sphinxvc
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- May 28, 2010
- Posts
- 3,469
- Likes
- 109
Well, the other DACs I've owned weren't top tier, so there isn't much of a comparison there, the Zodiac is clearly better in every department. I have listened to a few ESS-based DACs, like the W4S units, and the NFB-11 I owned, I did not find them to my liking. The Ref. 7, I haven't really spent enough time to offer a comment, I had a very brief audition with it. None of my auditions though made an impression on me as the one I had with the Zodiac Gold. That's what I went on when buying the Silver, and it does share enough of that Zodiac Gold heritage.
I highly recommend a third-party PS with any Zodiac though (Welbourne Labs or Teddy Pardo), there are blacker backgrounds, better dynamics, micro details, and imaging.
There are a number of Zodiac owners on head-fi that you should PM for their thoughts. They aren't the most prolific posters or reviewers, so PM is the way to go.
A couple of them have even owned W4S DAC2s, Ref. 7s and the like, and they have very interesting positions on what DAC they prefer.
Cheers.
I highly recommend a third-party PS with any Zodiac though (Welbourne Labs or Teddy Pardo), there are blacker backgrounds, better dynamics, micro details, and imaging.
There are a number of Zodiac owners on head-fi that you should PM for their thoughts. They aren't the most prolific posters or reviewers, so PM is the way to go.
A couple of them have even owned W4S DAC2s, Ref. 7s and the like, and they have very interesting positions on what DAC they prefer.
Cheers.