KZ PR1 (Hifi) early impression, apparently natural-leaning on warm
---
Hifi ver VS Bass ver (kz published graph)
![]()
Edit: can't wait for a 29.99$ planar iem
Last edited:
KZ PR1 (Hifi) early impression, apparently natural-leaning on warm
---
Hifi ver VS Bass ver (kz published graph)
![]()
I figure that might also interest some people here:
PROblemdetected posted some details that he found of FB about the Kinera Gumiho driver, which might explain why KZ's representative is being annoyed by it.
It does not excuse his behaviour, and I actually find their version of planar interesting, as the results are quite good (but different) than the planars drivers we had up until now.
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/kinera-qoa-discussion-thread.964627/page-2#post-17161876
After all, and even if it's not "like" the other planars, it is still a planar, albeit using a different technology and giving different results.
My guess is that it might give other companies some ideas for cheap and frankly quite good drivers for the price.
My modded version is my most used DAP. All the others fail to deliver the sound of these. If the stage was a tad wider, it would be the DAP value of the universe.My take on the Sony NW-A55 Walkman, which is the most fun I've had with an audio player in ages. It's rather difficult to find these days, but once you go the modded firmware route, it's one worth keeping in collection.
Full review: https://www.head-fi.org/showcase/sony-nw-a55-dap.24824/review/29260/
![]()
![]() |
![]() |
Stay updated on PENON at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A budget tube amp with single-ended output. Looks interesting, what's the DAC chipset here @Penon ?Aune Flamingo
32Bit/768k DSD512 Coaxial USB DAC Audiophile Tube Headphone Amplifier
Vacuum tube
Op-amp
DSD512
32Bit/768k
DoP128
aptX HD(Bluetooth edition only)
LDAC(Bluetooth edition only)
6.35mm interface
Variable lilne-out
Low-jitter oscillator
OLED
OP +BUF amp
±voltage
Infinite knob
All-aluminum remote(optional)
https://penonaudio.com/aune-flamingo.html
It's Es9038Q2MA
A budget tube amp with single-ended output. Looks interesting, what's the DAC chipset here @Penon ?
![]() |
![]() |
Stay updated on PENON at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Interesting!! Thanks for the reply.It's Es9038Q2M![]()
I have tested a prototype at the Munich High End show and it sounded very interesting.Interesting!! Thanks for the reply.
I am keen on it too let's see if I can arrange the budget.I have tested a prototype at the Munich High End show and it sounded very interesting.
https://www.headphonesty.com/2022/09/review-trn-st5/TRN ST5 first impressions:
I get how some could think the treble/upper midrange could be slightly bright and intense. My first player, the Sony WM1A was absolutely bright, and slightly forward with the treble/upper midrange intensity. Though a fast change to the TA desktop showed the TRN ST5 to be very revealing of source. With the TA desktop smoothness the ST5 was really in the zone........the detailed and acceptable intensity zone, though not sure what it will be like listening long term, or post burn-in? The Sony WM1Z will be interesting as it also has a forward brighter treble.......where the Sony 1A is more midrange forward. But at least it seems workable, though maybe slightly more bright and intense than the TRN BAX, going by memory? The BAX (as I remember it) had a slightly more plush treble, of course due to EST personality. Still for the money they are asking, the ST5 is truly something special I think? Still only moments into the listening, but first impressions are an important thing, and lead the way to what ever options surface later.
Construction is remarkable. I'm not using the included cable, but just simply clicked on the BAX cable and wide-bore tips. But the overall feel/size is much more accessible than the BAX, with a common size and weight. Fit due to the nozzle angle is great, as well as insertion depth. Fit and finish of the complete IEM structure is really something to behold, with clean lines and seamless feel-proof construction! It can only get better with burn-in, at least that has always been my IEM experience so far.
Bass at this point (going off BAX memory) seems more curtailed......but also there is a probably more accessible sonic balance, where many are not going to find the ST5 as flamboyant or bombastic.........thus less contrasty than the BAX? Simply more mainstream-tune maybe? I'm still wondering if the detail I'm hearing in real or due to such intense forwardness of the BAs.......maybe both? I kinda knew this is what we would have before opening the box, but guessed it slightly more relaxed treble beforehand? Lets see what burn-in does! I'm hopping the upper midrange will open-up and the treble will become slightly more relaxed? Still nothing I can't deal with if it stays like this. As far as I'm concerned there are ranges of brightness and forwardness and everything isn't always so black and white.
https://www.linsoul.com/products/trn-st5