johnwmclean
Aka: capone, bignurse.
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2008
- Posts
- 2,909
- Likes
- 52
Quote:
In the EHHA I’m using a match quad of telefunken’s, mosfet version in a speaker amp configuration. Both amps are driven by a separate dual Sigma22 psu with Sumr 120VA transformers.
Both amps are excellent with the LCD-2’s, both have great detail retrieval and musicality. There is a definite softening with the EHHA, it does sound incredibly good, would be preferable for some tastes. The Beta22 cuts the image a little crisper, bass is slightly more visceral and detailed.
I am also slightly biased as the Beta22 has more travel on the pot, it has a Khozmo 48 stepper as opposed to a Dact 24 stepper on the EHHA.
Quote:
I blame the the crappy microphonic stock cable...
I’ve used the old standard and ever reliable Rebecca Pidgeons Spanish Harlem track for vocal testing, with the stock cable she’s very forward with a closed in group behind her, the violin and cello interplay is lacking dynamics, kind of confusing and tends to mess up the presentation. Changing over to the Norse 8 conducter has her further back with a bigger soundstage, things are happening now, much more relaxed, everything has more space and time.
Do I need a flame suit?
Can you elaborate, in which areas, did the B22 fared better than the EHHA ?
Also which tubes & output transistors were you using ?
In the EHHA I’m using a match quad of telefunken’s, mosfet version in a speaker amp configuration. Both amps are driven by a separate dual Sigma22 psu with Sumr 120VA transformers.
Both amps are excellent with the LCD-2’s, both have great detail retrieval and musicality. There is a definite softening with the EHHA, it does sound incredibly good, would be preferable for some tastes. The Beta22 cuts the image a little crisper, bass is slightly more visceral and detailed.
I am also slightly biased as the Beta22 has more travel on the pot, it has a Khozmo 48 stepper as opposed to a Dact 24 stepper on the EHHA.
Quote:
John my man, after reading your post, i am sold by your experiences you have with LCD 2 as i have been sitting on the fence for a very long time contemplating which is better with b22. and here you are convinced me that LCD 2 is the better choice. i have heard both but not with my b22 so i roughly knows what are the differences between he6 and LCD 2.
would you mind sheding some lights on this sound signature i heard from LCD 2 that has been haunting me for quite some time. does the vocal and the instruments sound separated by a huge gap inbetween on the LCD 2? meaning, i heard the vocal to be very upfront and the instruments lying far behind the back giving me an impression of a void in between them? is this due to the lack of compatibility from the amp? i doubt that the AE amp is not powerful enough to drive LCD 2. thanks.
I blame the the crappy microphonic stock cable...
I’ve used the old standard and ever reliable Rebecca Pidgeons Spanish Harlem track for vocal testing, with the stock cable she’s very forward with a closed in group behind her, the violin and cello interplay is lacking dynamics, kind of confusing and tends to mess up the presentation. Changing over to the Norse 8 conducter has her further back with a bigger soundstage, things are happening now, much more relaxed, everything has more space and time.
Do I need a flame suit?