SolarCetacean
500+ Head-Fier
I acquired the Z1R a few months ago. I've demoed the Stellia on a few occasions. I haven't tried the IER-Z1R, though apparently it doesn't sound much like the MDR from what others say.Anyone here experienced the Sony MDR-Z1R? If you owned one and loved it did you replace it? If so, what was the MDR-Z1R replaced with? It's been a while since I owned a pair of Headphones, and I'm considering purchasing the MDR-Z1R or Focal Stellia. I currently have a loaner of the Focal Stellia, and sometimes I feel no connection to the music when listening to it. I have no idea what the MDR-Z1R sounds like but hope that it is similar to the IER-Z1R. If anyone has or currently owns both headphones I'd love to hear more about what you liked and disliked about the MDR-Z1R and the Focal Stellia.
I quite like the MDR-Z1R. It's one of my favorite closed-back headphones. The sense of space and spatial layering is very good. It has larger soundstage than many open-backs I've heard, and while it doesn't quite reach the stage size of the largest open-backs, I think it surpasses many of them in terms of spatial layering of sounds. It's a different presentation from your usual Harman/diffuse-field-style neutrality though. If you don't really focus on spatial presentation, then maybe the Z1R isn't the best option, because it can sound a bit strange in terms of tonality. Its tuning and presentation works really well on orchestral works though, particularly if a choir is involved - it's very immersive. It's also surprisingly detailed; you wouldn't think it on first listen, or when analyzing the FR graph, but it's easy to hear notes that are being played, even if some notes sound different from what a neutral presentation would render them as.
I wasn't that big a fan of the Stellia. It's fine, it has nice punchy bass like Focals do, but it sounded a bit metallic in the upper treble and otherwise wasn't particularly special.