kiteki
aka Theta Alpha 1
aka Alpha Zeta 5
aka Alpha Zeta 6
aka Nanocat Systems
And many other aliases
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2010
- Posts
- 10,617
- Likes
- 174
I think ljokerl is a very fine car-racer and I have not seen any bias and not much subjectivity in his reviews.
I find some reviewers on head-fi are too "positive" and simply talk about the good parts of every IEM they've tried and I feel I don't learn as much from those reviews, ClieOS is one such example, as much as I like shigzeo's reviews he is another such example where I have a hard time understanding how an IEM sounds, when you browse his blog every single review is positive, I'd like more critique and weaknesses pointed out or direct comparisons to other products the way that DAC/Amp review guy does very very well. As good as they are at reviewing, I ran into a problem researching the Sensaphonics J-Phonic since the only reviews of it were by ClieOS and Shigzeo and I had a hard time getting a picture of how it sounds, I had to rely on ClieOS saying it's a step above the GR07 and RE262, I think when I hear it I'll have much more distinct feelings and descriptions of how it sounds as that is usually the case.
James444's reviews are creative and he gives very good analogies which give me a great idea of how the products sound like "the EX1000 is a mercedes benz, I think you're looking for a sports car" or "The W4 has two bass poodles, and the EX1000 is one giant woof woof".
Overall most reviewers on head-fi are pretty good and that's why I like this place, there aren't many flavoured or biased reviewers, but DFKT is one, he is very good at critiquing and comic-relief but he really "loves" or "hates" whatever he touches, actually his reviews on that anythingbutapple place seemed really good to me but then I got a Cowon S9 and realised I think I don't share his sonic preferences at all as he seems to love "enhanced" sound or something so I completely glossed over his future exaltations like at the HJE900, but I'm sure he's a nice guy.
average_joe does great reviews but I don't get why it takes him so long to figure out how something sounds, maybe he's just busy and can't listen to music half the day like some of us Lol.
As for pianist I haven't seen many opinions by him yet really so I'm not sure what the controversy is about but I am looking forward to receiving my RE0 to see what all the fuss is about.
I don't really know where I'm going with this post but I guess I just want to point out that it seems like head-fi has lots of good car-racers that agree on which car drives better, moreso than wine-tasters that are biased to certain grapes and can sense chocolate and cinnamon with touches of creosote in their '57.
Sometimes I get confused by certain audiophile terms on head-fi and then turn to this glossary http://www.stereophile.com/reference/50 which helps, but I do think some people use certain words differently, which can cause confusion or a certain illusion of subjectivity.
Edit: I forgot the IMO.
I find some reviewers on head-fi are too "positive" and simply talk about the good parts of every IEM they've tried and I feel I don't learn as much from those reviews, ClieOS is one such example, as much as I like shigzeo's reviews he is another such example where I have a hard time understanding how an IEM sounds, when you browse his blog every single review is positive, I'd like more critique and weaknesses pointed out or direct comparisons to other products the way that DAC/Amp review guy does very very well. As good as they are at reviewing, I ran into a problem researching the Sensaphonics J-Phonic since the only reviews of it were by ClieOS and Shigzeo and I had a hard time getting a picture of how it sounds, I had to rely on ClieOS saying it's a step above the GR07 and RE262, I think when I hear it I'll have much more distinct feelings and descriptions of how it sounds as that is usually the case.
James444's reviews are creative and he gives very good analogies which give me a great idea of how the products sound like "the EX1000 is a mercedes benz, I think you're looking for a sports car" or "The W4 has two bass poodles, and the EX1000 is one giant woof woof".
Overall most reviewers on head-fi are pretty good and that's why I like this place, there aren't many flavoured or biased reviewers, but DFKT is one, he is very good at critiquing and comic-relief but he really "loves" or "hates" whatever he touches, actually his reviews on that anythingbutapple place seemed really good to me but then I got a Cowon S9 and realised I think I don't share his sonic preferences at all as he seems to love "enhanced" sound or something so I completely glossed over his future exaltations like at the HJE900, but I'm sure he's a nice guy.
average_joe does great reviews but I don't get why it takes him so long to figure out how something sounds, maybe he's just busy and can't listen to music half the day like some of us Lol.
As for pianist I haven't seen many opinions by him yet really so I'm not sure what the controversy is about but I am looking forward to receiving my RE0 to see what all the fuss is about.
I don't really know where I'm going with this post but I guess I just want to point out that it seems like head-fi has lots of good car-racers that agree on which car drives better, moreso than wine-tasters that are biased to certain grapes and can sense chocolate and cinnamon with touches of creosote in their '57.
Sometimes I get confused by certain audiophile terms on head-fi and then turn to this glossary http://www.stereophile.com/reference/50 which helps, but I do think some people use certain words differently, which can cause confusion or a certain illusion of subjectivity.
Edit: I forgot the IMO.