EPZ Q5 vs Simgot EA500 LM
This was supposed to be just a
quick comparison ... something in the realms of "
bass is better on this, treble can get spicy on that, this one has a larger stage", but I got sucked in and went slightly deeper. So let's do this.
I put both on NiceHCK 4.4mm cables. Unsure of their names, sorry. I also used Divinus Velvet tips on both to level the playing field in that regard. I did the comparison using my FiiO M15S DAP on High gain, so ample power for both.
Tuning-wise their tonality is pretty similar. They also both sound very coherent. But that is about as far as similarities go, so graphs are not to be trusted too much. From there on a clear trend kept reoccurring.
I started with the song called
Creep by Haley Reinhart to test a multitude of important parameters within the first minute. This allowed me to understand these two sets very quickly.
Where Q5's bass was choppy and grainy, LM has no trouble in dealing with the same passages with much more texture and almost palpable heft. Since this song has quite well pronounced and authoritative bass playing in the background, keeping it in check and ensuring its smoothness, precision and timbral accuracy without bloatedness and muddiness is quintessential. LM does that part significantly better. Bass is also more pronounced on LM, so it isn't at all a case of it being more tame and shy hence seemingly better controlled.
Going into the mids we have got a strong representative in the form of a piano. At first it might seem like Q5 provides better note weight, but after listening carefully I think it's just a case of sounding a bit more diffused which provides a sense of weight. In this tune, the piano can easily get lost in the mix once the rest get going, but here both sets do decently well to separate it. Imaging goes to LM. Her voice is a thing of beauty. It is so feminine while at the same time she has all the heavy artillery at her disposal whenever she fancies to let it rip. LM convinces me with a well-rounded vocal. I do prefer the placement and her vocal colour on the Q5, though, which might be mostly a case of less bass weight to take all the attention. Both managed to stay clear from sibilance.
Once trumpet and trombone join the party it gets crowded all of a sudden, so the main quality I'm looking for is separation on a rather small stage. I never really care too much about the actual dimensions of stage on IEMs, however their imaging and detail retrieval are the things I'm focusing on quite a lot more. There is no doubt that LM is superior in stage 3D-ness as well as the aforementioned imaging and detail retrieval. Following individual piano notes is not easy even on the greatest of sets, but these two do it solidly. Another thing that has stood out to me was the trueness of timbre which was far better on LM when it comes to brass instrumentation. Q5 sounded a bit plasticky and scratchy in direct AB - I haven't noticed that before.
Afterwards, I felt like trying something a bit more upbeat to
gauge the enjoyment factor.
That involved songs like
Flex by Pitch black,
God is in the soundwaves by Armin van Burren,
Shamanic tales by Astrix and
The magician by Eelke Kleijn.
It is songs like these that prove the limitations of
lower priced sets. They often struggle keeping up with pace especially at higher volume, where they get a bit tiresome and somewhat uncomfortable. That said, LM's bass shows no signs of stopping to pound even at volumes when the higher frequencies get too much for my ears. Both get screechy and aggressive, so honestly, these are not for loud listeners (I'm talking 95+ dB). I also could not describe any of the two having a musically enchanting character.
They both look and feel easily thrice the price. Excuse my horrible pics lol.
Ultimately, the difference between these two sets is very much
in tune with the difference in their prices. They do both show weaknesses once you ask for too much, but LM is the better overall package.