Well, I certainly opened a can of worms here. And all I said was that I bought something on his recommendation and didn’t like it. I guess we’re all on the same page.
Is there something to say against a well opened can of worms?
Guys on ASR are true believers.
In the Harman Curve.
Not shure if everyone of them really is aware, that Harman did more than one Curve. They also made an interesting one for selling (new) AKG (now Samsung) products.
Or really aware what “the“ Harman (Target) Curve is for.
it was a salesman Initiative to find out „how can we sell the most stuff“.
And it’s first version was nothing near something audiophile.
It was done in 2012 by Sean Olive. Then changed by nearly +5dB in 2013 in the 0 - 60 Hz range and -2dB at 3kHz. And again by another +2dB in the 0 - 60 Hz range and raised by -1dB at 3kHz in 2015. Spontaneous mutation in human race? 2 times in 3 years? A little too Star Trek with me.
In short words:
It is named target curve, because it is about listener acceptance.
Listener here means … buyer. Not ‘well trained audio expert‘. As in piano tuner, conductor or…
(No intention to offend us - the listeners in reality)
The best results the Harman Target Curve gained was 61%. Including no one above 50 years and nearly no female of the questioned people.
21% did a fascinating thing: They reduced bass and raised volume. Or at least asked about how to manage it.
Sean Olive and his team did a great job. They had to fight with inexperienced test persons, their exhaustion while testing and of cause the ever existing time/ressource limits.
But they did no study about the perfect hearing as some people frantically want to believe.
And they did nothing to develop ‘the perfect speaker‘, they found out what the most percentage of average people would like to hear.
And it shows only one thing: volume @ frequency. Nothing else!
Nothing about resolution (please don‘t think digital here), distortion, decay,…
By the way, do you guys remember how positive the public reactions were, when audio industry designed the first loudness function?
I appreciate Amirs (ASR) work. He and his friends did and I think will do great efforts in finding out about sound. I need to admit that I nearly never agree to his opinions, but this hobby, at least to me, is about different impressions/opinions.
I learn from analysing different point of views. And loving it.
If it helps understanding my maybe very own point of view, currently I‘m in IT as I guess is Amir, originally I was trained EE. Did Audio (circuitry) design, repair, sometimes tuning, mostly power supply and output and worked with sound studios (as a technician). All long ago while studying and I think of myself more than a kind of jack of all trades as an expert, except the particular job I am doing at a time. Oh and I am a pad swapper. At least monthly. No equalization (yet).
So, without any irony, thanks Amir. Your points help me understanding and sometimes adapting mine.
Measurements are important. In quality control as in development. They can tell you several things about the sound of, for example, a pair of headphones.
But if measurements are everything, why are there increasing sales with Vinyl?
If digital is perfect, why do I own 3 completely different sounding CD Players? Using the same external DAC? No matter which of the 4 I own?!
If measurement is telling everything about sound quality, why are there 9 Grado headphones in my cupboard, most of them in rotation for daily use?
Why do I have to wrangle these Grados out of the kids fingers day to day?
Just to mention the Target Curve - they have their own colored JBL headphones…
and hate cables.
I hate them running around with these ever to long, ever to short, non-detachable, indestructible Grado garden hoses, knocking everything including the youngest one down.