saxelrod92
100+ Head-Fier
Has anyone tried the auralic taurus mk II with the lcd 2.2 (pre-fazor)? I'm sure somewhere in these over 500 pages there is a post or two, but I have no clue which page, and can't spend the next 12 hours searching lol. Plus some new opinions would be nice since now in that price range we will soon have ragnarok, and in a few weeks the new violectric amps. So I'm curious what people think of the auralic in general, as there is not much talk about it on here, at least in comparisons that is. So far I'm leaning towards the new violectric v281, and for anyone that knows the youtuber/head-fi member HeadphoneAddictdotcom, he had the original taurus mk II and felt it was a bit bright with the lcd 2 rev 1, and preferred the v200. I have tried my lcds out of a burson soloist sl, and found it pushed the mids too far back, as well as dulled the treble/the overall sound, and was not powerful enough (had to turn the volume on high gain to about 2 and it felt lacking still). I feel that I have a similar sound preference to him, as well as to Tyll. Love detail, love bass, love mids, love thickness, but also a good solidity and edge. which is why for now I feel like the violectric amps seem like the right fit, plus all the great reviews. But I dont want to disregard something like the Auralic when it is used so often as most reviewer's reference/nearly flawless in most of its reviews. If anyone with a similar sound preference to myself, and as I mentioned above, has heard violectric amps and the taurus mk II, I'd love to hear what you thought of the differences and if you had to pick one to stick with for a whilst (they are pricey after all) which one would it be and why? And of course in context of being paired the lcd 2 pre-fazor (I got mine september 2013).
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!