When I say afraid of mods I don't mean us... meant the reviews given... was wondering if you felt comfortable reviewing a RW mod or if you feel it might compromise your standing with iRiver is all...
Here's a link to a recent post I made about this subject:
http://www.head-fi.org/t/684396/new-jh-audio-flagship-siren-series-roxanne/1725#post_10078176
...Its not a future proof device IMO, it will last five years or so before its replaced if not by iRiver then either another company, big or small, short or tall...
The AK240's support of all current formats makes it reasonably resistant to rapid obsolescence, but you're right that not much is truly future
proof.
...an explanation on why you would bypass the dual DAC sectionon the AK120 via optical out to pass the signal through an external amp with only one DAC would come in handy, seems extravagant.
Thanks .lol.
I don't pay much mind to how many DACs are in it, or which DAC chips are used. The HiFi-M8 is made by CEntrance, a company with vast experience doing digital development for a lot of different companies, like McIntosh, Bel Canto, Benchmark, PS Audio, Lavry Engineering, and others. Try driving an Audeze LCD-3 or HD 800 with the AK120 and then using the more powerful balanced amp in the HiFi-M8, and that would probably answer your question.
To me, it's the whole, very pocketable package that's the AK240 that excites me. Even with it--even at the price--at this size, there's going to be compromises versus putting together a stack of components. I haven't tried its balanced output yet, but there's no way its amp section is going to have the drive of, say, my Ray Samuels Audio SR-71b.
jude,
on the LO topic, any idea about this strange little "obstrusive" box ? Why is is needed rather than simply a cable ? is there some electronic inside ?
Here is simple question. Regarding the bal output . Why is the adaptor so large. With that metal plug . What is inside the plug ? It cannot just be a passive adaptor. Is the bal amp inside the adaptor or what ?
Al
I'm not sure what's inside the box--I don't have one of those here yet. To run a balanced headphone, you need a balanced headphone cable terminated in a balanced 2.5mm plug (not common, but Moon Audio made just such an end for me to go with my Moon Audio adapter system cables).
I'll try to find out more about that box.
How is the battery life on these anyway?
@anetode, I'm not sure how long battery life is rated for. I haven't measured/estimated that with my own typical use yet.
Just to add, HM901 has balance phone out before AK240. I am interested to demo AK240 but I cannot understand what innovation it has achieved
I have the HM-901, too, and I think part of the reason I've seen a lot more AK120's in the wild than HM-901's is that most, when faced with reasonably competitive choices, will take a simpler, smaller solution, when shopping for a portable player. The HM-901's amp modules allow for excellent flexibility, but I think most would rather accept a reasonable compromise that'll work with most headphones, versus specific modules purpose-built for specific use cases. Again, this is just part of the reason, as I see it: certainly, the AK120's user interface is also (for me) significantly smoother and more intuitive.
On its balanced output, specifically, I don't think there's necessarily innovation being claimed. However, for its size--and combined with the rest of its feature set--balanced output isn't quite common yet.
Jude... what would you say is more innovative & has the best SQ, the AK240 or the Chord Hugo?... out of interest.
@OK-Guy, that's a tough question. In terms of innovation, one is made to be an all-in-one (including music storage and UI for playback), the other is a DAC/amp (with a very cool bespoke DAC implementation) without media storage. As for which one sounds better, it's the Hugo. The Hugo is one of the best DAC/amps I've ever heard, regardless of form factor, and I can't wait to use it as a DAC-only with some of my favorite desktop DACs.