- Joined
- Sep 27, 2011
- Posts
- 252
- Likes
- 449
Sq wise I cannot compare for you because I have not heard the 2002. After looking at the photos of the DK2002, it appears that they have the share similarities in shell design with the DK-3001 I reviewed. The other thing I noticed was the DK2002 includes the older cable system. I was not happy with the fit of the DK-3001 and the DK2002 looks eerily similar. The fit of the DK-2001 has been thankfully retooled. The comfort is leaps and bounds above the older design, to my ears. The cable system included with the DK-2001 is the quick switch type of system to allow you to switch connectors without removing the cables, thus offering convenience and saves on wear and tear on the connection slots. I can totally endorse the DK-2001 from all aspects.
DUNU is becoming a major player in the market.
The SQ of the DK-2001 is full and rich. The bass is snappy and impactful with a moderate decay, DD bass coming in with a 13 mm driver. 1 mid-high BA and 2 ultra-high BA's balance out the sound.
Personally, and I am good at spending other's money, but I would go for the latest technology. You certainly can guarantee that the DK-2001 will perform at a level higher than the $299 price tag.
If it helps regarding the DN-2002 and the cable system for any 2002 owners out there: I was able to carefully dremel off the Plastic ‘lip’ on the headphone’s mmcx connectors a few months ago. (Go low and slow and shave it down, or use a hobby knife once you’ve made the initial dremel cut. The second one took maybe 2 mins tops with the knife.). I don’t recommend doing this if aren’t comfortable potentially ruinThe result is that they now work with any mmcx cable, are more comfortable (that few mm shaved off does help), and they still look ‘stock’ - you’d never know the difference by looking really.
I hope to compare the 2001 to the 2002 (and the rest of the Dunu IEMs!) at some point.
Last edited: