Show us your Head-Fi station at it's current state. No old pictures please...
Feb 24, 2012 at 12:31 PM Post #4,457 of 41,050
they both sound different to me...im new to the LCD-2 but loving it ever since..but for now if i have to choose one hmmm since ive got the HE-500 about 4-5months ago and got used to it ill pick the HE-500...but in any other ways they both sounded AMAZING...!
 
Quote:
 
How do you like both the HE-500 and LCD-2? If you had to choose one, which one would it be? :D
 
 



 
 
Feb 24, 2012 at 12:34 PM Post #4,458 of 41,050
Having owned both I can say they both have their place. For a 'one size fits all' headphone I'd pick the HE 500, but for me the LCD 2 beat it out. Since I listen to a lot of bass heavy stuff and the LCD 2's bass texture and depth are pretty much unmatched.
 
Both are a fantastic choice and with used LCD 2 prices and the new HE 500 price...They're pretty much on the same level.
 
Quote:
they both sound different to me...im new to the LCD-2 but loving it ever since..but for now if i have to choose one hmmm since ive got the HE-500 about 4-5months ago and got used to it ill pick the HE-500...but in any other ways they both sounded AMAZING...!
 


 



 
 
 
Feb 24, 2012 at 1:18 PM Post #4,459 of 41,050

 
Feb 24, 2012 at 3:50 PM Post #4,460 of 41,050

Quote:
i do believe this is the first stereoscopic headphone setup i've seen.
great job!! 
biggrin.gif


+2!!
 
Feb 24, 2012 at 10:15 PM Post #4,463 of 41,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by liamstrain /img/forum/go_quote.gif
 
Very nice!
 
I do wonder why la figaro/darvoice would have chosen a 3 pin xlr/TRS combo jack, rather than just a locking TRS... 


Perhaps they want to assert that it will drive a K1000/HE-6.
 
Feb 25, 2012 at 12:00 AM Post #4,465 of 41,050


Quote:
That would be 4 pin xlr, no?



You are correct.  The EF-6 has four-pin balanced just for the purpose of the HE-6's termination.
 
Feb 25, 2012 at 12:14 AM Post #4,466 of 41,050


Quote:
Quote:

Perhaps they want to assert that it will drive a K1000/HE-6.



They would, if it were a 4 pin combo jack (which I don't even think Neutrik makes), but that looks to me to be a single 3 pin combo jack... not the right connector for a balanced headphone.
 
Feb 25, 2012 at 12:24 AM Post #4,467 of 41,050
They would, if it were a 4 pin combo jack (which I don't even think Neutrik makes), but that looks to me to be a single 3 pin combo jack... not the right connector for a balanced headphone.


i have 4-pin neutrik silver contact connectors terminated on all my headphones. single 4-pin xlr is a balance connector and much more logical then the weird dual 3-pin xlr configuration with headphones. 4-pin xlr on headphones make more sense to me personally.
 
Feb 25, 2012 at 12:26 AM Post #4,468 of 41,050
Agreed. My point is, the 339 posted above has a single 3 pin xlr/trs combo jack on the face. I don't understand this choice.
 
Feb 25, 2012 at 5:16 AM Post #4,469 of 41,050

basshead.gif
 so....... much...... toys.......
Quote:
 
Rack:


 
Top to bottom:
Blue Hawaii amp
Sennheiser HEV90 Orpheus
Blue Hawaii PSU / Dayton speaker amp
Menace amp
Menace PSU
Accuphase DP 75
 
Headphones:

 
Top to bottom, left to right:
HE90 / HE90 / SR009 / R10 / R10
4070 / SR Omega / SR Omega / HE60 / SR007mk1
SR 5 / SR Lambda Signature / Thunderpants / SR Sigma / SR Lambda



 
 
Feb 25, 2012 at 6:22 AM Post #4,470 of 41,050
XLR and balanced connection are designed for pro audio use, thus 2 x 3 pin XLR choice is more consistent. 4 pin XLR isn't nearly as common.
 
TRS is actually a somewhat flawed connection, as the plug is being inserted or removed, there is a possibility that the right output and ground be shorted which would blow the right channel output. This is especially true for high end headphone amp that is capable of providing gobs of current in split seconds. A 3 pin XLR for unbalanced stereo termination would eliminate that risk.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top