nihalsharma
500+ Head-Fier
I remember buying a FiiO FH5 in the initial days of hobby. Out of the box, it just sounded quite opposite of what everyone would claim. There was no bass at all. The sound was very constrained. I was so worried that I had to place a return order Talked to few other folks and they asked me to wait for few days and it would definitely sound better. I do not want anyone to believe me, but the sound did change quite a lot after a week or so. This was a totally different sound than what initial sound was. After this, I have always believed in burn in.Then why do even the manufacturers recommend burn in? And why do professional reviewers always do burn in before writing reviews?
I've done burn in and heard zero difference from ootb (but only with all BAs) but every DD based set I have has sounded different to some degree ootb to then 100 hours of burn in (on a rig without listening).
I was sort of surprised when I got the CFA Black Star, a DD based set, and it didn't really seem to change with burn. I posted that in the CFA thread only to find out that they do their own burn during QC.
I found these actual experiences to make sense rather than just declare it all nonsense, but to each his own. YMMV and all that.
Another example would be Final Audio B3 and B1, they also open up quite a lot after some good amount of burn-in.
Many manufacturers do claim that their IEMs open up a lot after decent burn-in. Yes, for some IEMs, the sound impressions do not change at all but for many the sound does get better. I think it’s not fair to relate the discussion about cables and IEMs burn-in. I don’t see a correlation in both.
Also, about the Honda example a fellow member has cited, I think, yes if you do a lot of tweaks to your engine, maybe the acceleration would get better. As far as I know and after owning few cars, the engine does get smoother after some initial run and the first service.