High-end headphones for mixing and mastering?
post-8407038
Thread Starter
Post #1 of 31

gomincha

Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
81
Reaction score
11
Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Posts
81
Likes
11
Hi all,
 
I want a set of headphones as flat, realistic, accurate and detailed as possible for mixing and mastering applications.
I was thinking something in the lines of HD800, T1, LCD2, SR-007 and 4070.
Any suggestions?
 
     Share This Post       
post-8407594
Post #2 of 31

reeltime

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Dec 9, 2011
Messages
776
Reaction score
483
Location
Studio City, CA
Joined
Dec 9, 2011
Location
Studio City, CA
Posts
776
Likes
483
Website
www.linkedin.com
A few thoughts--
 
I'd master to near field monitors rather than headphones, if that's an option.  Something like a Genelec will serve you better based on what others will hear rather than a detailed set of cans.
 
But we live in a mobile world and I've had to bang projects out on the laptop myself, so I understand.  So if near field isn't an option, I'd choose something really flat, like the Ultimate Ears IERMs (I've mixed on these), or an AKG over the ear headphone instead of something that's beautifully colored like an LCD-2, Grado, HD 800 or the like.  You'll get a better overall mix that will sound good in any variety of playback situations.  Does that make sense?  It will save you money, too.
 
     Share This Post       
post-8407697
Post #3 of 31

ZARIM

IP address matches SNOOP_DOGG and HFAUDIOPHILE.
Joined
Dec 24, 2006
Messages
4,463
Reaction score
64
Joined
Dec 24, 2006
Posts
4,463
Likes
64
These cans (OP mentioned) need really good setup to sound there best but i will recommend the Grado PS1000, T1 for there soundquality and revealing hidden details.
 
     Share This Post       
post-8407902
Post #4 of 31

mwilson

Ants in my Stax
Joined
Dec 28, 2009
Messages
1,041
Reaction score
182
Joined
Dec 28, 2009
Posts
1,041
Likes
182
A considerable amount of mixing has been done on the cheap but reliable Fostex T20. I would second however that near-field, active monitoring is a more pervasive setup these days.
 
     Share This Post       
post-8407912
Post #5 of 31

sridhar3

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 27, 2011
Messages
1,676
Reaction score
104
Joined
Feb 27, 2011
Posts
1,676
Likes
104
Quote:
I'd master to near field monitors rather than headphones, if that's an option.  Something like a Genelec will serve you better based on what others will hear rather than a detailed set of cans.
 
I agree with the above statement.  If you need to do it with headphones, I'd go with the HD800, paired with a Benchmark DAC1 or Lavry DA11, and an SPL Phonitor.
 
     Share This Post       
post-8407929
Post #6 of 31

mwilson

Ants in my Stax
Joined
Dec 28, 2009
Messages
1,041
Reaction score
182
Joined
Dec 28, 2009
Posts
1,041
Likes
182
I would think that the HD800 with its almost artificial soundstage width wasn't ideal for mixing. Nor open back phones, for that matter. Am I talking out of my rear end?
 
Edit: should have added "Phonitor notwithstanding", as it can reign in the width to a degree.
 
Quote:
 
I agree with the above statement.  If you need to do it with headphones, I'd go with the HD800, paired with a Benchmark DAC1 or Lavry DA11, and an SPL Phonitor.
 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: kleefurd
post-8407941
Post #7 of 31

LFF

Co-Organizer for Can Jam '09
Member of the Trade: Paradox
Joined
Dec 6, 2004
Messages
7,055
Reaction score
259
Joined
Dec 6, 2004
Posts
7,055
Likes
259
OP, I have been mastering and restoring music for over 12 years now.
 
I would highly recommend you mix and master on monitors first. Double check on monitors and triple check on headphones.
 
A fantastic entry level mastering grade headphone I would recommend would be the Senn HD600 or Fischer Audio FA-003. Those are the cheapest options I would recommend and the ones that will give you the most bang for the buck. Your chain will matter too!  I would suggest a Benchmark DAC1 for amp/dac headphone or an objective 2/ODAC for a more affordable solution which is just as good, although I have yet to hear my ODAC but it supposedly measures better than the Benchmark.
 
If you want better, more expensive options, then I would recommend you look into the HE-500/HE-6 or Stax SR-007/SR-0009. Be prepared to spend a hefty sum on those headphones as well as supporting gear.
 
The best and most affordable solution, and one I use often, is a custom IEM. The UERM is excellent for mastering work and is extremely accurate and doesn't really require a huge amount of money for supporting gear.
 
If you have any other questions or just want to talk shop, then feel free to PM me.
 
     Share This Post       
post-8408343
Post #8 of 31

rhythmdevils

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
8,225
Reaction score
477
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Posts
8,225
Likes
477
If you listen to LFF your mixes might wind up sounding good.  Not recommended. 
 
Quincy likes to mix with the Q701 worn backwards. 
 

 
And Dr Dre likes to use Beats
 

 
     Share This Post       
post-8557961
Post #9 of 31

idratherbeflyin

New Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 18, 2011
Messages
18
Reaction score
11
Joined
Apr 18, 2011
Posts
18
Likes
11
Quote:
If you listen to LFF your mixes might wind up sounding good.  Not recommended. 
 

 
 
 
I got a bit lost with that lost comment since so much has been talked about above. What is "not recommended" specifically? IEMs? HD800? Monitoring with headphones as a rule? I'm shopping for good "flat" headphones so I am curious for my own education...
 
     Share This Post       
post-8557980
Post #10 of 31

SoupRKnowva

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
4,659
Reaction score
118
Location
Seattle, WA
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Location
Seattle, WA
Posts
4,659
Likes
118
Website
www.asyncbit.com
Quote:
 
I got a bit lost with that lost comment since so much has been talked about above. What is "not recommended" specifically? IEMs? HD800? Monitoring with headphones as a rule? I'm shopping for good "flat" headphones so I am curious for my own education...
 
Lol RhythmDevils was making a joke, sicne most mixes sound like garbage, it would be against the norm to have ones that do sound good.
 
     Share This Post       
post-8558003
Post #11 of 31

jcx

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jul 24, 2002
Messages
2,371
Reaction score
367
Joined
Jul 24, 2002
Posts
2,371
Likes
367
     Share This Post       
post-8558014
Post #12 of 31

silversurfer616

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Dec 2, 2011
Messages
799
Reaction score
202
Location
Aotearoa
Joined
Dec 2, 2011
Location
Aotearoa
Posts
799
Likes
202
Not sure,if this is meant for mastering???
 
     Share This Post       
post-8558760
Post #13 of 31

jcx

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jul 24, 2002
Messages
2,371
Reaction score
367
Joined
Jul 24, 2002
Posts
2,371
Likes
367
well you can make a personal calibration at AIX studios - or any other studio you can rent or get access for ~1/2 hr with your Realizer setup
 
     Share This Post       
post-8559837
Post #14 of 31

Scottsmrnyc

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
689
Reaction score
15
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Posts
689
Likes
15
 I use the Stax 40 70 headphone monitors for my musical production work.  Try them out.
 
     Share This Post       
post-10506397
Post #15 of 31

mehrdadiii

New Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
14
Reaction score
10
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Posts
14
Likes
10
  OP, I have been mastering and restoring music for over 12 years now.
 
I would highly recommend you mix and master on monitors first. Double check on monitors and triple check on headphones.
 
A fantastic entry level mastering grade headphone I would recommend would be the Senn HD600 or Fischer Audio FA-003. Those are the cheapest options I would recommend and the ones that will give you the most bang for the buck. Your chain will matter too!  I would suggest a Benchmark DAC1 for amp/dac headphone or an objective 2/ODAC for a more affordable solution which is just as good, although I have yet to hear my ODAC but it supposedly measures better than the Benchmark.
 
If you want better, more expensive options, then I would recommend you look into the HE-500/HE-6 or Stax SR-007/SR-0009. Be prepared to spend a hefty sum on those headphones as well as supporting gear.
 
The best and most affordable solution, and one I use often, is a custom IEM. The UERM is excellent for mastering work and is extremely accurate and doesn't really require a huge amount of money for supporting gear.
 
If you have any other questions or just want to talk shop, then feel free to PM me
hello,
I want to set up a professional carriable  studio. I couldn't have a fixed room for my arranging and mixing.(my genre is classical, house, pop, slow rock)
what do you recommend?
you someone says its impossible to produce professionally on headphones , someone says do it on a semiopen-backed headphone like DT880 pro with Creative Omni 5.1 surround soundcard for your laptop,in this way you can even mix in 5.1 by headphone!
someone says you need amp and external soundcard.Others say do it on a closed-back headphone, you can also use them for longtime mixing.
now you say UERM could be a good choice.
Im really confused!
what should I do?
thank you.
 
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top