DefectiveAudioComponent
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2008
- Posts
- 3,030
- Likes
- 128
Quote:
Right... so we have to wait until someone decides to mess up their expensive sextett then....
Quote:
The illustration on the wikiphonia says they tried to achieve a closed can regarding bass, and at the same time an open can regarding treble. The passive diaphragms are supposed to keep the bass backwave inside, but let the treble through. It sounds like an excellent idea for ortho drivers that are both bass weak and have trouble with treble. But I don't know if their idea ever really worked.
Originally Posted by ludoo /img/forum/go_quote.gif You missed the "where the Sextetts have the passive drivers" bit. The frame was from a pair of K240M, so the baffles had places for the passive drivers but no drivers. |
Right... so we have to wait until someone decides to mess up their expensive sextett then....
Quote:
Originally Posted by wualta /img/forum/go_quote.gif Near as I can figure from study of the patent, AKG was trying to make a closed 'phone that had none of the sonic problems of usual closed 'phones. The passive diaphragms (not drivers) were originally meant to adjust the frequency response variations that a closed earcup would have, and those would have been mostly in the bass and low midrange, not the treble, since the passives would've needed appreciable air pressure to work, and treble excursion in a headphone diaphragm is small. That's my best guess, anyway. |
The illustration on the wikiphonia says they tried to achieve a closed can regarding bass, and at the same time an open can regarding treble. The passive diaphragms are supposed to keep the bass backwave inside, but let the treble through. It sounds like an excellent idea for ortho drivers that are both bass weak and have trouble with treble. But I don't know if their idea ever really worked.