cooperpwc
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2006
- Posts
- 6,805
- Likes
- 543
(I also have some Complys on the way and will try those. I think that I might have the wrong size though. I got the Ts-500 and it may be too big.)
FYI - that official chrome case is available for 1,800 yen
http://final-audio-design-directshop.com/final/7.1/FI-CCA
It ends June 21 actually. $75 off gave me the excuse to finally "upgrade" (really a size downgrade) from the Stepdance.
I also wrap the cable around my ears. It removes all microphonics.
FYI - that official chrome case is available for 1,800 yen
http://final-audio-design-directshop.com/final/7.1/FI-CCA
I assume that this will be the new design with the padded interior. I would fire FAD an email and confirm though. The old snap-holder design had no padding.
By the way - and I should have made note when and where this happened - but there was a guy that had a 009 rig. And he also had the PF-X. He said the chain was important for the earphone, but when you had it right, the PF-X was just as good or superior to his tastes. Even with the sonic differences, the quality of the PF-X detail, air, soundstage, resolution, etc.. was easily on the 009 level.
Strikes me as odd that in a random thread unrelated to the FAD thread, this guy would make SUCH a statement about such radically different sound experiences.
Makes me want to go all out on a PF-X rig 8 )
The Sony Hybrid stem mod is a winner. Thanks!
The downside of the stem mod is that you lose a lot of wax protection. The covering on the Heaven VI tip is quite exposed. I keep my ears clean anyway and now I will really have to.
Good idea. How is their English? My Japanese is pretty rudimentary.
In answer to your question, yes, the 1602 roughly as mid-centric as the 1601...but as we integrated the structure of horn speakers into 1602, it produce more dense sound than 1601. You will be able to find obvious different sound feature so please try it out somewhere. Honestly, please be informed that it may not work well with deep bass sound produced by computer.
Here's an example, some time back I asked them about the difference between the 1601 and 1602 series and got this reply:
Quote:In answer to your question, yes, the 1602 roughly as mid-centric as the 1601...but as we integrated the structure of horn speakers into 1602, it produce more dense sound than 1601. You will be able to find obvious different sound feature so please try it out somewhere. Honestly, please be informed that it may not work well with deep bass sound produced by computer.
Here's an example, some time back I asked them about the difference between the 1601 and 1602 series and got this reply:
Time to put my 1602s (PX IXs) up for sale... fast!
Do you by any chance know if I can place an order with them direct or if I'd have to go through Tenso or something?
Is there a really good reason why one would want a Quickstep over a 2Stepdance?
I'm kind of upset now: As good as the Musica Acoustics service was in all other regards, I asked them on two separate occasions during my order if getting that case from FAD was possible, and the question was completely ignored twice. I assumed from that that it wasn't possible.
Quickstep has more robust 3.5mm jacks and extensive RF filtering. These are both useful improvements. However in terms of sound, the 2Stepdance and Quickstep are identical (and not much different than the original Stepdance).
I'm really not surprised that Musica Acoustics does not special order FAD accessories. Unfortunately there would not be much money in it for the hassle involved.