estreeter
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2009
- Posts
- 8,336
- Likes
- 480
Fantastic to get feedback on the Concerto vs the Matrix. Tougher to find comparisons with the mighty T-33H, but thats understandable.
My setup is the K702 fed by the M-Stage and usb DacWOW. I got the opa627 and didnt really like the changes it made to the soundstage. I also have a Corda Headfive and I decided to try 2 of the lm6171s out of it on a dual dip adapter and absolutely love this sound! I have read many posts about how picky this opamp is and am worried about damaging my M-stage running them on an amp not designed around them. Do I have anything to worry about?
Yea the concerto definitely hit the spot, volume precision with the LCD-2's are that much greater and that sense of something missing is definitely no longer there.
It was definitely a noticeable improvement on a large scale, but I wouldn't be doing the M-Stage justice by comparing sound signatures since I don't have the m-stage with me at the moment. I guess if I could though the matrix was less wire with gain then the concerto is.
Which was ok with the 702's but not so much with the LCD-2's.
As an added bonus the cross feed sounds better than foobars built in cross feed while at the same time making some older recordings with hard pannings easier to listen to.
Still, the m-stage is a solid amp.
The concerto makes the clicking noises when changing volume, but its not really a probem unless you have your hand on the knob during every song. Its stepped, but feels linear. No random shots of volume spike, no tactile grooves.
Please forgive my "newbie -ness". Great group here!
I've dusted off the Rega Planar 3 and have really started to enjoy listening to vinyl again. After reading this thread I've decided that I'd like to invest in the Matrix M-Stage and AKG-701 (or 702). I have a couple of questions.
My AV receiver that everything (including turntable) goes through is a Integra DTR-40.1
I "assume" that the Matrix simply connects though the tape-in / tape-out of the receiver, correct?
My other question regards the opamp's. My vinyl listening consists of a variety of music but if I were to zero in on what I'd like to listen to mostly with the headphones it would be female vocals (rock, folk, pop, jazz), classic jazz (coltrane etc.), some classical, and yes, some good old rock but don't need big boomy bass, just realistic imaging.
I was thinking of ordering the Matrix direct from Tam's site and was about to add the " BURR BROWN OPA627AP WITH CLASS A BIASING MOD" - mostly because it looks like plug' n play (ie: no soldering and removable) and do tests with and without it. If I didn't care for the sound with it I could simply remove it. Am I correct with this?
Any help or suggestions about this setup would be greatly appreciated. I don't have a huge budget but I think this combination will keep me happy for awhile. I'm assuming that the sound coming out of my old AKG-240's (I *think they're the sextet model) would be much better as well with the Matrix rather than the phone out of the receiver.
Thanks! - Bob
actually i do have my hand on the volume knob ....so often....i think the clicking noises will keep me away from the concerto
Got in two more opamps in to try; AD797 & OPA1641.
AD797 has similar attributes as the LM4562, but with a boost to the treble. Too bright for my taste.
The OPA1641 is again similar to the LM4562, but with some of the vocal magic of the OPA627. Seems to also add a bit of sparkle without being bright. The OPA627 has great vocals, but a tad on the dark side. The OPA1641 in the M-Stage is very well balanced with my LCD-2. Looks like we have a winner!