Taking delivery of my Venom RC-4, 8 feet length, 4pin XLR out today, so review/pics should be up within a week's time. Will be using them with LCD-3s and LCD-2.2s
Hi guys, just received my Toxic Cables Venom RC-4! So look forward to impressions/comparisons with several other cables soon. Btw, just out of interest, I was comparing the cost of the RC-4 to it's closest competitor in terms of material and shielding, the DHC RS OCC Copper Complement cable. The only differences is that the Toxic cables RC-4 uses a thicker wire (higher gauge) and that they both have different appearances. So anyway, I was just comparing them out of curiosity and found out that the price difference is pretty substantial. Toxic cables charges about 275pounds (about 435USD) before shipping for an 8 foot RC-4 with 4pin XLR connector and Viablue Y split while DHC charges 1075 USD for an 8 foot RS OCC Copper Complement also before shipping. That's about two and a half times more which imo is a lot for what looks like a very similar cable. In fact, even their entry level molecule cable runs a pretty hefty 630USD for an 8 foot length with a 4 pin XLR connector and a Viablue Y split. I'm not saying that the DHC cables are bad and I actually have a friend who has one of their RS OCC Silver cables and the build quality is great. However, I have to complement Toxic cables for offering the fantastic Rectangular Ohno Continuous Cast Solid Core Copper and Silver wire in their Venom and Venom RC-4 cables at a fraction of the price that DHC is charging (plus giving you a higher gauge, lower resistance wire too). Anyway, I'm really looking forward to pitting it against the ALO salty pepper which is one of my favourite cables and a friend's Whiplash TWAG as well as the stock Audez'e ADZ-6 B4 cable
I'd like to hope the same. But considering this is a "Toxic cables" thread and not knowing the MOT rules jargon, who knows?
If Peter couldn't provide details it'd be a shame. I am curious because I have a Q cable and looking at price differentials, I'd like to know
what you get comparatively.
I'd like to hope the same. But considering this is a "Toxic cables" thread and not knowing the MOT rules jargon, who knows?
If Peter couldn't provide details it'd be a shame. I am curious because I have a Q cable and looking at price differentials, I'd like to know
what you get comparatively.
MOTs can answer questions about their products. If not a sponsor, they can't give subjective opinions about or write anything that might be construed as advertising. No MOT can post negative comments about competitors or their products. It's all here:
MOTs can answer questions about their products. If not a sponsor, they just can't give subjective opinions about or write anything that might be construed as advertising. No MOT can post negative comments about competitors or their products. It's all here:
I'm sure there are, just posting a quick overview. I'm pretty sure the shielding techniques and material are different, just pointing out that the wire material is similar.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
