Kudos for this epic thread!
LoL @ reply #493, "Gary and the dacs" (after ~33 pages, but still before any dac is auditioned) and
LoL @ (at headphones coming of age but) "Grado is sort of like that weird uncle who lives out in the woods."
All in good spirit of course.
There appeared a long-lasting smile on my face when reading that, for a listener like Gary taking a serious effort, many well-built dacs aren't that different anymore. I found this early 'anticlimax' (imho a very positive one!) sort of reassuring because it is also my experience - with the usual disclaimers: to my ears, fwiw, ymmv, pending further exploration, etc.
I think it means that dac technology is rapidly getting as good as it ever will, for normal ears,
and the remaining differences, if any, are up to personal taste and choice of features.
Responding to a few comments I found interesting:
(the quotes are my paraphrases, not literal)
1) "speakers might be more revealing for this task"
I suspect many of us would sooner try such comparisons with headphones (and for Gary a comparison on speakers may defeat the purpose) but the comment gave me some food for thought, and for further experimentation. Speakers and their real-life circumstances are less dependable than headphones but perhaps they magnify some of the (im)perfections we like?
2) "you can learn to discern"
This is true in many situations but being able to tell dacs apart (by *any* cue one can learn to discern) does not necessarily serve the purpose envisaged. The point I'm trying to make is not like "ignorance is bliss" but that the cues may not even be what "we" are looking for. Not sure about this though, and at this point I cut myself short to avoid theoretical digressions.
3) "use the right source material"
The comments on the period are relevant imho, but also on the style and instrumentation.
To my ears and taste, classical bowed strings recently recorded in natural acoustics (in real stereo, not too close-miked-and-mixed) are the most revealing about good reproduction. At the same time the subjective beauty of it also tends to distract me (fortunately in a postive way!) so I am not sure about this. However, I do know that brass/woodwind have different and relatively few high harmonics compared to bowed strings. Technically, this could affect the kind of detail you may pay attention to.
What I'm trying to say here is that personal differences (of taste and of sensitivity) also interact with one's focus and attention to detail. Gary may dislike the HD800 if he listens to brass and I may like the HD800 when I listen to well-recorded strings. On the other hand, I'd readily agree with him when it comes to brass or pop music (though he'd not like the HD800 anyway).
I understand that Gary would be the last to say his findings have more than individual validity, but I mention it nonetheless because the dacs may differ in e.g. 'airy'-ness due to their analog stages and this may be more or less audible also depending on instrumentation and acoustics in the recording. I hope this makes sense and that he'll include some good strings for testing.
Thank you, Gary, and keep up the good work!