Quote:
Originally Posted by oicdn
What are the differences between ALL of them? Are they all essentially the same phone just different variations/colors?
|
This question is worth tackling, because there are some Orthodynamics that have important differences, as FV and ericj have already pointed out.
I have not heard the HP-2 or YH-2, but I would expect them to be indistinguishable from one another both visually and audibly, just as the HP-1 and YH-1 are. In stock form I would also imagine them to sound very much like the HP-1/YH-1 but for slightly less efficiency and a steeper rolloff on the bottom octave and a half. They also shouldn't be able to play quite as loudly, especially in the bass. With some careful EQ (underline careful), they can probably be made to sound very much like the larger-diaphragm models. Ericj, who has both and seems to hear more or less what I hear, can get into this a little deeper, and I hope he does, because what we're about on this thread is wringing out all the performance that was built into these drivers and making them perform at top potential-- without becoming obsessive about it, of course, and I'm sure that at the limit, in an optimized enclosure, the HP-1 will show the benefits of its big diaphragm-- lower bass distortion, more low-bass output, higher ultimate SPL.
Me, I'm going to take the psychological way out and tell you that you're much more likely to cherish the mint HP-2 and want to really make it sound like something special. Yeah, we hardbitten jaded types would've gone for the HP-1 for [makes quotes with fingers] technical reasons, but I think you're going to
enjoy the HP-2 just as much, probably more. You might like them enough to save up for an assault on a YH-100... if one ever shows up again, or even an HP-1. You can't beat $21 plus shipping. Wow.
I'll make a prediction: the difference between your HP-2 and an HP-1 is going to be much less than the difference between the HP-1 and the YH-100.
Which brings up the original question: do all Orthodynamics sound alike? I would put the HP/YH-1,2,3 pretty much in one lump, soundwise. They're a family. I'd be very surprised to hear any substantial differences. For what it's worth, Yamaha, in the HP-1A/HP-2 brochure, which gets quite technical, downplays the difference. I just hope your foam and earpads haven't deteriorated during their long storage. Let us know their condition when they arrive. Remember, don't drop them.
The oddballs in the Ortho line are the YHD-1 and YHD-2, the YH-100 and 1000,
some HP/YH-3s, and
some of the HP/YH-3 variants, ie, the HP-50 family. The YH-100 is tuned lower than its brothers (we've found some low-tuned HP-50s and HP-3s too), which makes it sound bassy and dull in stock form. The HP-50x and YHE-50x models were meant to be used with Yamaha's line of electronic organs, which may explain why they're different. The YHD-1 and -2 are a whole 'nother thing, oddballs even among the oddballs. The YHD-3 is a miniature HP-1, but with a semi-open back and flat foam earpads.
Of course, once any Orthodynamic driver is transplanted, the sound can be changed for better or worse, sometimes drastically, and it's good to keep in mind that most drastic changes are for the worse.
The Bellini headset is okay, but it's not the optimum enclosure for this type of driver, for a variety of reasons, and I can think of no better proof of this than ericj's YamaKoax, which is nothing more complex than putting a YH-2 driver into a headset designed by folks (Stax) who really know their planars. Of course, ericj added some personal erical magic to the transplant, using specific foams and felts and special emollients to smooth the sound even further. This is synergy, the real kind, based on (1) good engineering and (2) a refusal to throw money at the problem, which switches on Cheap person ingenuity.
.