- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Posts
- 8,337
- Likes
- 4,690
It's more on-ear than in-ear, i.e. the tips sit outside the ear canal and not inside.Dear AnakChan thank you for your valuable opinions. The thing is I have tried other technologies and am not satisfied particularly with the transparency.
What is the STAX SRS-002 Earspeaker System like ?...although in ear...maybe I should reconsider it.
Best regards,
Robert
Overall the sound is quite nice, but it has some very strange properties. It is quite detailed (think HD800ish level), but with much smaller sound-stage (HE400ish) and low levels of separation and imaging.
When I first heard it, I was baffled to find that it was possible for something to sound detailed, yet have so little instrument separation.
FR-wise, it has a good sound of bass (not sub-bass, and not much rumble), and rolled of treble. You can think of it as a mid-centric earspeaker.
It does not give you the electrostatic-bite, i.e. it did not give me the feeling of it being fast, but it was very transparent and clean.
On sound alone, I would rate it as about the sound of a $800-$1kish price range over-ear headphone. I find it better to compare it with full-sized cans than iem as that is what they sound like.
I personally do not find it uncomfortable, but a lot of people do, so YMMV is really the best I can say. That said, I do find the SRS-001 and SR-003 more comfortable compared to the SRS-002.
I also prefer the sound of the 001 and 003 to the 002, as it has slightly less treble roll-off and slightly more bass roll-off.
Personally for me, I found it rather hard to appreciate current Stax in-ear/on-ear-canal earphones. The sound signature was just a little too rounded from what I remember - granted I didn't listen to them for long. Who knows, maybe they'll have a new closed portable earphones with different sound.