scubaphish
500+ Head-Fier
Good to know I wasn’t alone with not being able to express sound differences between Pro and Mystique
If it hits every point you are looking for then its as good as it gets for youNice review.
For no real reason I've been wondering if this was as good as it gets in the range, from what I've read on comparisons with other models and brands the Kublai Khan hits every single point I'm looking for when I'm listening to music.
Stay updated on Noble Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
Are we there yet? I guess it depends on which wired products the comparison is made. In some respects, tws blows away wired products (app versatility / value per dollar tech)
Stay updated on Noble Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
Are we there yet? I guess it depends on which wired products the comparison is made. In some respects, tws blows away wired products (app versatility / value per dollar tech)
I'd be interested in your thoughts. After listening to the Kublai Khan and comparing it against TWS my suspicion is that for all the talk of codecs, the true thing keeping tws back is the power to drive more powerful drivers (can I phrase that better?).
Even playing low res files on the Kublai Khan has the sound sounding so much more voluptuous. It doesn't feel like I'm getting more information through via a cable, but rather that there is more power and stronger/better drivers being used.
Stay updated on Noble Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
May I ask a loaded question? In your opinion what are the tuning or tonal differences between the two FoKus models, Pro and Mystique?The secret sauce in the FoKus Pro & the Mystique is understanding where corners are cut in the industry & resisting to cut those corners, especially if they impact sound quality.
Maybe somewhere in the huge thread my question(s) have been addressed, but I've not read all the previous posts and thought I'd post this as a current wonderment.
Some background. I've owned (and love) a set of Noble Custom 8C's since they were first released, 2014 perhaps? Before that I owned a variety of superb CIEM's. My few attempts with Universal IEM's have been less than satisfying - I have some issues with fit and they seem to need resealing several times during my listening sessions. In particular, since I use these at the gym and move around a lot, even slight fiddling is a nuisance. Not an issue at all with CIEM's.
So my question, all else being equal, why spend huge bucks for a Universal when for about the same amount you could get CIEM's? The recent comments on the Kublai Khan seem to indicate this (Universal) IEM is the pinnacle of sound and it is certainly big bucks. But, spending "only" $400 gets the custom version. For me anyway, if I'm already spending $2,600, an additional $400 seems like a much better way to go.
Further, and not to open a can of worms on the "worth it" debate, I just can't wrap my head around spending $4,000 for the TOTL Ragnar Universal. In fact, if I correctly interpret the info on Noble's website, the Ragnar is only offered as a Universal. I just don't get it.
Now please understand this is in NO WAY a knock on Noble. I own their IEM's and they have treated me with nothing but the absolute best customer service and support. In my limited experience they offer the very best IEM's currently (or ever) made. I just don't understand why one would buy a super expensive Universal IEM if a custom version is available. Am I wrong in thinking a CIEM will always offer a better fit, better seal and, most importantly, a better reproduction of whatever music is being played? And IF I'm right, if the absolute best IEM is the goal, why not go Custom instead of Universal?
Stay updated on Noble Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
Stay updated on Noble Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
Stay updated on Noble Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|