FastGecko5
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2013
- Posts
- 767
- Likes
- 5,746
GesundheitChu 2 (weird rhyme there)
GesundheitChu 2 (weird rhyme there)
This is not a new release, heck, it's over a year old, but the Warwick Acoustics Bravura is the best pair of headphones I have ever had on my desk (and that includes Susvara). Breathtakingly good sound, literally can't find a flaw even after a whole month of nitpicking.
Microdynamics are precise, imaging is laser-sharp, bass slams hard which is quite rare for estats, and there are no tonal aberrations that I can hear. Timbre is not as natural as certain ZMF headphones but that's about it, and something I don't even notice after some time.
Do try to give these a listen when visiting CanJam or another audio show. A worthwhile experience. Sadly mine are loaners so they'll be sent back pretty soon. #sigh
![]()
I see no reason to take the plunge on this. I just don't see what it can do. I hope it's really cool, but don't see the appeal without the iem attached to it. Sounds like a gimmick that can be done with software. It's definitely more powerful than the 5k, but what's the market? I honestly don't know.For who is interested, QUDELIX T71 is out for preorder:
https://www.qudelix.com/products/qudelix-t71-usb-dac
At the moment I see no trace of the special 4-way IEMs to get the surround.
I'd say you have a good point until you take it to the extreme.Just playing devil's advocate, should price not be a factor in rating gear?
Let's take an exaggerated example for discussion:
- IEM A scores 4/5 based on technical performance, but costs $300 USD.
- IEM B has exactly the same technical performance as IEM A, but IEM B costs $100 USD.
Is it fair to grade both 4/5? Shouldn't the more expensive IEM be rated down, or at least the less expensive one be given more credit? If both are graded 4/5, where does the aspect of price-to-performance ratio come in? Should we be a bit more lenient with very cheap gear, and stricter with more expensive products, or treat all equally and strictly?
For who is interested, QUDELIX T71 is out for preorder:
https://www.qudelix.com/products/qudelix-t71-usb-dac
At the moment I see no trace of the special 4-way IEMs to get the surround.
I'm waiting for the Shanling H7. I guess I'll can try this monster in two weeks.I see no reason to take the plunge on this. I just don't see what it can do. I hope it's really cool, but don't see the appeal without the iem attached to it. Sounds like a gimmick that can be done with software. It's definitely more powerful than the 5k, but what's the market? I honestly don't know.
My logic is this, if I need more power I'll probably have a desktop amp and eq with Peace APO. So it just doesn't make sense to me at the moment.
I see no reason to take the plunge on this. I just don't see what it can do. I hope it's really cool, but don't see the appeal without the iem attached to it. Sounds like a gimmick that can be done with software. It's definitely more powerful than the 5k, but what's the market? I honestly don't know.
My logic is this, if I need more power I'll probably have a desktop amp and eq with Peace APO. So it just doesn't make sense to me at the moment.
I already own some qudelix, and it seems they didn't improve at all the 4 hours battery playing time (LDAC connexion) it's far to be sufficient for any of my uses..
Ideally, it is instructive to exclude price, as it can fluctiate and be different in different countries.
Then for this "ideal" absolute evaluation, scale of 1 to 5 won't be sufficient, even 1 to 10. So scoring out of 100 will be needed.
Also, those who evaluate should ideally have an access to reference IEMs across the scale, the scores of which are mutually agreed upon.
To achieve the above criteria is hardly practical and realistic, so subjectivity pretty much rules.
In this context, to get a good grasp of a IEM evaluation, multiple different opinions are needed to arrive closer to the objective truth.
Im really intriguing about 7.1 signal, for a gamer perspective, its an interesting add.I already own some qudelix, and it seems they didn't improve at all the 4 hours battery playing time (LDAC connexion) it's far to be sufficient for any of my uses..
These scores have sense only for technicalities. For other reasons it doesn't work. I can't believe that Legato has better sound then Shozy B2, but I believe in pleasure during listening to Legato in some tracks/styles.So, scoring from 0-100...
Would like to achieve a level of listening that let me difference between a 88 scored iem vs a 86 one. Or difference between a stage from 72 to 66.
Why score iems? Why not talk about them, without "salad words, and get the emotions or best thing about it transmitted?
-fi
You just figured out the answer, and then went right past it. A 5/5 on a $20 set would tell someone who can only afford a $20 IEM that "you should purchase this".To me a 5/5 says "if you have the money, you should purchase this"