Pictures of Your Portable Rig (part XVI)
Jan 19, 2013 at 5:34 AM Post #1,355 of 37,652
Quote:
 
Ha, no worries man. Thanks for the info. I was actually just marvelling at the lack of wires between the DAP (iPhone) and the amp/DAC, not between the amp and the DAC. That is pretty awesome, I can't believe it's $895 but I might have use for a device like the portaDAC. 
 
I'm still searching for my perfect portable rig - right now it seems like the beginners' setup below is holding me over, until I source a good amp and DAC (and have the money to splurge on them, too!)...
 
 

Cowon Z2 - FiiO E11 - Sennheiser IE80

I am sure most people could find a use for it hehehe, it is a very nice item! Your rig looks like it is doing a nice job as it is so there is no rush in upgrading. Instead of upgrading tiny increases at a time, now just wait until you can get something end game!
Quote:
That's wild stuff - has bluetooth progressed to the point where there's no audible (but perhaps measurable) degradation of the sound quality? Does using bt have much impact on battery life? 

I think USB sounds a little bit better (in intense listening, not so much casual listening) and coaxial and optical i have not yet tried but i would expect to be better for a few reasons and the fact they also support up to 24/96 when usb and BT are just 24/44.1. I have not run it out of battery yet so can not say :wink: Bluetooth is getting better though like with the UE9000!
 
Jan 19, 2013 at 5:41 AM Post #1,356 of 37,652
Bluetooth transfers digitally so the loss shouldn't be great if any. I always blamed the DAC in those bluetooth devices.
 
Jan 19, 2013 at 5:44 AM Post #1,357 of 37,652
it is nothing horrendous, one may think it is a bit gimmicky but it separates it from anything else, adds huge compatibility, iPod Touch/iPhone/android/any phone really and also sounds better than most things i have ever hear!
 
Jan 19, 2013 at 6:51 AM Post #1,359 of 37,652
If i was to i would have to get a wireless transmitter for connecting the UE9000 to the 1866 which is no biggie. If this is possible (i think so right) then i will at one point for the hell of it but i do not use the 9000 enough to rush into getting one right now. Also the 9000 is in NC/V Shaped mode in bluetooth....
 
Yes you do have to pay a premium for wireless
 
Jan 19, 2013 at 8:38 AM Post #1,360 of 37,652
Quote:
If i was to i would have to get a wireless transmitter for connecting the UE9000 to the 1866 which is no biggie. If this is possible (i think so right) then i will at one point for the hell of it but i do not use the 9000 enough to rush into getting one right now. Also the 9000 is in NC/V Shaped mode in bluetooth....
 
Yes you do have to pay a premium for wireless

 
Imo that wireless DECODER is guilty of the sound degradation, along with what UE intentionally designed to alter the FR. The transmission loss shouldn't be big, it is the decoding's fault.
 
Jan 19, 2013 at 9:03 AM Post #1,361 of 37,652
Quote:


DF mexico.

 
Quote:


desde df mexico
ipod 160gb+ sansa clip+ colorfly c3/wav 24 bit. & fiio e07k +fiio e 11 +aiaiai-tma-1 y allen&heath xone
xd2-53.nice,

 
Just wondering why you are double amping? 
And does it make any improvements??? :/
 
Jan 19, 2013 at 10:41 AM Post #1,362 of 37,652
Next set of gear to listen to and review...
 
Ortofon MHd-Q7 already done, VentureCraft Go-DAP DD Socket 1 (with Muses 01 OpAmp), Tralucent 1Plus2 with silver cables, and VentureCraft crazy thick gauge interconnects/LODs.
 
 

 
Jan 19, 2013 at 11:54 AM Post #1,364 of 37,652
Jan 19, 2013 at 12:08 PM Post #1,365 of 37,652
Quote:
Hmm...wheres the cans/IEMs tho?

Some of my cans are away stored, 8 pairs on the wall. IEMs that i use a lot are on the other desk drawer and the ones i do not use that much are in a cupboard i have next to my desk....
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top