R-30, for example, or even the MEElec A161P. Personally, I'd take one of the more accurate BAs for rock and metal, or a dynamic-driver set that's a little more v-shaped than the GR06. The Ultimate Ears 500 comes to mind as a "safe" choice that's been popping up pretty cheap lately.
Quote:
@joker vsonic gro2 be vs brainwavs m5 vs klipsch s4 i mostly listen to rap and want build quality
I'd go for the GR02. Have had a few earphones with that housing and they've all been very reliable, and the sound is arguably the best of the bunch.
Quote:
So as to not clog up the forums, does anyone know of a direct upgrade to the RE-ZERO in terms of sound signature? I returned the RE-262 I got recently due to not enough isolation, so now I have funds to upgrade (I tip-rolled like crazy and cannot get enough isolation without compromising the mids). Here's what I'm looking at and what I'm worried about for each:
- TDK BA200 - flat cables are annoying, and the shape looks like the RE-262, so I'm afraid for bad isolation/fit
- GR07 - I heard these isolate less than the BA200, but seems to be the sound I'm looking for
- Brainwavz B2 - so-so build quality
- Rockit Sounds R-50 - so-so build quality and memory/hard wire (I hate it)
- Astrotec AX-7 - seems to be the best build quality of the bunch, but not enough reviews to become informed
I am looking for an RE-ZERO with slightly more subbass and wider soundstage (everything else seems perfect) - mainly at the GR07 and BA200. Yet, if the R-50 is closer to my ideal sound sig and its build quality not as bad as I make it out to be, then I'll get it. If neither of these are "upgrades," then I'll just stick to my RE-ZERO since I love it to death.
Thanks in advance
EDIT: I liked the RE-ZERO's sound sig much more than the RE-262.
I would stick with the RE-ZERO. I don't think any of the ones I've heard are exactly what you are looking for with no additional drawbacks.
Quote:
Joker,
I have a quick question about the UE900 and the GR07s. I read your comments about them. I have the GR07 BEs. I like them alot and they are fun with most but I find they seem to collapse and don't really give the best separation and detail when listening to complex music. I have been listening to Holst Planets recently as my preferred test. I also ordered some TDK BA200s. These seem to do a better job with the issues I am having with the GR07 keeping the soundstage outside of my head during more complex passages. Even so, I have a brand new pair that is giving me shorting issues in an earpiece. They also aren't built to the overall quality of the GR07s. Finally we enter the UE900s. I have an opportunity to grab some of these at a great price (around $100 more than the GR07s). Will they do a better job than the GR07s at resolving detail and not "collapsing" as it were? Not sure if I am saying that right but during complex passages the GR07s just seem to lose any soundstage width and I feel as if I am listening to earphones instead of the music swimming around me.
I think you like the UE900s from all I have read. At what point in a price drop would you put them as the "bang for the buck" IEM?
I haven't heard the BA200. The UE900 has a very good presentation, with noticeably better depth and layering compared to the GR07. I think it's the lack of depth that you have an issue with with the GR07. There's not really a price point I can name - for those who don't mind it's minor foibles, the UE900 is definitely worth the price as is.
Quote:
How does the sibilance of the GR07 (or MKII) compare to that of the RE-ZERO. I did not find the ZERO to be sibilant at all, so it's probably not my biggest concern. Also, it's weird how you said that the 400 is the GR07 done right, because the 400 is claimed to be "polite," while the GR07 is deemed "fun."
It's worse, on the MkI at least. I've never found any of the HiFiMan products sibilant but the GR07 bothers me on occasion, as do its little brothers, the GR06 and GR02 BE.