smith
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2004
- Posts
- 634
- Likes
- 89
mines on Wednesday
Me Too !
@bhazard Happy Birthday and i hope you will have a very prosperous year ahead of you.
Moe SS01 at 44$ is it a good buy ?? i know you had it, what do you think ? or is there any better option available at 45$.
currently i have FidueA63,Qstry kc6 and SM E30.
I'm not too sure of the rules and policies here, and whilst I don't know the appropriate channel for me to express my sentiments, I think it's best that information be as transparent as possible, and hence my posting in this thread. If any administrators actually bother to read this or venture into this thread, then please enlighten me as to why the Havi B6 thread was locked.
I can understand that there are certain posters who are unable to refrain from certain types of posts. That is not an issue for contention. But that still doesn't warrant
1) Closing down a thread without any fair warning
2) Not taking into account that the thread had already steered away from the nasty posts that had earlier surfaced
3) Disregarding the efforts of the thread creator, who painstakingly spent time and effort to provide useful information to a product that is set for launch
4) Closing down a thread for an occurrence which has plagued other threads before. I don't see the same infringement being applied in those cases.
It's actually less of why the B6 thread was shut down, but more of why other alternatives weren't pursued. A better solution would have simply been to personally warn those who were guilty of unconstructive behaviour, clean up the thread of the unwanted mess, and then allowed it to carry on as per normal. That way, the 99% of innocent people would still have been able to read and update the thread with useful information of a highly anticipated product (the very purpose of Head-fi?)
Instead, just shutting it down completely, silently and abruptly just reeks of 杀一儆百, which is just totally uncalled for. I get that none of the admins actually read the B6 threads since it's regarding a product geared towards the budget conscious community. I'm not saying that it's anything to do with elite JH Layla level IEMs vs Budget Havi B6, but in all honesty I do not think a thread regarding a darling product would have been so effortlessly shut down if similar dissenting posts had occurred in it. The B6 might mean nothing in the eyes of elite audiophiles, but it means a lot to many of us.
+1000
whoever locks the thread should have the decency to post the reason as the last post.
Very sad that there is no procedure established or followed in these cases.
+1000
whoever locks the thread should have the decency to post the reason as the last post.
Very sad that there is no procedure established or followed in these cases.
For those that missed it, the B6 thread....
It's all a marketing scheme I tell you, look how much attention the b6 got now
simply geniuses!
I'm not too sure of the rules and policies here, and whilst I don't know the appropriate channel for me to express my sentiments, I think it's best that information be as transparent as possible, and hence my posting in this thread. If any administrators actually bother to read this or venture into this thread, then please enlighten me as to why the Havi B6 thread was locked.
I can understand that there are certain posters who are unable to refrain from certain types of posts. That is not an issue for contention. But that still doesn't warrant
1) Closing down a thread without any fair warning
2) Not taking into account that the thread had already steered away from the nasty posts that had earlier surfaced
3) Disregarding the efforts of the thread creator, who painstakingly spent time and effort to provide useful information to a product that is set for launch
4) Closing down a thread for an occurrence which has plagued other threads before. I don't see the same infringement being applied in those cases.
It's actually less of why the B6 thread was shut down, but more of why other alternatives weren't pursued. A better solution would have simply been to personally warn those who were guilty of unconstructive behaviour, clean up the thread of the unwanted mess, and then allowed it to carry on as per normal. That way, the 99% of innocent people would still have been able to read and update the thread with useful information of a highly anticipated product (the very purpose of Head-fi?)
Instead, just shutting it down completely, silently and abruptly just reeks of [COLOR=660099]杀一儆百[/COLOR], which is just totally uncalled for. I get that none of the admins actually read the B6 threads since it's regarding a product geared towards the budget conscious community. I'm not saying that it's anything to do with elite JH Layla level IEMs vs Budget Havi B6, but in all honesty I do not think a thread regarding a darling product would have been so effortlessly shut down if similar dissenting posts had occurred in it. The B6 might mean nothing in the eyes of elite audiophiles, but it means a lot to many of us.