bigshot
Headphoneus Supremus
There is nothing forced about an ABX. The test subject can switch back and forth as many times as he wants before making a decision, and he can listen to as long a sample as he wants. I think the articles linked in the first post say that, don’t they?
If you want to claim you can reliably hear differences that can’t be measured, you need to prove that in a test that eliminates expectation bias and perceptual error. That is a double blind test. If you don’t do that, we can just say that consciously or unconsciously, you’re peeking and the difference might be in you, not the equipment.
There is a process to follow for the scientific method. You don’t start guessing why something exists before you can prove it does exist. Audiophoolery is full of solutions to problems that don’t really exist. Manufacturers employ whole advertising departments to do just that. There are enough audible ways for sound fidelity to be messed up to not waste time worrying about inaudible ones.
If you aren’t going to accept controls on tests, you can pretty much “prove” any mjumbo jumbo that you want. The mind and subjective preferences are fully capable of distorting reality like a funhouse mirror. What you think you hear may not be what you are actually hearing. Blind listening tests with level matching and direct A/B switching between samples is the best tool we have for finding out what you actually hear.
If you want to claim you can reliably hear differences that can’t be measured, you need to prove that in a test that eliminates expectation bias and perceptual error. That is a double blind test. If you don’t do that, we can just say that consciously or unconsciously, you’re peeking and the difference might be in you, not the equipment.
There is a process to follow for the scientific method. You don’t start guessing why something exists before you can prove it does exist. Audiophoolery is full of solutions to problems that don’t really exist. Manufacturers employ whole advertising departments to do just that. There are enough audible ways for sound fidelity to be messed up to not waste time worrying about inaudible ones.
If you aren’t going to accept controls on tests, you can pretty much “prove” any mjumbo jumbo that you want. The mind and subjective preferences are fully capable of distorting reality like a funhouse mirror. What you think you hear may not be what you are actually hearing. Blind listening tests with level matching and direct A/B switching between samples is the best tool we have for finding out what you actually hear.
Last edited: