Dsnuts
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2011
- Posts
- 15,637
- Likes
- 32,339
Got the standard Blessing 2 not the Dusk.Could you do a comparison vs B2 Dusk ?
thank you,
They both have comparable stages width wise which I could have sworn Blessing 2 would have had a wider stage. Going from the blessing 2 to the Aladdin. right off the bat I can tell the height depth and layering for the mids is not even close. In fact the Blessing 2 sounds one dimensional in comparison. Sounds more flat neutral a bit like what we all know how neutral tuning sound is. Its treble is not as refined and as articulate as the the Aladdins treble. Of course the bass end of the B2 was a huge disappointment for me. Don't know how you can use this large dynamic and have it sound like a weak BA bass. I have several all BA iems that have much more authority and rumble vs the B2. Reason why the dusk version exists. It took crinacle to point out how gimpy the bass is on the blessing 2 and that slight splashy brighter treble for them to do a Dusk version. I am very confident the Aladdin is superior in all fronts even if the Dusk corrects the 2 glaring issues with the Blessing 2. Reason being. Its imaging and dimensional qualities are severely lacking in comparison to the Aladdin. No contest there.
Oh and not to mention the Aladdin don't feel like you got rocks in your ear holes.
The only reason why I own a B2 is because these are moondrops traditional house tuning. It is more or less for comparison purposes and in comparison. Aladdin is the superior earphone and not by a little either. It is the lack of dynamics for the B2 that really makes them medicore at best for me. To be fair they sound markedly better with an upgraded cable change but even then they aren't anything special imo.
Last edited: