Having a negative digital preamp doesn't cripple anything
Nevertheless, the new implementation on the X1 matches EQed loudness with EQ
ff loudness at the same volume setting, but caps the max volume setting lower than with EQ
ff. Would that help?
Doesn't a negative preamp reduce the gain available to the amp?
When I need to make some adjustments more than a couple decibels on the EQ (this is working from the top of the sliders) the volume is dramatically lower until I go back to the volume control and raise it. Well -I have some older recordings and in some cases I use ALL the gain left, therefore I feel the amp
has been crippled because as soon as I go and defeat the EQ - BAMM...plenty of amp/gain.
I feel that capping anything on the player is essentially taking away something I already paid for. And it's assuming to know my source material and my desired listening experience. There is a lot of source material with ridiculously low output, if anything, having more availabe gain in the EQ makes sense.
In
all my experience with EQ's since the early 70's this is the first implementation that uses a negative pre ....but why?
IF I could call it - I would say to make it just as virtually any other EQ in existence and with a gain slider next to the bands - it's so simple and it works.
Sometimes it's helpful to add gain others, subtract, that all depends on the source material and the desired result.
The one on my apple computer is beautiful -nothing distorts unless I do something extreme and then ya know what I do? Back something down again, and even then I'm not sure what is distorting - electronics, software or speakers.
It sounds like the X1 implementation might simplify the EQ process because one wouldn't need to keep toggling volume back and forth for comparison.
So yes, It probably would help.
I'm quite sure that others have asked for more user customizable presets, man that would be awesome!
Just eliminate the useless presets and use those for custom.