vwinter
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2010
- Posts
- 4,651
- Likes
- 405
Stax? Bro, I'm a mobile reviewer, I don't have any hardware to run something like that... Nor do I have one XD
LOL you should know me better by now.
Stax? Bro, I'm a mobile reviewer, I don't have any hardware to run something like that... Nor do I have one XD
Fine, SR-002 + SRM-002 then!
Who do I contact to get my RE-400s replaced? The strain reliefs on both the left and right earphones are coming off.
If anyone has a problem with their RE-400s, contact customerservice@hifiman.com Does not have to be purchased from Head-Direct to get warranty service but you are welcome to go through your dealer, if you prefer.
Early RE-400s had a known problem with the connector and that has been addressed.
Peter
I've been auditioning the RE-400 I bought for my girlfriend to replace her Audiofly 56 (the housing has seperated twice even after the use of crazy glue). First I'd like to note that I didn't receive a carrying case. Secondly I've found it impossible to get the smallest tips on; I fumbled with them for 10 minutes before giving up and putting on a set of double flanges (which do seal extremely well).
In the past I've been pleased with the RE-262 and enchanted with with RE-Zero (great balanced armature like clarity but thin bottom end). The RE-400 is better. Unlike the previous Hifiman IEMs I've used this one has an improved soundstage, better bass (though it's not bassy), better instrument separation and a generally better balance of frequencies. I can't think of anything else I've heard at $100 that can match this IEM. Personal experience suggests you'd have to spend much more to get better sound.
Since I've already promised to hand this over to the aforementioned girlfriend I must now consider snagging an RE-600.
I've been auditioning the RE-400 I bought for my girlfriend to replace her Audiofly 56 (the housing has seperated twice even after the use of crazy glue). First I'd like to note that I didn't receive a carrying case. Secondly I've found it impossible to get the smallest tips on; I fumbled with them for 10 minutes before giving up and putting on a set of double flanges (which do seal extremely well).
In the past I've been pleased with the RE-262 and enchanted with with RE-Zero (great balanced armature like clarity but thin bottom end). The RE-400 is better. Unlike the previous Hifiman IEMs I've used this one has an improved soundstage, better bass (though it's not bassy), better instrument separation and a generally better balance of frequencies. I can't think of anything else I've heard at $100 that can match this IEM. Personal experience suggests you'd have to spend much more to get better sound.
Since I've already promised to hand this over to the aforementioned girlfriend I must now consider snagging an RE-600.
If you are going to the RE-600, you will get a signature that is closer to the RE-262. You'll get a little better bass depth out of them, as well as midrange. Treble is down a little unfortunately though, but technically still sound (it's the non-offending type of treble).
That doesn't really sound like it's worth $300 more. Diminishing returns, I suppose.
In those terms, yeah, RE600 may not necessarily be better than RE400, but it's certainly not worse [though personally I dislike the tuning more], both are fairly good performing. The W4 is poor stock, UE900 even more so. 4ai.....no comment. Just goes to show you how overpriced most companies overprice in general, there are no set standards yet [unlike loudspeakers], so companies think they can get away with crazy prices by simply having their own sound, without actual technical justifications for so called claimed performance.
In terms of bass and mids, the RE-600 is definitely better than the RE-400. In terms of treble, some may say the RE-400 is better. I could have assumed you you disliked the tuning more... Although I'd rather it have the treble quantity of the RE-400, I actually am enjoying the RE-600 tuning a bit more than the RE-400.