Folks:
Here's today's report, and you're going to be disappointed, sorry, since I got no official DAC testing done today.
I did test the Niles switch and all of my cables, and found that the signal loss was coming from bad connections on some of the cables. Some of the cheapo Monoprice connectors were very tight, and as Barry S can attest, since he visited today, I have limited space to work with in my current test setup, which is in a cabinet in a corner. Pushing a balky connector in completely when space is tight and where light is limited can be difficult. I just failed to get a good connection on some of the wires, but couldn't see it, so didn't know it. When I connected them properly and tested them carefully against my old Monster cables direct from DAC to amp, the differences were a few tenths of a dB at most -- well within the margin of error. When I tested them running through the switch vs. direct, I got the same difference, as long as everything was very carefully connected. So it wasn't the switch's fault, or really even the cheapo cables. As usual, it was operator error.
That testing took a couple of hours. Yeah, time also flies fast and far when you aren't really having that much fun.
Then Barry came over and we played with the toys for several hours. The Gungnir continued to be balky. As in we couldn't get it to work. Maybe it will work again tomorrow. If not, I will send it back to its owner who can check to see if that is operator error as well. It most likely is, but Barry has a Gungnir of his own and he couldn't make this one work either.
Note also that the NAD was pretty balky today too. It apparently doesn't really like JRiver links too much. Or perhaps it doesn't like the other DACs I'm linking it to. I mean, NAD is a classy company, so maybe their equipment just doesn't like associating with DACs from colonial companies with names like "Dangerous Music." Sounds scary. So sometimes the NAD works, sometimes it doesn't.
As Barry can attest, it is pretty time-consuming and irritating to start setting up to test a couple of the DACs and the NAD, which was up and running 10 minutes ago before we hooked up one other DAC, or changed one wire somewhere else in the setup, is no longer running. So we played around with it a while, and sometimes it decided to run. Until it decided not to again. I'm pretty sure this is a problem with the drivers interfacing with JRiver, particularly in links, or when links are broken. Or when somebody moves in the room. Or when anything at all in the universe changes. In any case, it is really irritating.
However, later in the day when the NAD was working, we did some impromptu comparisons using Barry's new LCD-X. I will provide you NO RESULTS from that testing now, because we did not follow my protocol or use my LCD-3s much. But one critical piece of information was once again gleaned from what we did and bears repeating again: This is a
VERY subjective hobby.
In particular, Barry's ear and taste are pretty much
totally different than mine. He likes one type of sound -- very lean mids-- and I like the exact opposite -- thick mids. Hence his preference for the LCD-X and my choice of the LCD-3s. What I think is "better" or "best" in a DAC does not agree at all with what he thinks. He would not be happy with my current setup (particularly the LCD-3) paired with any of these DACs and I would not be happy with either his current or future setup with the LCD-X no matter what DAC he used.
However, we could agree that,
with the Odyssey Cyclops and the LCD-X, one DAC sounded leaner, or another one thicker, or a couple sounded really close to each other, or whatever. We heard most of the same things. We just couldn't agree on the value of those things... i.e., that one DAC (or amp or cans) was necessarily "better" or "worse" than the others.
I am telling this story in order to drive home a point I've made many times on these boards, and will reiterate once again here: I cannot and will not tell you what DAC to buy as a result of this testing. I cannot and will not tell you which DAC is "better". You have to decide that for yourself.
I can, and will, describe for you in tedious detail what these DACs sound like TO ME. which ones have the same flavor, and which ones have different flavors, as well as what those flavors are, as best I can find words to characterize them. I should even be able to tell you which ones have more of a particular flavor or less of it. I will tell you which one(s) I will be keeping, and why. If I can describe the sound accurately (according to my ears, in my system), I hope that will be useful information to point you in the direction of a unit that provides a flavor that you believe fits your preferences. But that's the best I (or anybody else) can do for you. You need to do your own comparison testing to gain the final understanding you need to make an informed decision.
Okay, more than enough useless jabbering. I am quitting for the night, and will strive to do 2 DACs tomorrow, to make up for the one I didn't do today.