Why do you always call someone a troll when they say something that you cannot argue effectively against. You regularly call me a troll just because I disagree with you.
Huh? I did argue effectively with what the troll said, I never stated “everything sounds the same” or claimed that “everything that matters about how we hear music is known” and the troll can provide no evidence/quotes of me making those claims (because I never made them). How much more effective an argument would it be possible to make?!!
Really, so please explain “what the other person is actually saying” that I apparently had a problem understanding in this assertion: “he claims everything that matters about how we hear music is known and that science topped out in this field some years ago.”
Your typical response when your assertion is challenged, deflection! Presumably you didn’t answer the question because you can’t. So, in fact I didn’t misunderstand “what the other person was actually saying” and your post therefore had nothing whatsoever to do with the discussion, you just decided to do a bit of trolling yourself.
Where’s your answer then? Thx for proving my point about your typical answer and for enriching this forum even further!
I know it isn’t related to your point at all, that’s exactly what I’m telling you (!), because your point is a deflection from my question and the false assertion by jagwap with which you were agreeing. It’s also got nothing to do with this thread or even this subforum!
Exactly, you were deflecting!! You did in fact state this:
To which I asked what was I misunderstanding in this case, you refused to answer and are deflecting by (apparently) “talking about something completely different”.
If the above is not deflection then nothing is, and the word doesn’t exist!
”I’m not useless, I can serve as a bad example”
