I understand where you're coming from. I've made repeated attempts to avoid getting into a general discussion about cables. Instead, I've tried to make specific comments about the relative value of cables in comparison to the DSP and active cross-over technology of the JH3A, on a cost-equivalent basis. And even then, I was fairly diplomatic in qualifying my statement.
I find it frustrating that others are supposedly entitled to be able to make recommendations about cables, but I'm criticized for offering my opinion that runs contrary to the popular belief, even though all objective evidence is clearly on my side. In that sense, I disagree with what I perceive to be an equivocation regarding "truth" as simply a matter of opinion. We're not talking about moral concepts, here. We're talking about measurable audio equipment.
If you want to suggest that your own anecdotal opinion runs contrary to the vast body of scientific literature that's been established on this subject, again, I don't have a problem with that. Many here have done that, but have tried to pass that form of evidence off as being more scientific than it actually is. I've been very clear in suggesting that "my truth" doesn't have to be anyone else's.
I find it interesting that I'm comfortable with others having an opinion, but I don't seem to be afforded the same courtesy. That's alright. As I said, my only involvement will be if someone makes what I perceive to be clearly erroneous claims. I can say the sky is green, and demand that others respect my personal "truth", but that doesn't mean it should be above challenge.