Chris_Himself
Member of the Trade: HPL Audio Cables
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Posts
- 3,169
- Likes
- 73
Quote:
This is the reason I don't solely depend on silly graphs for sonic impressions. This perhaps explain why I wasn't a huge fan of the LCD-2 signature or blown away off the bat when transitioning from RS-2i. It took some time but I "get it" now but obviously I'm a lot more active on this thread than the LCD-2 one.
Again it's very difficult to imagine how an RS-2i should cost $500.. but then it's even more difficult to fathom why the RS-1 is still king to people when compared against all the orthos considering it's bits of wood and some small flimsy drivers. I will never understand what secrets lurks inside that headphone.
As Brooko said, I didn't say inferior.
The "deal" with any planar radiator (ESP, electret, planar-magnetic/orthodynamic, etc) is that they put out a very uniform "wall" of sound, compared to the conical pattern that will come out of a dynamic cone (which is what you'll find in every Grado ever made). This is a very different presentation on it's own, even if they had the exact same frequency response (which they do not), because of how the sound-wave will interact with your outer and inner ear. So just like how an Ultrasone with S-LOGIC will not image or position audio in the same way as any conventional headphone, neither will any planar radiator. Same thing with speakers - there are plenty of great-sounding speakers that use multiple drivers in various alignments, and there are also a number of planar/dipole models that are also great-sounding. But they produce a very different sonic image because of the difference in how they put sound out.
So not only should you expect to see a large difference in tonal balance (in that, nothing has the same PRaT, tonal balance, etc that a Grado does), but the difference in radiation will also change and influence the sound very heavily. I will tell you that flat-out, if you think your Grado headphones are the best sounding thing since sliced bread, nothing else will get you that same experience except another Grado. They're very unique. I say this to hopefully prevent a lot of dragon chasing - don't waste your time with other manufacturers trying to get "a better sounding Grado" - just get a better Grado. If there's *major* issues you have with Grado headphones (e.g. you hate their tonal balance), don't waste your time buying more expensive Grado models - try something else.
It all ultimately comes down to preference - do you like chocolate or vanilla or perhaps Neapolitan?
This is the reason I don't solely depend on silly graphs for sonic impressions. This perhaps explain why I wasn't a huge fan of the LCD-2 signature or blown away off the bat when transitioning from RS-2i. It took some time but I "get it" now but obviously I'm a lot more active on this thread than the LCD-2 one.
Again it's very difficult to imagine how an RS-2i should cost $500.. but then it's even more difficult to fathom why the RS-1 is still king to people when compared against all the orthos considering it's bits of wood and some small flimsy drivers. I will never understand what secrets lurks inside that headphone.