Jesterphile
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2013
- Posts
- 364
- Likes
- 11
Lots of vintage integrated stereo amps do. My Yamaha A-500 goes great with the LCD-2s
Yea but..Impact...? Which headphone did you feel more beats by dre?
I dont know what set up you have or what music you listen to or even if you bother with eq, but out of my pioneer sa-9500 headphone out, with the bass knob turned a couple notches right, my lcd-2's hit harder than my xb1000's with comparable sub bass but way better mid bass slam/punch/kick whatever.
Set up right, they can hit like closed cans without interrupting or bleeding into the mids
When I listen to burial - truant, wu tang clan - triumph, or phaelah - the cold in you, the bass vibrates my entire skull violently lol
Jesterphile is correct. A nice vintage integrated amp may be what you're looking for.
If bass is what you're after and youre on a budget, an o2 amp has enough juice to power a pair of lcd-2's with ease and then all you need is a good digital graphic eq or good bass dsp plugins for foobar or mediamonkey like the h82 harmonic maximizer set on bass drum settings
Yeah I'm not gonna EQ my setup and then talk about my setup compared to others as if we're listening to the same headphone even remotely. I also don't have bass knobs on my Schiit Mjolnirs but I'll talk to Jason about it.
To me bass impact and punch are the exact same thing. Quantity of bass the LCD-2 has. The LCD-2 is perfectly capable of representing the lower tones perfectly, but it's how much attack is in the bass per drum kick for example.
So I listen to a lot of percussion where the HD800's snappy bass is great, but sometimes I'll settle down after a drink with LCD-2's while listening to cello where the lush midrange that melts with the bass and treble comes in handy. It's not to say that somehow the LCD-2 is missing an entire range of sound, it's there, it just doesn't have the attack of other cans.
Other cans I feel have bass impact but are not necessarily more quantity ie boomyness. Just because something has more bass impact than lcd-2 does not automatically class it in fart cannon territory, the LCD-2 isn't exactly a neutral benchmark itself, which is why it's so fun to listen to in the first place.
HD800
HD700
HD600
Grado RS-2i
Beyerdynamic DT880
Beyer T70 (have not heard T1)
None of those are particularly bassy headphones right? But they do have bass impact.
Jesterphile and I both see eye to eye, we both clearly own the headphones to this day so nobody is saying the LCD-2's suck guys.
Can you reword this so that we can have an idea of what kind of tone you're using when you say this?
Also, LCD-2 has good impact, but in a relative sense, it doesn't. It definitely doesn't have the slam of HD800 bass, and it definitely doesn't have the rumble and impact of a JH16. I guess we can call this balanced, but I don't believe Audeze's have "so much impact it shakes my core." I guess this all depends on what you have heard and what your reference point is. Even with the DNA Stratus, I didn't think it had that much impact, definitely more, but still not THAT much as suggested in this thread.
Maybe Dubstep Girl can give us a quick bass comparo between Audeze and TH900 on an ideal setup?
try listening at higher volumes, i think most people listen too quietly sometimes, and the audeze definitely needs volume for the bass to come out.
I don't know, you musta had something wrong, there's no way you didn't get impact from LCD2. Especially with Mjolnir.
try listening at higher volumes, i think most people listen too quietly sometimes, and the audeze definitely needs volume for the bass to come out.
but the LCD-2 i think has a type of impact thats kinda like HE-500 but still different. it definitely isn't always a rumble though or a boom, i don't know how you guys are trying to explain it, i seem confused since i always though it was impact that the LCD-2 have, but not the same type of bass as like a TH-900 would have, that kind of bass is mostly sub-bass and it has much more presence, like a subwoofer, it just fills your head with bass, the LCD-2 definitely doesn't have that. its more of just a midbass impact/punch, it definitely has more of it than the LCD-3. though the LCD-3 seems to have a little more sub-bass, but the LCD-3 seems lighter in t
Some of you's need to get your terminology up to date. Sub-bass != mid-bass. Chris_Himself is right, none of the LCD2's have a large amount of bass impact (if you want lots of impact look at the closed headphones in the Basshead thread). What the LCD's (2/both revisions and 3/both revisions) excel in is sub-bass, the low-end rumble.
The LCD2's need volume up a notch extra or too for treble and the mids to come out, you want to cancel that wall of dominating bass otherwise if you have volume on too low, or you get is a wall of bass, everything sucked out.
Pfff...
Some of you's need to get your terminology up to date. Sub-bass != mid-bass. Chris_Himself is right, none of the LCD2's have a large amount of bass impact (if you want lots of impact look at the closed headphones in the Basshead thread). What the LCD's (2/both revisions and 3/both revisions) excel in is sub-bass, the low-end rumble.
The LCD2's need volume up a notch extra or too for treble and the mids to come out, you want to cancel that wall of dominating bass otherwise if you have volume on too low, or you get is a wall of bass, everything sucked out.
My faith in the community hath been restored
Some of you's need to get your terminology up to date. Sub-bass != mid-bass. Chris_Himself is right, none of the LCD2's have a large amount of bass impact (if you want lots of impact look at the closed headphones in the Basshead thread). What the LCD's (2/both revisions and 3/both revisions) excel in is sub-bass, the low-end rumble.
The LCD2's need volume up a notch extra or too for treble and the mids to come out, you want to cancel that wall of dominating bass otherwise if you have volume on too low, or you get is a wall of bass, everything sucked out.