Musicians are the last few who can still know how an actual instrument sounds. Musicians are a dying breed being replaced by garage band dubstep insta geniuses.
This concludes my rant of the day :blink:
I don't think that's true actually, there's plenty if good 'uns out there! I'm only 19 and I'm attending a conservatory and negotiating a deal with a record label, etc. the digital tools of recording have gotten easier and more powerful than ever. As artists we can really have a ton of freedom to do some real cool stuff. By the same token the "crap" that's always been there is easier to make and more accessible than ever (thank the Internet)
IMO if people are making music and it makes them happy, and if it makes them money because others enjoy it even if it's goofy (some music is meant to be laughed at, or along with) then even better! It doesn't mean I have to pay attention or listen to it.
Musical standards I think have become more polarized (some people like Janelle Monae, Kimbra, Cecil Mclotin Salvant, etc) are conservatory trained and super skilled. Many (Mumford and some, imagine dragons, etc) aren't but are catchy, etc. who's music will last? I dunno. But I know what I prefer to listen to. I would argue that untrained virtuosos are rarer than before because of the nature of the industry but they still exist (Charlie Winston, Nick Waterhouse, Melody Gardot, etc)
That's just my two cents on it. The main danger I see is not lowering of standards, but new models of consuming music. Napster cut the recording business from a 10 billion to a 2 billion dollar business. And then you have to consider inflation as sales fall. There will always be touring groups, but you have to get popular to make money touring. If the music industry doesn't make high-fidelity profitable, we may see superstar groups and artists (Katy perry, justin bieber, Taylor swift, etc) churning out hits at set intervals, while some other groups are signed for the older crowd, and a lot of other stuff joins classical and jazz as audiophile-exclusive records with niche appeal. That's dramatic of course, but it is interesting to see where things are headed.
On the idea that musicians "know" real sound I have this to say: no amount of measurements or charts will ever tell you the tonality of a speaker. Measurements are important and helpful, but one thing never touched on is tonal tuning. Is the headphone slightly sharp? Is it pitched flat? Does it play an A at 440khz or 444, or 438? Most headphones that are warm sounding and super popular are slightly sharp, and for that reason, no good for mastering, monitoring, etc. a good musician will notice that the can sounds out of tune. Just throwing that out there, because it's not often mentioned. (I own Grados for the record. Tonality is spectacularly accurate, partly because they're tuned by ear, even though they're not as technical or "neutral" as other cans. For example: B&W makes great speakers, but they sound cold and sterile to me. I took a tuner and measure some test tones on an 801 nautilus, and it was about an eight step sharp. No thank you)
Just my take on it, sorry for the long post.
Happy Listening