The thing that nixes the Mojo for me is the limited 128 DSD, and 384 kHz in upsampling. I'd much rather stick with the iFi Micro iDSD with its up to 512 DSD & 768 kHz in upsampling. I feel that what this iFi device is capable of puts it well over the $1000 range, yet it's only $500. What would put these two different DACs on the same playing field is if the Mojo had that RCA output. Here's hoping that in the future these brands both offer a DAC with balanced headphone input in that $500-600 range.
I think you may have mixed up the Hugo and the Mojo. The Mojo does 768KHz, and I think it does 256 DSD. Have a look on Chord website or the Chord Mojo Official page that I linked for ruthieandjohn above. (I think the Hugo being older is 384KHz.)
There is debate about balanced output. I do not know the ins-and-outs. However don't write off the Mojo not being balanced or RCA out. Firstly Chord argue that line out done well, is as good as balanced. No Mojo owners I know have complained either. Second point, I use a QED Reference Audio J2P which 'jack to phono'. I hook up to RCA input of active Q Acoustics BT3. It all rocks for desktop. You can happily connect to an amplifier this way and I will in future. Right now I am desk space limited so I chose active speakers.
The Mojo is a good DAC and there is barely any dispute. I had my initial reservations but I was using 'direct sound' from PC. Going bitperfect changes everything; to a larger or lesser extent. It shows up a lot when playing my Star Trek: The Next Generation blu-rays. Direct sound vs bitperfect stands out like going from voices being flat against the back wall. To full utilisation of all sound in the soundstage, respectively.
The Mojo is a good DAC if you can live with it. It has taken me a few months to get properly adjusted. Now since I have a tuner on my desktop feeding optical to the Mojo I need it. My Meridian Explorer will not do that. My Mojo has fitted itself into my life.
The Mojo audio quality is exciting. I am sure I would be in audio oblivion bliss if I had more higher end kit than I have. My SR225e really feel at their limit. However they do make a good noise with the Mojo. There's no excess in tones anywhere from the Mojo; it is beautifully balanced. The soundstage is very tall in headphones, and very deep in speakers. Perfect in other words.
I absolutely recommend anyone audition Chord. It is said that anyone who baulks at the £1400 price of the Hugo, buys one after they audition it.
I am currently playing Love's Unkind - Donna Summer.
@ruthieandjohn Thank you for writing back. You are welcome.
Quick version:
The Hugo battery takes about 2 hours to charge and runs for about twelve hours.
The Mojo battery takes about 4 hours to charge and runs for about eight hours. (I think the Mojo battery was a brand new design to deliver strong power for high impedance headphones like the HD800.)
However both can be used on the desktop. I leave my mojo plugged in all the time.
The Mojo battery gets warm when charging. It can get quite toasty when charging and playing. However if you use plugged in all the time it only gets warm.
The charging circuit is quite clever. It uses power from the charger when we use it in desktop mode. Now and again it tops up the battery and gets a little warm. However this battery charge is short lived so it never gets hot. There is not worry about the battery being overcharged. The charging circuit cuts off when the battery is full and the Mojo left switched off etc. I.E. no load on the charger at the plug socket.
The trick to using the Mojo as a desktop DAC is this. Charge it up overnight, then leave it plugged in whenever you use it, so it stays fully charged.