No need to get defensive. Let's not confuse an appreciation thread with a propaganda thread.
No headphone is perfect; not even the PS1000. There's plenty of praise for it here but that doesn't mean that PS1000 owners should ignore its flaws, if that's how we perceive them. For example, I happen to love the look of the matte aluminium enclosures but I'm not enamored with the two nicks that came with them at no extra charge.
Like a couple of other PS1000 owners who have posted here, I too have found the bass presentation of the PS1000 to be its shortcoming. Despite this, we still think that the PS1000 is a wonderful headphone. It's also been mentioned here that the bass tightens up after a time. I hope that it does and I'll keep an open mind about that. Saying that the PS1000's bass presentation is its weakness, is not the same as saying that its bass is poorly presented or sub-standard. It's just not its strength relative to everything else that it does so exceptionally well in my opinion.
I happen to like the way the PS1000 renders bass overall but would I appreciate it even more if it was as detailed and textural as the HD800 and W5000? Well yes I would. That's a subtraction for the PS1000 compared to those flagship headphones in that area of performance but I prefer the PS1000 to them both. So on balance, the positive attributes of the PS1000 clearly outweigh those of the other two headphones to my ears and I don't think that's incompatible with the purpose of this thread.