Originally Posted by
average_joe /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Quote:
I believe AJ and tupac has NT-6 V1 which has boosted ends(could be reason for that being pointed out compared to H8P) relative to V2. I wonder if AJ has heard NT-6 V2 which graphically that is provided is leveled relative to the graph of the V1. H8P more detailed? hmmm. Sounds more leveled also. Curious how it compares to the NT-6 V2?
So, would the Viento-R be the V2 sound?
Have not heard the Viento-R. This is what Tomcy says in comparison to UERM:
Only heard the NT6 demo vs. the UERM full custom. NT6 is brighter up top, but has better mid presence. Overall UERM is more relaxed and open sounding. NT6 has a little more impact in the bass. Didn't do things in-depth, so that's about it.
Here is KimVictor's comparison of the demos he heard at Hidition:
http://cymbacavum.com/2014/07/26/a-short-tour-of-hiditions-hq-in-seoul-and-brief-impressions-of-their-ciems/2/
"The switches in reality only alter the bass or midrange by a few decibels, so don’t expect a night and day difference, but the differences are still quite noticeable and audible. So, if you like a slight boost in your sub-bass or mids, you’re in for a treat with the Viento-R. Detail retrieval and clarity remains fairly average, lagging slightly behind the NT6, but I am convinced that the Viento-R is the most musical of Hidition‘s offerings."
Common statements from both Tomcy and KV is there NT6 sounds a bit bright. They both own UERM, but your chart shows that UERM is bright, but the V1 is analytical. John who got the NT6 made around the same time says it sounds the same to his UERM. It doesn't seem he has tested with better sources just dragonfly and Audinst MX-1 both which I don't regard very high of and may not be idea to reveal distinguishing features very well. I'd say DAC2 is a good source for comparisons. It does reveal the analytical nature of the treble, but at the same time the hyper detailing(nuances and bass defintion) without the typical ES9018 forwarded dry trebling is revealed of how far it can go.
Your summary of V1:
reference bass, dynamic range, bright, analytical, spacious 3D, transparent, realistic, extended bass and treble
Very detailed, analytical reference sound that has some musicality to it with a very spacious and 3D presentation. Ultimate clarity in an analytical way. Exceptional technical ability.
Of UERM:
analytical, bright, 3D, spacious, accurate, neutral bass, detailed, transparent
Bright and analytical with impressive imaging, the UERM doesn't lack in many ways other than the harsh treble with less than perfect masters.
Both you state CK10 being close which mean both have bright character(although CK10 to be much brigher, but it was V1 you have summarized). Part I don't think CK10 comes anywhere near is that it's flat sounding with any sources, but the NT6 has layering or imaing with considerably wider stage, better bass definition with DAC2. What is also common I'm reading is the more mid presence of the NT6, but that could be do to comparison to more bass boosted NT6 pro. Also since both Kim and Tomcy listened to demos, there will be aspects that is altered.