musicmind
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2006
- Posts
- 1,480
- Likes
- 19
Thanks Robojack...sounds promising
How are the mids on the W3, more detailed than the SA6 while not being as forward ?
I've been using the SA6 with the largest flange, I'm wondering which of the W3 tips you find of comparable size and whether the SA6 tips works well for you fit and sonics-wise with the W3?
Happy listening
Quote:
How are the mids on the W3, more detailed than the SA6 while not being as forward ?
I've been using the SA6 with the largest flange, I'm wondering which of the W3 tips you find of comparable size and whether the SA6 tips works well for you fit and sonics-wise with the W3?
Happy listening
Quote:
Originally Posted by robojack /img/forum/go_quote.gif For the most part, I found huge improvement in the W3's over the SA6s. There's a much larger soundstage, and the mids are easily superior to the SA6s. For the most part, they are non-fatiguing (to my ears), although if you don't get a good fit, you might find yourself with some sibilance. All in all, it's a much richer-sounding IEM than the SA6s, and really brings out the best/worst in your music recordings. In terms of the fit, I don't see why people are complaining about it. What is it about this IEM that people find harder to fit than other IEMs? The size of the sound tube (is it longer/shorter than the UM2 or UM1?), or is it that it's harder than other IEMs (for some ppl) to insert? I myself, have not found much problems with fit. |