autoexec
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2009
- Posts
- 511
- Likes
- 71
I do hope they will have a flat sound signature. The ones who want to color can use their amps and headphones
Anyway, last word belongs to James.
X5!
I do hope they will have a flat sound signature. The ones who want to color can use their amps and headphones
Anyway, last word belongs to James.
We ran out of speculation and wishes for the X5
Of course there is the PNP USB port able to read directly from a portable drive wish
James as you can see the community wants uncolored dap which functions perfectly and user friendly. I hope you are reading
Just kidding, we all know you are a great guy and always consider customers ideas and suggestions.
...aaaaaand the game breaker is coming, high end sound quality and 24/192 playback, incredibly user friendly and functioning properly. Also won't burn your wallets down either
X3 price x 2 is more than okay for me honestly.
An uncolored dap would be best..imho the headphones should be doing the coloring.
(...) Hifiman series 801/901 have also horrible problems too. Their battery life is crappy and if you look at the 901, there are already build quality issues (esp. wheel) and the device getting hot etc etc. (...)
The wheel issue was in the first batch or two and has been solved: They use another part now which has a good track record.
Just a thought James, as I think this hasn't been mentioned before, concerning X5's aesthetics.
People here gave you many suggestions concerning the actual "inside" of the player, many more that I could think of
One thing but: I figure Jonathan Ive did (does) a brilliant job at Apple in maximazing not only UI but also the connection between function and appearance in Apple products and I think your "top of the line" DAP would benefit enormously from well thought of and endearing looks....I don't know what others think about it.....
I agree, apple products have wonderful design. I'd say the have the best looking dap, along with the AK100. You'll also notice that these two DAPs that have their own setbacks, that when taken in an audiophile context, become major issues.
Don't get me wrong, I love aesthetics, maybe even in OCD terriorty--I've spend countless hours tagging all of my music with correct art, which can sometimes mean scanning the covers myself, and doing color correction. But at this point, SQ and UI are the most pressing concerns, just because no company has really delivered on these as a pair.
So in short, I agree that elegant aesthetics would be lovely, but no so lovely if the UI is loopy. (I'm not too concerned about SQ--we all know of Fiio's impressive track record in the SQ/Price ratio).
So I think what we should do, is ask James for a good lookin' player, but very humbly, because he has done an incredible amount for us, much more than I've every seen in any company.
I would suggest if the Pre-production units of X5 are available now, then send them to respected & experienece senior headfiers such as ClieOS to review.
So that James (Fiio) has more time to react to any serious design flaw in X5 before going into the mass production mode.
For sure we wish the Fiio X5 to be on par with DX100 (HDP-R10), HM-901 & AK120, the Ivy League of Reference DAP.
kkcc & 96rubberduckys,
I totally agree with you.
SQ and UI + various technical features are the most important issues.
It's just that I thought that an "audiophile" DAP, if marketed properly, doesn't necessarily have to be a "niche" product.....I know: do not judge a book by it's cover...still the cover helps to sell it well
plus, I have to admit, as much as I hate apple "closed" world, when I hold in my hands an ipod/iphone/macbook I always marvel at how "luxurius" and precious they look and feel....