Waiting is over. Viking Ragnar and SP3000 have arrived.
I am completely overwhelmed.
Now I need my listening time.
I am completely overwhelmed.
When I first demoed Ragnar, I was listening to N8ii and M9. Both sounded great, but still a little on the digital side. Last night, I rolled over to N6ii ti and Ragnar sung. Really delivers a nice sound. So crystal clear is this one.I am excited as well. quite unsure about a good pairing dap-wise. LPGT Ti could likely be too much (bright) for the Ragnar.
Your N8ii and Ragnar would make for a good combination I guess (... or is N8ii brighter than LPGT Ti ). Although N8ii should generally be excellent, I was hesitant to buy it because of the numerous "issues" mentioned by users in the respective thread; I got the impression that it is not for me but rather for those who benefit from a dap with a playground of different settings and adjustments.
Some time ago I decided to wait for SP3000. Let's see.
When I first demoed Ragnar, I was listening to N8ii and M9. Both sounded great, but still a little on the digital side. Last night, I rolled over to N6ii ti and Ragnar sung. Really delivers a nice sound. So crystal clear is this one.
Impressionssssss!!!!! Don’t keep us waitingWaiting is over. Viking Ragnar and SP3000 have arrived.
I am completely overwhelmed.Now I need my listening time.
It is purely based on synergy. The Ragnar has timbral issues that are nicely addressed by an R2R DAC. On its own, the Ragnar can sound more digital. The R2R dac gives it a more organic sound. I imagine it will be even better with RS8. I didn't get a chance to hear them together.interesting observation that the supposedly simpler, less complex and developed device (N6ii ti) has the edge over the jack-of-all-trades (N8ii) in terms of combination with Viking Ragnar.
By the way, which ear tips are you using with your Ragnar? Thanks.
Have you had the chance to listen to Turii Ti? I did a comparison between Ragnar and Turii Ti, and in my opinion, Turii Ti is much better in realism as it makes the Ragnar more digital sounding. As usual, YMMV.At the moment I'm so euphoric to claim that I have have never heard anything better than this with regard to a realism and pristine and clear presentation.
Pre-first impressions of the Noble Viking Ragnar, here we go!
The signature is pretty much an inverse L shape. Treble sits above bass and midrange. The signature as a whole is extremely linear and smooth, it is airy and delicate and transparent.
The bass really is quite flat and light as @gryphonos and a few others mentioned. I don’t know if it improved since last night or I got more used to it, but it’s definitely very neutral. Quality is somewhere around the Odin’s Imo, very impressive and a bit short from something like FiR’s kinetic bass
As far as personal preference goes, I’m missing midbass quantity. The quality is great and so is the decay, but I’m missing a little more presence
Midrange is incredibly airy. It’s pretty linear, no forwardness in the upper mids and male vocals sound great. What sets it apart is how clean it sounds and how it “flows” effortlessly, almost like a phantom image of the vocals. Incredible all around
Treble is spectacular. Very present, smooth, ethereal, extended - everything I could want and hope for
Technical ability is up there, but the staging is the one thing that really sets it apart - I don’t think I’ve heard an IEM that stretches this far in all directions. Kr5 and Traillii are pretty wide for example, Thumimm is very spherical and tall, A12t is quite deep, but the Ragnar pushes in all directions almost endlessly.
It definitely is the most technical Noble I’ve heard to date, I can’t rate it highly enough. Based on first day of listening, I’m sure a few won’t love it because it is very neutral and as some others have mentioned “digital,” but it’s right down my street personally