Orel
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2012
- Posts
- 90
- Likes
- 10
Hey joker, one more question before I buy the Meelectronics CW31, are they good for metal? That's the most problematic genre I have with headphones, will it work well with these? Thanks
I found the cable noise to be annoying on the A161s though they did sound incredible. I like to lay on my side while I listen to music and I couldn't get them to feel comfortable after trying a couple of different tips. I'm a noobie on audiophile equipment, but I decided to send them back. Seems like the SE215s might provide better comfort at this price point. They should also provide better bass since they're using dynamic drivers instead of BAs, correct?
I'm not a bass head but the music I listen to has a lot of deep tones (think "If 6 was 9" by Jimi Hendrix or the "Gayene Ballet Adagio" from the 2001 soundtrack if you're familiar. (Yeah, I'm a grey beard...)
Any recommendations for this kind of listening?
Thanks!
JJ
Joker!! How about a review of the ATH-CKW1000/CKM1000? Would really like to see how good you consider their sound to be. I would send you my pair if i can part with them when I eventually purchase them (CKM1000 within 2-3 weeks). Just so as long as you burn them in for me, I would consider it to be a great honor to add another top tier iem to your legendary list. How does one go about assisting you in this endeavor? What is the wait time?
And a quick question for anyone who can reply, are their any customs that go with a straight down cable approach? I am not a big fan of the behind the ear iem. Sucks because I would spend top dollar for them and the best reviewed phones happen to be as such.
Joker,
Have you tried the bass edition of the Vsonic GR07?
Joker,
I've ordered the Phonak 232's but they have not shipped yet. I was able to get them for $450 delivered.
Now I am reconsidering, and your input would be appreciated.
.
The review you give the 1964-v3 makes them very tempting.
I chose the phonak's in part because they were your highest rated earphones with phone/mic/control capability (excluding the much much pricier AKG's). I've checked with 1964 and they say that their buds are compatible with some cables with that control such as this one:
http://www.jhaudio.com/product/mic-cable-smart-phones
(do you have experience with JHAudio buds and how they compare with 1964's?)
Now with impressions and that second cable the 1964's are likely to cost closer to $550 for me, where the Phonak's are $450.
So which should I go for?
Now I will say that I listen to a variety of music - not much electronic/dub type stuff that many other posters seem to enjoy. I listen to rock, classical, and jazz. And I have been using the "5" series shure's, mostly the 530's, for many years. I do really like their sound - cheaper phones when i try them seem to have way over extended bass that is very unrealistic.
That said, the "V" signature of the 232's may be less appealing to me than the 1964's. Absolute isolation is less of a priority to me than sound quality (I am a listener, not a stage musician!) and I do have some concern about the "maintenance" that would be required with customs - do I need to replace them every few years if my ears change? (I am 54 years old, if that matters.)
Anyway, any thoughts you have would be appreciated.
Hey joker, one more question before I buy the Meelectronics CW31, are they good for metal? That's the most problematic genre I have with headphones, will it work well with these? Thanks
Joker how would you compare the soundmagic e10 and the she3580 (the es18 uses the e10 drivers and are priced around the she3580)?
Joker,
I'm currently trying to decide between yamaha eph-100 and westone um3x (I own both) and I saw that you gave slightly higher score to UM3X in terms of sound quality. However, I have not been able to notice any difference between them maybe except slightly more laid back treble on the yamahas which may actually be something good for long listening sessions. Vocals sound exactly the same, bass is pretty much equal too. Instrument separation and imaging seems more or less same too. What is your take on these 2 head to head ? I also have SM3 V2 but I already decided to return them since bass is slightly weaker compared to UM3X and EPH-100. I mostly listen to vocal jazz and edm/trance. Should I maybe try something else ?
Thanks alot Joker, I will be buying the GR07 as soon as possible.. I'm confirming the source I have found that sells it for $160. They still include the hard shell case. Thanks again This thread really helped
They may be a bit more laid-back in the highs than I like for metal but for $30 you won't do a whole lot better. Soundstage is also a touch flat in terms of depth but not too bad. They are resolving, clear, and not too mid-bassy, which is where a lot of cheap earphones break down for me when it comes to metal. Metal is a pretty broad category, though. I keep a few metal albums on hand for quick benchmarking but the two I use most often are Panopticon by Isis and Arrows & Anchors by Fair to Midland. I think both are quintessential modern metal and both sound just awful with sub-par headphones.
isn't that the mk1, with the case, not the two?