- Joined
- Jul 22, 2011
- Posts
- 7,049
- Likes
- 1,168
Like I said - BA are good of you want flat response. Then bass is very good.
Again, this is just a straight up fallacy.
The reason I bring up the number of IEMs I've heard is because it lends a greater sample size. James444 has heard and owned more than double the IEMs I have, and he's been around the block enough to be considered a earphone connoisseur.
Some of the bassier IEMs I've heard have been balanced armatures. The likes of the SD3, TG334, N6, FI-BA-SS, FA-4E XB, and others will outpunch a lot of dynamics.I actually couldn't get along with the Noble 6 because it had straight up too much bass.
The only fact in the BA vs dynamic debate is that tuning is almost everything. Driver type plays a part, yes, but not nearly as much as you may think. Look at the MH1c vs Aurisonics Rockets. Both are microdynamics, but the MH1c's bass makes the Rockets tremble in comparison.
Some argue that BAs are faster than dynamics...again, this is false. The GR07 manages to be damn near perfect in balancing speed, impact, texture, and quantity. It's faster than a lot of BAs I've heard as well.
Too bad when comparing to an actual high quality, well tuned dynamic like my FX850 or the IE80, the bass sound suddenly turns out anemic and pale in comparison. Heck, even the Bassos whip those BA in bass, and despite the Basso name, they aren't that imposing with the bass. The Rain 2 has heavier more present bass.
I was going to say something about this, but James444 addressed it in a far more diplomatic way than I could have.