The Sub-$200 Portable Amps Shootout – 13 (+11) amps compared
Jul 31, 2012 at 1:02 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 615


IEM Reviewer Extraordinaire
May 11, 2004
Mid Johor, Malaysia
This is basically an extension of the sub-$100 amp shootout as the evaluation and scoring method are essentially the same. As always, this comparison is only a subjective evaluation and nothing more than my own personal opinion.
Evaluation Method
Sources: Sansa Fuze via custom LOD (around 0.5Vrms)
IEM used for evaluation: HifiMan RE0, Etymotic ER4S and Shure SE530.
Amps are all in their lowest gain setting. Volume matched using a SPL meter to ≤1dB via white noise and double checked with a multimeter. They are also RMAA tested (loop-out / loop-in though Tone Well UT24 audio interface with a 16ohm load) but only result of significant will be discussed. Output impedance and power are measured using fixed loads and 1kHz tone. The reference amps used for the elevation are Meier Audio StepDance and NwAvGuys’ O2 (built by JDS Labs), both excellent amps of their own.
(Note: it would seem strange that O2 is both the reference amp as well as an amp under review, but this is only because of how good I think it is.)
[Build Quality]
Build quality covers not only housing, but also material, design, size, etc – plastic is not necessary rated worst than metal. Functionality is the key here.
Current are measured (volume matched driving fixed 47 ohm and 23.5 ohm load, 1kHz pure tone) to multiple with voltage for power.  Most amp have more than enough power for typical IEM, the important point is having enough voltage for high impedance IEM (>100 ohm) and enough current for low impedance IEM (<16 ohm). However, only two typical numbers are covered here.
[Power Drop]
Calculated from the data generated in the Power measurement, this percentage shows how much power is lost when switching from a 47ohm fixed load to a 25.5ohm fixed load. Ideally a lesser power drop indicates a more consistent amp’s performance between different load situations. It also shows the direct negative impact on power delivery caused by higher output impedance.
[Output Impedance]
Calculated from the voltage difference between no-load and a 47 ohm fixed load with a 1kHz pure tone. Less than 1 ohm is best for most IEM as it has the best dampening and doesn’t affect the FR curve of the IEM.
Size and weight comparison. Ratings are given as relative. From Biggest (1/5) to smallest (5/5)
Related to transient. Mainly about the sense of attack - especially noticeable on bass note.
Not related to coloration, transparency is used as the sum of the openness and layering of the amp, which are what essential to produce the depth of the sound field
If transparency is the depth, then soundstage is used as the sum of width and separations. Together, they define the overall resolution of the amp.
[Coloration / Neutrality]
This can be either pure measurement (FR curve) or perceived difference in presentation. O2 will be the main reference here.
Tested using a cellphone receiving call in very close proximity.
How well the amp behaves with hiss prone IEM, mainly SE530.
Odds and ends that are not covered on above.
Out of a full mark of 5 points
= 1 point
= ½ point
= Zero point
i.e. ●●●◎○ = 3½ points


Obsession can be quite costly.
Take note the grayed out amps in the list have been previous reviewed in the sub-$100 shootout and are mostly quoted from previous review with updated measurements.
(In alphabetical order)
  • digiZoid ZO2.3 ($119.95)
  • FiiO E12 Mont Blanc ($130)
  • FiiO E17 Alpen ($140)
  • HeadRoom Total BitHead ($150)
  • iBasso D-ZERO ($109)
  • iBasso T3 ($119)
  • iBasso T5 ($169)
  • JDS Labs C421 – AD8620 ($189)
  • JDS Labs C421 – OPA2227 ($184)
  • JDS Labs C5 ($189)
  • JDS Labs Objective 2 ($144)
  • Lear FSM-01 ($130)
  • Leckerton Audio UHA-4 ($199)
Jul 31, 2012 at 1:04 PM Post #2 of 615

digiZoid ZO2.3 (from sub-$100 shootout)
Build Quality: ●●●●● (Beautifully finished, even with a full plastic housing)
Power: ●●●●◎ (Decently powerful)
Power Drop: 6%
Output Impedance:  ●●●●○ (2Ω)
Portability: ●●●●◎ (Ultra-portable)
Speed: ●●●●○ (Decent)
Transparency: ●●●◎○ (slightly forwarded)
Soundstage: ●●●○○ (Not particularly wide)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●◎○ (Never quite a flat line, but EQ is its game)
EMI: ●●●◎○ (Easily susceptible)
Hissing: ●●●○○ (Fairly noticeable)
Remark: The bass boosting ZO2.3 isn’t near the best sounding amp in the comparison and yet it is one of the most expensive (top at $99.95 *digiZoid has increased the price to $119.95, making ZO2.3 invalid for the sub$100 comparison). As purely an amp, ZO2.3 has a roll off bass (in Bass Level 0 setting) and doesn’t have quite the resolution compared to those that are cheaper in price. However, ZO2.3 brings something else to the table that will worth your while – the multi-level bass boost, and improved from the original ZO, the ability to take line-out signal. Though it might not be the best sounding or the most powerful amp around, it is great for adding bass to lean sounding IEM. At least for me, I tend to see it as an EQ first and an amp second. It is small so it won’t take much space, and the overall finish is pretty good. The output impedance is a bit high, but any IEM over 16 ohm shouldn’t be a problem at all. However, I won’t use it with IEM of very low impedance (or really high sensitivity) as hissing can become more noticeable.

FiiO E17 Alpen
Build Quality: ●●●●● (Solid design with good functionality)
Power: ●●●●● (Plenty)
Power Drop: 3.9%
Output Impedance:  ●●●●● (0.6 Ω)
Portability: ●●○○○ (Full size)
Speed: ●●●●◎ (tiny bit softer in kick but really good overall)
Transparency: ●●●●○ (decent)
Soundstage: ●●●●○ (decent)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●◎ (Warmish and slightly forward, but not nothing major to complain about)
EMI: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Hissing: ●●●●● (Very very minor, only detectable in high volume)
Remark: Functionality is the key for E17 Alpen. It isn’t the best sound of the batch but it has the SQ to get the job done. Most importantly, it takes more type of inputs (USB, Coaxial, optical and analog line-in) than any portable amp/DAC that you can find for with a maximum of 24/192 support with a cheaper price tag. Best bang for the bucks is what E17 is all about. For harder to drive headphone, E17 can even dock onto E9 or the newer E09k for higher output. With the FiiO L7 connector, you can also use E17 as a standalone DAC for outputting line-signal to another amp. By itself, the performance of the amp section is about the same level as FiiO’s own E11 and iBasso T3. Beside the fact that the DAC section has a very mild, almost inaudible -3dB roll-off over 18kHz (probably due to the DAC’s reconstruction filter), there is very little technical fault on the device itself. It is a well rounded, all purpose multi-tool of a portable amp/DAC. It might be master-of-none, but one can hardly ask for more with the $140 price tag.

FiiO E12 Mont Blanc
Build Quality: ●●●●● (Solid)
Power: ●●●●● (Plenty)
Power Drop: -1.5%
Output Impedance:  ●●●●● (0 Ω, too low for measurement)
Portability: ●●○○○ (Full size)
Speed: ●●●●◎ (Sharp and energitic)
Transparency: ●●●◎○ (Only decent)
Soundstage: ●●◎○○ (Mediocre)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●○ (The narrow soundstage makes everything sounds more forwarded and warmer than it should)
EMI: ●●●◎○ (Noticeable and annoying, but not overly loud)
Hissing: ●●●●◎ (Silence in operation, but hiss when recharging)
Remark: E12 is the first FiiO portable amp that can be called a top sounding amp, or at least very close to one - immensely powerful and well controlled but lacks the best transparency and soundstage. The narrower width and depth cause the overall presentation to push forwarded, giving an impression of warmth and energitic sound with a rather musical vocal. However, the forwardness also reduces overall resolution and refinement. Porbably best pair with full size headphone that is either wide in soundstage or more laid back in nature. Sub-bass is a little (-1dB) rolled off near 20Hz, but small enough not to be noticeble. It would have been a great amp if it has the soundstage to match its power, but still a really solid choice for its $130 price tag

HeadRoom Total BitHead (from sub-$100 shootout)
Build Quality: ●●●●● (Like a tank)
Power: ●●●○○ (Weak, worsen as load impedance goes down)
Power Drop: 9.7%
Output Impedance: ●●◎○○ (5.4Ω)
Portability: ●○○○○ (Larger than typical full size)
Speed: ●●●●◎ (Good speed, though impact is slightly weak)
Transparency: ●●●●○ (Decently deep)
Soundstage: ●●●●◎ (Fairly good)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●◎○ (Rolling off at the bass’ end with a 16ohm load is not a good thing)
EMI: ●○○○○ (Really bad)
Hissing: ●●◎○○ (Rather bad)
Remark: Like PA2V2, the Total AirHead (TA, and TBH in this case) is an old design. For whatever reason, HeadRoom doesn’t seem to want to update the design for the new generation of IEM that are much more efficient and probably trickier to drive. The good news first – 1) TA is the only amp in the comparison with a crossfeed circuit. I have had other portable amps with crossfeed before and the implementation on TA (TBH) is by far the best in creating a very relaxing, natural, binaural-like listening effect. 2) The TA, as well as the Total BitHead (which is what steps in for TA here), is built like a tank. It might be a full plastic + rubber construction, the design is very much foolproof.  The use of 4 AA batteries also means this amp will last almost forever as opposed to the Li-ion battery used on other amps. But it does come with the price of overall portability. 3) Transparency and soundstage are quite good, despite the other problems I’ll mention below.
Now comes the bad news – 1) the high output impedance means any headphone under 40 ohm (following the 8x rule) will not be ideal for the amp. In fact, most of the sensitive multi-driver IEM with crossover circuit will probably sound quite colored. 2) Result of rolloff under 100dB (to -3dB @ 20Hz) with a 16 ohm test load is an indication of too small an output caps. It is not as bad as ZO2.3 in flat EQ mode, but at least ZO2.3 has bass boost to bring back (and excel) the bass. 3) Under RMAA testing, TA’s (and TBH’s) performance worsens with lower impedance load. While it still has more than enough power, it seems to indicate that the amp is having trouble keeping the same performance when impedance is too low. All and all, the result of the tests is pointing toward the conclusion that TA (and TBH) is just not an IEM friendly amp. This won’t be surprising if we consider that there aren’t quite as many IEM users around when the TA (and TBH) was designed. Like PA2V2, it is an outdated design for the current market and is costing too much to be considered a good buy. 4) The USB DAC section in TBH isn’t nearly as nice sounding as many other cheaper options available today. Any other amp/DAC in this shootout will probably make for a much better purchase easily.

iBasso D-ZERO
Build Quality: ●●●●● (Simplicity and well fabricated)
Power: ●●●●● (Second most powerful)
Power Drop: 1.4%
Output Impedance:  ●●●●● (0.5 3Ω)
Portability: ●●●●○ (Small)
Speed: ●●●●○ (decent speed, slightly slow on attack)
Transparency: ●●●◎○ (A little short in depth)
Soundstage: ●●●●◎ (Good)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●○ (Clean with a fainted sense of warm. Bass rolls off with low impedance load)
EMI: ●●●●◎ (very low but detectable)
Hissing: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Remark:  Intended as the ‘FiiO E7 Killer’, D-zero does offer a better sound than the former.  But that should be expected since it is >$20 more expensive than E7 and offer less features. By itself, D-zero is decently well rounded. Used as USB DAC, it can get slightly brighter but shouldn’t be a big problem as long as it isn’t paired with an already bright sounding headphone. The sub-bass (<100Hz) however does roll-off with low impedance load (-3.5dB with 16ohm load), indicating that the use of output capacitors with too small of capacitance. It would have been a great amp/DAC choice and a true E7 killer if it is under $100. But given D-ZERO cost up to $125 shipped from iBasso, it is too close to the better sounding and feature-rich E17 ($140 shipped) to have any comfort. As a pure amp, it also doesn’t offer any advantage over its older sibling, the T3 or the cheaper FiiO E11. As an USB DAC however, D-ZERO offers a good, clean sound, which is where D-ZERO’s true value is, especially since the line-in (AUX-in) also double as a line-out when D-ZERO is used as USB DAC. Overall, the asking price put D-ZERO in an awkward place where is it a bit too expensive to compared to the cheaper stuff yet it is not good enough to compare to the more expensive stuff. Even so, it still makes Total BitHead looks totally over-priced and out-dated.

iBasso T3
Build Quality: ●●●●○ (Decent but can be better)
Power: ●●●●● (Most powerful)
Power Drop: 0%
Output Impedance:  ●●●●● (0.5 Ω)
Portability: ●●●●◎ (Ultra-portable)
Speed: ●●●●◎ (Good, missing just a tiny bit of the deep kick)
Transparency: ●●●●◎ (Good)
Soundstage: ●●●●○ (decent)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●◎ (Mostly neutral with slight brightness and a sense of leanness)
EMI: ●●●●◎ (very low but detectable)
Hissing: ●●●●◎ (Very minor, almost inaudible))
Remark:  One of the slimmest of the batch yet offers really solid power (in fact, highest into a 47ohm load used in testing and most consistent into a 25.5ohm load). T3 can sound a bit lean and sterile for those who are looking to add weight and body to their music by amping, but technically it is still very good. As an ultra-portable, there is really not much to complain about with such a good performance.

iBasso T5
Build Quality: ●●●○○ (slight disappointment)
Power: ●●●●◎ (Decently powerful)
Power Drop: 8.7%
Output Impedance:  ●●●●○ (2.7 Ω)
Portability: ●●●●◎ (Ultra-portable)
Speed: ●●●●○ (Softer edge seems to be a balanced ground specialty)
Transparency: ●●●●● (well rendering of depth)
Soundstage: ●●●●○ (Decent, but still a little short in width)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●◎ (Mostly neutral with a unique smoothness of balanced ground)
EMI: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Hissing: ●●●●◎ (Very minor, almost inaudible)
Remark: T5 is supposed to be the better T3 – in some way it is, but in other ways it isn’t. On the plus side, T5 has BTL ground, a type of active balanced ground similar to that used on many Meier Audio’s amp. It gives benefit of a balanced setup without the need to recable your headphone. It isn’t as good sounding as Meier Audio StepDance, but iBasso has done a great job on packing such a complex implementation into such a tiny package while still maintain a really good SQ. While it might not have the highest output to the 47ohm test load, it can still get really loud with good power into more difficult load. It would have been the perfect ultra-portable if not for some major flaws.
Now on the bad side of things – the build quality of T5 is rather mediocre. First, the rubber coating around the zinc alloy frame chipped almost as soon as I start using it. Second, the battery ballooned up and failed within a short few months. Third, the amp has really loud click-and-pop during startup and shutdown. Lastly, for an ultra-portable designed mainly for IEM, the output impedance is slightly on the higher side. As my fourth iBasso’s amps, T5 also has the worst build quality of them all. I wonder if iBasso’s intension to pack everything into such a small package has ended up costing them to cut corner in build quality. Without saying, I am disappointed.
[Update 28 Sept. 2013] iBasso has responded to user's email that T5 is unable to recharge and operate at the same time, despite failing to mention such a crucial information on its website or in the manual. It is also a much further issue that some T5 owner had reported that they T5 can be used when recharged, while a few also reported battery failure. For these questionable build quality issues, I strongly advise against buying an T5.

JDS Labs C421 – AD8620
Build Quality: ●●●●◎ (Very good)
Power: ●●◎○○ (Weakest of the batch)
Power Drop: 21%
Output Impedance:  ●◎○○○ (10.7 Ω)
Portability: ●●○○○ (Full size)
Speed: ●●●●● (Almost as good as O2)
Transparency: ●●●●● (Will give it half a mark more if I can)
Soundstage: ●●●●◎ (Good)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●● (Almost as good as O2, almost)
EMI: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Hissing: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Remark: C421 with AD8620 is by far the best sounding amp after O2 in the batch. Sonically there is nothing bad to speak of – clean, neutral, well balanced and specious. It goes particularly well with IEM, especially Etymotic ER4S, as it can render depth in the most spectacular way. The JDS signature bass boost also helps a lot. Measurement wise, it is almost flawless as well – except in one particular area, the high output impedance, which also makes it to have the worst power delivery into a low impedance load of all the amps in review. It still has enough, but obviously it could have been a lot better. High output impedance generally give two problems: first, low electronic dampening. Second, coloration to the headphone. The good news is, coloration doesn’t seem to be a problem for C421 as it still measured perfectly flat with low impedance IEM. Of course, you still won’t get much dampening out of it. Without the high output impedance, this would have been the best $200 amp around, both sonically and technically. 

JDS Labs C421 – OPA2227
Build Quality: ●●●●◎ (Very good)
Power: ●●◎○○ (Weakest of the batch)
Power Drop: 21%
Output Impedance:  ●◎○○○ (10.8 Ω)
Portability: ●●○○○ (Full size)
Speed: ●●●●● (Almost as good as O2)
Transparency: ●●●●○ (decent)
Soundstage: ●●●●◎ (Really good, but lack a sense of openness)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●◎ (Really good, but slightly forwarded)
EMI: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Hissing: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Remark: C421 with OPA2227 shares almost all the good and bad of C421-AD8620. Afterall, the two are the same except for the opamp. In comparison, OPA2227 offers a richer, more upfront presentation over the higher resolution on sonic space of AD8620. Musicality over precision, if you like. Beyond  that, C421 with OPA2227 is still a very capable amp.

JDS Labs C5
Build Quality: ●●●●● (Excellent)
Power: ●●●●◎ (Decent)
Power Drop: 14%
Output Impedance:  ●●●●◎ (1.8 Ω)
Portability: ●●○○○ (Full size)
Speed: ●●●●● (Good)
Transparency: ●●●●◎ (Decent)
Soundstage: ●●●●○ (Slight lack in width)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●● (Almost as good as O2, almost)
EMI: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Hissing: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Remark: In a sense, C5 is the C421-evolved. It addresses some of C421 technical issueses such as high output impedance and the subsequent low power delivery. While C5 is still not the most powerful amp around, it now has much better power delivery and thus more versitile to handle different type of loads. Sonically, it remains top notch but not neccesery better sounding when compared to its elder sibiling, the C421-AD8620. The one area theat C5 is noticeably weaker is on its soundstage. Perhaps it is the lingering character of OPA2227, C5's soundstage is still too overly focus in the center - not just compare to C421-AD8620, but UHA-4 as well. Depth is however slightly better. Overall a technically better amp than C421 and still a top-tier, but if you like your C421 with yout current headphone, then there is no hurry to get the C5.

JDS Labs Objective 2
Build Quality: ●●●●◎ (Very good)
Power: ●●●●● (Plenty)
Power Drop: 0.6%
Output Impedance:  ●●●●◎ (1.1 Ω)
Portability: ◎○○○○ (More transportable than portable)
Speed: ●●●●● (reference)
Transparency: ●●●●● (reference)
Soundstage: ●●●●● (reference)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●● (Perfectly colorless)
EMI: ●●●●◎ (very low but detectable)
Hissing: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Remark: Designed via measurement, O2 is the reference amp of the whole shootout and offers the best SQ subjectively and objectively. It has the best blend of everything, as far as sound being the only concern. But as an amp designed solely to achieve maximum SQ, the practicality side of the amp does suffered a bit. First, the size and weight are closer to a transportable rather than a portable amp. Second, the use of non-standard power supply / charger makes it much less viable as a traveler choice. In fact, it is the only other amp besides Total BitHead (which isn’t rechargeable anyway) that doesn’t take an USB connection for power / recharge. The less-than-easily accessible batteries compartment also means that, even when using regular non-rechargeable 9V when travelling, you still need to carry a screw driver around. Overall, O2 is more like a desktop amp that can go mobile, rather than a truly portable amp in spirit.

Lear FSM-01
Build Quality: ●●●●○ (Decent but can be better)
Power: ●●●●◎ (Decently powerful)
Power Drop: 4.2%
Output Impedance:  ●●●●● (0.55Ω)
Portability: ●●◎○○ (Almost full size)
Speed: ●●●◎○ (Not bad, but does feel a little slower than it should)
Transparency:  ●●●●◎ (Good depth rendering)
Soundstage: ●●●◎○ (Not bad, but not particularly wide too)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●◎ (Very clean on the slightly leaner sounding side)
EMI: ●○○○○ (Really bad)
Hissing: ●●◎○○ (Rather bad, worsen with higher gain)
Remark: FSM-01 is a good sounding amp with some problem of its own. Before O2, this would have been one of the most transparent amps under $150. The main issues with FSM-01 are the high level of hiss and non-resistant to EMI, which makes it a less practical option these days when many use smartphone as source. With O2 only costing less than $15 more, FSM-01 just doesn’t seem that attractive anymore.

Leckerton Audio UHA-4 with OPA209
Build Quality: ●●●●● (Excellent)
Power: ●●●●● (Plenty)
Power Drop: 1.6%
Output Impedance:  ●●●●● (0.1 Ω)
Portability: ●●●●○ (Slim but wide)
Speed: ●●●●● (Excellent)
Transparency: ●●●●◎ (Good)
Soundstage: ●●●●◎ (Good)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●● (Really neutral, somewhere between the two C421)
EMI: ●●●●○ (Low)
Hissing: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Remark: UHA-4 with OPA209 is the most expensive amp of the batch (and in fact cost over $200 when shipping is included) but also has the best balance between subjective sound, objective measurement as well as real world practicality. Sonic wise, it is a close blend between C421-AD8620 and C421-OPA2227, with some of the detail and resolution of the former and the richness of the later while still remains mostly neutral and transparent. I still prefer C421-AD8620 over UHA-4 but it is a really close call. The only part of UHA-4 that doesn’t sound quite as perfect is its overall resolution and rendering of space. It is really good, but not great. Measurement wise, UHA-4 is almost as good as O2 in every area. Size and weight wise, UHA-4 is slim and easy to carry around. The USB DAC itself is really good as well. Not ObjectDAC level but definitely gives E17 a good run for its money even though it is just a good old 16/44.1 USB DAC. Oh, there is also a crossfeed if you need it. In many ways, UHA-4 reminds me of my trusty Meier Audio 3MOVE, but in a much smaller package. If you must spend $200 for an amp/DAC with the best combination of sound quality and functionality, this will be the one to get.
  • JDS Labs Objective 2
  • JDS Labs C421-AD8620 / Leckerton Audio UHA-4(OPA209) / JDS Labs C5
  • JDS Labs C421-OPA2227 / FiiO E12
  • iBasso T5
  • Lear FSM-01 / Fred_fred_2004’s 3 Channels Headphone Amp
  • FiiO E17 Alpen / iBasso T3 / FiiO E11
  • iBasso D-ZERO / JDS Labs cmoyBB v2.02 / C&C BH
  • digZoid ZO2.3 / Electric Avenues PA2V2 / FiiO E07K
  • FiiO E6 / FiiO E02i
  • FiiO E7 / SoundMAGIC A10
  • HeadRoom Total BitHead / HeadRoom Total AirHead
Note: Sub-$100 amps are included but grayed out.
  • Again, amps are all volume matched using a SPL meter during the review.
  • No amp is perfect. Best sounding amp doesn’t equal to the most practical amp. You’ll need to decide what feature is most important to you and go from there.
  • As far as sound quality being the only concern, #1 to 3 will be what I'll refer as top-tier portable amp with little to no sonic flaw. The 5~7 will be second tier with more pros than cons. 8 and below are entry level with mix result, depend largely on how you use them. T5 is more of an in-between class.
  • Big thanks to JDS Labs for the C421-OPA2227 loan unit.
...Continue to read the Sub-$100 Amps Shootout here.
Jul 31, 2012 at 1:25 PM Post #4 of 615
I certainly took me a while to finish it. I think I RMAA all the amps at least 5 times

Jul 31, 2012 at 8:30 PM Post #6 of 615
thanks for your impressions Clieos
I am searching for an <$200 amp and I think you've just helped make up my mind.
Take care
Jul 31, 2012 at 9:19 PM Post #7 of 615
Much much props for all your hard work! Funny, from my reading it seems the top performers from the sub-$100 category are the most suitable for an IEM listening situation, in addition to being great bargains. I think I'm going to sell my FiiO E5 bundled with my AD700 headphones, and pick up a FiiO E11 for general use with my Ety ER*6i and AKG Q701 headphones until the desktop O2 amp with DAC is released. I would never have thought the E11 was a great contender without your hard work ClieOS, and I would never have heard about many of these other amps such as fred_fred_2004's. The latter amp could use a more catchy name, don't you think?
Aug 1, 2012 at 8:06 AM Post #11 of 615
Great job !  just a little question about the ranking of the Portability, should have better description for that based on the size.  

I can put actual measurement of 3 dimensional size as well as weight to them. Will add those info in later.
Aug 1, 2012 at 8:40 AM Post #12 of 615
great comparison, i have the T5 and agree that the build is rather poor, the e7 is much better in that regard. It does sound good tho. But has quite an audible hiss with my ie80's. Sound quality wise which is better the T5 or the UHA-4?
Aug 1, 2012 at 8:45 AM Post #13 of 615
great comparison, i have the T5 and agree that the build is rather poor, the e7 is much better in that regard. It does sound good tho. But has quite an audible hiss with my ie80's. Sound quality wise which is better the T5 or the UHA-4?

UHA-4 wins, hand down.

I would have been happier even if T5 is twice as large as long as it has better build quality.
Aug 1, 2012 at 10:19 PM Post #14 of 615
I gotta take this list with a grain of salt. I noticed a hiss with the JDS Labs C421 - OPA 2227 when I had it for a few days. I also noticed a bit of EMI from my iPod on top of it. I did happen to be testing the latest production components, which models did you test?
Aug 1, 2012 at 11:10 PM Post #15 of 615
EMI from iPod? I don't realize iPod is capable of radio wave emission (of significant level) at all. Are you sure it isn't the noise from some other components? For example, microdrive from older iPod, etc. I could understand if it is an iPhone cause those are known to be real bad with EMI (I am using a Samsung for testing, btw). Also, what headphone you were using at the time? I tested with SE530, which is notorious for picking up hiss. But I am certain there are worst out there. Even so, wait till you hear the FSM-01 before you know what counts as really bad hissing - it is like having two mosquitos flying inside your ears.

My C421 are all current models btw.

Users who are viewing this thread