Quote:
The XB1000 has more bass quantity than the PRO700MK2? That's new, as I'm pretty sure the PRO700MK2 has greater quantity than the XB1000. I agree with the description of the PRO700MK2's punch, though. The M50s on the other hand, are rather light on bass, for me. They are generally good headphones, but they'll need an amp to get the bass to shine.
So, are they lousy headphones?
I recently did an A/B comparison with the ATH-Pro700MK2, Sony XB1000, Q40 and M50, using a COWON J3 player. The XB1000 had the most bass quantity. If you want to just drown in everything bass and nothing else, the XB1000 offers that unique experience. The ATH-Pro700MK2 slammed the hardest with its ungodly amounts of mid-to-upper bass. The Q40 has a nice evenness through the bass range, producing the best detailed bass. The M50 are boomy and probably the best-sounding headphone but are bass-light compared to the others. (The ATH-WS55 and AKG K181 sound just as nice as the M50 but with even more bass).
The XB1000 has more bass quantity than the PRO700MK2? That's new, as I'm pretty sure the PRO700MK2 has greater quantity than the XB1000. I agree with the description of the PRO700MK2's punch, though. The M50s on the other hand, are rather light on bass, for me. They are generally good headphones, but they'll need an amp to get the bass to shine.
Keep in mind, the COWON player is known to make bad headphones sound good. I wouldn't exactly call the Pro700MK2 or XB1000 good headphones.
So, are they lousy headphones?