Reviews by nmatheis

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Sound. Scalability. Aesthetics. Comfort. Price
Cons: Microphonics. Over-ear wear difficult. No single-flange wide-bore tips.
INTRODUCTION
 
I want to thank Meze for giving me a spot on the 12 Classics tour. It's been fun giving these a listen!
 
This is the second time I've had the opportunity to review Meze products, and I want to make sure I say a few things about them before moving on with the review. The first Meze product I reviewed was a very nice pair of closed headphones, the 99 Classics (LINK to review). I really liked those a lot, but there were a few things holding them back from being just good enough for me to shell out my hard-earned cash for. What were those? Well, one was aesthetics. At the time I reviewed them, they only came in Walnut/Gold/Black or Maple/Silver/White. Neither of those struck my fancy. I'm not a fan of white headphones, and I thought the gold was a bit too bling-bling for my tastes. I recommended that Meze make a version with Walnut/Silver/Black, and they responded quickly by releasing that version with a bit more restrained aesthetics. Nice! Next up was the choice of pads. They were a bit too shallow, so my ears touched the driver covers. I really don't like this, so I (and several others) suggested deeper pads. Last, the cable exits straight down out the cups and is wrapped in nylon fabric, resulting in scratchy microphonics when the cable rubs on your shoulders. I suggested that they keep the fabric below the y-splitter but change to a less microphonic covering above the y-splitter. Ok, that was quite a while ago. When I was at RMAF recently, I ran into Antonio and Mircea from Meze and topped at their booth to chat. They had a beautiful pair of Walnut/Silver/Black 99 Classics sitting there, so I hooked them up to my Lotoo PAW Gold and took a listen. Huh? What was this? My ears no longer touched the driver covers. Awesome! The cable was still completely sheathed in scratchy fabric, but with the aesthetic improvement and new pads I couldn't resist. I purchased a pair of 99 Classics of my own. Why did I take this detour? To let you know that the Meze team is small enough to be responsive to suggestions for improvement and nimble enough to implement them quickly. I think that's important when deciding how to spend your hard-earned cash, so I wanted to point out that the team at Meze are cool cats!
 
 
TL/DR REVIEW
 
Alright, for those of you who don't want to watch me ramble on about the 12 Classics (and 11 Neo) (well, and other stuff, to be honest 
wink.gif
), here's the down-low...
 
 
SPECS 
  1. Frequency response: 16Hz - 24KHz
  2. Impedance: 16Ohm
  3. Sensitivity: 101dB (+/- 3db)
  4. Total harmonic distortion: < 0.5%
  5. Noise attenuation: up to 26dB
  6. Titanium coated 8mm mylar driver
  7. Copper-clad aluminum voice coil
  8. 3.5mm gold-plated jack plug
  9. 7N OFC cable, lenght: 1.2m
 
 
11neo-product-frequency.png
 
FR Curve From Meze's 12 Classics Product Page
 
 
PACKAGING
 
IMG_20161029_164302-01.jpgIMG_20161029_164354-01.jpgIMG_20161029_164522-01.jpg
 
I'll let the packaging speak for itself...
 
 
ACCESSORIES
 
IMG_20161029_163658-01.jpg
 
You get the clamshell zipper case shown above in the packaging section plus a shirt clip and a few pairs of tips. Meze also includes a pair of Comply tips (not pictured). Single-flange wide bore tips would be a nice addition!
 
 
BUILD + ERGONOMICS
 
IMG_20161029_164709-01.jpgIMG_20161029_164925-02.jpg
 
The shells are wood barrels with aluminum end caps complete with fancy-schmancy Meze trident logo and aluminum nozzles. Strain reliefs are just fine. It would be nice if the L/R markings were more visible.
 
 
IMG_20161029_162939-01.jpg

Play/Pause + Receive/End Call Remote + Mic. I'm sure it's functional, but I used these with DAPs so I didn't test.
 
 
IMG_20161029_162818-01.jpg

Y-splitter is aluminum and again bears the Meze logo. Strain reliefs are fine and are reminiscent of those on the earpieces. Notice that there isn't a cinch. The cable feels quite rugged, and I don't have any concerns about durability. It is a bit thick above the y-splitter which, combined with the lack of cinch, makes wearing these over ear a no-go.    
 
 
IMG_20161029_162646-01.jpg
 
Gold-plated 3.5mm plug with aluminum construction. Strain relief is a bit short but fine.
 
 
FIT
 
IMG_20161111_120202-01.jpg

As mentioned above, these are obviously intended to be worn down and any attempt to do otherwise will almost certainly result in frustration. 
 
 
SOUND
 
The single dynamic driver 12 Classics have a slightly warmed-up sound with tight punchy bass, neutral mids, crisp highs, and good soundstage. I listened to them out of several sources from budget to TOTL DAPs with Electronic, Classic Rock, and Metal and found that they scale well as you use better sources and sound good with all of the music I threw at them. My experience with the Lotoo PAW Gold pairing was particularly eye opening, producing very tight, punchy, visceral bass and crisp highs that were well-defined but not hot.
 
Tip rolling allows you to tweak the sound as usual. Stock single-flange tips were my point of reference, resulting in the sound  as described above. Comply provide an even warmer experience with smoother highs more akin to the 11 Neo. Stock double-flange tips reduced bass a slight bit, opening up the top end and increasing soundstage. Spiral Dots leaned them up quite a bit, giving a slightly warmed-up reference type sound.
 
By comparison, the 11 Neo are warmer, smoother, and more relaxed with stock single-flange. Bass increases a bit, as does lower mid presence. Highs are smoother without losing too much definition. Soundstage is more closed in comparison but is still good for the pricing. Tip rolling provides similar results as above, with Comply probably warming these up too much for most people, stock double-flange tips open them up a bit, and Spiral dots bringing these pretty close to the sound of the 12 Classics with the stock single-flange tips. 11 Neo do lack technicality compared to the 12 Classics and don't scale as well, but they're still a good buy at their price point.
 
 
SUMMARY
 
In my opinion their responsiveness to tip rolling and increasingly better sources indicates that these punch above their price point, making them an easy recommendation with just a few minor caveats which are that the cable should be more pliable/supple above the y-splitter to allow for over-ear use, the lower cable is a bit prone to microphonics, and the accessories package lacks single-flange wide-bore tips. Great job Meze!
 
 
With all that said, here's my video review. I hope it's useful. Enjoy!
 
 
 
 
Thanks again to @MezeTeam for sponsoring this tour. You're cool cats, and I'm glad I had the chance to meet you at RMAF. Keep up the good work!
Bansaku
Bansaku
Great review!

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Dynamic, powerful sound in a small form factor. Can roll opamps to fine-tune sound. Simple controls.
Cons: No display. No gapless. No breakpoint resume. WAV-only (for now). Short battery life. No longer in production :(
Hi all! I'm back from a reviewing hiatus as I settled into a new job with more responsibility at a newer company. It feels good to be at the point where I can tell you about some of the cool, new audio gear I've found lately. The absolute most interesting audio gear I've had the pleasure of testing out recently has been from @tjstyle of Revamp Acoustics. If you haven't heard of them, I won't blame you. I stumbled across them completely by accident. My man @tjstyle is one cool cat. He's an Android developer who can also whip up a mean circuit board. He's working other cool stuff besides audio gear, too. Seriously cool dude!
 
Okay, so how did I hear about the TeriPlayer G1 and why was I interested? Well, I was just skimming through the Portable Source Gear forum one day and saw a thread about the TeriPlayer. Like many of us, that immediately brought to mind the Altman TeraPlayer so I clicked on the thread to see what was up. It turned out that @tjstyle was hand-crafting DAPs for an audio club in Indonesia with the ultimate goal of creating a more cost-effective alternative to the TeraPlayer. Hmm... I thought this was pretty interesting, so I found a way to contact the guys responsible for the project (Deni & TJ). After some back and forth, I purchased a G1 of my own - the only one they sold to someone outside of Indonesia. Not that I'm the only G1 owner outside of Indonesia. Given the rarity and (spoiler alert!) bang for your buck you get with G1, it's been on eBay at much higher prices than they were originally sold for.
 
For this review, I'm trying a new format and am going to direct you to the video below for the bulk of the review which not only covers the TeriPlayer G1 but also TJ's newest creation - the Nuansa A1 portable amp. They create the cutest stack I've ever seen, and their sound signatures complement each other very nicely. Up here on top, Im just going to give you the TL/DR version so please check out the video review and help me out by providing feedback in my YouTube channel.
 
Ok, here we go. But first a couple of useful links... 
 
  1. TeriPlayer G1 Thread
  2. http://www.head-fi.org/t/795394/ind...type-discussion-split-from-tera-player-threadRevamp Acoustics
 
 
TL/DR
 
I've used TJ's TeriPlayer G1 for several weeks with everything from sensitive IEM to full-size headphones tat I wouldn't take out of my house. I also brought it to RMAF CanJam to get feedback from other headfi'ers I trust. In that time, G1 has become a serious contender for most ear time out of my ever-growing stable of DAPs despite the rudimentary user interface, lack of gapless, and short battery life of only 5-6 hours. Now, that's saying something because I have a lot of DAPs to choose from. One thing that's helped that is the ability to change opamps. I've switched from the stock AD8397 to MUSES02 for a smoother sound signature and am really happy with the balance of dynamics and smoothness I'm getting. Everything I throw at this little guy from my beloved FLC8S to my new love the AudioQuest Nighthawks sounds amazing. At first, I wondered if I was a bit cray-cray, which is why I took it to RMAF for others to hear. I let some of my seasoned headfi buddies and also some well-respected members of the trade give it a listen. At first, they thought it was a joke because it's just a simple DIY DAP. After listening, they were G1 believers and thought it was easily worth twice the original price of around $180. Most of them thought the sound quality was more along the lines of a $400 DAP but were a bit put off by the overly simplistic user experience. That's understandable. It's pretty rudimentary, lacking many of the creature comforts of mass produced DAPs. That isn't necessarily a bad thing, though. Just think of it as getting back to basics, and you'll probably be fine!
 
Positives are the very good sound quality, which strikes a good balance between a more energetic, dynamic sound and a smooth, organic sound, driving power, solid build quality, simplicity, and the ability to roll opamps to fine tune the sound.
 
Negatives are lack of gapless and breakpoint resume, short battery life, wav-only for now (although I've been testing FW with MP3 and FLAC decoding), and complete and utter lack of availability.
 
Four stars because I think the audio quality is damn good and overcomes what some will perceive as negatives given the G1's simplicity...
 
Ok, I think that's enough back story to set you up for the video review, so here we go. I hope you enjoy, and if you have any questions please feel free to ask away!
 
0.jpg

 
 
A big thanks and shout-out to @tjstyle for creating such wonderful audio gear. There's quite a mystique building up around your products, and I hope others will be able to enjoy them soon!
 
Cheers,
Nikolaus
hqssui
hqssui
Thanks  for the review.
twister6
twister6
Nice way to tease everybody, Nic : "Great DAP... but no longer in production" :p
nmatheis
nmatheis
Lol, @twister6. I'm hoping @tjstyle will put this little guy back into production with an updated battery for increased playback time. Adding in at least MP3 and FLAC decoding would be nice, as well. Gapless won't happen for the original G1, but I've expressed my keen interest in gapless support to TJ and am hoping he can implement this in future versions!

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Good build quality. Budget-friendly price.
Cons: Needs EQ. Ponderous bass. Non-ergonomic earpieces.

INTRODUCTION

My first exposure to T-PEOS was back when the Altone 200 IEM was released. I pre-ordered it based on @H20Fidelity's impressions. It was my first hybrid IEM, and I really liked it for its killer combination of punchy bass, clarity, ergonomics, and price. Although I don't listen to them much anymore, Altone 200 are one IEM I'll keep in my collection if nothing more than for sentimental reasons. When T-PEOS released the follow-up to the Altone 200, the Altone 150, 250 and 350 lineup, I was able to extensively audition the lineup and provided impressions. The newer Altone lineup saw a break from the punchy, clear sound of the Altone 200. Instead, we got a more consumer-oriented sound with copious bass. With a bit of EQ to tone down the bass the Altone 250 sounded pretty damn good, but for me EQ was a necessity. Even with EQ, I wasn't a big fan of the Altone 150 and 350. Beyond the overly rambunctious sound, the new Altone lineup wasn't very ergonomic with overly large connectors and super springy cables. For my tastes, T-PEOS was clearly headed down the wrong path, and I tried to make that clear in my Altone 250 review and impressions of the entire lineup. With my love for the Altone 200, I wanted to see T-PEOS succeed in recreating the magic. 
 
That's all fine and good Nikolaus, but we aren't talking about the Altone lineup here, are we? No, we're not. I just wanted to make my history with T-PEOS clear. And when I (as with a few others in the Head-Fi community) was recently approached by James Park to evaluate their new Rasiel IEM, I wanted to see where T-PEOS was at right here, right now. Would Rasiel really be "vacuum tube sound" as the ad copy suggested? Would it be balanced and smooth, or would it fall into the the trap of consumer-friendly bass-heavy sound? The Pros and Cons provide a high-level answer. Read on if you're interested in diving a bit further down into the details...
 
Rasiel Website: LINK.
 
 

DISCLAIMER

T-PEOS sent me a pair of T-PEOS Rasiel in exchange for my unbiased review. I hope my feedback is useful for my fellow Head-Fi members as well as for T-PEOS. 
 
 


ABOUT ME
I'm a 44 year old father who listens to a lot of electronic and metal, although I do listen to a wide variety of music. I'm primarily a portable audio enthusiast and have been in the game since the venerable Shure E2C was first released. Bought one, plugged it into one of my many MD players, and have been hooked ever since. I do enjoy listening at home and am becoming increasingly interested in building up a nice desktop setup. As with a lot of people my age, my hearing isn't perfect but I've be listening for a long time and feel confident in assessing audio gear.


 
 

SPECIFICATIONS 

  1. Driver : Dynamic driver 10mm​

  2. Sensitivity : 110 ±2dB​

  3. Power : 3mW / 20mW​

  4. Impedance : 8Ω ± 15%​

  5. Frequency Range : 20Hz ~ 15kHz​

  6. Weight: 8g​



 

 

PACKAGING & ACCESSORIES



IMG_0245.jpg

As usual, I'm not going to spend much time on describing the packaging and accessories. It's about what you'd expect at this price point. 
 
Inside the box, you get the IEM plus S, M, L silicon tips and a pair of M Comply tips. 
 
Despite the accessories list claims to the contrary, there was no fabric pouch or shirt clip in the box. Odd...
 
 

BUILD & ERGONOMICS

IMG_0247.jpg

In the photo collage above, you can see Raisel's teardrop-shaped metal earpieces, mic / remote unit, y-splitter, 3.5mm L-plug, and bits and pieces of the cable.
 
Some thoughts on the design and build quality:
  1. The metal earpieces are quite solid but aren't the most ergonomic. I struggle to acheive a secure fit with silicon tips. Using Comply solves this. This holds true when wearing down or up.
  2. The vent holes are directly adjacent to the strain reliefs. Isolation is okay but not great. If worn down, wind noise isn't an issue. Worn up, the vent holes are quite exposed and Rasiel are more susceptible to wind noise.
  3. The mic / remote module is a simple and functional one button unit. I rarely listen out of my phone, so this isn't something I'd use anyway.
  4. The y-splitter separates the upper non-braided cables from the braided cable below. Unfortunately, there's no cinch.
  5. The 3.5mm jack is a smartphone-friendly L-Plug.
  6. The cable feels solid and isn't prone to microphonic or tangling.
  7. All branding is TGD and not T-PEOS.
 
 
Here's how they'll look, assuming your ears are similar to mine...
 
IMG_0248.jpg
 
 

SOUND

The basic sound signature of Rasiel is v-shaped, with strong, ponderous bass and elevated upper mids / lower treble. Beyond the sheer abundance, bass speed is ponderous and bass texture is flat. Lower mids suffer from bass bleed. The slow, elevated bass and lower mids lead to a wooly sound. The midrange proper is sucked out. Vocals aren't going to pop here. Upper mids / lower treble are emphasized, so you'll still be able to hear those high notes and cymbals over the copious bass. Not exactly what I go for in an IEM. Definitely more of a consumer-friendly sound.
 
So what to do? EQ...
 
Shelf down the bass, drop the lower mids a bit, and bring up the mids proper a bit. That sounds better, but now the upper mids / lower treble are a bit out of balance. Drop those down a touch, and we've got a relatively balanced sound signature. While its definitely better, I'm not blown away. The bass is still slower than I'd like and lacks texture. Oh well, at least the mids aren't sucked out anymore.
 
I'm not going to go into a deep dive comparing with other IEM I have in this price range. Suffice it to say that I recently received a few other budget-friendly IEM from Alpha & Delta, Rhapsodio, and Vsonic and find myself reaching for the others over Rasiel.
 
 
 

SUMMARY

I went into this review process hoping that T-PEOS would surprise me with a more balanced budget-friendly IEM. Unfortunately that wasn't the case. Instead, I found a well-built IEM that didn't fit me well sonically or ergonomically. Looking over other reviews, I'd say I wasn't alone in my thoughts on the overall sound but do seem to be an edge case when it comes to fit since others were able to achieve a good fit with less work than I did. I'd love to be able to recommend Rasiel for a sports IEM because the sound signature seems made for that, however the heavy metal shells and so-so isolation make that a hard recommendation for me to make. In the end, I'd recommend these for those looking for a consumer-friendly sound, durability, and a bit of flash. Unfortunately, that leaves out a lot of the Head-Fi crowd. Oh well, here's hoping T-PEOS takes the critical commentary and suggestions seriously and gives us more IEM like the instant classic Altone 200. C'mon T-PEOS, we know you can do it! 
 
Thanks again to T-PEOS for providing me with a review sample.

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Good balance between musicality and detail. Very ergonomic. Good accessories package.
Cons: Mid-bass hump. No wide bore tips.

INTRODUCTION

NuForce made its name under Jason Lim's leadership developing high-performance audio products that didn't break the bank. Jason Lim has moved on, but the NuForce brand is still going strong under the new Optoma NuForce brand name. Optoma is a well-known projector company that decided to diversify into the home and portable audio markets with its acquisition of NuForce. Recently, @jyri at Optoma NuForce reached out to me and asked if I'd be interested in reviewing their new HEM IEM lineup. This is an expansion of the work NuForce did with the Primo8 quad-BA IEM, with HEM2 single-BA, HEM4 double-BA, HEM6 triple-BA, and HEM8 quad-BA. I'd already heard their single-driver titanium-coated dynamic IEM, the NE800M. While that was an enjoyable IEM, it had more bass than I typically look for in an IEM. While well-received, I got the impression that I'd probably have similar thoughts about NuForce's Primo8. Would the new HEM lineup be more of the same? I'm here to tell you that in my opinion, the answer is a resounding no. Beyond just expanding the lineup, each of these IEM have their own character to satisfy the varying needs of music lovers. If the HEM lineup is any indication of things to come, I'd say the future is bright for NuForce. In this review, I'll let you know what I think of the HEM8 and also touch on the other IEM in the HEM lineup. And a big shout-out to @jyri from NuForce for letting me test these out!
 
Optoma NuForce Website: LINK.
 
Dedicated NuForce HEM thread: LINK.
 
 

DISCLAIMER

There is no financial incentive for writing this review, and this is my honest opinion of NuForce's new HEM IEM lineup. I hope my feedback is useful for my fellow Head-Fi members as well as for NuForce. 
 
 
 
 



[size=17.03px]ABOUT ME[/size]
I'm a 44 year old father who listens to a lot of electronic and metal, although I do listen to a wide variety of music. I'm primarily a portable audio enthusiast and have been in the game since the venerable Shure E2C was first released. Bought one, plugged it into one of my many MD players, and have been hooked ever since. I do enjoy listening at home and am becoming increasingly interested in building up a nice desktop setup. As with a lot of people my age, my hearing isn't perfect but I've be listening for a long time and feel confident in assessing audio gear.


 
 

SPECIFICATIONS



Screenshot_20160319-211047.png

*Please click for a larger, easier to read table.
 
 

PACKAGING & ACCESSORIES



 
HEM8_package_.jpg
 
This is the basic package you're going to get with each of the IEM in the HEM lineup. You'll get a larger pelican-style case that you can stash everything in plus a smaller semi-hard fabric case that you can use when you only need the IEM. Of course, you get the actual IEM which come nestled in protective foam. You get two cables to choose from. Both use standard two-pin connectors. There is a more "boutique" SPC quad-braid cable with shrink wrap y-splitter and cinch. There's also a more conventional OFC non-braided mic cable. I'm glad NuForce gives you the choice because, being mainly a DAP user, I always choose to use a non-mic if given the choice. I'm sure there are plenty of you who'll want to use them with a smartphone, so you'll probably put on the mic cable and never look back. Both cables come with a relatively low-profile 3.5mm L-plug that's smartphone case friendly. NuForce includes two sets of S, M, and L narrow-bore silicone tips. One set is softer, and the other is firmer. They also throw in M and L Comply tips. Rounding out the package, you get a 1/4" adapter, cleaning tool, and shirt clip. Again, you get all of this regardless of which HEM IEM you purchase. What's missing? Wide bore tips. As @Dsnuts pointed out, you can coax a different presentation out of the HEM IEM by using a wide bore tip. Something along the lines of SpinFit tips would be a welcome addition to allow user to fine-tune the sound to their preference.
 
 

BUILD & ERGONOMICS

 
HEM_black.jpg
 
Here's a close-up of the HEM8. The same shells are used across the HEM lineup just varying in color as shown at the top of the specs chart a couple sections up. HEM2 is a nice red color, not overly bright which is appreciated. HEM4 is a nice shade of blue that shifts in color to a dark purplish blue as you move it around, which reminds me of the pics I've seen of the Primo8. HEM6 and HEM8 are both a classy matte black. The lightweight polycarbonate shells feel tough and are very ergonomic, making it easy to listen to them for extended periods of time. The connectors are color-coded. White lettering and line for the left side and dark yellow for the right side. It's subtle yet helpful. Another subtle yet helpful addition is the knurled texture on the connectors, making them very easy to grip while inserting and removing the cables. Finally, you can see that the cable is shaped to fit over your ear. That's not memory wire. Instead, there's a shrink wrap coating that helps the cable maintain that form. While it's not as form-fitting as memory wire can achieve, it is much slimmer, comfortable, and glasses-friendly than most memory implementations. I like it. And as a bonus, this makes it easier to wear the HEM IEM either up or down. I tried out both successfully. The only caveat with wearing down is that the knurling on the connectors has the potential to rub a bit. I didn't find that to be a problem, but it might bother those of you with more sensitive ears. I bet most of you will just end up wearing them over ear anyways.
 
 
HEM + MIC CABLE
HEMLRmic_blacksquare.png
 
Here's a close-up of the HEM8 with the mic cable. The cable is supple and the strain reliefs are very soft and bendable. As you can see, the mic module contains a single-button remote to take/end calls and play/pause, ffwd, and rew music. Again, I have no use for those, as I listen with DAPs.
 
 

SOUND

As mentioned in the intro, I've had these for a long time and as such have given them plenty of listening time with DAPs from various manufacturers. I've also listened to all the typical music I enjoy, mainly electronic and metal with a smattering of jazz and modern composition thrown in for good measure. As I'm writing this review, I've been jamming them with the brand spanking new Shanling M5 DAP and my trusty Cayin N5. Neither combination doesn't disappoints. And if it wasn't obvious from up above, all listening was done with foamies which might make my impressions differ a bit from others who I've noticed tended to use the silicone tips that just wouldn't stay in my ears. For this review, I thought I'd give you an overview of the lineup from HEM2 to HEM8. I'll start with HEM2 and work my way up to HEM8. As I've been writing this review, I've also seen some reviews come in and think it'll be interesting to see how my thoughts on these align or differ from others. Okay, so here we go...
 
HEM2
HEM2 are the entry-level, single-BA IEM. I'll be honest with you and tell you upfront that these clicked with me right from the start, whereas the others grew on me. HEM2 has a nicely-balanced sound signature on the warm side of neutral. There is a bit of roll-off on either side of the frequency range. This is more apparent on the upper end, where they lack sparkle. This helps cover up any sibilance in recordings but also makes HEM2 feel restrained / polite. Soundstage is fine but feels held back by the warm sound signature, coupled with a lack of sparkle. I'm left wondering how much a bit of sparkle up top would help out here. It would add a bit of excitement and spaciousness to an otherwise relaxed / polite listen. All that said, I quite enjoy these. They remind me a bit of one of my favorite configurations of the FLC8S IEM (red, gray, gunmetal). And by remind me, I don't mean they sound the same. I mean they're reminiscent of the sound. The FLC8S is a triple-hybrid known for fantastic separation, imaging, and soundstage. FLC8S in my preferred configuration also has very linear, visceral bass, perhaps even skewed a bit towards sub-bass. Being a single-driver with a bit of roll-off on either end, HEM2 can't quite match up as far as spacial cues or bass extension and impact are concerned. I can't hold that against the HEM2, though. The mere fact that I really liked them on first listen and was reminded of one of my all-time favorite IEM is pretty damn impressive in my book. This isn't your dad's single-BA IEM!
 
HEM4
Stepping up from the HEM2, we come to the HEM4 double-BA IEM. These stick out as the more "reference" sound signature in the lineup. In comparison to the rest, HEM4 has the leanest bass and is more upper-mid focused to my ears. Again I'll be completely honest with you and tell you that I didn't like this one much at first listen. Compared to the others, it lacked the full, rich, organic sound. They made HEM4 sound a bit too lean and a bit bright. As I've spent more time with it, my thoughts have changed. In fact, I've come to really like HEM4. Like I said, coming from the others it sounds lean, but when I take some time away from the others and just listen to HEM4 in isolation it sounds really good. In fact, the more I spend time with it, the more I realize it's giving me what I was looking for in the HEM2. While the bass quantity is less, the bass quality is improved and isn't quite as soft. There's a noticeable increase in upper mid presence and sparkle up top. As such, it can be a bit more revealing of sibilance than HEM2, which is a sibilance killer. It's not accentuating sibilance like some IEM I've tried recently, just revealing what's there. Spacial cues are kicked up a notch, a noticeable improvement. Yes, I'm liking this one more and more with each listen. Funny how that happens sometimes. In fact, if you look over my initial impressions of HEM4 in the HEM thread, you'll see I was ready to write this one off as a loss in my initial impressions. Not that it was bad, I just didn't think it suited my taste on first listen. Given some time, they're growing on me. And that's why I like to listen for awhile before judging anything...
 
HEM6
Stepping up once again, we come to the HEM6 triple-BA IEM. These strike me as a marriage of the HEM2 and HEM4 sound signatures. You get the fuller, warmer bass + mids of HEM2 coupled with the upper end sparkle of HEM4. Despite the similar sound signature, the overall sound quality is beyond a mere marriage of those two sound signatures. While reminding me of the HEM2 bass, HEM6 bass is higher quality. It reaches deeper and conveys more detail. Mids on HEM2 were nicely balanced, and HEM6 follows that lead instead of getting more energetic in the upper mids like HEM4. The upper end retains the crispness and sparkle of HEM4 that was lacking in HEM2. Again, this means HEM6 will reveal (but not accentuate) sibilance rather than cover it up like HEM2. Spacial cues and soundstage are better than HEM2 but fall behind HEM4, which has the most open, airy sound of the three discussed so far. In fact, moving from HEM4 to HEM6 is a bit shocking. At first HEM6 sounds closed in, but after acclimating for a bit HEM6 starts to open up. This is another in the lineup that I wasn't immediately taken with but has grown on me the more I listen to it.
 
HEM8
And we finally arrive at HEM8, NuForce's new quad-BA flagship IEM. These take all the good points I've talked about so far and marry them all together into one fine-sounding IEM. Bass is extended and conveys good detail. To my ears, it sounds like it combines the reach and detail of HEM6 bass but backs off a bit in quantity and sounds nicely tighter as a result. Mids are the most balanced of the bunch. Not as full and warm as HEM2 and HEM6, but not skewed towards upper mids like HEM4. The upper end sounds crisp and has good detail retrieval but isn't as sparkly as HEM4. Sibilance isn't as prominent with HEM8 despite the upper end sounding nicely detailed. Spacial cues are very good. That's probably the first thing I noticed about these when moving up from HEM6. And despite being a fuller sound than HEM4, HEM8 blows them out of the water when it comes to imaging. Doing a lot right with no obvious deficiencies, HEM8 are easily my favorite IEM in the lineup.
 
FINAL THOUGHTS ON SOUND
I hope that walk through the lineup gives you a good idea of what I think of them. Each of them is unique and earns its place in the lineup, however this is definitely a case where the flagship is the clear winner. That's not always the case. I've listened to lineups where I end up preferring the mid-tier IEM over the flagship. Not here. HEM8 is the clear winner as the most balanced, musical IEM of the bunch. If you prefer a bit more bass quantity, I could see you preferring HEM6 over HEM8. If you like things a bit leaner, HEM4's your IEM. Not quite ready to spend that much, HEM2's got you covered as one of the better tuned single-BA IEM I've heard to date. One thing I've always liked is having a couple different sounds signatures, energetic + relaxed. Along those lines, I could see buying HEM2 (relaxed) + HEM4 (energetic) to fulfill those roles quite nicely without breaking the bank.
 
As an aside, @Dsnuts pinged me and suggested I try the tip mod he covered in his Primo8 and HEM8 reviews. I did try that mod and was impressed with how much it opened up the soundstage. It really helped me see the potential the HEM lineup had while I was waiting for them to burn in. Now that they're burned in, I don't feel the need for the tip mod any longer. It's still nice to have the option for sonic variety, though, which is why I have a pair of modified tips sitting in the case of whichever HEM IEM I'm listening to at the time. You know, just in case the mood strikes me. Please head over to his excellent HEM8 review for more details (LINK).
 

SUMMARY

NuForce has done a great job with their new HEM lineup. The lightweight, ergonomic shells ensure comfortable listening sessions. The accessories package with two cables, two cases, and three kinds of tips is generous, although including some wide bore tips to further open up the sound would be appreciated. Speaking of sound, as I hopefully very clearly conveyed up above, it's easy for me to pick a clear winner here and it's HEM8. The other IEM all have their strengths, but HEM8 is the most nicely balanced sound. Couple that with the impressive imaging, and we've got a winner on our hands. But don't let that dissuade you from looking at the others in the lineup. Depending on your sonic preferences and budget, one of the others might just end up being the winner for you.
 
Oh yeah, as of the time I wrote this review, there's a NuForce HEM "Blue Box" ovdr on Massdrop. Go take a look (LINK).
 
To wrap, I'd again like to give a big thanks to @jyri for providing me with review loaners of the HEM lineup. It was fun taking them for a test drive! 
Jackpot77
Jackpot77
Top work - very clear explanation of the differences between the models. Great read.
shigzeo
shigzeo
Great review.
Nosaj1969
Nosaj1969
I just received a pair of the HEM2 today from the latest Massdrop, and was a bit dissapointed at first, but seeing your article and reading a bit about the mod here and elsewhere that you mentioned, and not having the JVC silicone (I'm not a big fan of silicon tips anyway) I had a spare pair of Comply Tx-400s around and used the same mod, and wow!  It was an amazing difference right away.  I am hoping they will sound even better once I get them broken in a bit more, but certainly the mod with any larger bore tips will likely work.  Since some people have indicated they don't like the isolation that is lost with the silicone vs the memory foam, this may be yet another way for people to get the mod with a combination of the two.  I think the biggest impact so far I noticed was an improvement in bass impact.  The highs as others have indicated are a bit rolled off anyway, so I don't think this really hurt much, but didn't seem to impact the mids. Would like to know other's thoughts if you try it out!

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Balanced, refined sound. Holographic soundstage.
Cons: Large shells. Shallow fit.

INTRODUCTION

Unique Melody. It's a CIEM brand that's been around for awhile. In fact, the UM Miracle was one of the very first CIEM I'd ever heard of and is still regarded as a classic. Despite being familiar with the brand, I knew very little about them, much less heard them. So imagine my surprise when MusicTeck reached out to me and asked if I'd be interested in taking the UM Miracle V2 and UM Maestro for a test drive. Of course, I said yes. Since receiving them, I've gone from playing Mr. Mom to helping rapidly commission a brand spanking new production lab in a very short amount of time. This caused a delay in letting you all know what I think of these. My life isn't slowing down any, but I've decided that enough is enough. I'm going to make time for this review no matter what, and so here we are. Since these two IEM share a lot in common including excellent sound, shape/size, packaging, and accessories, I'm going to combine the reviews.
 
Links of interest:
MusicTeck's UM Page: LINK
Unique Melody's new FaceBook page: LINK
 
 

DISCLAIMER

There is no financial incentive for writing this review, and this is my honest opinion of the Unique Melody Miracle V2 and Maestro IEM. I hope my feedback is useful for my fellow Head-Fi members as well as for Unique Melody.
 
 

ABOUT ME

I'm a 44 year old father who listens to a lot of electronic and metal, although I do listen to a wide variety of music. I'm primarily a portable audio enthusiast and have been in the game since the venerable Shure E2C was first released. Bought one, plugged it into one of my many MD players, and have been hooked ever since. I do enjoy listening at home and am becoming increasingly interested in building up a nice desktop setup. As with a lot of people my age, my hearing isn't perfect but I've be listening for a long time and feel confident in assessing audio gear.


 
 

SPECIFICATIONS



MIRACLE V2
6 Balanced Armatures
2 Low, 2 Mid, 2 High
3 Way Crossover
18 Hz to 19 kHz
114 dB SPL Sensitivity
15.9 ohm Impedance
$1050
 
MAESTRO
12 Balanced Armatures
4 Low, 4 Mid, 2 High, 2 Super High
4 Way Crossover
20 Hz to 20 kHz
109 dB SPL Sensitivity
20 ohm Impedance
$1450

 
 

PACKAGING & ACCESSORIES



As usual, I'll go over packaging and reviews in pictorial format. Packaging and accessories are virtually identical.
 
PACKAGING
Packaging.jpg
 
Both IEM come in minimal black square boxes with shiny black text. The whimsical nature of the text is a breath of fresh air in an industry that seems to be taking itself more and more seriously.
 
ACCESSORIES
Accessories.jpg
 
In all, you get the UM IEM, a black metal carry case with the UM logo, four pairs of wide bore single flange tips, three pairs of foamies, 1/4" and airplane adapters (does anyone use those?), and a cleaning tool.
 
 

BUILD & ERGONOMICS

I'll attack this section in pictorial format, commenting on what I like and what I think could be improved as I go.
 
UM IEM WITHOUT TIPS (MIRACLE V2 ON TOP, MAESTRO ON BOTTOM)
IEM-1.jpg
 
 
UM IEM WITHOUT TIPS (MIRACLE V2 ON TOP, MAESTRO ON BOTTOM)
IEM-2.jpg
 
It should be pretty obvious from these pictures that both the UM Miracle V2 and Maestro are universal fit IEM. Of course, they also come in custom versions. If I were picking up a pair for myself, I'd most certainly go the custom route. Why? At this price point, why not just go ahead and take the plunge. And from what I've seen in the Maestro thread, the customs can be made with a smaller shell. The universal shell's large size was really pushing the limit for what my ears can take. I've been lucky enough to try the CustomArt and Empire Ears lineups recently, and both of those had significantly smaller shells at the same or higher driver count. They also had longer nozzles. CA & EE's smaller size and longer nozzles made for a more comfortable fit than I get with the UM IEM. The UM's short, wide nozzle prohibited me from using silicone tips. I tried the stock tips plus some from my collection, but they just kept slipping out of my ears. In the end, the only tip I could get to work for me to achieve a secure fit with good seal were the foamies. This did have some benefits, though. The combination of foamies plus the large shell provided some of the best isolation I've ever experienced. On the other hand, I started to feel "hot spots" due to the large shells. During longer listening sessions, I had to reposition the IEM to maintain comfort. My biggest suggestion to UM is to make the shells smaller. This would allow more people to comfortably enjoy them. I know it's possible. EE's 14-driver Zeus is smaller than the 6-driver Miracle V2. Please UM, make these smaller!
 
Connectors are recessed 2-pin. This makes them very stable and less prone to bending but also a total PITA to remove. I got them out once but decided not to go through the pain again for a pic. Should've snapped a pic while I had it out. Oh well...
 
Shells are glossy piano black. Miracle V2's faceplate has Unique Melody in a jumbled silver font. Maestro's faceplate has a carbon fiber pattern with Unique Melody in a very small silver font. Which look you prefer is obviously up to personal taste. I kind of like the design they went with on Miracle V2. The jumbled up writing captures more of that whimsical spirit we saw on their packaging.
 
 
Y-SPLITTER, CINCH, 3.5MM PLUG
IEM-3.jpg
 
 
The 3.5mm jack and y-spliter are clear shrink tubing. Before the y-splitter, you've got a 4-stranded braid. Above the y-splitter, you've got a 2-stranded braid. The 3.5mm plug is one of those ginormous ones that absolutely will not play nicely with a smartphone case, so if you use a smartphone with these you're probably going to have to shed that case first. All in all, it screams "boutique cable". I'd love to see UM offer a more modern, smartphone-friendly cable. Luckily, the cable is replaceable, so if you really want something different you can always buy a different one.
 
 

SOUND

As mentioned in the intro, I've had these for a long time and as such have given them plenty of listening time with DAPs from various manufacturers. I've also listened to all the typical music I enjoy, mainly electronic and metal with a smattering of jazz and modern composition thrown in for good measure. As I'm writing this review, I've been jamming them with the brand spanking new Shanling M5 DAP and my trusty Cayin N5. Neither combination doesn't disappoints. And if it wasn't obvious from up above, all listening was done with foamies which might make my impressions differ a bit from others who I've noticed tended to use the silicone tips that just wouldn't stay in my ears.
 
As I've listened to the Miracle V2 and Maestro, I've gone back and forth over which I prefer and come to the conclusion that I really like both. It's hard to pick one as the clear winner. The Miracle V2 have  a touch less bass and a bit more energy in the upper mids and lower treble. This makes them a slightly more energetic listen. When I'm up for a more involved listen, I turn to the Miracle V2. That's not to say that they're lean, reference, or overly energetic up top. They're still a well-balanced listen, with punchy bass and and treble that thankfully doesn't hit any of my hot spots. I'm becoming more sensitive to sharp / piercing treble peaks, so this is particularly important to me these days. Overall, the Miracle V2 are a very satisfying listen and were the IEM I was more immediately drawn to. Conversely, the Maestro are a more "refined" listening experience. Notes are a bit fuller / thicker, upper mids are more restrained, and lower treble is reined in a bit. All that said, these are not dark IEM, just a bit darker than the Miracle V2. Detail retrieval is still excellent and soundstage and spacial cues take a step up from the Miracle V2. Over time, I've come to appreciate the Maestro sound more and more and think I'd end up preferring these in the long run. 
 
When I first got these, I had the Empire Ears collection in house, so I was lucky enough to be able to listen to all of them. In my opinion, the Empire Ears collection can be split up into two categories. Cerberus and Spartan are distinctly different, being a more forward / energetic listen than the rest of the lineup. Hermes, Athena, Apollo, and Zeus were what I'd classify as a more "refined" sound, more along the lines of the UM Maestro. However, there are distinct differences in the approach EE and UM took with their higher-tier lineups. The EE IEM have a slight bit less bass and noticeably less upper mid and treble energy than the UM IEM. This made the EE IEM sound somewhat restrained in comparison to the more fun sounding UM IEM. I ended up preferring the EE IEM with more upper mid and treble energy, so the UM IEM were a good fit for me. 
 
I took these to work and let one of my buddies listen to them. He's not an audiophile per se, but his dad has built up a very nice audiophile grade listening setup in his basement. The kind where you just fall back onto your leather couch and let the music immerse you. The setup we all wish we had but can't afford yet. You know what I'm talking about. Well, I let him listen to both of these with via MacBook Pro -> iFi iDSD Micro. He thought the UM Miracle V2 were great IEM. Better than anything he'd heard to date. Then I let him test drive the UM Maestro. The look on his face was priceless. He said it was like being in his dad's listening room but miniaturized. Sure, Maestro are pricey, but compared to his dad's setup? No comparison. 
 
 

SUMMARY

It's been a fun journey with the UM Miracle V2 and Maestro, and I'm glad my life's settling down enough now that I can share my thoughts with you all. Are these for everyone? Certainly not. They're both TOTL competitive IEM and priced accordingly. If that's what you're looking for, then you should be looking at these. If they're out of your price range, no worries. Buy some nice triple hybrids (I highly recommend the FLC8S) and be satisfied for now. Sooner or later, the TOTL siren song will be calling your name, and when that time comes, please give these some serious consideration. The sound certainly warrants it. And if / when you do decide to pull the trigger, I'd urge you to go for full customs to get the most comfortable fit and best sound out of these that you can. I have the sneaking suspicion that these would sound even better if they were full customs. 
 
Just as an aside, I'd also urge you to look into the UM Merlin. They're UM's quad hybrid, and I'm betting those are a damn fine listen. I hope to hear them someday!
 
To wrap, I'd like to give a big thanks to MusicTeck for providing me with review samples of the Miracle V2 and Maestro. 
Fred-svv
Fred-svv
Now Unique Melody are launching new versions of the Maestro and Mentor. The Mentor/Maestro will come with two new cables (You can choose wich one to use, because will came with two). The engineer technology will change, making a better depth and instrument separation. They will come with the same technology of the freqPhase of JH Audio.
launching the new version. Someone made an purchase or had the opportunity to teste the V2?

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Warm, engaging sound. Nice design. Simple functionality. Big knob.
Cons: No coaxial input. No visual gain indicator.
test-element-banner.jpg
Photo courtesy of JDS Labs.
 

INTRODUCTION
I've been looking around for a pair of full-size cans, and one of my Head-Fi buddies was raving about his new pair of ZMF OMNI. In fact, he's so in love with them that he wanted to share the love and ended up loaning them to me for a couple weeks. In addition to the pair of ZMF OMNI, he also threw in the JDS Element for me to try. He said that was a good pairing, so I thought I'd relate my experience with that combination to you in a "quick review". In addition to the Element, I also paired the OMNI with the Apogee Groove, Aune X1S, and iFI Micro and will provide some brief listening notes on those pairings. 
 
 

ABOUT ME

While I'm primarily a portable audio enthusiast, I've been getting more interested in desktop gear recently. I mainly listen to classic rock, electronic, and metal these days, but I do throw in some alternative rock, jazz, and modern/minimalist composition from time to time. And as with a lot of people my age, I've got some hearing issues. I've got mild tinnitus and suffer from allergies, which can affect hearing in my right ear. I'll admit it, I'm not blessed with a pair of golden ears. That said, I've been listening to audio gear for a long time and feel confident in assessing gear. I just wanted to be transparent up front.
 
 
SPECS
  1. Frequency Response 20Hz-20kHz +/- 0.1dB
  2. THD+N 1kHz, 150 Ω 0.0009%
  3. IMD CCIF 19/20kHz 150 Ω 0.0004%
  4. IMD SMPTE 150 Ω 0.0005%
  5. Noise, A-Weighted -108 dBu
  6. Crosstalk @ 150 Ω -67 dB
  7. Output Impedance 0.1 Ω
  8. Channel Balance +/- 0.56 dB
  9. Max Continuous Output, 600Ω 140 mW (9.4VRMS)
  10. Max Continuous Output, 150Ω 505 mW
  11. Max Continuous Output, 32Ω 1.1 W
  12. Peak Output Power, 32Ω 1.5W
 
  1. Frequency Response 20Hz-20kHz +/- 0.15dB
  2. THD+N 100 Hz -0.15 dBFS  0.0023%
  3. THD+N 20 Hz -0.15 dBFS 0.0016%
  4. THD+N 10 kHz -0.15 dBFS 0.0019%
  5. IMD CCIF 19/20 kHz -6.03 dBFS 0.0011%
  6. IMD SMPTE -6.03 dBFS  0.0012%
  7. Noise A-Weighted dBu 24/96 -102 dBu
  8. Dynamic Range (A-Weighted) >112 dB
  9. Linearity Error -90 dBFS 24/96 -0.02 dB
  10. Crosstalk -10 dBFS 100K RCA -100 dB
  11. USB Jitter Components 11025Hz -113 dB
  12. Maximum DAC Line-Output, 100K 2.10 VRMS
  13. File Format Support PCM up to 96/24
 
Price: $349 for the standard configuration or $369 with RCA output (LINK)
 
 
PACKAGING & ACCESSORIES
The JDS Element comes in a simple box just big enough to hold the Element and USB cable. The power adapter is included in an extra box. You can download the user manual here: LINK.
 
 
BUILD & ERGONOMICS
Simple is the word that comes to mind when thinking about the Element's design. It looks like a black Mac Mini with a giant knob on top. Doesn't get much more simple than that. I'll go over it in a little more detail in pics below.
 
jds-labs-element-front.jpg
Photo courtesy of JDS Labs.
 
Looking at the front of the Element, two elements caught my eye. The first is the big, black volume knob. The second is the 1/4" headphone jack. If you look hard, you can even see that the bottom of the Element has a different finish. The top of the Element is aluminum, while the bottom is grippy soft-finish rubber to keep it from sliding around and scratching your desktop. Nice!
 
Of course the 1/4" jack means you'll need an adapter if you want to use headphones with a 3.5mm plug. No worries, just add one to your cart for an extra 99¢ making your purchase an even $350 (or $370 if your want RCA input). Or if you're like most of us, just grab an adapter from your audio junk drawer. That's what I did while testing the OMNI, which are terminated with a 3.5mm plug.
 
 
the-element-rear.jpg
Photo courtesy of JDS Labs.
 
Looking at the back of the Element, from right to left we see the USB input, RCA input, vents, gain button, power button, and adapter jack. Simple, simple, simple...
 
Connect up via USB for DAC/Amp, turn the volume knob down, push the power button, and a white LED lights up inside the Element, giving the volume knob a soft white outline. Okay, we're all ready to go. Start playing some music, turn up the volume, and start jamming. If the Element doesn't get loud enough, you can always engage high gain.
 
The only nitpicks I have from a design / functionality standpoint are that there is no visible gain indicator. Personally, I'd be happier with gain and power switches instead of buttons, although this would disrupt the Automatic DAC Line-Output functionality (where you press the power button to toggle between Headphone vs. RCA output). And I'd love to see coaxial input, so I could use one of my DAPs as a transport instead of being tied to my computer. JDS Labs has the option to add RCA output for a measly $20, but there's no option to add coaxial input which is something I really like about my Aune X1S and the iDSD Micro I've been testing out.
 
 
COMPUTER
I’m a Mac user, so for me the Element (as with pretty much every DAC/Amp I try) was plug n play. Easy peasy!
 
 
SOUND
I’m the first to admit that describing sound isn’t an easy thing to do, so I’ll try to describe this as clearly and concisely as possible. As mentioned in the introduction, I was lucky to be able to listen to the Element + ZMF OMNI pairing for a couple weeks. At the end of that time, I broke out some other gear I had around to see what I thought of those vs. the Element. The other gear was the Apogee Groove, the Aune X1S, and the iDSD Micro.
 
BASIC SOUND SIGNATURE
I found the Element to have a warm sound signature meaty bass, warm lower mids, forward upper mids, crisp treble, and good soundstage and spacial cues. It's an analog-ish, easy to get along with sound that I really enjoyed with the OMNI, but don't go in expecting a linear sound signature.
 
Element vs. X1S: Element is warmer, with more bass emphasis and impact. Element's bass feels meatier. Element's lower mids are a bit warmer. Element's upper mids are more upfront and can get a bit more forward than I'd prefer. Element's upper end a bit crisper. X1S has tighter, more neutral bass. X1S mids are are more linear. X1S upper end sounds more present and extended but smoother. Element has slightly larger soundstage and better separation.
 
Element vs. Groove: Again, Element has meatier bass and that makes the Element feel more ponderous. Mids are comparable. Groove has more forward treble that gets a bit hot for me. Groove has larger soundstage and with more air and better separation. Out of this gear, Groove sounds the most digital to my ears.
 
Element vs. iDSD micro: iDSD micro is falls between X1S and Groove. It has tighter bass vs. Element. Mids are a bit more forward vs. Element. Highs are a bit more forward than X1S but not as much as Groove. Good soundstage and separation but not as expansive as Groove. Bass boost doesn’t do too much with OMNI. 3D makes the sound more holographic but can make upper mids a bit bright for me.
 
 
SUMMARY
I enjoyed my time with the JDS Element and encourage you to check it out if you're looking for a warm yet engaging all-in-one DAC/Amp solution. I could easily see this being a good piece of gear for my office at work. I can't find much to fault with the Element. Sure, it only decodes up to 96/24 PCM files, but I don't typically listen to files with higher resolution and bitrate than that. JDS has a great blog article that explains the choices they made while designing the Element. It's an interesting read, and if you're interested in picking up the Element I suggest you head on over and take a few minutes to read the article (LINK). The major nitpick for me is that I'd really like to see a coaxial input, so I could use one of my DAPs as a transport for those times I don't have my laptop around. I'd also like to see a switch instead of a button for the gain setting to give me a tactile and visual indicator of what state the device is in. Other than that, the Element is a well-designed piece of kit that has a nice, engaging sound. Thanks again to my Head-Fi buddy for letting me take a listen to these. I appreciate it!
 
the-element-top.jpg
Photo courtesy of JDS Labs.

Music Alchemist
Music Alchemist
I'm curious what would give it a "warm" sound signature when the measured frequency response is perfectly neutral with a deviation of +/- 0.1 dB. Seems to me you may be confusing the sound of the headphone (and how it interfaces with the electronics) with the sound of the amp/DAC, since you apparently only tested it with that one headphone.
nmatheis
nmatheis
Dude, where'd the anime avatar go?!?
 
Just reporting on what I heard with the Element vs. three other DAC/Amps with the same headphones. The headphones sounded more linear with a couple of the other DAC/Amps but warmed up quite a bit with the Element. I was just testing out gear with some headfi buddies today and mentioned trying out the Element. One of the guys had also heard it and commented on how it was pretty warm / bassy. I hadn't mentioned that characteristic to him yet, so it was an unbiased comment. 
Music Alchemist
Music Alchemist
Haha. I change my avatar all the time.

Well, I think it's important to test out lots of headphones when you test out electronics like amps and DACs. I'm still curious how it would make things warmer than neutral when the frequency response is neutral. It may just be bringing out more of the natural sound of the headphones, but I dunno.

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Very nice, smooth sound. Fancy-schmany design. Pretty comfy.
Cons: Small cups. Shallow pads. Microphonic cable.

November 2016 Update

​I wanted to come back to these and let you all know that I bought my very own pair of Walnut and Silver 99 Classics at RMAF. I also had Maze send me the new, deeper pads. I'm so impressed with how Maze has responded to the community here on headfi. I'd suggested a less bling-bling design with silver instead of gold in my review, and they quickly responded. I also suggested deeper pads, and they responded to that, too. With that, the only complaint I have is with microphonics and would suggest that Maze look into putting a plasticized sheath above the y-splitter to cut down on the rubbing microphonics I get with the fabric cover. Other than that, Meze's got it nailed with these!
 
And I want to give a big shout out to Antonio and Mircea from Maze. I met them, and we chatted a bit at RMAF. Seriously cool cats!
 

 

INTRODUCTION

Okay guys, this strange introduction. When I saw the Meze 99 Classics pop up in the sponsors forum, I didn't give it that much thought. Blinged-put woodies didn't look like my thing. Then one of my Head-Fi buddies PM'ed me and asked if I was going to review them. I've reviewed a fair amount of IEM and portable source gear but am a bit of a noob with headphones, but I thought I'd at least poke around and find out what these were. Searching the forums for Meze brought up some controversial posts regarding Meze's previous headphones. Go ahead, do a search sometime and see what you find. With that information in mind, I was intrigued and figured these deserved a listen. Would they stir up more controversy? Would they be the headphone that puts Meze firmly on the map? I wanted to find out of myself, so I threw in for the review tour. For those of you too impatient to wait for the end, I'll let you know right now that while not perfect the 99 Classics are a great-sounding headphone that suits my tastes very nicely but comes with a few caveats that I'll deal with in the review.
 
ABOUT US
OUR STORY
As a team directly involved in arts and sports, we, here at Meze Headphones understand that music is not just a pastime but a way of life. Whenever we're creating or performing we're accompanied by our favorite tracks. We designed our headphones to transpose you in our world. The real wood design was specifically created to offer a warm sound, a sound that you can enjoy no matter the situation. Experience your music in a new way. Let us take you on the journey we followed, to the perfect natural sound.
 
OUR MISSION
Our mission is fairly simple: to raise the bars in terms of audio quality and design for headphones in general. We want you to feel the music you like, we want to give you the chance to enjoy that special song, just as the original artist intended it to sound. Besides offering a crisp and clear sound, our headphones will leave people wondering what is that special song that you're listening to. Allow yourself to experience music like never before, comfortably and with style.
 
OUR CUSTOMERS
Our first concern is to satisfy you, our fans and customers. Our customer support team is always looking to deliver the best solutions and answers to all of your questions. So, do not hesitate to ask us anything. We will get back to you as soon as possible. And do not forget: we're looking forward to your feedback.
 
PHILOSOPHY
MOTIVATION
Our passion for music and art is the drive behind Meze Headphones. We created our range of headphones and earphones with this aspect in mind. We created them as if for ourselves.
VALUES
Meze Headphones has stood by its values since the beginning of the company. We did not follow trends and let them influence the audio quality and design of our headphones. They are timeless objects that will not go out of style the next season. We achieved this through patience and dedication.
 
PEOPLE
The team behind Meze Headphones is a team of passionate specialists, with backgrounds in sound engineering, product design, crafting, and music.
 
TECHNOLOGY 
Since wood is the trademark of our company, we make sure that each and every pair of headphones and earphones are carefully crafted from selected lumber.
 
We chose to use only air dried walnut lumber for the spectacular colors that it can display. As a result, we have to wait up to eighteen months for the lumber to dry so that we can shape the wood into the emblematic Meze Headphones look. This is the timeframe needed only for curing and drying the lumber before any further processing can begin. We are patient because we know that the end result is worth the wait.
 
The process of shaping just a single pair of earcups takes up to 8 hours. The whole process of sanding, lacquering, and finishing lasts 45 days. We could cut corners but we take great pride in delivering the best product to our customers.
 
The craftsmanship of our headphones and earphones is paramount. The wooden components of our products are carefully inspected and no flaws are permitted to reach the final assembly. Aesthetics are as important for us as they are for you. We want you to wear a pair of Meze Headphones and know that you are enjoying a timeless art piece.
 
We are using walnut wood for its sturdiness and for its acustic qualities. Although harder to find and to work with, we chose walnut for the brighter, more balanced sound that it offers to our headphones. Simply put, it is a blend of technology, art, and nature.
 
It is well to mention that all the wood that we use in our headphones is strictly harvested from mature trees that have reached the end of their life cycles. This way, we are helping the environment and we're giving the old trees a chance to shine one more time in the shape of Meze Headphones.
 
 
LINKS OF INTEREST
Meze 99 Classics Page: LINK
Meze 99 Classics Tour Thread: LINK
Meze 99 Classics Thread: LINK
 
 

DISCLAIMER

There is no financial incentive from Meze for writing this review. I am in no way affiliated with Meze, and this is my honest opinion of the 99 Classics. I hope my feedback proves useful for my fellow Head-Fi members as well as for Meze.
 
 

ABOUT ME

I'm a 43 year old father who loves music. While I listen mostly to electronic and metal these days, I do listen to a wide variety of music - from electronic (Autechre, Boards of Canada) to modern/minimalist composition (John Cage, Philip Glass) to alternative rock (Flaming Lips, Radiohead) to jazz (John Coltrane and Miles Davis) to metal (Behemoth, King Diamond) to classic rock (Eagles, Rush).  
 
I'm primarily a portable audio enthusiast. My portable music journey started with the venerable Sony Cassette Walkman and then progressed to portable CD players, minidisc recorders (still have my Sharp DR7), and finally on to DAPs like the Rio Karma, iRiver IHP-1xx, iPod 5.5, iPhones, and the newer crop of DAPs from Fiio and iBasso.
 
Being a portable audio enthusiast, I typically listen with IEMs but am enjoying listening with full-size headphones more and more and tend to like u-shaped sound signatures, although I break out v-shaped IEM & HP from time to time for fun.
 
As with a lot of people my age, I've got some hearing issues. I've got mild tinnitus and suffer from allergies, which can affect hearing in my right ear. I'll admit it, I'm not blessed with a pair of golden ears. That said, I've been listening to portable gear for a long time and feel confident in assessing audio gear - just wanted to be transparent up front.



 
 

SPECIFICATIONS



  1. Transducer Type: Dynamic Neodymium / Mylar
  2. Transducer Size: 40mm
  3. Frequency Response: 15Hz - 25KHz
  4. Sensitivity: 103dB at 1KHz, 1mW
  5. Impedance: 32Ohm
  6. Rated Input Power: 30mW
  7. Maximum Input Power: 50mW
  8. Detachable Kevlar OFC cable
  9. Plug: 3.5mm gold plated
  10. Ear-cups: walnut or maple
  11. Weight: 290g
  12. MSRP: $309
  13. Warranty: 2 years

 
 

PACKAGING & ACCESSORIES



As usual, I'll go over the packaging and accessories in pictorial format with a wrap at the end. 
 
UNBOXING
Meze99Classics-15.jpg
 
WHAT YOU GET
  1. 99 Classics
  2. 1.2m OFC cable with microphone and Play/Pause button
  3. 3m OFC cable
  4. Airplane adapter
  5. 1/4 inch adapter
  6. Cable pouch
  7. Headphone travel case
  8. Manual
 
 

BUILD & ERGONOMICS

Again, I'll attack this section in pictorial format, commenting on what I like and what I think could be improved as I go.
 
CHOICES...
Meze99Classics-17.jpg
 
When I first saw a picture of the 99 Classics on the tour accouncement, I honestly thought they looked a bit too bling-bling. My recommendation was to replace all the gold trim with silver to tone things down a bit. Well, you know what? Meze listened, and they've now added a black/silver/walnut model to the lineup in addition to the original black/gold/walnut and white/silver/maple models.
 
 
 
MEET the Meze 99 Classics
Meze99Classics-16.jpg
 
 
CABLE
Meze99Classics-18.jpg
 
When handling the 99 Classics, it was immediately apparent that a lot of thought went into their design. Simple and elegant are words that came to mind. A bit bling-bling, yes, but that can be overcome by choosing the black/silver/walnut model. 
 
What did I like? I like the very comfortable self-adjusting suspension headband, comfortable ear pads, just right clamping force, pivoting cups, and the fact that the 99 Classics are primarily a metal + wood design held together with screws instead of glue. 
 
What did I think could be improved? I'm not a fan of the cups, which aren't wide enough and end up feeling a bit cramped and kind of like a hybrid on/over ear design. My biggest recommendation to Meze is to strongly consider using a wider cup to give our ears a bit more breathing room. My second biggest recommendation is to make the pads a bit thicker, so my ears don't touch the drivers. My third recommendation is to lose the fabric sheath above the y-splitter cable to reduce microphonics. My final recommendation is to have the cable exit at a slight angle to the front. The straight-down exit combined with the fabric sheath caused a lot of scratchy microphonics whenever the cable brushed against my shoulders. Change these while keeping the same sound, and I'm all in Meze!
 
Just a note that these don't fold flat. Didn't bother me, as I'd probably use these in the office but it might bother some of you so just be aware.
 
 
 
SOUND
Those of you who know me know that I've been listening to a lot of classic rock, electronic and metal lately. I might throw in some hard bop jazz or modern minimalist composition every now and then, too. Just wanted to make sure you know what kind of music I listen to for context. Unlike some other reviewers, I don't keep to a strict playlist (although I do have some songs I do always end up listening to). Instead, I choose songs I know well and feel like listening to. I feel it's more organic that way. I try to get at least 16/44 FLAC but don't shy away from using AAC or MP3 if that's what I've got on-hand. Anyways, on with the show, eh...
 
I listened to the 99 Classics out of various sources from my iPhone 5S, various DAPs, and the Apogee Groove. I also did some casual comparisons with my AKG K553 Pro and Philips Fidelio L1.
 
Here's the FR curve Meze threw up on their website, along with the following quote: "
Artificially tweaked frequencies: Meze's solution - Tuning a balanced natural sound"
Meze99ClassicsFR.jpg
 
So did Meze succeed in creating a balanced, natural sound? Well, I think from the introduction you can tell I thought the answer is a yes. For context, I was just coming off the HiFiMan Edition X headphones (LINK to review) when I received the Meze 99 Classics. In fact, @grizzlybeast and I swapped the 99 Classics and HEX at our usual drop off spot, which quite amused @MezeTeam who thought it sounded very Noir-ish! Anyways, back to our story. Erm, I mean review... HEX were the best headphones I've heard to date, so I was figuring I'd be underwhelmed with the 99 Classics. But when first plugging them into my iPhone 5S for a quick listen, I read liked what I heard. Nice tastefully enhanced bass that felt a bit loose. Neutral mids. Smooth as silk treble. Good (but not great) soundstage. Ahh... Very easy to listen to. Moving on to my DAPs tightened things up a bit. The punchy bass extends deep with just a slight mid-bass hump. Mids again remain neutral and sound very natural. Treble remains clear and detailed but without accentuating sibilance. Soundstage gets a bit bigger but is still constrained by the closed nature of the 99 Classics.
 
As mentioned above, I primarily listened to the 99 Classics with classic rock, electronic, and metal. I found it well-suited for those genres. Older, leaner classic rock recordings were filled out quite nicely. Bass kept up with my electronic collection pretty well, although the soundstage was a bit limiting. As far as metal, I don't listen to tech-death so can't comment on how technically capable these are for the more demanding sub-genres. However, the 99 Classics do pass my black metal test of allowing me to listen to black metal classics without feeling like my eardrums are being impaled. Score!!!
 
Compared to my AKG K553 Pro, the 99 Classics sound much more natural with more action in the lower end and less action up top. The way the 99 Classics handles things is much more to my taste and is just another nail in the coffin for my K553 Pro, which are in the For Sale forums right now should you be a neutral head who wishes to take them off my hands.
 
Compared to my Philips Fidelio L1, the 99 Classics sound much livelier with higher quality bass and increased upper mid and treble presence. I've been feeling that the L1 are too dark and veiled for my tastes for a while, and again this was the nail in the coffin. If you'd like a pair of L1, please visit the For Sale forums and take them off my hands.
 
 

SUMMARY

So, does all this mean I'm ready to sell off my lesser-used cans and buy the 99 Classics? Nope, and I'll tell you why. Despite really, really enjoying the sound, comfort, and build quality, I'm not a fan of the narrow cups. I need just a bit more room, and I've got smallish ears for a 5' 9" guy. If the ear cups were bigger and the pads a bit deeper, I can see this easily being my pair of "office cans". As mentioned above, I'd also love to see the fabric removed above the y-splitter, but this is something I could overcome with an aftermarket cable so it's not a biggie. But those cups just didn't get along well with my ears. Does that mean they won't get along with your ears? Nope. They might be perfect for you, so if you're looking for a new pair of smooth, natural sounding woodies, please give the 99 Classics a look!
 
To wrap, I'd like to give a big thanks to @MezeTeam for choosing me to participate in this tour. After this, I'm really looking forward to the next headphones from Meze!
reddog
reddog
I a great review, full of information, made for a fun read. I also like the photos.
Bansaku
Bansaku
Nice review! :)
Laura Jia
Laura Jia
Hello
I am Laura. sorry to interrupt you. Could you review our BT earphones? 
here is my email: laura@ivafee.com
I don't know how to get touch with you.
I look forward to your reply.
Best Regards,
Laura

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Smooth, fun sound with deep, powerful bass. Inexpensive for a triple hybrid.
Cons: Wide nozzles. Need third-party tips to sound their best. Discontinued :(

INTRODUCTION

I first heard of LZ-A2 from @RedJohn456 and @Hisoundfi. They were both talking about this Chinese DIY triple hybrid that had amazing bang for your buck. At that time, I was deep into the FLC8S (still am, by the way - LINK), so I didn't think too much about LZ-A2 and went about my business jamming the FLC8S. Then @peter123 joined in the LZ-A2 love-fest, and I thought to myself, "Nikolaus, you need to get yourself a listen to these LZ-A2." So I reached out to the now defunct Faith Audio and secured a pair for review. Little did I know that they would end up collectors' items, as the LZ-A2 was discontinued right after I received them. After spending some time with them, I can tell you I'm eagerly awaiting their successor, the LZ-A3 and will be updating you on them when I receive them. So just what is it that makes the LZ-A2 special? Usually triple hybrids use a dynamic for bass, a BA for mids, and another BA for the highs. However, the LZ-A2 follows the lead of some higher end IEM manufacturers in dedicating a dynamic and and BA to bass. This is the first time I've heard of a lower-end hybrid IEM using this configuration. I'll go over how that impacts the sound in the actual review.
 
I usually include a bit of information about the manufacturer but can't dig up any information on LZ, so I'm skipping that this time around. However, I am including a link to the LZ-A2 discussion thread should you find yourself interested in joining in the conversation (LINK).
 
 
 

DISCLAIMER

There is no financial incentive for writing this review, and this is my honest opinion of the LZ-A2. I hope my feedback is useful for my fellow Head-Fi members as well as for LZ.
 
 

ABOUT ME

I'm a 44 year old father who listens to a lot of electronic and metal, although I do listen to a wide variety of music. I'm primarily a portable audio enthusiast and have been in he game since the venerable Shure E2C was first released. Bought one, plugged it into one of my many MD players, and have been hooked ever since. I do enjoy listening at home and am becoming increasingly interested in building up a nice desktop setup. As with a lot of people my age, my hearing isn't perfect but I've be listening for a long time and feel confident in assessing audio gear.


 
 

SPECIFICATIONS



Drivers: 1 Dynamic + 2 BA
Impedance: 16Ω
Sensitivity: 120dB/mW
Frequency Range: 2Hz - 24kHz
Plug: 3.5mm straight plug
Cable Length: 1.2m
Weight: 25g
Price: ~$100

 
 

PACKAGING & ACCESSORIES



Since the LZ-A2 are a DIY IEM, there's no packaging. You simply get the LZ-A2 and accessories in a clamshell case.
 
LZ-A2 + ACCESSORIES
LZ-A2-6.jpg
 
LZ-A2-4.jpg
 
In all, you get LZ-A2, narrow bore single flange tips (S, M, L), medium bore double flange tips, cheap foamies, stabilizer fins, ear guides, shirt clip, and clamshell case. It'd be nice if they provided some wide bore tips because that where the magic happens with these. More later...
 
 

BUILD & ERGONOMICS

I'll attack this section in pictorial format, commenting on what I like and what I think could be improved as I go.
 
LZ-A2 WITHOUT TIPS
LZ-A2-1.jpg
 
The earpieces are aluminum with plastic nozzles that are wider than your typical IEM, making it a bit hard to tip roll. Finish isn't the best, with some rough edges here and there. Lucky they weren't in places that touched my ears. Strain reliefs are pretty short. Despite the vent hole being very exposed on the rear of the LZ-A2, it didn't make them especially prone to wind noise. That was a nice surprise. And if you look carefully, you'll see "LZ-a2" and L/R markings on the earpieces in very low-contrast text. It'd be nice if it were easier to see the L/R markings since these are a symmetrical design.
 
 
Y-SPLITTER, CINCH, 3.5MM PLUG
LZ-A2-7.jpg
 
The 3.5mm jack and y-spliter are metal with a knurled finish to make gripping them easy. The cinch is plastic and does a fine job of staying in place. The cable feels like the one used on some Vsonic IEM I've purchased in the past. It's got what feels like a silicone coating and isn't overly prone to tangling or microphonics. Again, the strain relief isn't the longest,  but I'm assuming it'll do its job just fine.
 
 
LZ-A2 SUITED UP AND READY TO ROCK!!!
LZ-A2-5.jpg
 
Here are the LZ-A2 with one of the two pairs of tips I settled on, the stock medium-bore double-flange tips. These tips were pretty comfortable, and the LZ-A2 sounded pretty good with them. That said, I ended up using a pair of wide-bore single-flange tips I had sitting around most of the time. I'll go over that later.
 
 
FIT
LZ-A2 can be worn down or over ear. I like both options and split my time 50/50. If I'm headed out, I wear them over ear. If I'm hanging out in the house, I'm more likely to wear them down. Both are comfortable for long periods for me. I can see the wide nozzles potentially causing some long-term comfort issues for those of you with small canals, though. The ear guides LZ threw in are some of the softest I've ever used. That said, as a glasses wearer, I hate ear guides with a passion and once I tested them out I put them away never to be used again.
 
 
SOUND
Those of you who know me know I listen to a lot of electronic and metal. You might even know that I've been jamming a lot of classic rock lately, as well. I typically listen to music from Autechre, Behemoth, Bjork, Candlemass, Depeche Mode, The Eagles, Fleetwood Mac, Iron Maiden, King Diamond, New Order, Rush, and Sigur Ros during my time with new gear. I might throw in some hard bop jazz or modern minimalist composition every now and then. Just wanted to make sure you know what kind of music I listen to for context. Unlike some other reviewers, I don't keep to a strict playlist. Instead, I choose songs I know well and feel like listening to. I feel it's more organic that way. Anyways, on with the show, eh...
 
When I first got the LZ-A2, I placed them on my burn-in rig with pink noise at a moderate volume for a couple days. After that, I tried them with my iPhone and the Lotoo PAW 5000 DAP I recently got in for testing. I also tried them with different tips. I'll go over that stuff in a minute. For now, I'd like to tell you what you'll be getting with LZ-A2. These are what I like to call an "audiophile fun" sound signature. You're going to get (very) extended, elevated bass, neutral-ish mids that might be just a tad recessed, and relatively smooth treble. Over in the LZ-A2 thread, these have been called anything from an L-shaped signature with flat response other than the elevated bass to a v-shape. I definitely wouldn't call them a v-shape at all. Personally, I'm hearing them as more of an L-shape. Something that always seems to come up is the need to find a pair of headphones with a similar sound signature, and these have been compared to Audeze LCD2. I haven't heard LCD2, so I can't confirm that. Looking over FR graphs for both, I can see how the comparison would be drawn, though.
 
After burning these in, I left on the stock Medium narrow-bore single-flange tips and plugged them into my iPhone and was a bit disappointed. The bass sounded boomy and sloppy. I've had this experience with my iPhone before, so I wasn't too surprised or judgmental. I didn't feel like this was a good match, so I moved on to the PAW 5000. The bass sounded a wee bit less bloated now. Better, but not perfect. So I decided to try out some other tips. First, I tried the stock Small narrow-bore single-flange tips with deeper insertion. Nope, pretty much the same for me. How about the stock medium-bore double flange tips? Yes, these are better. Bass is tamed a wee bit more but still not where I'd like it. Over on the LZ-A2 thread, people are all about the very wide-bore JVC Spiral Dot tips with LZ-A2. I don't have any of those, but I do have a lot of tips roaming around the house (kids...), so I grabbed a pair of Medium wide-bore single-flange tips and slapped those on. Yup, this is where the action is! Bass was knocked down a bit more and sounded tighter. Now I'm feeling like the bass is in better balance with the mids and treble. Nice!
 
Now even though I tamed these a bit, please don't get the idea that they're neutral nor is neutral what I was after. The goal for me was to achieve better balance while retaining the fun sound signature. I think I got there with a better source plus the wide bore tips. I've been listening to the FLC8S a lot recently. They're tunable, and I've got them set up with the maximum sub-bass filter, medium bass filter, and maximum mids + medium treble filter. In comparison with the FLC8S in that configuration, LZ-A2 definitely has increased, harder hitting bass however FLC8S has sweeter mids and is more resolving. Again, LZ-A2 proves its bombastic nature against the more refined FLC8S. FLC8S also has better spacial cues (soundstage and placement of sounds). Then again, FLC8S is one of my current favorites and costs three times as much as LZ-A2, so the fact that I'm comparing these two in such favorable terms lets you know how much bang for your buck I think you're getting with LZ-A2. 
 
I also used LZ-A2 for audiobooks and movies, and I have to tell you I really like this type of sound signature for those. The audiobooks I listen to typically have male narrators, and the LZ-A2 gives their voices a nice, rich tone that makes listening to books a real pleasure. With movies, I was genuinely shocked at the rumble coming from these bad boys. I haven't heard IEM with such deep bass extension before. I'm sure they exist in more basshead-centric IEM, but to hear that depth in such a balanced IEM was amazing.
 
Shifting back to music for a bit, I listen to metal with rapid-fire kick drums which can be hard for dynamic drivers to deal with. Sometimes they just can't keep up, and the drum hits start to blend together. Not good. The interesting thing about the LZ-A is that they've got a dynamic and a BA driver covering the bass, so bass notes have good, fast attack but don't decay super fast. It's a best of both worlds situation. So in those songs with rapid-fire kick drums, the drum hits have distinct drum hits but don't end up sounding staccato like they can with BA-only IEM. I like i!
 
Back to the mids and treble, they're pretty smooth without being overly polite. It's a nice balance that keeps the LZ-A2 fun but not exaggerated. Again, I like it!
 
 

SUMMARY

Can you tell I like these? Ignoring the price, I don't see myself choosing these over my current faves, the FLC8S. However, for the asking price and to get a more "fun" sound signature with great, quality bass without veering off into Beats territory or into v-shape land, these guys are a steal! Are they perfect? Nope, they're not. The build is okay but not fantastic. The nozzles are wider than typical IEM, making tip rolling a bit challenging while also making insertion hard for those with narrow ear canals. And you'll need to seek out some better tips to tame the bass and balance out the sound signature. In my opinion, none of these are showstoppers and be overcome pretty easily.
 
Unfortunately, the LZ-A2 are discontinued. So why am I reviewing a pair of discontinued IEM? Good question! Well, the first reason is that these push a lot of the right buttons for me. The second is that LZ is coming out with a new IEM right after the Chinese New Year holiday that looks like it'll be the LZ-A2's successor. It's called the LZ-A3, and I'm really excited to hear it. I hope after reading this and the other great reviews out there that you're excited, too. Be on the lookout for impressions and reviews of the upcoming LZ-A3 from myself and others in the next couple months. Man is it a good time to be in this hobby! 
 
To wrap, I'd like to give a big thanks to Faith Audio for providing me with a pair of LZ-A2 for review and to LZ for making such a great IEM. Keep 'em coming, LZ!
Koolpep
Koolpep
Thanks, great review!! I second your description of the sound.
Grayson73
Grayson73
Enjoyed reading your review!
Cheesedoodle
Cheesedoodle
Regarding the $160 price for the LZ-A2, that Aliexpress seller told me that she talked Lao Zhong, who makes this DIY IEM, into using his remaining inventory of LZ-A2 parts to make a few more pairs. That's why a few new pairs are occasionally popping up on Aliexpress.

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Smooth balanced sound with good soundstage. Comfortable. Very easy to drive.
Cons: Ginormous. So much plastic. Spendy.

INTRODUCTION

I'm a HiFiMan HE400 owner. They were my introduction to both planar and higher-end headphones. Yes, I know HE400 isn't really a high-end headphone, but at the time I bought them it was the most headphone or IEM I'd purchased to date. I've given the old HE400 a lot of love over the years and have recently started down the path of modding them with velpads, a Lohb suspension strap, and (soon) some Sorbothane. I'm hoping they'll take me farther into the future with a little love. So as you might be able to tell, I've got a bit of a soft spot for HiFiMan headphones. I've also taken a two-week test drive of the HE400S. While those were nice, they weren't quite what I was looking for. I wanted more than my HE400 could give me, and that wasn't the HE400S. So when I saw the Edition X tour open up, I immediately signed up. I wanted a taste of what high-end HiFiMan headphones could give me. Perhaps it would've been better if I hadn't. This experience has opened up a can of worms for me. I'll explain as we head into the review.
 
LINKS OF INTEREST
HFM HEX Page: LINK
HEX Tour Thread: LINK
HEX Thread: LINK
 
 

DISCLAIMER

There is no financial incentive from HiFiMan for writing this review. I am in no way affiliated with HiFiMan, and this is my honest opinion of the Edition X. I hope my feedback proves useful for my fellow Head-Fi members as well as for HiFiMan.
 
 

ABOUT ME

I'm a 43 year old father who loves music. While I listen mostly to electronic and metal these days, I do listen to a wide variety of music - from electronic (Autechre, Boards of Canada) to modern/minimalist composition (John Cage, Philip Glass) to alternative rock (Flaming Lips, Radiohead) to jazz (John Coltrane and Miles Davis) to metal (Behemoth, King Diamond) to classic rock (Eagles, Rush).  
 
I'm primarily a portable audio enthusiast. My portable music journey started with the venerable Sony Cassette Walkman and then progressed to portable CD players, minidisc recorders (still have my Sharp DR7), and finally on to DAPs like the Rio Karma, iRiver IHP-1xx, iPod 5.5, iPhones, and the newer crop of DAPs from Fiio and iBasso.
 
Being a portable audio enthusiast, I typically listen with IEMs but am enjoying listening with full-size headphones more and more and tend to like u-shaped sound signatures, although I break out v-shaped IEM & HP from time to time for fun.
 
As with a lot of people my age, I've got some hearing issues. I've got mild tinnitus and suffer from allergies, which can affect hearing in my right ear. I'll admit it, I'm not blessed with a pair of golden ears. That said, I've been listening to portable gear for a long time and feel confident in assessing audio gear - just wanted to be transparent up front.



 
 

SPECIFICATIONS



  1. Rated Impedance: 25Ohm (±3 Ohm)
  2. Sensitivity: 103 dB @ 1kHz 
  3. Frequency response: 8Hz - 50KHz
  4. Price: $1800

 
 

PACKAGING & ACCESSORIES



As usual, I'll go over the packaging and accessories in pictorial format with a wrap at the end. 
 
UNBOXING
HFMHEXUnboxing.jpg
 
 
WHAT YOU GET
HFMHEX-5.jpg

In all, you get HEX, one thinner/shorter cable for portable use, one thicker/longer cable for desktop use, a 1/4" adapter, and paperwork. I'd prefer they packed HEX in a more practical case instead of the giant box.
 
 

BUILD & ERGONOMICS

Again, I'll attack this section in pictorial format, commenting on what I like and what I think could be improved as I go.
 
MEET HEX
HFMHEXBuild1.jpg
 
HEX look a lot like HEK. It's a rather large headphone with unusually shaped earcups. Despite being absolutely ginormous, these extremely comfortable headphones. The suspension strap, roomy cups, and soft pads make it easy to wear HEX for long periods without discomfort. However, I'm a pretty average sized guy at 5'9", yet I had to wear HEX on the smallest setting. I can't imagine these fitting smaller people very well. And finally, I'm wishing the gimbals were metal. Maybe I'm just used to the Cold War build quality of my HE400, but these guys feel a bit fragile for $1800. I guess that's the price you pay for light weight...
 
 
HEX + CABLES
HFMHEX-10.jpg
 
Nothing too special here, I just wanted to show a picture of HEX with the cable plugged in. I'm not a fan of long, thick cables, so I used the thinner, shorter cable during my audition period. I like that the cables exit the cups at an angle instead of straight down, so the cables don't constantly rub on my shoulders. This helps minimize microphonics. I also like that the connectors are much more user-friendly than the coax-type connectors on my HE400. Those are just a PITA. The thinner, shorter cable has a 3.5mm L-plug that works with smartphone cases, which is good because you can get some damn good sound out of just an iPhone with HEX.
 
HEX vs. HE400S
HFMHEX-12.jpg
 
Just a comparative shot of a more typical HFM headphone next to HEX to give you an idea of just how roomy HEX is.
 
 
SOUND
Those of you who know me know I listen to a lot of electronic and metal. You might even know that I've been jamming a lot of classic rock lately, as well. I typically listen to music from Autechre, Behemoth, Bjork, Candlemass, Depeche Mode, The Eagles, Fleetwood Mac, Iron Maiden, King Diamond, New Order, Rush, and Sigur Ros during my time with new gear. I might throw in some hard bop jazz or modern minimalist composition every now and then. Just wanted to make sure you know what kind of music I listen to for context. Unlike some other reviewers, I don't keep to a strict playlist. Instead, I choose songs I know well and feel like listening to. I feel it's more organic that way. Anyways, on with the show, eh...
 
I listened to HEX out of various sources from my iPhone 5S to various DAPs to my Aune B1 portable amp and Aune X1S desktop DAC/Amp. I'd also like to point out that my reference for a good sounding headphone is my HE400. I'm hoping to broaden my experience with high-end headphones in the future, but for now my experience is somewhat limited. Just wanted to be transparent about that.
 
The first thing I plugged HEX into was my iPhone. I was immediately impressed. Making a high-end planar that sounds so damn good right out of my phone is some powerful voodoo. I jammed for awhile and then started plugging into different sources I had laying around. While HEX sounded a bit different with each source and better with some than others, it wasn't like I heard any night and day transformations in sound quality. In general, HEX has a smooth, balanced sound that extends well on either side but leans a bit towards the dark side. That said, I didn't feel like I was missing out on detail, HEX just wasn't using brightness to boost detail. Never did I get any accentuation of sibilance or piercing highs. While I liked this, I noticed that some others on the tour would've preferred a bit more energy up top. Male and female vocals sounded natural, never sounding out of place or getting shouty. Bass was deep and responded well when listening to electronic music. It wasn't the tightest bass I've heard, but it was very organic and enjoyable. In short, I clicked immediately with the sound and that feeling never wavered during my time with HEX.
 
I really enjoyed HEX with the Soundaware Esther Analog DAP. It has a full, warm sound that bonded immediately with HEX. It was a beautifully lush listening experience.
 
I also really enjoyed HEX with my Aune B1 and X1S. These gave HEX a more neutral, detailed cast. 
 
So depending on which way I wanted to go (lush vs. detailed), I had options. I'm sure if I had higher-end gear, HEX would respond even better.
 
Compared with my HE400, HEX had more linear bass, more present mids, and much smoother treble. HEX also had a more expansive soundstage. I'd always known HE400 didn't have an even frequency response, but I'd always felt the soundstage was quite good. HEX changed my thoughts on that pretty quickly, with wider, deeper, taller soundstage and better imaging. I can still enjoy my HE400 but am definitely left longing for what I'm missing in HEX. All that said, I recognize that I have little experience with TOTL headphones, so I might be more easily won over than some more experienced tour members.
 
 

SUMMARY

As you can probably tell, I loved a lot of things about HEX. The sound and comfort were top notch. However, I'd like to see them built to accommodate smaller heads. I had to use them on the smallest size, and my 21 year old daughter had a sizable gap between the suspension strap and the top of her head. I also have concerns about the build quality for the price HiFiMan is asking for these. Perhaps I'm just being paranoid, but I'd like to see a little more metal involved to make them at least appear more bulletproof like my good old HE400. And while I didn't experience the issues personally, I know a few of my tour mates have experienced various QC issues ranging from cups not centered between the gimbals and sound cutting out from the female connector. I'm hoping these issues are few and far between and are quickly resolved.
 
To wrap, I'd like to give a big thanks to HiFiMan for choosing me to participate in this tour. It was an enlightening experience and I must say that I miss that great HEX sound.
nmatheis
nmatheis
Hi @leobigfield. I'd love to find a pair of these used for a decent price, however I'm sadly also not in a position to buy a pair at full retail price.
Sil3nce
Sil3nce
Thanks for the honest impressions my friend.
Hope you get to hear more TOTL phones
nmatheis
nmatheis
Thanks @Sil3nce. I'm listening to ZMF OMNI right now and am quite enjoying them. I might talk to Zach...

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Superb ergonomics. Good design. Balanced sound. Good spacial cues. Tiny. Beautiful.
Cons: Lack bass impact. Hits my sensitive spot for treble. A bit on the spendy side.

jays_qjays_5_hero_low.jpg

Image courtesy of JAYS
 
 

INTRODUCTION

Hi guys. I recently got a chance to listen to the new q-JAYS courtesy of @shotgunshane and thought I'd let you know what I thought of them. Prior to this, I'd heard of JAYS but had no experience with their IEM, so I started looking into them a bit and found out I've got a bit of a tangential connection. Not really a connection to JAYS but to where JAYS come from. You see, my wife's father moved to the US from Sweden after university. My wife still has family in Sweden, and I've been to Stockholm (where JAYS are headquartered) twice since we were married. We walked all over Stockholm. I probably walked past JAYS HQ and never even knew it. I can tell you with certainty that the next time I'm over there, I'm going to make it a point to visit JAYS and see what they're cooking up for us.
 
TL/DR: For those of you too impatient to read over the whole review, I think my pros and cons mention most of the salient points. The new q-JAYS are probably the smallest, most ergonomic IEM I've ever used. They literally disappear in your ears. On top of that, they are engineered to last with all-metal construction, removable parts for easy cleaning, and detachable cables. JAYS was targeting a reference sound, and to my ears they've mostly achieved that with a balanced sound that should appeal to a lot of Head-Fi'ers. I could personally use more bass impact and decay and a bit less prominence in the upper end. I'll expand on this more in the review, but there you have the gist of it.
 
Before we move on with the review, here's a bit about JAYS:
 
Our story begins back in 2006. We had a simple idea and a big vision — to create great music experiences that everyone could enjoy and love. 

Today, we’re based in an old brewery in central Stockholm, and the heartbeat that continues to drive us forward is a relentless focus on engineering and design innovation. We believe that by humanizing innovating technology with good design, we can create memorable music experiences with an emotional impact. 

Our promise to you is a steadfast commitment to design and engineering excellence and a rigorous attention to details. To deliver on that promise means we have to stay true to our core value of simplicity in everything we do, in order to make products that are beautiful, easy to use and are built to last. 

Of course, producing quality products requires more than just quality materials — it requires highly-skilled and passionate team members with the ability and experience to ensure that every detail on every finished product comes out precisely as intended. 

Our team here at JAYS is a dedicated group engineers and designers who believe that there’s only one way to properly build a great product — to do it one detail at a time. From the unboxing experience to your everyday comfort using our products, we assure you that every detail has been carefully considered and improved by us over the years.

It’s always gratifying to be recognized for your hard work in the form of awards. But what we love and enjoy the most is creating experiences and products you will enjoy for long. We owe a huge thank you to our community for joining us on this amazing journey, and we hope that you will continue to be a part of our story.

LINKS OF INTEREST
JAYS q-JAYS page: LINK
q-JAYS threads: LINK, LINK
 
 

DISCLAIMER

There is no financial incentive from JAYS for writing this review. I am in no way affiliated with JAYS, and this is my honest opinion of the q-JAYS. I hope my feedback proves useful for my fellow Head-Fi members as well as for JAYS.
 
 

ABOUT ME

I'm a 43 year old father who loves music. While I listen mostly to electronic and metal these days, I do listen to a wide variety of music - from electronic (Autechre, Boards of Canada) to modern/minimalist composition (John Cage, Philip Glass) to alternative rock (Flaming Lips, Radiohead) to jazz (John Coltrane and Miles Davis) to metal (Behemoth, King Diamond) to classic rock (Eagles, Rush).  
 
I'm primarily a portable audio enthusiast. My portable music journey started with the venerable Sony Cassette Walkman and then progressed to portable CD players, minidisc recorders (still have my Sharp DR7), and finally on to DAPs like the Rio Karma, iRiver IHP-1xx, iPod 5.5, iPhones, and the newer crop of DAPs from Fiio and iBasso.
 
Being a portable audio enthusiast, I typically listen with IEMs but am enjoying listening with full-size headphones more and more and tend to like u-shaped sound signatures, although I break out v-shaped IEM & HP from time to time for fun.
 
As with a lot of people my age, I've got some hearing issues. I've got mild tinnitus and suffer from allergies, which can affect hearing in my right ear. I'll admit it, I'm not blessed with a pair of golden ears. That said, I've been listening to portable gear for a long time and feel confident in assessing audio gear - just wanted to be transparent up front.



 
 

SPECIFICATIONS



  1. Driver unit: Custom Dual Balanced Armature
  2. Rated Impedance: 50 Ohm @ 1kHz 
  3. Sensitivity: 103 dB @ 1kHz 
  4. Frequency response: 5Hz - 20KHz (8Hz - 16kHz ± 5dB)
  5. Plug: 3.5mm gold-plated L-plug 
  6. Cable: Detachable 1.2 m Kevlar cable with custom threaded SSMCX
  7. Price: $400

 
 

PACKAGING & ACCESSORIES



As usual, I'll go over the packaging and accessories in pictorial format with a wrap at the end. 
 
Front of outer sleeve
Q-Jays-1.jpg
 
 
Back of outer sleeve
Q-Jays-2.jpg
 
 
Inner sleeve
Q-Jays-3.jpg
 
 
The actual box with a thick, heavy, beautiful user manual
Q-Jays-4.jpg
 
 
Lift up the user manual to reveal yet more unboxing opportunities
Q-Jays-5.jpg
 
 
Looks like someone at JAYS took some LEAN coursework
Q-Jays-7.jpg
 
 
Here are all the goodies
Q-Jays-8.jpg
 
In the "About Us" information up above, JAYS mentioned paying attention to details. I think the unboxing experience proves that point quite nicely. As I was unboxing the q-JAYS, it struck me that JAYS out-Appled Apple. Very classy!
 
I like that JAYS included four sizes of silicone tips to ensure their customers could find just the right size, although I ended up not using the included silicone tips for reasons I'll cover later. It's nice that they include a pair of comply tips because I found these a better match for me. The included screw-top carry case is made of tough matte black plastic. What else? Hmm, not that you'll use them often but q-JAYS even includes connector covers to place over the threaded SSMCX connectors when they're detached. Again, JAYS has those small details covered.
 
 

BUILD & ERGONOMICS

Again, I'll attack this section in pictorial format, commenting on what I like and what I think could be improved as I go.
 
q-JAYS Schematic
jays_qjays_3_reference_low.jpg
Image courtesy of JAYS
 
Just for fun before we get rolling, here's a picture of the disassembled JAYS. One thing I'd like to call out in this picture is the small grey line on the right male MMSXC connector. That's the only marking JAYS provides to distinguish Left from Right with the q-JAYS. Very minimalist! I don't think that's an issue, because it's pretty apparent how they're supposed to fit in your ears.
 
 
q-JAYS with Medium Comply tip as a size reference
Q-Jays-9.jpg
 
Wow, they're really small. I hope putting them right next to a medium Comply tip helps put just how small the q-JAYS are into perspective. This view also gives you a pretty good look at the female connector and right above that we see a vent hole. This isn't typical on BA IEM, and I'm left wondering if it's more for equalizing pressure. In any case, the vent hole is well positioned to avoid wind noise, which is highly appreciated. I also like the powder coat finish, which provides a nice textured surface to grip when inserting and removing the q-JAYS.
 
 
Removable debris / wax guard
Q-Jays-10.jpg
 
Rather than simply use adhesive or a clip to attach a mesh debris / wax guard, JAYS includes a removable perforated end cap so you can clean it thoroughly. Just unscrew it, wash, dry, and replace. Easy-peasy. It is very small though, so make sure you don't lose them down the drain!
 
 
Close-up of connectors
Q-Jays-11.jpg
 
Here you get a nice close-up of the connectors and strain relief. I like this implementation. It's a quick, easy, and secure. No worries about friction fit connectors degrading over time, either. And because they're detachable, you can connect the cable to either earpiece to ensure you have the correct channels when worn down or over ear. I really like that because it's pretty disconcerting when you go from wearing an IEM down to wearing them up and critical elements in your music are all of a sudden coming from the wrong ear.
 
 
Cinch, Y-Splitter, L-Plug
Q-Jays-13.jpg
 
As with the earpieces, JAYS decided to go small with the cable. Not by making it short, but by making it thin and supple with Kevlar reinforcement to increase toughness. It isn't very susceptible to microphonics, either. The only concern I have is finding aftermarket cables with the threaded SSMCX connectors, which doesn't seem to be very common. Maybe I'm just not looking in the right places. So if you like to swap cables, take that into account. As with the earpiece strain reliefs, the remaining stain reliefs on the cable are well done. Not much to fault with the cable, but I will say that the thinness will shock you at first. You'll probably think that you'll shred the cable in no time. Just remember that it's Kevlar reinforced You'll be fine.
 
 
q-JAYS all suited up and ready for battle!!!
Q-Jays-15.jpg
 
Again, note just how small the q-JAYS are in comparison to the Comply tips. Simply amazing!
 
I usually put in some pics of how IEM look worn down vs. up, but I totally forgot to do that this time. Sorry about that. But I can tell you that since these are easily one of the smallest IEM you'll run across, they simply disappear in your ears when worn either way. So if you're contemplating purchasing the q-JAYS, rest assured you'll get a good, comfortable fit either way. Just to drive the point home, I let my 21yo daughter try these out. She's got small ears and has comfort issues with most of the IEM I let her try out. Not with q-JAYS. She said these were the most comfortable IEM I'd ever forced her to try out.
 
To sum up, with q-JAYS you'll be getting a small, highly-ergonomic IEM that's built to last. And even though the cable may seem like a weak point at first glance, you just need to move past that because it's built to be tough with Kevlar reinforcement and good strain reliefs. But tough doesn't mean stiff and microphonic. Quite the contrary, the cable is supple and microphonics are controlled very well. If ergonomics, build quality, and looks were all that needed to be considered, then q-JAYS win. Game over. No questions asked in my mind. Going back to q-JAYS "About Us" information, they just killed it with the attention to detail put into these. BRAVO!!!
 
But that's not all there is, is it. Of course, you need excellent sound to match, so let's see what I think of the sound...
 
 
SOUND
Those of you who know me know I listen to a lot of electronic and metal. You might even know that I've been jamming a lot of classic rock lately, as well. I typically listen to music from Autechre, Behemoth, Bjork, Candlemass, Depeche Mode, The Eagles, Fleetwood Mac, Iron Maiden, King Diamond, New Order, Rush, and Sigur Ros during my time with new gear. I might throw in some hard bop jazz or modern minimalist composition every now and then. Just wanted to make sure you know what kind of music I listen to for context. Unlike some other reviewers, I don't keep to a strict playlist. Instead, I choose songs I know well and feel like listening to. I feel it's more organic that way. Anyways, on with the show, eh...
 
JAYS was targeting a balanced, reference sound for the new q-JAYS. Balanced and reference mean different things to different people. To me, a balanced sound signature is a u-shaped sound. Give me a bit of low and high end emphasis. A bit more low end emphasis than upper end emphasis because I don't want the sound to get harsh. To me, a reference sound signature is flat. This is the WYSIWYG sound signature, and I honestly I'm not too fond of it. A lot of my music lives in the low end, and reference tuning just doesn't provide me with enough bass quantity to be satisfying. So with this in mind, where do the q-JAYS come out? I'd say they come out somewhere in the middle ground between how I see balanced and reference.
 
Before describing the sound signature, I want to mention that q-JAYS provide very good spatial cues. Soundstage is expansive, and it's easy to pinpoint sounds as they appear in headspace. I was impressed with this aspect of the q-JAYS. 
 
On with describing the sound signature. q-JAYS do have a slight bass lift. They also have some added emphasis up top. To my ears, the emphasis up top outweighs the low end emphasis. Depending on your point of view, this could either be a good or bad thing. For me, I found myself wanting more bass quantity. What was there was good and well-extended, no doubt about that. I just wanted more of it. The mids are nicely present and balanced very well from top to bottom. q-JAYS won't ever give you shouty mids. The upper end. Yes, that upper end. Some will love it and feel it's well-balanced with the rest of the sound signature. Unfortunately, it hit my sensitive spot in the upper region. The q-JAYS are also a quick-sounding IEM with fast attack and decay. This attribute combined with hitting my sensitive spot in the upper region made drum hits sound overly sharp, cymbals crashes turned harsh, and I got pronounced sibilance / hiss after S and T sounds. While some would argue that these are all present in the recording and that the q-JAYS are just doing their job as a reference IEM, I have other IEM that provide plenty of detail retrieval without this issue. So this led me to seek out remedies. The obvious route was tip rolling, and I'll go over that in a bit, but before that there was one suggestion I thought I'd try first.
 
The first suggestion for decreasing sibilance was to use an impedance adapter. I actually happen to have a couple of those laying around and gave that a shot. I tried both my 75 Ohm and 100 Ohm impedance adapters and didn't hear a difference between those two. I did hear a definite difference between the stock sound and the sound using the impedance adapters, and it wasn't for me. Using the impedance adapters did drop down the sound in the upper end, making that more comfortable for me. However, it also decreased bass quantity. Since that was one of my nitpicks with the sound, using the impedance adapters was a double-edged sword in that it solved one nitpick at the expense of accentuating the other. It was a good suggestion that made an audible difference. It just wasn't for me, so I moved on to testing out different tips.
 
Speaking of tips, I didn't get on with the included silicone tips. While they were comfortable and provided a good fit, they had the lowest bass emphasis and were the worst offenders for highlighting sibilance out of all the tips I tried. Switching to the Comply tips started to balance out the sound a bit more toward my preferences. Bass was a bit more emphasized and sibilance wasn't as highlighted. I still wasn't quite there, though. Since I had a good idea of where these needed to be to fit my tastes, I broke out the Ostry tuning tips. If you haven't seen these before, there are three Ostry tuning tips which affect bass and the sibilance area to varying degrees. Ostry 100 tips simply reduce sibilance a bit. Not bad, but not quite there yet. Ostry 200 tips reduce sibilance and add a slight bass boost. Better. Ostry 300 reduce sibilance and boost the bass a bit more. Again, better. Out of all the tips I tried, I liked the Ostry 200 and 300 tips the best. But, and this is a big but, the q-JAYS nozzle has a very small diameter so the Ostry (and most other tips) simply won't fit securely on the q-JAYS nozzle. Sure, you can put them on, but they'll end up coming off in your ear. Not ideal.
 
My final experiment was to try out an EQ correction curve. Using a 30-band EQ, I added a bit of a low end boost (+2dB @ 20Hz -> 0dB @ 160dB). This added a bit more warmth and punch down low. I also added a bit of upper end cut (-2dB @ 6.3kHz, -4dB @ 8kHz). This reduced sibilance, and gave percussion a less sharp and more natural tone. If your tastes are similar to mine and you're not afraid of using EQ, this is a good alternative (or supplement) to tip rolling.
 
If you're interested in taking a look, I'm including some rough listening notes I took with the q-JAYS and a few other IEM. The main IEM I used for comparison were the 3-BA Empire Ears Cerberus and the triple-hybrid FLC8S configured with one of my favorite tunings (Red-Grey-Gunmetal). Cerberus costs a fair amount more than the q-Jays, while the FLC8S cost a little less. I also threw in the double-hybrid Trinity Delta with the Gunmetal filter and the triple-hybrid LZ-A2 for the first song, which is one of my faves. These both cost significantly less than the IEM I used for the rest of the retesting. The listening was all out of my iBasso DX90, which has very fine volume control. I set the q-JAYS to a comfortable listening level and then volume matched the other IEM as closely as possible using my Dayton IMM-06 calibrated mic with results in the table directly below. 
 
DX90 + 1kHz FLAC test tone
q-JAYS: 185 = 83.7dB
Cerberus: 158 = 83.6dB
FLC8S: 167 = 83.6dB
A200: 188 = 83.7dB
Delta: 188 = 83.7dB
LZ-A2: 177 = 83.7dB
 
Bjork - Crystalline
Q-Jays: Sibilance accentuated making a high-pitched hissy noise at the end of s and t sounds. Bass not as present as I’d like making it sound soft. Bjork’s voice isn’t as full as I’d prefer. Cymbals sound sharp. Great sense of space and spacial cues. Sounds quick.
FLC8S: Sibilance still present but not as accentuated. More bass impact and presence - more to my preference. Smoother treble. Good sense of space and spacial cues. Not as quick but more organic.
Cerberus: Sibilance is minimal to not present. Most bass presence and seems like a bit of a mid-bass bump making it the punchiest. Upper mid boost makes Bjork’s voice a bit nasal. Treble is more present than FLC8S but is still relatively smooth. Best sense of space and spacial cues of the bunch.
A200: Obviously v-shaped with more powerful bass and scooped lower mids. Lacks sub-bass extension. Upper mids more present making Bjork’s voice stand out in the mix but not overly shouty. Surprisingly the high end isn’t as sharp. Drums and cymbals are more listenable. Sibilance is still present but not as pronounced. Good sense of space and spacial cues but not as good as q-JAYS.
Delta + Gunmetal Filters: Moar bass!!! Wow, a bit much mid-bass here Bjork’s voice is a touch softer than with A200 - just about right for me. Upper end is crisp and clear without being harsh. Sibilance is minimized. Good sense of space and spacial cues but not as good as q-JAYS. 
LZ-A2: Sibilance is present but minimized. Bjork’s voice is pretty neutral in the mix and a bit dry. Percussion sounds natural. Quite a bit of bass presence here similar to Delta but more linear. Sense of space is good but again not as good as q-JAYS.
 
The Eagles - Take It Easy
Q-Jays: Sibilance is back on s and t. Upper register guitar and cymbals sound a bit hot / crispy. Bass is again a bit softer than I’d like. Vocals are a bit thin. Banjo at the end is very clear and present but a bit sharp.
FLC8S: Still has sibilance but again not as accentuated. Upper guitar and cymbals more laid back. Bass is more present in the mix. Vocals are richer. Banjo at the end is present in the mix but not as clear and sharp.
Cerberus: Wow, the opening guitars are much more present here. Most sibilance is gone with Cerberus. Vocals are the most present with Cerberus but get a bit shouty in the upper register. Upper register guitar and cymbals get lost behind the rhythm guitar and vocals. Bass is a bit much for this song. Banjo at the end is between FLC8S and q-JAYS for clarity but isn’t sharp.
 
Rush - Tom Sawyer
Q-Jays: Opening lacks power. Drums and cymbals sound sharp. Upper register guitar sounds etched. Geddy sounds a bit thin. Very quick drums. Good sense of space and spacial cues like drums panning and synth spreading down and out to the sides.
FLC8S: Good punch at the beginning. Drums and cymbals sound less sharp and more natural. Upper register guitar a still etched but a bit less so. Good sense of space and spacial cues but definitely not as open as q-JAYS. Geddy sounds less thin. Bass line is fuller.
Cerberus: Wow, the opening has the power needed as well as a great sense of space and depth to it that the other two don’t have. Guitars are a bit more forward than I’d prefer. Bass line is great. Geddy sounds right between the other two. Drums and cymbals sound very natural but cymbals tend to get lost behind the guitars. The sense of space is great here.
 
Nile - Unas, Slayer of the Gods
Q-Jays: Pretty good sense of space but soft and lacking the timbre found in Cerberus. There are a bunch of cymbals right after the opening that sound like my ears are being shredded - so hissy. Cymbals are way too sharp and over-emphasized. I’m getting quite a bit of sibilance in Karl’s vocals on t’s and ending s’s. Vocals are most present with these. Rapid-fire drums sound unsubstantial. The downtuned electric guitars however sound pretty damn good here. Could use more bass presence to keep the song chugging along, though.
FLC8S: Good space and timbre - better than q-JAYS but not as good as Cerberus. Cymbals are still hot but don’t stand out over everything like with q-JAYS. A bit of sibilance but not as much of an issue here. Guitars sound spot on. Bass presence is very good for this song. Rapid-fire drums sound very natural and don’t blur. Vocals could be more present.
Cerberus: Oh! My! God! The sense of space and timbre in the opening acoustic guitar is just amazing! But again, guitars are a bit more present than I’d prefer. Vocals are getting lost. Bass is nice and weighty for the chugging parts of the song. Keeps up very nicely with the rapid-fire drumming without sounding sharp and machinegun-like.
 
Fleetwood Mac - Dreams
Q-Jays: Good sense of space and spacial cues. Sibilance is accentuated. Drums and cymbals sound a bit sharp. Stevie’s voice is nicely present. Bassline is a bit too light for me.
FLC8S: Bassline is much more full but some might find it a bit much for this song. Sibilance is more under control. Stevie’s voice is more intimate. Cymbals and drums sound less sharp and more natural. Spacial cues are good but these aren’t as open and airy as q-JAYS.
Cerberus: Nice full baseline. As with q-JAYS, Stevie’s voice is very present but can get pretty shouty at times. Guitars can be a bit much. Drums and cymbals sound natural but cymbals tend to get lost in the mix. Great sense of space and spacial cues.
 
I've skimmed some of the other reviews and impressions. Some have said the q-JAYS sound warm and full. Some have said it sounds neutral. Some have said it lacks bass and sounds bright. I think it's all context. I've been listening to some IEM that sound fuller and warmer recently, so for me the q-JAYS sounded a bit thin. Add the issues I experienced with sibilance, and q-JAYS came across sounding a bit bright to me. For those of you who prefer warm, full, bassy IEM, you're going to find these lacking. For those of you who crave a reference sound, q-JAYS will sound just a bit on the warm side. And for those of you who like a bright analytical sound, these will sound a bit warmer still and might not be your cup of tea. 
 
 

SUMMARY

As you can probably tell, I've got mixed feelings about the q-JAYS. On the one hand, they're incredibly ergonomic and amazingly well-built. They're just about the perfect size and shape for a pair of IEM, in my opinion. The attention to details is amazing, from the unboxing experience to little (yet important) things like a removable debris / wax filter. On the other hand, the sound just wasn't for me. Was it bad? No, it just wasn't quite what I was looking for. If there was a bit more bass impact and presence and the upper end didn't really tickle my sibilance sensitivity zone, I'd be giving these a higher rating. However, I have no doubt that many a Head-Fi member will really enjoy these. I'm eagerly awaiting the next iteration of the q-JAYS with great anticipation. And the next time I'm in Stockholm, I'm going to make a point to drop by JAYS and say hi.
 
To wrap, I'd like to @shotgunshane for loaning these to me for a listen!

shane55
shane55
Nice review, my friend.
I enjoy the brightness, and while they could use a wee bit more bass impact, their natural and very neutral sound appealed to me very much.
nmatheis
nmatheis
Thanks, guys. I'm looking forward to my next visit to Stockholm. I'm actually going to make a point to visit JAYS.
nmatheis
nmatheis
FYI: I'm going to be getting these in soonish for another quick listen to try deep insertion in the hopes that will give me a more agreeable listening experience. If so, I'll update the review accordingly.

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Beautiful warm sound. Small form factor. All-metal build. 2 mSD slots. L, M, H Gain options.
Cons: Quirky UI. No gapless. Poor battery management. Output impedance.
*** SEPTEMBER 2016 UPDATE: SOUNDAWARE M1PRO ***

Thanks to Mary at Soundaware, I recently had the opportunity to audition the Soundaware Esther M1Pro. I thought it would make sense to update my original review of the Esther Analog since there are so many similarities. The user interface is identical to the original, so please refer to the main review below and watch the UI video I uploaded to get a good feel for how the M1Pro works. It's still a very basic user interface that lacks amenities found in DAPs from AK, Cayin, FiiO, iBasso, Shanling, etc. Despite that, it is ultimately quite useable. Maintaining a highly-organized music library is a must, as Esther relies on folder browsing. If you're a tag browser kind of person, please consider yourself forewarned!

 

When it comes to playing music, I'm still missing gapless. I have a lot of albums that flow seamlessly from one song to the next, and the M1Pro (as with Esther Analog) leaves a noticeable gap. This can be overcome by conjoining songs into one track, but that's not a solution I'm interested in pursuing no matter the sound quality. I'm also still hearing the slight fade out as songs end that I don't get with other DAPs.

 

Basic sound with my dynamic driver IEM and HE400 planar headphones is great. It's reminiscent of Esther Analog (again, please refer to the original review below) but with wider soundstage, tighter and more impactful bass, more prominent upper mids, and more shimmery highs. Very nice. This is a sound I could just sit an immerse myself in. However, the 10 Ohm output impedance is definitely altering frequency response for the multi-BA IEM I tested. My Campfire Audio Nova had noticeable decrease in bass and corresponding increase in upper mids. This made them sound leaner and more aggressive than with other DAPs I've used. Some might enjoy this, as it can make warmer multi-BA IEM sound more resolving. However, doing this by altering the overall frequency response doesn't allow one to enjoy the tuning the manufacturer intended. For this reason, this is something I hope can be resolved with future soundaware DAPs. In particular, I'm hoping the beautiful new MR2 DAP that's soon to be released will have a lower output impedance. Less than 1 Ohm would be ideal. 

 

For comparison, I listened to the same tracks with various DAPs and ended up liking PAW Gold > M1 Pro > M1 Analog / Shanling M5 > Cayin N5. M1Pro is indeed one of the better DAPs I've had the pleasure to listen to, and at $6-700 puts the Lotoo PAW Gold to shame in the "bang for your buck" department. However I'd end up choosing Shanling M5 over either M1 for two main reasons. First, I don't want frequency response to be altered for my multi-BA IEM due to high output impedance. Second, I really need gapless to just work. In addition, the user interface on the Shanling M5 is one of the more bulletproof I've used in a Chinese DAP. 

 

Regarding gain settings, low gain is sufficient for the various IEM I used. I was able to keep volume at high settings in low gain to try and make best use of the DAC as per Soundaware's recommendations. Only with my HE400 did I raise the gain setting up to high gain.

 

One final point that needs mentioning is battery drain during sleep mode, which is much higher than I've seen with other DAPs. It's always shocking to listen in the evening and then come back the next morning and see 10% or more knocked off the battery percentage.

 

From my experience with other DAPs, I'd think that a lot of what I find lacking in M1Pro could be resolved with FW updates. However, I'm not sure Soundaware has the bandwidth to fix everything, and there could be hardware limitations I'm not aware of. Ultimately, I'd say that potential buyers (as always) should read over the review, strongly consider whether the M1Pro meets all of your needs, and make an informed decision. If it were based solely on sound, I'd give the M1Pro a very strong recommendation. However, I'm primarily an IEM user and have several pairs of multi-BA IEM I like to use with DAPs, so the 10 Ohm output impedance would be a major factor in my personal decision making process as would the lack of gapless support.  


 


 

 

INTRODUCTION

I've said it before, and I'll say it again here. I've been very lucky to hear many great-sounding DAPs this year. This product category continues to explode at an increasing rate. Everyone's coming out of the woodwork to carve out their own space in the DAP market, and they want to get their product out quickly. Sometimes I fear they push out their product a bit too quickly. Today, I'm here to tell you about such a product, the Soundaware M2 Esther Analog. Amongst all the reviews I've written, I think this is the one I'm the most conflicted about. On the one hand, I'm in love with the sound. It's absolutely gorgeous. Warm, full, gentle and yet full of detail. I also like the build. It's a nice, small, lightweight all-metal design. On the other hand, there are some engineering choices from both hardware and software standpoints that let the Esther down. High output impedance, lack of gapless support, and very quirky battery management are some of the issues you'll contend with should you choose to use Esther Analog with the current firmware (V1.0.046). So I'll just say right now before I proceed with this review that Esther Analog, like the Aune M2 (LINK to review), is a reserved recommendation at this point in time. If the firmware issues I take issue with are resolved, I'll revisit this review and update my rating accordingly. And I'm very happy to tell you that Soundaware's representative on Head-Fi has been very receptive to my constructive criticism. Okay, enough of the introduction type stuff, let's get on with the show, shall we?
 
Before we start, here's a bit of information about Soundaware from their website:
 
SOUNDAWARE Audio Co. Ltd. is a high-tech company founded in 2011, located in the national high- tech development district of Nanjing, which is a famous historical and cultural city in China. 
 
SOUNDAWARE is specialized in the design of chip, digital audio processing, audio power technology and operating system etc. Based on our strong background and rich experience in the field of high-fidelity audio playback, we have independently developed the FPGA logic, hardware architecture, schema etc. The whole architecture of high-fidelity digital audio playback has achieved the national patent. We are the only company who has the patent in China. Based on our patented high-fidelity digital audio playback technology, we apply the developed playback chips, modules, architecture to our products, which have excellent playback effects and have gained amazed reputation from the market.
 
SOUNDAWARE is aimed at promoting high-fidelity streaming audio playback, providing advanced high-fidelity digital audio & video playback solutions and high fidelity home & portable products. Besides, customized leading chips, modules, and overall solutions are supplied to cooperated partners. We have built R&D cooperation relationship with internet company and chips manufactures.
 
LINK to Soundaware's English website.
LINK to Esther User Manual.
LINK to "best practices" for squeezing the best sound out of Esther.
LINK to the Soundaware Esther thread.
 
 
DISCLAIMER

I was provided the Esther Analog as a review loaner. There is no financial incentive from Soundaware for writing this review. I am in no way affiliated with Soundaware, and this is my honest opinion of the Esther Analog. I would like to thank Mary at Soundaware for providing a review loaner and also for her patience, as I've taken far longer with this review than I originally intended. Thanks for your understanding, Mary!
 
 
ABOUT ME

I'm a 43 year old father who loves music.  From electronic (Autechre, Boards of Canada) to modern/minimalist composition (John Cage, Philip Glass) to alternative rock (Flaming Lips, Radiohead) to jazz (John Coltrane and Miles Davis) to metal (Behemoth, King Diamond) to classic rock (Eagles, Rush), I listen to a wide variety of genres and artists. 
 
My portable music journey started with the venerable Sony Cassette Walkman and then progressed to portable CD players, minidisc recorders (still have my Sharp DR7), and finally on to DAPs like the Rio Karma, iRiver IHP-1xx, iPod 5.5, iPhones, and the newer crop of DAPs from Fiio and iBasso. 
 
I typically listen with IEMs from my ever-growing collection from budget to mid-fi. Less often, I grab a pair of full-size cans. While I've had the Soundaware Esther Analog, I've been lucky to also have some other great gear to test out. In addition to my HiFiMan HE400, I also got to try out the HiFiMan Edition X. For IEM, I've been testing out FLC8S (LINK to review) and the Empire Ears lineup. And of course, I've used my trusty VE Zen 2.0 earbuds (LINK to review). I do have a lot of other gear, though. You can always check my profile for a reasonably up to date gear list. 
 
As with a lot of people my age, I've got some hearing issues. I've got mild tinnitus and suffer from allergies, which often affect hearing in my right ear. I'll admit it, I'm not blessed with a pair of golden ears. That said, I've been listening to portable gear for a long time and feel confident in assessing audio gear. I just wanted to be transparent up front. 
 
 
SPECIFICATIONS 

Specs.png

PRICE: $557.49 shipped on Amazon (LINK)
 
 
PACKAGING & ACCESSORIES

As usual, I'll go over the packaging and accessories in pictorial fashion below
 
Classy box
SoundawareEstherAnalog-1.jpg
 
Model Information
SoundawareEstherAnalog-2.jpg

As can be seen here, Esther comes in two versions: Analog and Vitality. Analog has a warm, full, smooth sound. Vitality is the more modern / conventional sound. Color choices are grey or white (Glacier).
 
Opening the box
SoundawareEstherAnalog-3.jpg

The first thing you see when you open the box is the Warranty Card and an actual physical User Manual.
 
Esther revealed
SoundawareEstherAnalog-4.jpg

 
Esther plus accessories
SoundawareEstherAnalog-5.jpg

In all, you get Esther, a USB cable + wall charger, and card reader. I also got a 16Gb Samsung mSD card loaded with some sample music, although I'm not sure if the retail version comes with a card. No big deal though, since we DAP fanatics have plenty of mSD cards around. Conspicuously missing is a case of any sort. As you'll see later, Esther is vented for cooling and I think this might be part of the reason there's no case. At least including a carry pouch would've nice. I've been using the FiiO HS7 semi-hard case to store Esther in during my evaluation period. I'd recommend something similar should you choose to purchase an Esther for yourself. Also conspicuously missing is a coaxial cable, which would be nice because Esther uses a different tip configuration than my other DAPs.
 
 
BUILD & ERGONOMICS

As usual, I'll go over the build and ergonomics in pictorial fashion below, pointing out what I like and what I think could be improved. 
 
FRONT
SoundawareEstherAnalog-6.jpg

This is where most of the action is. Over on the left are the Return button at the top and the Menu button on the bottom. On the right are transport and menu navigation controls. At the top is the color screen. Like the FiiO X5 and X7, the screen isn't flush with the surface. I'd like to see this changed in future iterations, making it sleeker and less prone to accidental damage. Unless there's some practical reason I'm not aware of, I'd also recommend the front of the player be smooth instead of having a "terraced" finish on the left side by the Return and Menu buttons.
 
The case is metal with good fit and finish. Buttons are placed perfectly, leaving absolutely no gaps. This adds to the feeling of quality. I like the button-driven operation but would recommend the transport control buttons were a bit more spread out. During blind operation, I did find myself pressing the wrong buttons occasionally as my fingers easily slid over the whole array.
 
REAR
SoundawareEstherAnalog-7.jpg

The usual info is on the back. The "sinogram" near the bottom indicates that this is the Analog version. I like the chamfered edges, which make Esther very comfortable in your hand. 
 
BOTTOM & TOP EDGES
SoundawareEstherAnalog-13.jpg

Top: From left to right, we see the Headphone Out, Line Out, and Coaxial Out. I'm no Coaxial Out expert, but I sure wish Soundaware included a coaxial cable with the appropriate configuration because this doesn't work with any of the coaxial cables that come with my other DAPs. Inconvenient!
 
Bottom: Micro USB data + charging port on the left and 2 x mSD slots on the right with cover. While I really like this stacked mSD implementation because it saves space, it could use a better guidance system. The mSD cards can go in at an off-angle instead of just going in straight on. It's not that big of a deal, as all you do is have to reposition the mSD card. I just haven't run into this issue with other DAPs. The mSD slot cover is a bit floppy and comes out of place easier than I'd like. I prefer a bit more rigid cover like those on the FiiO X5 and Cayin N5. That said, the cover does its job. Not a major complaint. Just a couple minor nitpicks.
 
RIGHT & LEFT EDGES
SoundawareEstherAnalog-14.jpg

Left: From top to bottom, there's the lock switch and some vent holes. Speaking of Lock Mode, it locks out all of the front buttons, leaving just the power / screen button and volume rocker active. So you can adjust he volume and get a quick peek at what's currently playing when in Lock Mode.
 
Right: From top to bottom, there's the power / screen button, volume rocker, vent holes, and hard reset pinhole.
 
Okay, your tour of Esther is compete. You've seen it all...
 
What did I like? Well, the button layout is pretty good. The side buttons are where your thumb and index or middle finger will naturally rest. A quick shift over, and the buttons on the front face are easily accessible by your thumb. The volume rocker and power / screen button have a good solid click to them, meaning you're not likely to make accidental button presses. The fit and finish are nice as is the size, which reminds me of my iPhone 4s with an Otterbox case. Two mSD are much appreciated, as are dedicated HO, LO, and CO jacks.
 
What could be improved? The front buttons are oddly shaped, a bit close together, and a bit mushy. You'll want to make good use out of the hold switch to ensure you're not skipping tracks accidentally when Esther is in your pocket or a bag. When you do have it locked, there's no way to skip tracks. You can only adjust the volume, activate / deactivate the screen, and power down Esther. It would be much appreciated if a long press on volume up / down allowed you to skip tracks like on some of the other DAPs I've tested. The printed text is very low contrast, so you'll have a hard time reading it in poor lighting or at off angles. I'm a big fan of high-contrast text and would suggest a change here. Luckily, you'll memorize the button layout pretty quickly, so you don't really need to look at the text very often anyway. And finally, some internal guides to ensure you don't insert mSD cards at an off angle would be appreciated.
 
 
UNBOXING VIDEO
0.jpg


That's probably the first unboxing video I shot, so please excuse the very rough production values.

 
 
GUI / FIRMWARE

Esther is Soundaware's first DAP. Instead of going the Ingenic route as Cayin, FiiO, and Shanling went, Soundaware decided to create their firmware from scratch. While this means they could tailor the firmware completely to suit their needs, it also means they had quite a challenge ahead of them. As pointed out in the introduction, this is the area where Soundaware needs to spend the most time improving Esther. I'll go over the various menus and point out some inconsistencies and odd choices as I go. Before moving forward, I will point out that Soundaware has been receptive to suggestions for improvement and has already started to incorporate some of these suggestions into their firmware. They've still got a ways to go, but at least they're started the journey!
 
MAIN MENU: SETTINGS
SoundawareEstherAnalogGUI-Settings.jpg

Esther's Main Menu is laid out horizontally, so you simply click the Back / Forward buttons to navigate through the various sub-menus. When you get to the one you want to dive into, you press the Play / Pause button to dive in. When you want to jump back up a level, you use the Return button. If you want to go back to the Main Menu, push the Menu button. Once you're in a list, you use the Up / Down buttons to move up / down one menu item at a time. The Back / Forward buttons act like Page Up / Down buttons in a list. This allows you to move up or down through lists with fewer button presses but does feel like a band-aid solution. Accelerated scrolling through lists by holding down the Up / Down buttons would be much appreciated. Once you're back to the Main Menu, one more press of the Menu button will take you to the Now Playing screen. Okay, I think we've covered navigation basics. It's all pretty easy to learn but could be further optimized to make the navigation process simpler.
 
Getting back to the Settings Menu, you'll see a lot of familiar choices there. You'll also see some unfamiliar choices. For instance, PowerOff Options seems to be an area of confusion. I'll go over the PowerOff Options you'll want to use in the Battery section below. But for now, let's just say this isn't very straightforward and definitely needs to be optimized. Then there's Turntable Mode, which is actually a dedicated Digital Out mode that shuts down the analog circuitry to ensure the highest quality signal out of Coaxial Out. This is one of the areas I've been trying to help Soundaware, and we should see changes to more straightforward terminology in future firmware releases. 
 
You'll notice in the two images on the right that the screen gets split between a sub-menu sidebar on the left and either icons or text on the right. This trend continues across all of Esther's menus and is a contentious choice in my opinion. I don't find that the icons add value, and the space would have been better utilized by making the list take over the entire width of the screen. This is especially true once we visit the Music Library menus, where the limited characters can get pretty annoying.
 
At the top of the screen is the Topbar, which could be better utilized. Right now, you can't see any information about Play Mode, Volume, or Gain Setting in the Topbar. These should all fit, and I've made this suggestion to Soundaware. I'm hoping they strongly consider retooling the Topbar to provide more useful information at a glance for Esther owners.
 
MAIN MENU: UPGRADE + ABOUT
SoundawareEstherAnalogGUI-UpgradeAbout.jpg

These are pretty self-explanatory.
 
MAIN MENU: PLAYING
SoundawareEstherAnalogGUI-8.jpg

Again, pretty self-explanatory. This takes you to the Now Playing screen.
 
MAIN MENU: RECENT LIST + FAVORITES
SoundawareEstherAnalogGUI-RecentsFaves.jpg

The Recent List keeps a running record of albums / folders played so you can jump back to them quickly if you want to. I thought this was going to be a running record of songs, so seeing it populated with albums / folders surprised me. It's honestly not a feature I've used, so I'm agnostic about this. 
 
Favorites is like an on-the-go playlist similar to what other DAPs give you. To add a song to the Favorites list, you simply press and hold the Menu button when that song is selected in a list or while in the Now Playing screen. A confirmation will pop-up that the song has been added to Favorites, which needs to be dismissed by pressing the Play / Pause button. I figured you'd be able to remove a song from the list by repeating the process, but it's not that easy. To remove a song, you have to navigate to it in the actual Favorites list and press and hold the Menu button. Again, a confirmation will pop-up that the song is now removed from the list. 
 
IMPORTANT: There's no .m3u support, so this is all you get. If anything beyond this very basic playlist support is critical for you, Esther isn't your DAP.
 
MAIN MENU: STORAGE
SoundawareEstherAnalogGUI-13.jpg

This is where I spend most of my time because Esther has very rudimentary Tag-based browsing options.
 
Storage Sub-Menus
SoundawareEstherAnalogGUI-Folders.jpg

At the top level, Esther offers you a choice between SD0 and SD1. You can tell some pretty nerdy engineers programmed the GUI, because normal humans would've called these something site SD1 and SD2 or TF1 and TF2. Anyways, after you get done geeking out over that, you can see I've got the Artist as the next level. After that, I've got Albums arranged in order of the Year of release. Then I've got songs with a leading zero. This is a testing card, so it's not as hierarchical as my main cards, which would have another level of organization at the top-level (A-C, D-F, etc. folders). As mentioned earlier, navigating these is pretty straightforward. You navigate up / down using the Up / Down buttons, Page Up / Down using the Back / Forward buttons, and select using the Play / Pause buttons. Adding in a layer with A-C, D-F, etc. reduces the amount of Page Up / Down button presses you need to perform. In fact, individual letters (A, B, C, etc.) at the top level might be even better. That's up to you. Of course, accelerated scrolling would make the need for such meticulous organization less critical. Not sure if this ca be implemented, though.
 
MAIN MENU: MUSIC LIBRARY
SoundawareEstherAnalogGUI-Library1.jpg

I mentioned above that support for tag-based browsing is rudimentary. I'll go over that below. These options are mainly for those times you want to shuffle everything by one artist or all the music on the card.
 
Music Library Sub-Menus 
SoundawareEstherAnalogGUI-Library2.jpg

Album: This gives you an alphabetical list of all the albums you've got scanned into Esther's database. I can't ever envision using this.
 
Genre: This has never worked for me with any of the three firmware releases I've tried. (And yes, my files do have Genre tags.)
 
Artist: This is on the bottom row in the picture above. It gives you an alphabetical listing of all the Artists scanned into Esther's database. Then for each artist, you get a list of all the songs ordered by album. I tried to show that in the picture last two pictures on the bottom row, where you can see the first seven songs listed belong to the Insen album and then songs from the UTP album are listed next. Since Esther's database recognizes these tags, I suggested that they look into adding an Album layer here for more advanced tag-based browsing. You could always keep a "Play All" option at the top-level of each Artist listing to play an Artist-specific playlist.
 
All Music: Pretty self-explanatory. And again, this is organized by album.
 
So as I mentioned a couple times above, this is tag-based browsing is rudimentary right now. I want to make that clear. It doesn't bother me in the slightest because I rely primarily on folder-based browsing. I only use tag-based browsing to shuffle all songs when burning in new gear, so Esther's level of sophistication is just fine with me.
 
MAIN MENU: NOW PLAYING SCREEN
SoundawareEstherAnalogGUI-Playing.jpg

Whew, we've finally made it to the Now Playing screen! Esther provides you with two options. On the left, you can see the more detailed Now Playing screen with and without album art. On the right, you can see the Simplified Now Playing screen, which fills the display with album art if you've got it. You toggle between these two screens by pressing the Up button. Pressing the Down button toggles between Play Modes - but only on the Detailed Now Playing screen.
 
Detailed: I like it that there's a lot of information here, but the way that information is laid out makes poor use of screen real estate. For example, you can see the Transport Control icon (Play, Pause, Stop, FFWD, REW) at upper left in both the Topbar and in the screen itself. There's no good reason I can see for this redundancy. You can also see the Play Mode icon in the upper right of the screen but not in the Topbar. This is an odd choice that has implications in the Simplified Now Playing screen. In between these two icons on the screen, the Artist and Song information alternates. Right underneath that in the "vinyl" circle, you can see the Folder name. Then along the bottom, you can see a the bit-depth, resolution, file type, queue, time elapsed, and total time for the current song. If this were my GUI, I'd immediately get rid of the "vinyl" circle, remove the Transport Control icon, move the Play Mode icon to the Topbar, and split out the Artist, Album, and Song information int other separate lines that use the full width of the screen to maximize the amount of information you can see at a glance. I'd also add in Gain and Volume information to the Topbar. There's plenty of room and it's useful information, so why not.
 
Simplified: Here you get a nice big view of any Album Art you've associated with your music files. Otherwise, you get a pretty empty screen. The really weird thing is that you can't change Play Modes while in this screen. Why, oh why would this be disabled? Sure, the icon isn't there, but the option shouldn't be disabled. This solidifies my thought that the Play Mode icon should be moved to the Topbar, and the ability to toggle between Play Mode options should be available in both display modes. This just makes sense. I'd also move the alternating song info text along the bottom to a semi-opaque strip near the top of the screen just under the Topbar. This would provide more width for the Artist, Album, and Song information. Finally, I'd drop in the bottom progress bar and file info from the Detailed Now Playing screen. 
 
If all of those suggestions were in place, you'd now have a nice detailed look at all of the song information with or without Album Art. Without Album Art, you could use the screen real estate to spread out al the information and make the text a bit larger. This would make Esther a great choice for people with compromised vision. With Album Art, you'd get all the same information but the Artist, Album, and Song info would alternate scrolling just under the Topbar. It could also be just above the bottom progress bar area, but I like near the top better. Just my two cents. You'd also be able to toggle Play Modes with either display. Personally, I think that these changes would make Esther's GUI much better, and I've proposed them in the Esther thread. Seems like others like these suggestions, and I'm hoping that Soundaware will start to implement some of these changes soon. If they do, I would revisit this review and increase the rating.
 
GUI VIDEO
0.jpg


That's a video I shot awhile back. There has been a firmware update or two since then, but the basic functionality is the same.
 
TO SUM UP
Esther's GUI is pretty rudimentary, so be prepared for that going in. You're going to wind up using Folder Browsing, so make sure your music library is well-organized. Luckily, Soundaware knows this aspect of Esther needs improvement and is actively working to make it better. I'm hoping to revisit this review and increase the rating in the near future as the firmware matures.
 
 
BATTERY LIFE & RELATED

Battery life is okay. If you charge it and listen straight through with minimal fiddling around, you're going get about 8 hours of playback time. Here's the rub, Esther's battery management is unique and not in the good sense of the word. I know it's been a long time, but way up above I mentioned the PowerOff options. Okay, it's time to revisit that topic. So, can either set Esther to Power Off or Sleep. If it's Power Off, then no battery is consumed during your time away from listening to music but (and this is a big but) if it completely powers down you have to connect via USB to turn it back on. For you iPhone hackers out there, this is kind of like a tethered jailbreak. And booting back up from a completely powered down state is slow compared to the other DAPs I've used. Now if you set Esther to use the Sleep option, it shuts down and resumes quickly but uses power while it's sleeping. So you sleep Esther, come back awhile later, and see the battery indicator drop say from 75% to 65% as Esther takes stock of how much of a battery hit sleep was this time. Obviously none of this is optimal, and Soundaware knows that because users have given them feedback. Recent posts in the Esther thread indicate that Soundaware is currently working on improved battery management, and I hope they tackle this sooner rather than later.
 
Optimal PowerOff Options
  1. Auto PowerOff = Never
  2. Smart PowerOff = 10, 20, or 30 minutes
  3. Power Key Setting = Long Press Sleep
 
Even after setting these options, you'll need to make sure the battery doesn't get fully depleted. If it does, you'll need to plug into USB in order to reboot. My advice is to make sure you charge daily when you're actively using Esther. If you're not going to be using Esther for several days, do a complete shut down and remember that you'll need to plug into USB the next time you power on.
 
 
USB DAC

USB DAC? What USB DAC? Move right along, good sir!
 
 
SOUND

During my time with Esther, I've had the chance to play around with a lot of gear including the Empire Ears IEM lineupFLC 8S tunable triple hybrid IEMHiFiMan Edition X planar headphones, and VE Zen 2.0 earbuds. As usual, I listened mainly to classic rock, electronic, metal, and modern composition in AAC and FLAC formats. I also had the Chord Mojo and Soundaware M1 Esther Analog in for testing at the same time, so I put in some time switching off between these three sources and have some thoughts on what the strengths of each are. 
 
Esther Analog has a very warm, full, lush sound with an enveloping but not overly large soundstage. Along with the Chord Mojo, Esther Analog turned out to be one of my favorite sounding portable sources in 2015. They both have a very natural sound that can make other sources sound exaggerated by comparison. But they do differ in the degree of warmth and fullness, with Mojo just tilting to the warm, full side and Esther Analog fully entrenched in the warm, full zone. I honestly haven't heard a DAP that sounds like this before and am entranced with most of the pairings I've used. 
 
It hasn't been all roses, however. Esther Analog does have 10 Ohm Output Impedance, so pairing it with sensitive, low impedance multi-BA IEM can be a bit of a crap shoot. For instance, when pairing it with the Empire Ears lineup, Esther sounded very good with most of the IEM. However, when I reached the 8, 10, and 14 BA IEM, I started losing a lot of upper end detail. Cymbal crashes were buried, percussion lost crispness, etc. Luckily, these were the only cases I found where I had poor synergy, and I can't say for certain it's due to the 10 Ohm output impedance but that suspicion will always be there. Lowering the output impedance would help alleviate these concerns and is a recommendation for future DAPs from Soundaware. 
 
With the lower BA count IEM, my hybrid IEM, my dynamic drivers, and my planars, I found Esther paired up very nicely. Probably my favorite pairing was with HiFiMan HE400. I don't own a tube amp, but after listening to this lush, warm DAP paired with HE400 I can certainly see why pairing them up with a warm tube amp is highly recommended. Esther brought out the mids and took the edge off the upper end peakiness, making my HE400 sing. So if you're looking for a good sound signature to pair with brighter cans, Esther might have just the sound you're  looking for. If you're using dark, warm cans to begin with, I'd look for a brighter DAP. 
 
Here's a brief comparison with Aune M2 and Chord Mojo, two newer entries in the market I've listened to recently:
  1. Warmth: Esther Analog >> Mojo > M2
  2. Fullness: Esther Analog >> Mojo > M2
  3. Dynamics: M2 > Mojo ≃ Esther Analog
  4. Soundstage: M2 > Mojo ≃ Esther Analog
  5. 3D: Mojo ≃ Esther Analog > M2
  6. Bass: M2 > Mojo ≃ Esther Analog
  7. Mids: Esther Analog > Mojo > M2
  8. Treble: M2 > Mojo ≃ Esther Analog
 
 
MISCELLANEOUS PLAYBACK-RELATED STUFF
GAIN SETTINGS: Like my iBasso DX90, Esther has L, M, & H Gain settings. I really like this in a DAP, as it allow you to crank up the volume with whatever gear you're using and make best use of the DAC. For IEM, I'm able to push the volume up past 50% on Low Gain. with Zen 2.0 and HE400, I use Medium Gain at 70-100%.
 
GAPLESS: Nope, no gapless. I tried different file types and all had a very noticeable gap between songs that should be seamless. I then tried CUE + FLAC. That didn't work, either. I listen to a fair amount of albums which have seamless transitions between songs, so this is pretty important to me. If Esther had positional breakpoint memory, I could overcome this by just ripping seamless albums as a single file. However, Esther resumes to the beginning of the last song you were playing, so I'd find myself being thrown back to the beginning of an album if I ripped to one file. Frustrating!
 
FFWD/REW: Both of these operations are slow as molasses and lack any appreciable acceleration as you continue to hold dow the FFWD/REW button. Please fix!
 
FADE (0.5 SECOND MUTE): Esther has an option called Fade, which is the absolute most confusing feature on Esther. From what I've gathered from chatting with Soundaware, the intent is to introduce a 0.5 second mute at the beginning of songs to help avoid crackles, pops, etc. when switching between songs with different resolution. The Chord Mojo has a similar feature. However, what I find is that with Fade ON, I don't get the 0.5 second mute - most of the time. Sometimes the 0.5 second mute does happen even though the songs have the same resolution. This was frustrating, so I switched to Fade OFF figuring this would solve the problem, Nope, now I get a 0.5 second mute at the beginning of each and every song. To give you an idea of what this does, try playing Rush's classic song Tom Sawyer. It's got an awesome drum hit that starts off the song. With Fade OFF, that drum hit is completely gone. I understand the rationale behind this feature, but I think it needs some attention to function properly. For now, just leave Esther set to Fade ON and hope for the best.
 
 
Glamour Shot: Esther Analog + FLC8S
FLC8S-12.jpg

 
 
SUMMARY
I started off this review stating that this is the most conflicted review I've written. I'm absolutely in love with Esther Analog's sound and praise it highly for that. Without a doubt, it's warm, full sound pushes all the right buttons for me. I also really like the overall form factor. The size is just right. Button placement is good. Two mSD sots are highly appreciated. There's a lot to like. However, the immature firmware needs improvement. Poorly thought out GUI, lack of gapless playback, limited tag support, poor battery management, and the oddly-implemented Fade feature make Esther a reserved recommendation. So, here I am wanting so very much to give Esther a 4.5 rating but can't bring myself to do it because of the firmware. I know that Soundaware is actively working to implement some of the improvements I've suggested throughout this review, and I'll revisit this review and revise my rating if / when improvements are made.
 
One other thing to note is that I recognize that there are different types of DAP users. There are those who seek out the best possible sound, and damn the UI. They're able to forgive a hell of a lot of quirks. For those people, feel free to tack on an extra star because as long as you're looking for a beautiful full, warm sound I think you're going to love Esther Analog. Conversely, there are those DAP users who are looking for A&K or iPod level UI. For you guys, you might want to subtract a star because this is a boutique DAP and will never meet your expectations. I tried to write this review with more of a middle ground mindset and hope my rating reflects this.
 
Keep an eye out for future Soundaware products. I've got the feeling their sophomore DAP is really going to be one to watch for!
 
Thanks for taking the time to read this. Feel free to shoot me a PM if you've got any questions. 
 
And finally, a big thanks to @soundaware for loaning me the Esther Analog to review, for patience as I've taken the time to really evaluate this DAP, and for openness as I've provided suggestions for improvement. I greatly appreciate this attitude and have enjoyed the experience immensely!
Sonic Defender
Sonic Defender
Sounds like a great DAP. Those fans of the ZX2 warm tonality might gravitate to the Esther.
howdy
howdy
Great review, Extremely detailed.
ozkan
ozkan
Excellent review mate! :thumbsup::thumbsup:

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Great sound that can be tuned to your liking with covers. Comfortable. Attractive.
Cons: Needs a good source to really shine.

 
*** I originally posted this review under the VE Zen listing, but since a VE Zen 2.0 listing was created after my initial review I'm reposting here. ***
 

INTRODUCTION

Upstart Venture Electronics has been making quite the name for themselves around Head-Fi in 2015. It seems like everybody who listens to their gear is nothing short of impressed with what this new company has been able produce in a short amount of time. From their super bang for your buck $5 Monk earbuds to their high-resolution Duke IEM to the Runabout amp, their products never cease to impress. The same can be said for their Zen earbuds. In fact, I received a review sample of the Zen earbuds quite some time ago. You remember those, right? The 320 Ohm white earbuds people were raving about. Well, right before I was going to write my review for them, I got word from VE that an improved Zen would soon be released called Zen 2.0. I was quite enamored with the original Zen, so I was skeptical that the new model could really be that much better. But on the other hand, VE really seemed to know how to produce master craft earbuds so I shelved my review of the original and waited patiently for the new model to arrive. Arrive they did, and boy was VE right about these being an improvement. They took an masterpiece of an earbud that I was looking at giving a solid 4.5 star review and kicked things up a notch. Yes folks, I'm awarding the VE Zen 2.0 my first ever 5 star review. I honestly never thought the day would come, but I think VE has simply done an outstanding job with these. 
 
Before we get to the review proper, let's take a moment to learn about VE (Venture Electronics):
 

 
Before we head off to the review, I'm going to give you a few links I found useful:
  1. VE's Website: LINK.
  2. VE's AliExpress Store: LINK
  3. VE Thread: LINK.
  4. @DJScope's review: LINK
  5. @Brooko's Zen 1.0 and 2.0 Veritas measurements: LINK
 
 
 

DISCLAIMER

There is no financial incentive from VE for writing this review.  I am in no way affiliated with VE, and this is my honest opinion of the Zen 2.0 earbuds. I would like to thank VE for giving me a chance to review the Zen 2.0 earbuds, and I hope my feedback proves useful for my fellow Head-Fi members as well as for VE.
 
 

ABOUT ME

I'm a 43 year old father who loves music.  While I listen mostly to electronic and metal these days, I do listen to a wide variety of music - from electronic (Autechre, Boards of Canada) to modern/minimalist composition (John Cage, Philip Glass) to alternative rock (Flaming Lips, Radiohead) to jazz (John Coltrane and Miles Davis) to metal (Behemoth, King Diamond) to classic rock (Eagles, Rush).  
 
I'm primarily a portable audio enthusiast. My portable music journey started with the venerable Sony Cassette Walkman and then progressed to portable CD players, minidisc recorders (still have my Sharp DR7), and finally on to DAPs like the Rio Karma, iRiver IHP-1xx, iPod 5.5, iPhones, and the newer crop of DAPs from Fiio and iBasso.
 
Being a portable audio enthusiast, I typically listen with IEMs but am enjoying listening with full-size headphones more and more and tend to like u-shaped sound signatures, although I break out v-shaped IEM & HP from time to time for fun.
 
As with a lot of people my age, I've got some hearing issues.  I've got mild tinnitus and suffer from allergies, which can affect hearing in my right ear.  I'll admit it, I'm not blessed with a pair of golden ears.  That said, I've been listening to portable gear for a long time and feel confident in assessing audio gear - just wanted to be transparent up front.



 
 
SPECS
  1. Driver: 15.4mm Single Dynamic 
  2. Rated Impedance: 320 Ω @ 1kHz
  3. Frequency Range: 15 ~ 23500 Hz (-10dB)
  4. Sensitivity: 106 dB @ 1mW
  5. Cable: 1.2m TPE-sheathed OFC
  6. Plug: 3.5mm gold-plated L-plug 
  7. MSRP: $148
 

 

PACKAGING & ACCESSORIES



Since this was an early review unit, I didn't receive final packaging. So what did I get? It's all in the picture below.
 


Zen 2.0, regular and donut foam covers, ear stabilizers, shirt clip, and clamshell case. Just a note that the foam covers included are the Heigi-style foams, which are thicker than the foam covers included with the original Zen earbuds. This has some ramifications on sound I'll mention later.
 
 

BUILD & ERGONOMICS

As usual, I'll walk you through the VEZen 2.0's build in pictorial format.
 
VE Zen 2.0 without covers

 
Hey, those look pretty sexy, don't they! Gone are the opaque white earpieces and cable of the original Zen earbuds. The earpieces are still the same shape and size, but they now come in a transparent smoked gray color. Each earpiece has the VE logo, which is their web address. So if you forget how to find out more about VE, just yank the buds out of your ears, take a peek, type 52VE.CN into your browser, and BAM! you're on the VE website. Of course there are also L/R markings on each earpiece, as well. To complete the transformation, the cable sheath is now transparent exposing the colorful red wiring underneath. I really like the new look, and I think you will, too!
 
 
Y-Splitter, Shirt Clip, 3.5mm L-Plug

 
With the Zen 2.0, VE did away with the chin cinch, which is honestly no big loss. In it's place, they now include a shirt clip. I prefer using shirt clips anyway, so for me this was a positive move. I'm sure some of you will pine for a chin cinch, though. Sorry. Pretty standard 3.5mm L-plug. No complaints there.
 
 
VE Zen 2.0 with Ear Stabilizers


While they look odd, the ear stabilizers actually do a really good job of maintaining a secure fit without resorting to using foam covers.
 
 
Here's a pic of the ear stabilizers in action!

 
I know it looks weird, but it works. It really does. For me anyway. Some really dislike them, though. It all depends on ear anatomy and personal preference. All you can do is give them a try and see if they work for you. I've also used them naked, with the included foam covers, with the original Zen's foam covers, and with some rubber covers from my Yuin OK-series earbuds. They all change the Zen 2.0 different sound, some more dramatically than others.
 
So just to wrap up, you're getting pretty much everything you need to get up and running with the Zen 2.0. You get a couple foam covers to choose from and ear stabilizers to ensure you get a good fit and can fine-tune the sound to your liking. You get a solidly-built pair of earbuds. And you get a case to stash them in when they're not jammed in your ears. What more could you ask for? A remote? Mic? Nope, not for this guy. I'm not about compromising the cable's integrity with such accoutrements. I'm not very likely to use 320 Ohm earbuds with my smartphone anyway. Are you? 
 
 
SOUND
I listen to a lot of experimental electronic and metal and mainly used those genres to evaluate the VE Zen 2.0 earbuds. During my time with them, I've listened through many sources including my FiiO X5 DAP and Aune X1S Desktop DAC/Amp. I've also listened through a couple DAPs I've had in for testing. Just for kicks, I also gave them a listen out of my iPhone 5s (yes it can be done!). I'll go over what I thought of the sound and some brief thoughts on cover-rolling.
 
But first, a beauty shot with the Aune M2
 
You can change an earbud's sound signature quite a bit by using them with or without different covers. For those of you who're new to earbuds, this is a bit like tip rolling kicked up a notch. I'll try my best to covey what like about them with different covers and wrap-up with a brief comparison with Zen 1.0. So, here we go...
 
In conversations with VE, I learned that Zen 2.0 are intended to be used naked. Yes, naked my friends. Take those covers off, and revel in the glorious balanced sound! In my experience, this is as good as it gets from an earbud. While it's not like a sub-woofer pounding away at your eardrums, you actually get good bass response. If you want more bass, you can experiment with covers. Using rubber rims will give you a bit more bass presence. Using foam covers will provide even more bass response, the level varying depending on foam thickness. Mids vary from very slightly forward naked or with rubber rims to slightly recessed with foam covers. Similarly, the upper end is nicely present, lively and engaging naked or with rubber rims. Throw on some foam covers, and the upper end is damped. So depending on the covers you use, you can get anything from a nicely balanced, detailed listening experience with a nice soundstage and good imaging to a warmer, darker, more intimate listening experience with thick foam covers. It really is a lot of fun to play around with different covers depending on your mood, the type of music you're listening to, and your source. As mentioned above, I listened to Zen 2.0 out of various sources. They're revealing enough to scale well with better sources, so please don't dismiss them just because they're earbuds. Play around with better sources and see how Zen 2.0 respond. I think you'll be as impressed as I was at how well they respond as you throw them at increasingly better sources.
 
It was interesting listening to these after falling in love with the original Zen earbuds. While I loved the originals, they were a bit more of a one trick pony. Throw on some foam covers, and they were great. Nicely balanced with great detail. Take the covers off, and they sounded very thin, cold, and overly bright. The new Zen are much more versatile. Since they were tuned to be nicely balanced without covers, you can really play around with the sound signature. It gives you more reasons to fall in love with Zen 2.0. Nice!
 

 
SUMMARY
I know they're derided, but I've always had a fondness for earbuds and just love what VE is doing. Along with other boutique earbud manufacturers like Blox and Yuin, VE is dead set on showcasing just how great earbuds can be. From their $5 Monk (Go! Buy!! Now!!!) to their mid-level Asura and on to their flagship Zen 2.0, each hand every one of VE earbuds are top-notch performers. The upgrade from Zen 1.0 to Zen 2.0 showcases just how fast VE is learning, iterating, and improving. I honestly can't wait to see what they'll bring us next!
 
If you're at all interested in Zen 2.0 but aren't ready to drop more than $100 for a pair of earbuds yet, please do yourself a favor and pick up a pair of VE Monk. Seriously. I mean it. It'll cost you less that $10. Try those and get a small taste of what you'll be getting with Zen 2.0. I think you'll be convinced to take the next step and try out Zen 2.0, in which case you'll have Monk as your beater buds and Zen 2.0 as the buds you keep for a more immersive listen.
 
I hope you found this useful and would like to give a hearty thanks to VE for giving me the opportunity to review the Zen 2.0. Keep cracking out awesome buds VE!

mochill
mochill
Great review bro :grinning:
nmatheis
nmatheis
Thanks Mo!

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: High-quality, highly-customizable sound. Small. Ergonomic. Built well. Detachable cables.
Cons: Microphonics. Overly tight cinch. Limited tip choices. Very small tuning filters.

FLC8S-17.jpg

Image courtesy of FLC
 

 

INTRODUCTION

Hi guys. I discovered a real gem of an IEM in 2015, the excellent FLC8S. Out of all the IEM I tried in 2015, this is the one that most caught my attention and has gotten a disproportionate amor of ear time. How did this all come about? Well, I was chilling out, jamming to some music one day when I noticed an email in my inbox from Teo over at LMUE (Lend Me Ur Ears). In the email, Teo asked if I'd like to check out the FLC8S because he though they were a great IEM that deserved more attention. I didn't really know anything about them, so I started looking around to see what these were about. One of the first things that popped up was a stellar review of the original FLC8 by Joker over at The Headphone List (LINK). He gave them a solid recommendation, and I learned that they were the most customizeable IEM I've ever heard of. If you've followed my reviews, you might remember that I've reviewed a few customizable IEM recently. Those were the RHA T20 (LINK) and the Torque Audio t096z (LINK). I also own the Trinity Delta. While the RHA T20 and Trinity Delta offer a few different "flavors" of the same basic sound signature, the Torque Audio t096z offers six unique sound signatures. They are all very nice IEM, and I enjoy listening to them all. Anyways, back to FLC8S. They have 36, count 'em, 36 different tuning options. That sounded really cool, so I shot an email back to Teo and told him that I'd love to check them out. Well, long story short, I fell in love with them. I've shared them around a bit, and everyone I've let listen to them has also been very impressed with them. I gave them to a self-pronounced treble-head and bass-head at a local mini-meet, and both said they were amazing. I didn't even change the tuning to accommodate their preferences. I turned a couple of my fellow Head-Fi buddies onto them, and they both agree that these are right at the top of all the IEM they've listened to in 2015. Most recently, I let @Paulus XII in on them and wasn't surprised when they stole his heart, too. Yes folks, these are the real deal!
 
Here's what FLC would like you to know about the FLC8S:
 
FLC Technology is one of the earliest companies in China to explore the hybrid balance armature and dynamic driver technology. In 2011, it is the first company to launch a hybrids customs. The FLC 8S is the first universial hybrid balance armature and dynamic earphones by FLC technology. Due to FLC Technology's extensive experience in the hybrid technology, the FLC 8S features excellent cross over technology which creates a coherent sound between the dual balanced armature drivers and the dynamic drivers. 
 
FLC 8S recongises that there is no one size fit all sound signature for all users. Hence, it is designed to be highly tuneable so that users can tune it according to their sound preference. While tuneable earphones are not new in the market, the FLC 8S represents the pinnacle of this technology as it allows for 36 variations of sound unlike most tuneable earphones which allows only 3 different sound signature at most. 
 
The FLC 8S comes with improved built quality and comes with braided cables as compared to the FLC 8.
 
 
I've also had a bit of back and forth with FLC's founder Forrest Wei (@Flcforrestwei) and learned a bit about him. Like most audio engineers, you've probably never heard of Forrest. Neither had I, but let me assure you that just like the FLC8S, he's is the real deal. Before starting FLC, he worked at Ultimate Ears at the time the venerable Triple-Fi 10 were being developed. He's also worked at Jabra and Harman. As you can see, he's been around the block. He started up FLC because he not only believes in hybrid IEM technology, he believes the sound should be customizeable to give every listener the right sound signature at the right time without buying several pairs of IEM. Besides FLC8S, Forrest also sells a CIEM version with the same 36 levels of custmization. Now that's unique! FLC also has a new line of single-crystal pure silver cables with all the connector choices you need. There's also a new flagship product under development. I've heard a bit about it and can't wait to give it a listen. Let me assure you it's going to be another amazing product from FLC. So there you go. Now you know a bit about Forrest Wei. We're lucky that he recently joined us on Head-Fi, hanging out with us FLC lovers over in the FLC8S thread. Thanks, Forrest!
 
FLC8 & 8S Thread: LINK
 

DISCLAIMER

There is no financial incentive from FLC for writing this review.  I am in no way affiliated with FLC, and this is my honest opinion of the FLC8S.  I would like to thank FLC for giving me a chance to test drive the FLC8S, and I hope my feedback proves useful for my fellow Head-Fi members as well as for FLC.
 
 

ABOUT ME

I'm a 43 year old father who loves music.  While I listen mostly to electronic and metal these days, I do listen to a wide variety of music - from electronic (Autechre, Boards of Canada) to modern/minimalist composition (John Cage, Philip Glass) to alternative rock (Flaming Lips, Radiohead) to jazz (John Coltrane and Miles Davis) to metal (Behemoth, King Diamond) to classic rock (Eagles, Rush).  
 
I'm primarily a portable audio enthusiast. My portable music journey started with the venerable Sony Cassette Walkman and then progressed to portable CD players, minidisc recorders (still have my Sharp DR7), and finally on to DAPs like the Rio Karma, iRiver IHP-1xx, iPod 5.5, iPhones, and the newer crop of DAPs from Fiio and iBasso.
 
Being a portable audio enthusiast, I typically listen with IEMs but am enjoying listening with full-size headphones more and more and tend to like u-shaped sound signatures, although I break out v-shaped IEM & HP from time to time for fun.
 
As with a lot of people my age, I've got some hearing issues.  I've got mild tinnitus and suffer from allergies, which can affect hearing in my right ear.  I'll admit it, I'm not blessed with a pair of golden ears.  That said, I've been listening to portable gear for a long time and feel confident in assessing audio gear - just wanted to be transparent up front.



 
 

SPECIFICATIONS



  1. Driver unit: 8.6 mm dynamic drivers+ dual balanced armature 
  2. Rated Impedance: 11 Ohm 
  3. Sensitivity: 93 dB/mW 
  4. Frequency response: 20Hz - 20KHz 
  5. Plug: 3.5mm gold-plated L-plug 
  6. Cable: 1.30m TPU cable
  7. Price: $350 (LMUE)

 

PACKAGING & ACCESSORIES



As usual, I'll go over the packaging and accessories in pictorial format with a wrap at the end. 
 
Looks like a plain box, right?
FLC8S-1.jpg
 
 
Nope! The top cover folds back to reveal the FLC8S nestled in protective foam.
FLC8S-2.jpg
 
 
Then that top layer slides out to the right to reveal the carry case and accessories keychain case. Cool!
FLC8S-3.jpg
 
 
Here are all the goodies you get.
FLC8S-4.jpg
Sorry about the stray tip in the pic...
 
The unboxing experience is really fun. It felt like I just kept discovering more and more goodies stashed away inside. I recently got the Lotoo PAW Gold in for testing and noticed that the boxes are very similar. Turns out Forrest is a big fan of Lotoo DAPs!
 
I like the nearly indestructible metal accessories holder and IEM case. These will most definitely keep your FLC and accessories safe and sound for a long, long time. I'm not sure I'll ever use the 1/4" and airplane adapters. Some might, though. Honestly, these would just end up in my stash of unused accessories. I'm sure you noticed the pair of tweezers were, right? That's weird. Tweezers packed in with a pair of IEM? What's that about? Well, they're supposed to help change the tiny tuning filters. I didn't find them very helpful, though. I ended up just using my fingernails to change the filters. Maybe some will need it, but not this guy. 
 
The tips are basically the same shape, but the gray ones are softer and are the ones I preferred. And surprise, surprise, tip rolling has been a topic of discussion on the FLC thread. While I enjoy the sound with the stock gray tips, some don't like them and end up using third-party tips. Wide-bore double-flange seem popular. During my conversation with Forrest, I learned that the stock tips were chosen because they conveyed more detail. Even so, it'd be nice to see some different tip styles included to accommodate differences in ear anatomy and to allow users to further refine the sound to their taste.
 
NOTE: The tuning filters are really small, so make sure to change them over something that can catch them if they fall.
 
 

BUILD & ERGONOMICS

Again, I'll attack this section in pictorial format, commenting on what I like and what I think could be improved as I go.
 
FLC8S
FLC8S-7.jpg
 
You can see a lot of the elements of the FLC8S in the picture up above. Lets start off with the earpieces. You can see all three types of modular tuning components for each earpiece that make the FLC8S so unique. On the left earpiece's inner face you can see the RED ULF (Ultra Low Frequency) tuning filter, while on the right earpiece's outer face you can see the GRAY LF (Low Frequency) tuning filter. You can also see the GUNMETAL MF (Mid Frequency) + HF (High Frequency) tuning nozzle. All of these are easy to remove. The tuning nozzles simply screw in. ULF and LF tuning filters are friction fit and fit in snugly. The ULF tuning filter is hard plastic and is the smallest of the tuning components. The LF tuning filter is made of silicone and is a bit bigger. It's easy to distinguish between these two, so you're not going to be putting the wrong tuning filter in the wrong port. Since they are quite small, please change these over the carry case or something similar so you don't lose them. FLC includes an extra of each ULF and F filter just in case you do lose one, though. And if you're really worried about losing them, you can purchase the tuning accessories keychain kit separately.
 
You can also see the braided detachable cables with memory wire. All is color coordinated in a tasteful BLUE. Perhaps you can also tell from the picture that the FLC8S is pretty small. If not, I'll include an in-ear picture below to show you that they are indeed pretty darn small.
 
 
FLC8S Schematic
FLC8S-16.jpg
Here you can see all the tuning components, as well as the internals. I'll go over specifics for the different tuning choices available in the next section, but this gives you an idea of how flexible the FLC8S are in finding just the right sound for you.
 
 
Cinch, Y-Splitter, L-Plug
FLC8S-13.jpg
 
Good news, bad news time, people.
 
Stock Cable
Bad News: The stock cable is fairly springy and is microphonic, and the heat shrink tubing looks a bit shabby. Moreover, the cinch shrink tubing is so tight I had a very hard time moving it up the cable.  I let Forrest know this. He relayed this to the team, and they've made the cinch made a bit looser.
 
Good news: The FLC8S comes with a high-quality OFC braided copper cable. With its coordinating blue color and heat shrink tubing, it has quite the boutique appearance. And I really like that it has an L-Plug that works with smartphone cases. 
 
Original Cable
Besides the stock cable, there's also the original FLC8 cable which is a standard black copper cable that is more supple and comes with a more typical, functional cinch and lacks memory wire. The copper is a bit lower quality, but it is a highly-ergonomic cable and allows the user to choose between wearing the FLC8S up or down and is lees prone to microphonics.
 
Silver Cable
The newest addition to the FLC lineup is the brand spanking new single-crystal pure-silver cable, which is very similar in construction so expect the same springiness and microphonics. I just got this, and the cinch on it is just right. Nice!
 
 
FLC Cables: Original (top), Stock (bottom left), Silver (bottom right)
FLC8S-18.jpg
 
NOTE: FLC8S use the same 2-Pin connector as the venerable UE TF10, so you'll have lots of aftermarket options should you choose to go that route.
 
 
FLC8S in BLUE vs. RED
FLC8S-19.jpg
 
In addition to the regular blue color, FLC8S are also available in a Limited Edition Red model. I think a mix n match model would be awesome!
 
 
 
Worn Up
FLC8SWornUp.jpg
 
Here they are worn up with the original FLC8 cable that doesn't have memory wire. Very comfortable for my ears.
 
 
Worn Down
FLC8SWornDown.jpg
 
With the original FLC8 cable, you can wear them down since it lacks memory wire. This isn't as comfortable for my ears, but my ears are a bit on the small side. I suspect those with anger ears will find it more comfortable. in any case, it's nice to have options, and I do find myself 
 
 
SOUND + TUNING ACCESSORIES
Those of you who know me know I listen to a lot of electronic and metal. You might even know that I've been jamming a lot of classic rock lately, as well. I typically listen to music from Autechre, Behemoth, Bjork, Candlemass, Depeche Mode, The Eagles, Fleetwood Mac, Iron Maiden, King Diamond, New Order, Rush, and Sigur Ros during my time with new gear. I might throw in some hard bop jazz or modern minimalist composition every now and then. Just wanted to make sure you know what kind of music I listen to for context. Unlike some other reviewers, I don't keep to a strict playlist. Instead, I choose songs I know well and feel like listening to. I feel it's more organic that way. Anyways, on with the show, eh...
 
As mentioned above, FLC8S has a lot of tuning options. So as opposed to trying to impress you more with vivd descriptions of their amazing sound, I'm going to discuss the various tuning options and which I prefer. Let's start with a run-down of the various tuning filters.
 
Ultra Low Frequency
  1. Clear = Minimum
  2. Gray = Medium
  3. Red = Maximum
 
Low Frequency
  1. Clear = Minimum
  2. Gray = Medium
  3. Black = Maximum
 
Mid + High Frequency
  1. Blue = Medium Mid Frequency + Low High Frequency
  2. Gunmetal = Medium Mid Frequency + Medium High Frequency
  3. Gold = Maximum Mid Frequency + Medium High Frequency
  4. Green = Medium Mid Frequency + Maximum High Frequency
 
Ok, now you've seen all the tuning choices that await you. Perhaps you can guess what some of the trends are. Did you guess that most people prefer the GRAY and RED ULF tuning plugs? Yup! Perhaps they also prefer the GRAY and BLACK LF tuning plugs? Right again! You also think most people like the GUNMETAL and GOLD MF + HF tuning nozzles? Man, you're good! You got them all right!!!
 
I played around with the various tuning plugs and nozzles and rapidly came to the conclusion that I'm not a fan of using the clear tuning plugs at all. They gut the bass. Not a fan of the blue tuning nozzle. Guts the upper end. Green's not my favorite, either. It's ok, but it's got a bit too much upper end energy for me for general listening purposes. After nailing down which tuning plugs and filters I'd rather avoid, I started working with my preferred tuning accessories to hone in on my favorite combinations. 
 
My hands-down favorite is RED-GRAY-GOLD Well-extended bass with good bass impact. Mid-bass is very well balanced with sub-bass. upper bass is reigned in. Very nice. Not boomy. Mids are tilted a bit towards the upper mids. The upper end conveys a good amount of detail without veering into harsh territory. I'd highly recommend using that as a starting point and then try substuting one of the tuning plugs at a time to hone in on your favorite. 
 
Some of my other favorite tunings are:
  1. RED-GRAY-GUNMETAL. This is very similar to the RED-GRAY-GOLD combo up above but the upper mids are a bit more relaxed. A nice warm, relaxed listen.
  2. GRAY-GRAY-GUNMETAL. This is the default combination and works very well as a reference tuning.
  3. RED-BLACK-GOLD. Choose this when it's party time and let the bass kick!
 
Beyond the basic tuning, FLC8S is able to convey a good sense of space and spacial cues. It's not the best I've heard, but it is above average for it's price and competitive with higher priced IEM. Of course some of this is source dependent, and I've found FLC8S scales well with increasingly better sources. I've tested it out with my iPhone 5s, Aune M2, Cayin N5, iBasso, Shanling M2 & M3, Soundaware Esther Analog, and most recently the Lotoo PAW Gold. While the FLC8S sound just fine out of my iPhone, add a decent amp to your audio chain or plug them into an entry level DAP and you notice the dynamics are a bit better and the soundstage increases. Move up to a mid-level DAP, and again the FLC8S doesnt at all feel like it's holding your audio chain back. Hell, I'm listening to them out of the PAW Gold I just got in for testing, and it sounds amazing! It's with PAW Gold that I can really hear FLC8S performing at its highest level, and the benefits of the new silver cable are most evident. So if you get the FLC8S, just know that it'll keep up with you as you upgrade your audio chain.
 
FLC8S-27.jpg
 
I've skimmed some of the other reviews. While I consider the ability to alter the tuning a major strength of the FLC8S, I noticed that a couple people seemed to feel it was a gimmick. Obviously, I disagree. Let me be completely realistic about this. I don't expect anyone is going to be out on the bus and think to themselves, "Hey, I want to change filters on my FLC8S right now." That's pretty unrealistic. However, every once in awhile I do like to change the filters. Like I pointed out above, FLC8S can be a reference-tuned IEM if you configure it properly. So if you need that, it's there for you. Want to throw on some bass-laden hip-hop or electronic music and just give in and have some party time fun? Yup, you can do that, too. Feel like a v-shaped sound sig? FLC8S has you covered. you can even get a dark, warm sound signature if you throw on the BLUE tuning nozzle. Of course, you'll probably go right back to your favorite tuning afterwards. So what? At least you didn't have to go out and buy another IEM to get a taste of those other sound signatures. FLC8S has you covered, baby!
 
 

SUMMARY

By now, I certainly hope you're intrigued by these. I truly feel that FLC8S are an undiscovered gem in the IEM universe and hope they finally start to get the attention they deserve. Make no doubt, these are a phenomenal IEM with great sound in a nice, comfortable, small package. Add the ability to tune them to your liking, and they're a force to be reckoned with. And in my opinion, Forrest did a great job creating a highly-tunable IEM. Are they perfect? No. Are any IEM perfect? Of course not, and don't let anyone try to convince you otherwise!
 
So what could be better? Well, I mentioned a few minor nitpicks along the way like microphonics, the overly tight cable cinch, and limited tip selection. Luckily the FLC8S have detachable cables, so if you end up falling in love with them you can always look around for a cable that fits your individual needs. There, that problem's solved. Tips? Well, who amongst us doesn't have way too many tips floating around? I mean honestly, I've got more tips than I know what to do with! So that's not really a big deal, either. The one thing that can't be changed is the very small tuning accessories. I know a lot of prospective FLC owners will be nervous about using them. Luckily you can purchase replacements, so just order a set of replacements when you order the FLC8S and you'll be set!
 
To wrap, I'd like to congratulate Forrest at FLC for crafting a superb IEM that is competitive with IEM that cost significantly more. I look forward to your future creations with great anticipation!
canali
canali
Btw great review...kudos...enjoyed reading about Forest's background, too. Wish we'd get more bio stuff from the smaller new companies...adds both a bit of charm and respect for the skillsets they're bringing to the table.
jinxy245
jinxy245
I'm so intrigued by these...thanks for the review. You can obviously write a really (REALLY) long review, but you were concise and very readable... Thx!!
Arsalan
Arsalan
Thanks for review.
Which one would be better?
Dudu 2002 or FLC8s

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Fantastic sound. Durable build. Small size. Fine volume control. Connectivity.
Cons: No storage pouch. Aesthetics might not be for everyone. A bit pricey.
 
ChordMojo-15.jpg

iPhone 5S → Mojo → VE Zen 2.0
 
 
INTRODUCTION
I've been very lucky to hear a lot of great sounding gear this year. Pictured above are a couple of my favorites, the Chord Mojo and the VE Zen 2.0 earbuds. Yes, I'm leading off with the punch line this time. Mojo is one of my 2015 top picks. Why? Quite simply, it has the right combination of small size, durable build, easy connectivity to my iPhone or DAPs, good battery life, and very natural sound. To put this in context, I've heard many portable sources recently ranging from DAC/Amps like the Calyx PaT, Cayin C5DAC, Cozoy Astrapi & Aegis, Creative Sound Blaster E5, and Shanling H3 to DAPs like the Aune M2, Cayin N5 & N6, FiiO X3, X3ii, X5, X5ii & X7, iBasso DX90, Shanling M3 & M2, and Soundaware Esther. I haven't heard all of them together, but I hope this listing gives you some appreciation for the wide variety of portable sources I've put through their paces this year. I was also very lucky to have the Aune M2 and Soundaware Esther Analog DAPs in house along with the new Empire Ears IEM lineup and HiFiMan Edition X headphones, so I got to test out Mojo with some very nice gear.
 
So, Chord. Of course I'd previously heard of them. Who around here hasn't? Their Hugo is famous around Head-Fi for having top notch sound and a unique aesthetic design. However, it's price prevented a lot of people (myself included) from giving it a listen. And given it's largish size, it's more of a transportable solution than a truly portable one. And that design. I wasn't so sure of it, to be honest. But the Hugo mystique was certainly intriguing. I often found myself wishing I could give one a test drive but unfortunately didn't have access to one. So when the Mojo was announced and one of my Head-Fi buddies @x RELIC x came out as a beta tester with many glowing words, it caught my attention and I was lucky enough to get a chance to test one out as part of a small US mini tour. Mojo obviously caught a lot of other people's attention, as well. The Mojo thread started by @Mython is one of, if not the, fastest growing threads on Head-Fi. No doubt about it, Mojo has certainly made waves in this community!
 
 
Before we start, here's a bit of information about Chord from their website:
 
Chord Electronics Ltd is a world-leading manufacturer of high-end audio products. Since 1989, under the leadership of proprietor John Franks, Chord Electronics has been pushing the boundaries of innovation, creating some of the planet's finest hi-fi, home cinema and professional audio equipment. A technology-driven leader, Chord Electronics' philosophy of ongoing evolution and refinement continues to deliver landmark audio products with extraordinary performance and unrivalled design features. 

Born from the highly demanding world of aircraft avionics, Chord Electronics maintains a commitment to exemplary engineering, cutting-edge technology and exceptional build quality. Ingeniously designed for high performance over the long term, Chord products are renowned internationally for their advanced technology which is amongst the best in the world. Since 1996, Chord's collaboration with Robert Watts, a digital design genius with 30 years' DAC technology development experience, has produced a number of advanced digital products that are, quite simply, without equal. 

Chord's achievements have been recognised in the media, too, with magazines and websites from around the world awarding Chord products the highest accolades. Chord's passion for sound quality and exemplary engineering continue to produce audio equipment with exceptional insight into recorded music. Sparkling clarity, unrivalled transparency and huge reserves of high-quality power are trademarks that have become synonymous with the brand. Chord is trusted and admired internationally, and its global customer base includes: the BBC; EMI's Abbey Road Studios (London); Sony Music Studios (New York) and Skywalker Sound to name but a few. 

Why not discover for yourself what Chord Electronics can do for your favourite music? Our web pages can help you learn more about our product ranges and find retailers of exceptional ability, who will take time to help you find the product that's right for the way you listen. Welcome to Chord.

 
USEFUL LINKS
  1. LINK to Chord's Mojo page.
  2. LINK to the Mojo mega-thread.
  3. LINK to the Mojo solutions thread.
  4. LINK to the Head-Fi Mojo FAQ.
  5. LINK to @x RELIC x's encyclopedic review complete with an interview with Chord's Rob Watts. If you haven't already, do yourself a favor and go read it!
 
 
DISCLAIMER
I was provided with the Mojo as a review loaner. There is no financial incentive from Chord for writing this review. I am in no way affiliated with Chord, and this is my honest opinion of the Mojo. I would like to thank Aune for sponsoring the tour and specifically @AuneAudio for allowing me to participate!
 
 
ABOUT ME
I'm a 43 year old father who loves music.  From electronic (Autechre, Boards of Canada) to modern/minimalist composition (John Cage, Philip Glass) to alternative rock (Flaming Lips, Radiohead) to jazz (John Coltrane and Miles Davis) to metal (Behemoth, King Diamond) to classic rock (Eagles, Rush), I listen to a wide variety of genres and artists. 
 
My portable music journey started with the venerable Sony Cassette Walkman and then progressed to portable CD players, minidisc recorders (still have my Sharp DR7), and finally on to DAPs like the Rio Karma, iRiver IHP-1xx, iPod 5.5, iPhones, and the newer crop of DAPs from Fiio and iBasso. 
 
As mentioned in the introduction, I was lucky to have some very nice earbuds, headphones, and IEM to test out Mojo with. For earbuds, I used the VE Zen 2.0. For Headphones, I used my HiFiMan HE400 and the HiFiMan Edition X I had in for testing. For IEM, I used the Empire Ears lineup. Yes, Zeus got his Mojo on!  
 
As with a lot of people my age, I've got some hearing issues.  I've got mild tinnitus and suffer from allergies, which often affect hearing in my right ear.  I'll admit it, I'm not blessed with a pair of golden ears.  That said, I've been listening to portable gear for a long time and feel confident in assessing audio gear. I just wanted to be transparent up front. 
 
 
SPECIFICATIONS 
Output Power @ 1kHz: 720mW @ 8Ω, 35mW @ 600Ω
Output Impedance: 0.075Ω
Dynamic Range: 125dB
THD @ 3v - 0.00017%
Battery Life: 10 hours
Price: $599
 
 
PACKAGING & ACCESSORIES
As usual, I'll go over this in pictorial fashion with a few brief comments.
 
Front & Back of Box
ChordMojoBox1.jpg
 
It's super hard to see in the picture, but the Mojo logo is printed in a reflective white on white on the box's lid. Operating instructions are on the bottom of the box.
 
Sides
ChordMojoBox2.jpg

Sample rate guide (ROYGBIV, yo!), more instructions, and technical specs.
 
Mojo + Accessory
ChordMojo-8.jpg
 
You get the Mojo plus a charging cable. That's it, folks. I've seen this listed as a con for some of the reviews, and I just don't agree. Mojo has so many ways to connect that it would seriously be going above and beyond to provide all the different cables one might need. Luckily, cables aren't really that hard to find. A storage pouch of some sort would be nice to slip Mojo inside when not in use to prevent scratches, though. Really Chord, no storage pouch?
 
 
BUILD & ERGONOMICS
As usual, I'll go over the build and ergonomics in pictorial fashion below, pointing out what I like and what I think could be improved. 
 
Top + Bottom
ChordMojoFrontBack.jpg
 
Top: Here we can see the main features of Mojo's physical user interface, the three balls. When I first saw pictures of the Mojo with these three balls all lit up, I just didn't get it. I thought it looked just plain goofy, to be honest. However, people I trust said it looked better in person, so I did my best to reserve judgement. Luckily, once I pulled Mojo from the box I was very pleased with what I felt and saw. The aluminum case has a nice powdery soft finish. It's got some heft to it. This doesn't feel like a device that's going to get hurt if it bounces around a bit. Scratched? Sure. Dented? Maybe if you threw it. Seems pretty bulletproof to me. The balls are a very hard translucent plastic, which seems pretty durable although I've read reports of them getting scratched. I didn't notice any scratches on the Mojo I had in for testing even though I was the third reviewer. I'd say that pretty good, since Mojo doesn't come with a case of any sort and I mainly kept it in my man bag bouncing around with my other gear when not in use.
 
Bottom: Built-in silicon bumpers, manufacturing information and serial number, lots of tiny screws.
 
 
Left & Right Sides
ChordMojoLeftRight.jpg
 
Just a better view of the volume and power balls. When I saw pictures of Mojo, I didn't realize they would spin. Yup, they spin freely in their settings. It's a bit odd coming from traditional buttons, but you get used to it pretty quickly. Once powered up, the balls all light up. They're pretty bright at first, but you can dim them to a more reasonable level for low light environments. And since we're talking about the balls, this is probably as good a place as any to discuss volume adjustment. 
 
Volume Adjustment: I like Mojo's ability to fine-tune the volume for anything you throw at it from sensitive IEM to hard to drive headphones to full-on line out. Just hold down the buttons and you cycle through the color spectrum from double red for the lowest volume setting to double white for the highest setting. And yes, for you fellow science nerds out there, the volume and resolution indicators really are ROYGBIV. As a scientist, I can appreciate that. I've seen that some reviewers feel the volume change is somewhat slow, and it is if you're going from lower settings to higher settings when rapidly switching between IEM and headphones. However, I don't really see this being an issue in real world usage. If you're switching between different gear, you'll change the volume once, start jamming, and then fine tune a bit for individual songs. Easy peasy!   
 
 
Inputs & Outputs
ChordMojoInOut.jpg

Left: Mojo has two 3.5mm headphone jacks. I'm not sure how likely it is that two people listening at the same time with different cans are going to need the same volume setting, but it is handy for stacking to have both left and right jacks to choose from.
 
Right: From left to right, you've got COAX IN, USB IN, Charging Port + Battery Indicator LED, and OPTICAL IN.
 
NOTE: Unlike some devices, you can charge Mojo while jamming to your favorite tunes!
 
So now you've had your tour of Mojo. You've seen it all. It's really all pretty straight forward. It really is just as easy as turning it on, plugging it in, pressing play, and finding the right volume level. Easy peasy!
 
 
BATTERY LIFE

Depending on usage, you're going to get 8-10 hours of battery life out of the Mojo. Not too shabby. Given that you can charge while listening, I can see using this during a commute, plugging in at work, using on your commute home, at the gym, etc. and never really have to worry about running out of juice during normal usage. On long flights, you might need an external battery brick, though. 
 
EDIT: I totally forgot to mention the battery indicator LED the first time around, but I was just reminded of it in the main Mojo thread so I thought I'd come back and comment on it. It's also based on the color spectrum, with full charge being blue and then the color changing from green to yellow to red to flashing red when you really, really need to find a charger quick. Nice consistency in using the same basic ROYGBIV color coding across the various functions and so deliciously nerdy!
 
 
SOUND

During my time with Mojo, I basically used it in two main set ups. The first was paired with my iPhone 5S via CCK, and the second was with my FiiO X5 via COAX with FiiO L17 IC. I also plugged in to my MacBook Pro briefly to make sure it worked properly. Being a Mac, it just worked. No drivers needed. No fuss. Same with the other connections, really. Mojo sounded like Mojo to me across all sources. As mentioned in the introduction, I was also playing with the Aune M2 and Soundaware Esther Analog DAPs when I had Mojo and these will be my main sources of reference. They're all very good sources, so it was a pleasure to be able to switch back and forth between them. So what did I find?
 
Mojo has a very natural sound that fit between the more neutral sound of the Aune M2 and the quite full, warm sound of the Esther Analog. In a lot of respects, Mojo and Esther Analog were on par with each other. Both have what I would describe as natural, unexaggerated sound signatures that allow for a high level of detail retrieval without resorting to brightness or an ultra-wide, unrealistic sound field. Where they differed was in the level of fullness and warmth, with Mojo being just a bit on the full, warm side and Esther Analog being quite full, warm. Both have a very realistic placement of sounds in 3D space. I listen to a lot of extreme music, and one thing I really appreciated about both was the ability to handle all of that extreme music without breaking a sweat and making it all very listenable. That doesn't always happen. The Aune M2 on the other hand was more energetic, with more exaggerated lows and highs and a wider sound field than either Mojo or Esther Analog. To my ears, this gave the impression of the M2 having a more dynamic sound but at the expense of sounding less natural.  
 
Here's a quick summary I put together as I was listening to the three, with greater quantity (not quality) on the left:
Warmth: Esther Analog >> Mojo > M2
Fullness: Esther Analog >> Mojo > M2
Dynamics: M2 > Mojo ≃ Esther Analog
Soundstage: M2 > Mojo ≃ Esther Analog
3D: Mojo ≃ Esther Analog > M2
Bass: M2 > Mojo ≃ Esther Analog
Mids: Esther Analog > Mojo > M2
Treble: M2 > Mojo ≃ Esther Analog
 
I found myself being repeatedly drawn to Mojo for its natural, realistic sound. It's a full, mature sound that still left space between sounds. While it didn't have the largest sound field, it sounded very convincing. It is very balanced across the spectrum. Nothing really stands out. What you feed it is what you get. Compared with the Aune M2, you get a more refined sound. Compared with Esther Analog, you get a more neutral (though still very natural) sound. Because of this high level of refinement and lack of exaggeration across the spectrum, I found Mojo to pair very well with all the gear I tested it with. None of my gear was exceptionally hard to drive, though. My earbuds and IEM were kept in the lower range, while I needed to push up to the higher range for my HE400. From what I've read, one reviewer found Mojo lacking with very demanding cans. I can't confirm or deny this. Just be forewarned. 
 
Happy Cans! (VE Zen 2.0, HiFiMan HE400, Empire Ears Hermes)
ChordMojoCans.jpg
 
 
SUMMARY

When I first hooked Mojo up to my iPhone and took a listen, I knew it was something special. As I listened to it in comparison with other gear I had on hand, I confirmed this. When I went out for a walk with the Empire Ears Hermes pictured above and Mojo's battery ran out leaving me to plug directly into my iPhone, I can assure you I was not a happy camper. I couldn't wait to get back home and get the Mojo charged up. Midway through my time with Mojo, I started wondering if I should just abandon DAPs altogether and go for iPhone + Mojo. As mentioned in the introduction, I've heard a lot of DAPs this year. I've got a bit of an obsession with them, so for that thought to cross my mind was a bit surprising to me. So, why wouldn't I do this? Well, for starters I have an obsession with DAPs. I also have a large, eclectic music collection and like to have it at hand in FLAC format if possible. I just can't fit it all on my iPhone. So why not just use Tidal, you say? Smartphone + Tidal + Mojo has got to be a killer combination, right? Well, that would be a great solution if a lot of the music I listen to wasn't too obscure for Tidal to carry. So I find myself in the position where I probably need a DAP with two mSD slots as a transport for when I want all of my music with me. I guess that's not so bad, right? Either strapped to my iPhone or a DAP, I think I see a Mojo in my future...
 
If you're looking for one of the best sounding devices your can carry around in the palm of your hand, put Mojo on your shortlist. The hype is very real!
 
 
Thanks for taking the time to read this. Feel free to shoot me a PM if you've got any questions. 
 
And finally, a big thanks to Chord for making a mini-tour happen and to the tour organizer. I'm glad I could participate and experience this fantastic little device for myself!
howdy
howdy
Great review Nik! I miss that thing. It still looks in great condition. As I told you I will be buying this soon and hopefully this will be it for awhile. Nobody wants to buy my FiiO X5 and Im practically giving it away. Anyways, Im trying to be more focused on another hobby and that is shooting bow with my son.
nmatheis
nmatheis
@howdy: Your X5 Classic would make a great 400Gb transport for Mojo! Just sayin'...
 
One of my uncles is an avid bow hunter. Mostly Elk. Seems to have a lot of fun. Are you a hunter or just shoot shoot for fun? Training to be Arrow or Hawkeye?
almoskosz
almoskosz
"Cons: bit pricey" It's still the cheapest Chord :D

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Great sound. Quick, simple UI. Good one-handed operation. Auto-gain. Great build. Class A amp.
Cons: CUE-only Gapless. No USB DAC. No COAX / SPDIF Out. One card slot. Battery life. UI too simple for some. No tag-based browsing. AAC/ALAC issues.
AuneM2Official-1.jpg
Photo courtesy of Aune
 
***Even though the M2 I reviewed is BLUE, it is not the M2s. It's a pre-production model of the standard M2.***
 
[size=medium]Jan. 2016 EDIT: An issue I thought had been resolved with AAC & ALAC playback has not been resolved, so I'm removing a half-star from my review until this is fixed. The issue is that any AAC or ALAC songs over 8.5 minutes are skipped over and not played. Hopefully, this is resolved soon.[/size]
 
INTRODUCTION
I've been very lucky to hear many great-sounding DAPs this year. This product category is exploding at a rate I'm sure many of us wouldn't have guessed at a couple years ago. Today, I'm here to tell you about the newest contender, the Aune M2. I've become a fan of Aune this year, participating in review tours for the both the Original B1 Amp (LINK) and the updated B1 2016 Version Amp (LINK), the Aune X1S desktop DAC/Amp (LINK), and now the Aune M2 DAP. When my buddy @hakushondaimao asked if I'd like to review the new M2 DAP he'd been playing with and help kick off Aune's US Tour of the M2 DAP and B1 2016 Version Amp, of course I said yes. Who doesn't love playing with new DAPs? Hmm? I sure do! Maybe you do, too. If so, please check out the tour thread Aune put up (LINK)!!!
 
Now, I'm not going to lie to you, my time with the M2 has had its ups and downs. Since this was a pre-production, pre-release model, it was running beta firmware. Bugs... Yup, there were plenty of bugs. Take a look at @hakushondaimao's review (LINK). He loved the sound but held back on his rating due to firmware bugs and limitations. I experienced a lot of the same bugs and limitations. Most of the bugs have been fixed, but a lot of the limitations remain. I'll go over those in the review below, but you get a taste of them from my pros and cons above. Okay, enough preamble, let's get on with the review, shall we!
 
Before we start, here's a bit of information about Aune from the About Us section on their website:
 
About Aune
 
As Ao Lai Er Technology’s high quality HiFi brand, Aune has been devoted to developing and producing desktop, portable and car audio products. Founded in the year of 2004, Ao Lai Er owns the largest Chinese audio technology website - HIFIDIY.NET and high end audio brand TITANS. HIFIDIY.NET has 700 thousand members. It’s always been a platform for the most advanced HiFi technology communications and practice. We gained lots of experience from the long-term accumulation, and have released hundreds of kits and parts from independent R&D, which are well received around the world! Aune team is a group of audiophiles who only pursue the best. We use our products in daily life and we love each and every one of them! Superb sound is Aune’s goal; great user experience and satisfaction is what Aune pursues. We are striving to make Aune one of the world’s famous audio brands in the future!
 
In order to design a world-class audio products, aune include the formation of an excellent R & D team of professional designers at home and abroad, has a number of strong, serious and responsible work of professional and technical personnel in our team, as well as a love for music professional audio career employees, 100 percent have a college, doctoral, master's degree or above. The most important thing is that they have strong technical strength, for the sound development of a range of products, from the cd drive, speakers, amplifiers, decoders, and even the future of the player home audio and video so you can design the perfect product, and can get the industry the affirmation and recognition of consumers!
 
LINK to Aune's English website.
LINK to the Aune M2 thread.
LINK to the Aune M2 US & Canada Tour thread.
 
 
DISCLAIMER
I was provided the M2 as a review sample and to kick off Aune's US tour for the M2 DAP + B1 2016 Version Amp. There is no financial incentive from Aune in writing this review. I am in no way affiliated with Aune, and this is my honest opinion of the M2.  I would like to thank Aune for sponsoring the tour and specifically @AuneAudio for allowing me to participate!
 
 
ABOUT ME
I'm a 43 year old father who loves music.  From electronic (Autechre, Boards of Canada) to modern/minimalist composition (John Cage, Philip Glass) to alternative rock (Flaming Lips, Radiohead) to jazz (John Coltrane and Miles Davis) to metal (Behemoth, King Diamond) to classic rock (Eagles, Rush), I listen to a wide variety of genres and artists. 
 
My portable music journey started with the venerable Sony Cassette Walkman and then progressed to portable CD players, minidisc recorders (still have my Sharp DR7), and finally on to DAPs like the Rio Karma, iRiver IHP-1xx, iPod 5.5, iPhones, and the newer crop of DAPs from Fiio and iBasso. 
 
I typically listen with IEMs from my ever-growing collection from budget to mid-fi. Less often, I grab a pair of full-size cans.  Recently, I've been listening a lot with my AKG K553 and HiFiMan HE400, as well as the Alpha & Delta AD01 and RHA T20 IEM I had in for testing.  I do have a lot of other gear, though.  You can always check my profile for a reasonably up to date gear list. 
 
As with a lot of people my age, I've got some hearing issues.  I've got mild tinnitus and suffer from allergies, which often affect hearing in my right ear.  I'll admit it, I'm not blessed with a pair of golden ears.  That said, I've been listening to portable gear for a long time and feel confident in assessing audio gear. I just wanted to be transparent up front. 
 
 
SPECIFICATIONS 
 
Headphone Out:
Output Impedance: 1Ω
THN+N: 0.0009% @ 300Ω
Peak power: 32Ω/230MW
  
Line Out:
THN+N: 0.00038% (24bit/44.1k 1KHZ 0DB)
NOISE: 3UV
DNR: 117DB
CCIF: -118DB
  
Outputs:
3.5 mm Headphone, 3.5mm Line
 
 
Amplifier:
ARM + CPLD + AK4490 + High Bias amplification
 
 
Volume Control:
0-100, jog-dial controlled
Gain Selection:
Gain adjust adapts to headphones/earphones used
Equalization:
None
 
 
Storage:
1x micro-SD card (up to 128GB, FAT32), no internal storage
Supported Audio Formats:
 
 
DSD: DSF/DSD64, DFF/DSD64, ISO Whole Track
WAV: 16/24/32 Bit, 44.1K/48K/88.2K/96K/176.4K/192K WAV+CUE
FLAC: 16/24 Bit, 44.1K/48K/88.2K/96K/176.4K/192K
APE, ALAC, AAC, MP3
 
 
Battery Capacity:
3500 MA
Battery Life:
7.5+ hours* (Class A, continuous play)
Charging Time:
4.5 hours at 800 MA (charger not provided)
Power Saving:
Auto Power Off, Backlight time off, Breakpoint Resume
 
 
Dimensions:
120mm x 65mm x 17.5mm
Weight:
195g
 
* Up from the 5-6 hours for pre-production M2.
 
Those are the base specifications for the M2, but there are three M2 variants with differences pointed out below.
  1. M2 (US$349): 2x Japanese NDK 2520 ultra-low-jitter crystals. Black & Silver.
  2. M2 Pro (US$499): 2x USA Crystek CCHD575 crystals, specially tuned OP-amp combination. Black & Silver.
  3. M2s (US$649): Same as M2 Pro but with different colors, and Satellite-level, Teflon PCB substrate. Blue.
 
 
PACKAGING & ACCESSORIES
As this was a pre-production model, I didn't receive any packaging or accessories. @hakushondaimao has indicated that the final production models will come with packaging similar to Aune's B1 Amp. The only accessory you get is a USB cable to charge the M2. Basically, you're getting the a box with the M2 and a USB cable. No silicon cover. No storage pouch. Nada. At the price point we're looking at, I would've appreciated a silicon case. The M2 I've got is getting a few small dings, which a silicon case would prevent.
 
 
BUILD & ERGONOMICS
As usual, I'll go over the build and ergonomics in pictorial fashion below, pointing out what I like and what I think could be improved. 
 
FRONT + LEFT
AuneM2-1.jpg
 
Here we can see several features of the M2's physical user interface. The M2 has a nice all-aluminum case, which makes it quite durable but susceptible to dings, dents, and scratches. On the front face are three transport control buttons. I like these. They're in a pretty good spot for one-handed operation. When holding the M2 in my left hand, they're in just the right spot for my thumb to reach over and interact with them. Above those, you see the 2.4" IPS screen. Along the bottom you see the Headphone Out, Line Out, and micro USB charging port. No file transfer here, folks, so get out your card reader! All of the markings on the front face are laser engraved, so there won't be any worry about them fading over time. Markings on the other faces are painted on, and I haven't seen any degradation over the month or so I've been using the M2 despite the lack of case.
 
In addition to acting as transport controls, the Back/Forward buttons move up/down through menus. The Play/Pause button holds double-duty, both selecting menu items with a press and backing out of menus with a press + hold. A quick press + hold backs you out one level, while a longer press + hold takes you back to either the Main Menu or Now Playing Screen. It's a bit unusual, but you'll get the hang of it quickly. I've also got a video below that shows the UI in action. Press Back + Play/Pause to switch between Play Modes. Press Forward + Play/Pause to Add/Remove a song from Favorites.
 
And the color is very tricky to capture. It's more of a teal blue. I was going to include a pic from Aune's website, but even their press images of the blue M2 don't capture the color properly. Oh well, you'll just have to use your imagination...
 
 
REAR + RIGHT
AuneM2-2.jpg
 
The usual info is on the back. Being a pre-production model, this one got the SN001 serial number. Along the left side, you see the reset hole (gotta look carefully for this one!), the sole micro SD card slot, the rotary dial, and the micro HDMI port. Similar to the transport control buttons, the dial does double-duty as both volume controls and menu navigation. If you're on the Now Playing screen, a press takes you to the Main Menu, which a press + hold backs you out to the song list. In menus, a press selects items, which a press + hold backs you out a level. A long press + hold backs out to the Main Menu and then back to the Now Playing screen. Again, it's not quite like other UI I've used before, but you'll get the hang of it quickly enough. And it's fast, which is nice!
 
​Edges along the rear side are just slightly rounded. I wish they were more rounded like the front edges, as the edges tend to dig into your palm. If you get a chance to audition the M2, turn it over in your palm and feel how much better the nice rounded front edges feel in your hand. Hopefully next time...
 
 
BOTTOM & TOP EDGES
AuneM2-22.jpg
 
Bottom: HO, LO, micro-USB
Top: Power / Screen Lock Button
 
 
RIGHT & LEFT EDGES
AuneM2-23.jpg
 
Right: Reset hole, micro-SD slot, Rotary Dial, Micro-HDMI
Left: Nada, nothing, zilch...
 
Okay, so we've been all around the M2 now. You've seen it all. What did I like? I really like the button layout. It's very well thought out for one-handed operation in the left hand, so you lefties should be happy with this DAP. Your thumb controls the three buttons on the front, your index finger gets the lock key, and your middle finger gets the rotary dial. Very easy to use with minimal shifting in your hand. Nice! What was missing? The most obvious to me was the lack of COAX / SPDIF Out. You've got micro-HDMI, which you could use to connect up to a home system but not the more typical Coax Out. This means you're not going to be connecting the M2 to any portable DAC/Amps any time soon. I'm not up on whether micro-HDMI is being implemented in desktop DAC/Amps yet, but I haven't seen it. You can always get an HDMI → COAX converter, but then you're adding more circuitry to your audio chain. Main point, the Digital Out choice is unusual and somewhat limiting at this point in time. I think Aune is very confident you'll be happy with the M2's performance and won't be looking to use an external DAC/Amp.
 
 
I didn't include a comparison pic, but the M2 is basically the same dimensions as the FiiO X5. M2 is just a hair narrower and about a cm shorter. This puts it right between the FiiO X5 and Shanling M3. In other words, it's getting up there in size and is more on the transportable size. It's the sort of DAP I like to throw in my "man bag" instead of my jeans. Shirt pocket? No way. Skinny jeans fan? Nope. Go get yourself a nice "man purse"! 
 
And again, Aune decided to make this nifty BLUE color exclusive to the top-level M2s DAP, so you'll be looking at Black or Silver for the M2 and M2Pro.
 
 
GUI / FIRMWARE
As I mentioned in the introduction, I've been through several beta versions of the firmware and am now on the final version. What a wild ride it's been, my friends. Fun, though. I've been a beta tester before, so I enjoy the experience of working with engineers and developers to fine-tune the user experience. Of course, the manufacturer has their own vision and definitely has the final word, so some of my suggestions weren't included in the M2's feature set. That's okay. Aune definitely had a vision for the M2, and they stuck with it. What I'll do now is give you some pics of the GUI and also include a video where I go over the physical and software UI to help make things clearer.
 
Before we begin, though, I want to make one point clear. The M2's GUI was built for speed. This isn't a luxury car approach. The M2 is like a sports car tat's been intentionally stripped down for maximum speed. It boots so fast, it's almost like the hibernation mode on other DAPs. Push a button, and the M2 gives you what you want and it gives it to you right now. I think it's the most responsive DAP I've used, and I have little doubt it's because it's so stripped down. It's also rock solid. Sure, I've encountered some bugs. I haven't had it freeze, though. The reset hole has not been touched by me. Not once. Nice!
 
MAIN MENU: SONGS + FOLDERS
AuneM2-24.jpg
 
On the top row, you see the Songs menu item. This is basically a list of all songs on your M2. Select this, switch to shuffle mode, and you've got your own Shuffle All radio station.
On the bottom row, you see the Folders menu item. This is probably where you'll spend more of your time, so please organize your mSD card. I like Artist → Year  Album → Songs. Adding Year ensures all of my albums are ordered by release date. This type of organization can be easily automated via MP3Tag + Google-Fu and is well worth it for any DAP, IMHO!
 
 
MAIN MENU: PLAYLISTS
AuneM2-25.jpg
 
Here you get two choices. Most played just gives you a running list of your most played songs. Favorites gives you a chronological list of all the songs you've favorited.
 
 
MAIN MENU: SETTINGS
AuneM2-26.jpg
 
I'm not going to go over all the settings here, but I'll point out a few interesting points. First, I really like the Lock Key Setting. You can customize which buttons are active while the screen is locked. Same goes for the rotary dial. Some of the buttons and rotary dial functions even have more than one choice. This really allows you to make the Aune M2 work the way you want it to when the screen is locked. Nice!
 
Nitpick time... See that Gapless Playback choice? Well, it only works if you've got a CUE sheet. That's probably my biggest complaint about the M2, and one I've made very clear to Aune more than once. Play Mode toggles between Folder Repeat, Folder Shuffle, and Song Repeat. I've requested a Play Mode that just plays the current folder once and stops. I don't know about you, but I dot need to hear the same album ad infinitum. A "play through folders" feature would also be appreciated. Totally missing is a choice for Resume Play. The M2 always starts up at the beginning of the last song you played. I'd like the choice between beginning vs. position. Hopefully some of this missing functionality will be added in over time.
 
 
NOW PLAYING
AuneM2-21.jpg
 
Whew, we've finally made it to the Now Playing screen! On the top bar, you get a volume indicator which maxes out at 100, a lot of blank space, DAC filter indicator, an empty spot for the ♡ Favorites symbol, Play/Pause + Back/Forward indicator, Play Mode indicator, and finally the battery indicator. In the main screen, you get Song, Artist, and Album from top to bottom. Song name is derived from the file name, while Artist and Album are derived from tags. At the bottom, you have the elapsed time, song # / # songs queued up, and song length above the progress bar. Under the progress bar, you have resolution, bit depth, and file type. No album art, though. Hope you didn't want any. Doesn't bother me one bit. I'm here for the music, not to waste battery life looking at pretty pictures. Of course, YMMV.
 
Aune's Quick Start Pic should help:
 
12.QuickStartGuide.jpg
 
 
HW + FW UI VIDEO
0.jpg

 
TO SUM UP
The M2's GUI is pretty bare bones, so be prepared for that going in. Don't expect a lot of frills, keep your files / folders well-organized, and you'll be fine. in fact, you'll be treated to a very fast GUI! Of course, it is missing some common features other DAPs have. So if you're looking for non-CUE sheet gapless playback, EQ, album art, tag-based browsing, etc., you're going to be sorely disappointed. If that's you, move along, my friend!
 
 
BATTERY LIFE

Battery life is on the short side for a DAP these days. You're looking at DX90 level battery, so in the 5-6 hour range. I'd heard rumblings of better battery life in the 8-9 hour range for the final production model, but this doesn't seem to have played itself out yet. Hopefully battery life can be optimized with future firmware updates. Be prepared to top the battery off every day or two, depending on how much you plan on using the M2.
 
 
USB DAC

USB DAC? What USB DAC? Move right along, good sir!
 
 
SOUND

During my time with the M2, I've had the chance to play around with the Empire Ears IEM lineup, FLC 8S tunable triple hybrid IEM, HiFiMan Edition X planar headphones, and VE Zen 2.0 earbuds. As usual, I listened mainly to classic rock, electronic, metal, and modern composition in AAC and FLAC formats. I also had the Chord Mojo and Soundaware M1 Esther Analog in for testing at the same time, so I put in some time switching off between these three sources and have some thoughts on what the strengths of each are. 
 
In general, I found the M2 has a very dynamic sound just on the warm side of neutral with a wide soundstage. It easily competes with other DAPs in its price class and beyond. To illustrate that, I chose to focus on M2 vs. Mojo and Esther Analog, which are both around twice the price of the M2.
 
Warmth: Esther Analog >> Mojo > M2
Fullness: Esther Analog >> Mojo > M2
Dynamics: M2 > Mojo ≃ Esther Analog
Soundstage: M2 > Mojo ≃ Esther Analog
3D: Mojo ≃ Esther Analog > M2
Bass: M2 > Mojo ≃ Esther Analog
 
Mids: Esther Analog > Mojo > M2
Treble: M2 > Mojo ≃ Esther Analog
 
Mojo and Esther Analog are very impressive sources. Very impressive! I was quite surprised at how competitive the M2's sound was. Listening to M2 on it's own, it's easy to get swept away by the sound. Listening in comparison to Mojo and Esther Analog, M2's bass sounds a bit enhanced, the soundstage is wider but not as 3D, mids aren't as full and sweet especially when compared to Esther Analog. I'd say which you prefer comes down to preference, as I didn't feel I was missing out with any of them. I was just getting different flavors.
 
VOLUME @ COMFORTABLE LISTENING LEVEL
FLC 8S: 40/100
Empire Ears Zeus: 25/100
VE Zen 2.0: 50/100
HiFiMan HE400: 50/100
HiFiMan Edition X: 45/100
 
M2 drives everything from extremely sensitive IEM to power-hungry planars well. Even though I got plenty of volume out of the M2 with HE400 and Edition X, I did find stacking them with the Aune B1 Amp in Class A mode made them a bit punchier. it certainly wasn't necessary, but I had the B1 at hand so why not.
 
Not my HE400, but you get the picture. The M2 + B1 stack was obviously meant to be!
AuneB1v2-15.jpg
 
 
SUMMARY

What an interesting experience this has been. The M2 is probably the most unique DAP I've tried. Unlike the other DAPs I've tried, the M2 eschews most creature comforts for the sake of speed and simplicity. So-so battery life, no album art, no tag-based browsing, no gapless unless you generate CUE sheets. It's certainly not a DAP for the everyman. It's a DAP for the hardcore audiophile who gladly makes those trade offs for the sake of a very dynamic, engaging sound, Class A power, and nicely engineered ergonomics. If you feel you need a little extra oomph, hook it up to the Aune B1 and you've got a very synergistic combination. Are the trade-offs worth it? For me, they're not really trade-offs. I intentionally strip album art out of albums on some of my DAPs to speed up the UI, so obviously the M2's lack of album art support doesn't impact me much. I also have a very organized folder structure on my mSD cards and rely solely on Folder Browsing, so again no compromise for me. I'm rarely without access to power, as I typically keep an external battery pack and cables in my man bag when I'm away for the day. Gapless, though. That one gives me some grief. I'm really hoping Aune is able to enable gapless without the need for CUE sheets. I also hope they enable positional resume so I'm not forced to start at the beginning of my last song every time the M2 starts up. And finally, I'm hoping they add in play through folders and single folder Play Modes. If Aune implements these last three (gapless, positional resume, and additional play modes), I'd be thoroughly satisfied with the M2 and bump up it's rating to 4.5 stars. I know some of you love your creature comforts, though. For you, I'd give the M2 a 3-35. star rating depending on how strongly you feel you need all those first-world comforts the M2 is missing. In fact, a lot of you will probably see the lack of album art and tag-based browsing and move on. That's too bad. The M2 is a finely engineered music machine that deserves more attention than I think it'll get. Hopefully this review helps.
 
Thanks for taking the time to read this. Feel free to shoot me a PM if you've got any questions. 
 
And finally, a big thanks to Aune and @AuneAudio for providing me with the M2 for review and for setting up the M2 + B1 review tour. They're both great products, and I look forward to seeing more great products from Aune in the future. If you've read this far and are interested in the tour, please check out the following LINK!
Stuff Jones
Stuff Jones
nmatheis  Thanks for the explanation. I'm coming from the Shozy Alien so my expectations for features are pretty low. Battery life is a little bit of a bummer though. I hope the claims of improved battery life with the new firmware are correct. Has anyone corroborated yet? 
 
Thanks for the review btw :)
Whaleshark12
Whaleshark12
mgunin
mgunin
Nikolaus, thanks a lot for reviewing! I wonder how M2 compares to N5 strictly soundwise? They are priced quite closely, but N5 is more feature-rich... And, how about Shozy Alien? :wink:

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Rock-Solid Bluetooth connection. Amazing Bluetooth Range. Good Call Quality. Comfortable. Solid Build.
Cons: Needs EQ. So-So Isolation. Questionable Aesthetics.
AusdomM05-7.jpg

 
 

INTRODUCTION

Okay. Who out there's heard of AUSDOM? Many hands raised? I thought not. I hadn't heard of them until they reached out to the Head-Fi community with a review opportunity for their M05 Apt-X Bluetooth headphones. The Bluetooth products I've tried have been pretty hit or miss with respect to connection and quality. Would the AUSDOM's M05 fare better? I was curious, so I signed up and was lucky enough to be chosen as a reviewer. Thanks AUSDOM!
 
So who exactly are AUSDOM? Well, they're a general tech company, making headphones, IEM, speakers, home security cameras, webcams, car DVRs, chargers, and cables. Their website has been in existence since 2005. Who knew?
 
Here's a bit more about them from their About Us page:
 
Focusing on product development and innovation, AUSDOM designs products with best customer experience so that each user can enjoy life with simple and smart technology. For each product, our designers and engineers will carefully study the user's habits, and use their creativity and experience to provide the consumers with convenient, efficient and valuable products. Every AUSDOM product is made with care, every detail counts to impress our customers. Giving our customers the perfect experience has always been AUSDOM’s goal. The recognition of our customers and their suggestions are our driving force.
AUSDOM is a team dedicated to design. They are not afraid to follow their dream. We advocate for innovation and Internet culture, we adhere to international perspective. We share the convenience of the Internet. We facilitate our customers’ life by bringing intelligent and convenient products in their life.

We are consumer-centric. We establish a system with ecosystem values: focus, equality, freedom, openness, sharing and win-win. We hope that we can all grow, progress and have fun in work and in life.



Here are some useful links for you to check out before or after the review. I especially recommend checking out the link to @Brooko's measurements. I found this very helpful when setting up an EQ correction for the M05. Thanks @Brooko!
  1. AUSDOM's Website: LINK.
  2. AUSDOM's M05 Page: LINK.
  3. AUSDOM M05 Thread: LINK.
  4. @Brooko's Comparative Measurements: LINK.
 
 

DISCLAIMER

There is no financial incentive from AUSDOM for writing this review. I am in no way affiliated with AUSDOM, and this is my honest opinion of the M05  I would like to thank AUSDOM for giving me a chance to test drive the M05, and I hope my feedback proves useful for my fellow Head-Fi members as well as for AUSDOM.
 
 

ABOUT ME

I'm a 43 year old father who loves music. While I listen mostly to electronic and metal these days, I do listen to a wide variety of music - from electronic (Autechre, Boards of Canada) to modern/minimalist composition (John Cage, Philip Glass) to alternative rock (Flaming Lips, Radiohead) to jazz (John Coltrane and Miles Davis) to metal (Behemoth, King Diamond) to classic rock (Eagles, Rush).  
 
I'm primarily a portable audio enthusiast. My portable music journey started with the venerable Sony Cassette Walkman and then progressed to portable CD players, minidisc recorders (still have my Sharp DR7), and finally on to DAPs like the Rio Karma, iRiver IHP-1xx, iPod 5.5, iPhones, and the newer crop of DAPs from Fiio and iBasso. Being a portable audio enthusiast, I typically listen with IEMs but am enjoying listening with full-size headphones and desktop gear more and more.
 
As with a lot of people my age, I've got some hearing issues.  I've got mild tinnitus and suffer from allergies, which can affect hearing in my right ear. I'll admit it, I'm not blessed with a pair of golden ears.  That said, I've been listening to portable gear for a long time and feel confident in assessing audio gear - just wanted to be transparent up front.



 
 

SPECIFICATIONS

  1. Drivers: Dynamic, 40mm
  2. Rated Impedance: 32Ω
  3. Sensitivity: 91dB ±3dB @ 1mW
  4. Frequency Range: 20Hz ~ 20kHz
  5. Rated Power: 20mW
  6. Mic: Omni-Directional
  7. Bluetooth: 4.0 with APT-X Support
  8. Wireless Range: 10m
  9. Battery Life: 20 Hours
  10. Standby: >250 Hours
  11. Charge Time: 2-3 Hours
  12. MSRP: $160 (On Sale For ~$46 on Amazon)


 

 

PACKAGING & ACCESSORIES



As usual, I'll go over the packaging and accessories in pictorial format.
 
FRONT
AusdomM05-1.jpg
 
REAR
AusdomM05-2.jpg
 
ACCESSORIES
AusdomM05-8.jpg
 
 
In all, you get
  1. M05 Headphones
  2. Storage Pouch
  3. 1.2m Cable
  4. USB Cable (not pictured)
  5. User Manual

The external packaging is attractive enough. I do wish AUSDOM included the specs on the outside of the box instead of buried in very small print in the User Manual inside the box. Inside the box, the M05 are packed in a plastic insert. I'd prefer a more eco-friendly insert. It'd give the M05 unboxing experience a more upscale feel.
 
Accessories are pretty sparse, but honestly what more do you need? The cable is pretty thin and doesn't inspire confidence. Given the M05's excellent Bluetooth performance, it's not something I think I'd ever touch unless the M05's battery ran out - and that's not very likely. The mesh storage pouch provides a thin layer of protection. It's enough to keep the M05 scratch-free, but it's not going to prevent them from getting crushed so be careful where you pack them if traveling.
 
 

BUILD & ERGONOMICS

As usual, I'll walk through the various design and ergonomic features of the M05 in pictorial format below, pointing out what I like and where I see room for improvement.
 
OUTSIDE
AusdomM05-3.jpg
 
You can see the design and features here. Moving around the Left cup from front to back, you find the mic module, power, volume -, volume +, and 3.5mm jack. Moving around the Right cup from front to back, you have FFWD, Play/Pause, REW, and USB charging port. There are a lot of buttons packed into a small space, but I've found it to be pretty manageable. Note the tactile raised dots on the volume +/- and FFWD/REW buttons. I really like that and wish the Power and Play/Pause buttons had those, as well. The headphone jack is in an odd place, but as noted above you're not buying these to use them wired, are you? If so, you should just look at wired headphones.
 
Design-wise, I like the matte black rubberized finish on the cups, arms, and lower headband. I didn't snap a picture, but the inner band is metal, so you can bend the headband a bit to adjust the fit. I needed to do this, making the headband a bit narrower to accommodate the shape of my head. I don't personally like the carbon fiber design on the cups and top of the headband. Real carbon fiber is okay, but fake carbon fiber? Nope, not for me. I'd much rather AUSDOM has used the same matte black rubberized finish for the whole cups and the top of the headband. That's just me and my aesthetic taste. Of course, your tastes may be different. Maybe you'll really like the carbon fiber look. 
 
INSIDE
AusdomM05-4.jpg
 
Headband and ear cup padding is adequate for comfortable wearing for extended periods. My small-ish ears fit inside nicely, but they do just touch the drivers. It's not enough to bother me, but I do feel thicker pads would help. If you're sensitive to this, these might not be the headphones for you.
 
FRONT / BACK
AusdomM05-9.jpg

Not much to say here, just showing you what they'll look like from the front and back.
 
To sum up, while I mostly like the design, I do think a few changes would make this an even better headphone. Thicker pads would help keep ears from touching the drivers. 
 
SOUND
FYI: I mainly listen to experimental electronic and metal and mainly used those genres to evaluate the M05, along with a bit of classic rock thrown in for good measure. I used the M05 primarily via Bluetooth out of my iPhone and MacBook Pro. 
 
So what does AUSDOM say about the M05? Descriptors used on the AUSDOM's M05 page are Deep Bass, Rich Bass, Powerful Sound, Crystal-Clear Vocals, High Fidelity, and 3D Surround Sound. How does the M05 live up to those descriptors? It certainly lives up to the descriptors about strong, powerful bass. High-fidelity and crystal-clear vocals? Not so much.
 
At first, I used the M05 a lot for listening to my current audiobook, The Brother Initiate by Sean Russell. The M05 sounded great, enhancing my experience by giving the narrator's voice a deep rich tone. Good so far.
 
Then I watched the first two episodes of Badlands. Hey, it was recommended to me because I watch The Walking Dead. While it sounded good, don't bother watching the show. Not so good...
 
Finally, I listened to some music while I was watching dishes with my two wee boys wreaking havoc in the house. Not too shabby. I was impressed so far with these. 
 
So when I went on the M05 thread to report in and saw @Brooko mention heavy mid-bass and muffled vocals, I was a bit taken aback. So I waited until the boys were in bed and listened in a quiet environment. And as usual, @Brooko was spot on. The vocals were masked and sounded a bit hollow. I applied an EQ curve he suggested and found it really cleared up the vocals a lot, but I felt it also took away some of the character that AUSDOM was going for with the M05. Gone was the fun bass, replaced by a more balanced sound signature. So I played around with the EQ settings until I found an EQ curve that I felt retained the M05's basic character, while bringing the vocals forward and making them sound less hollow. This took the M05 from a very bass-forward sound signature to a more tastefully done, fun, bass-enhanced signature with clear vocals and a smooth top end. I'd use this in noisier environments and experiment with cutting he bass even further in quiet environments.
 
Soundstage and placement is okay but can't keep up with my AKG K553 Pro. That's not surprising given the bass-forward sound signature with a smooth top end. It can be helped along by cutting the bass and increasing upper mids and treble.
 
Here are the basic EQ settings I found worked well with the M05, keeping the fun, bassy sound while making them sound more clear. Feel free to experiment here. And again, I must mention that @Brooko deserves credit for laying a very solid foundation for the following EQ curve.
 
15-Band EQ Settings
-1dB @ 63H
-2dB @ 100H
-3dB @ 160H
-2dB @ 250H
-1dB @ 400H
+1dB @ 1k
+2dB @ 1.6k
+2dB @ 2.5k
+1dB @ 4k
 
Further decreasing the bass valley to -6dB leans these up quite a bit for listening in quieter environments or for those of you are bass-shy.
 

ISOLATION: It's a bit below my AKG K553 Pro. It's okay, but I do find myself needing to raise the volume a bit when my boys are knocking bao
 
POWER REQUIREMENTS: With the stock Music app on my iPhone, 3-5 clicks is a normal listening volume. 6-7 is getting loud. 8-9 is pretty loud. Beyond that, and your ears might be ringing a bit. 
 
 
BATTERY LIFE
AUSDOM claims 20 hours of music or talk time. I've got to say, I think it must be much longer than that. I charged these once when I first received them a couple weeks ago, have listened to a lot of my audiobook, watched a few hour-long tv shows, and quite a bit of music, and they're still going strong. In fact, I've been listening to them while editing the pics for this review and while writing it, and the Bluetooth battery indicator on my iPhone looks like it's still at 90%. It's barely moved at all since I first charged them, and these have had lots of use. It's absolutely insane. Either the battery indicator on my iPhone is way off, or AUSDOM uses the most conservative battery life estimates I've ever encountered. Simply amazing!
 
 
BLUETOOTH
Bluetooth performance is equally stellar. Pairing was simple, and once paired the M05 stay locked on like a bloodhound. @iancraig10 mentioned placing his Bluetooth receiver in his house and using the M05 while wandering around his garden. I tried a similar test. I paired the M05 up with my iPhone, placed my iPhone in the middle of my house on street level, walked outside, shut the door, and started walking down the street. From past experience with Bluetooth devices, I didn't expect it to work once I left the house. Nope, I walked past my next door neighbor's house. Still going strong. I walked past the next house. Still going strong. Halfway through the next house, the signal finally cut out. I started walking back, and the M05 picked up again once I got to my next door neighbor's house. I was simply stunned with the range on these. Great job AUSDOM!
 
 
 
SUMMARY
So what do I think of the M05? I like the basic design and rock-solid Bluetooth performance but am not enamored with the aesthetic choices. Sound is a mixed-bag. If you use these primarily in noisy environments and/or like a bass-forward sound signature, you might find the stock sound satisfactory. If you're listening in quieter environments and/or like a more balanced sound, you're going to want to take some time to play with EQ settings until you hone in on the right EQ curve for you. Is it a deal-breaker? Depends on your attitude towards EQ. After playing around with EQ settings on @Brooko's recommendation, these aren't a pair of headphones I'd be likely to use without EQ. Luckily, I've got a few apps on my iPhone with really good EQ modules. My streaming app, Deezer, also has an EQ module. It's admittedly very simple, but I quickly honed in on an EQ setting there that cleared up the M05 nicely. So if you're not afraid to EQ, you might want to give these a shot. If you're an EQ hater, pass these on by unless you love bass. 
 
I feel my rating of these deserves a little explanation. Stock sound is not stellar, but with EQ it's quite passable. Combine that with the extremely impressive battery life and Bluetooth performance, and I feel these are deserving of four stars. If I was rating them solely on sound and/or the battery life and Bluetooth performance weren't so good, I'd be rating these a 3-3.5. But man, the battery life and Bluetooth performance it's hard not to find thee a useful addition to your headphone arsenal!
 
I just want to point out that as of this review, these headphones are on sale for the unbelievably good price of ~$46 on Amazon. At that price, I can only recommend you grab up a pair and see if they're for you. Such a low price of entry for headphones with this high level of utility. Do yourself a favor and give them a shot.
 
I hope you found this useful and would like to give a hearty thanks to @Ausdom Audio for giving several members of the Head-Fi community a chance to review the M05. AUSDOM has proven they've got  a lot of potential. With a little more attention to tuning, they're going to have real winners on their hands!
Gracesheng
Gracesheng
Graet review and nice photos, thanks for sharing. 
JediMa70
JediMa70
I got them today.. I was goin to send them back since i started to play with EQ, something I usually dont like to do and they started to be really ok

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Great sound that can be tuned to your liking with covers. Comfortable. Attractive.
Cons: Needs a good source to really shine.
 

VEZen2.0-5.jpg

 
 

INTRODUCTION

Upstart Venture Electronics has been making quite the name for themselves around Head-Fi in 2015. It seems like everybody who listens to their gear is nothing short of impressed with what this new company has been able produce in a short amount of time. From their super bang for your buck $5 Monk earbuds to their high-resolution Duke IEM to the Runabout amp, their products never cease to impress. The same can be said for their Zen earbuds. In fact, I received a review sample of the Zen earbuds quite some time ago. You remember those, right? The 320 Ohm white earbuds people were raving about. Well, right before I was going to write my review for them, I got word from VE that an improved Zen would soon be released called Zen 2.0. I was quite enamored with the original Zen, so I was skeptical that the new model could really be that much better. But on the other hand, VE really seemed to know how to produce master craft earbuds so I shelved my review of the original and waited patiently for the new model to arrive. Arrive they did, and boy was VE right about these being an improvement. They took an masterpiece of an earbud that I was looking at giving a solid 4.5 star review and kicked things up a notch. Yes folks, I'm awarding the VE Zen 2.0 my first ever 5 star review. I honestly never thought the day would come, but I think VE has simply done an outstanding job with these. 
 
Before we get to the review proper, let's take a moment to learn about VE (Venture Electronics):
 
ABOUT_US_VE-audio_Venture-Electronic__.jpg
 
Before we head off to the review, I'm going to give you a few links I found useful:
  1. VE's Website: LINK.
  2. VE's AliExpress Store: LINK
  3. VE Thread: LINK.
  4. @DJScope's review: LINK
  5. @Brooko's Zen 1.0 and 2.0 Veritas measurements: LINK
 
 
 

DISCLAIMER

There is no financial incentive from VE for writing this review.  I am in no way affiliated with VE, and this is my honest opinion of the Zen 2.0 earbuds. I would like to thank VE for giving me a chance to review the Zen 2.0 earbuds, and I hope my feedback proves useful for my fellow Head-Fi members as well as for VE.
 
 

ABOUT ME

I'm a 43 year old father who loves music.  While I listen mostly to electronic and metal these days, I do listen to a wide variety of music - from electronic (Autechre, Boards of Canada) to modern/minimalist composition (John Cage, Philip Glass) to alternative rock (Flaming Lips, Radiohead) to jazz (John Coltrane and Miles Davis) to metal (Behemoth, King Diamond) to classic rock (Eagles, Rush).  
 
I'm primarily a portable audio enthusiast. My portable music journey started with the venerable Sony Cassette Walkman and then progressed to portable CD players, minidisc recorders (still have my Sharp DR7), and finally on to DAPs like the Rio Karma, iRiver IHP-1xx, iPod 5.5, iPhones, and the newer crop of DAPs from Fiio and iBasso.
 
Being a portable audio enthusiast, I typically listen with IEMs but am enjoying listening with full-size headphones more and more and tend to like u-shaped sound signatures, although I break out v-shaped IEM & HP from time to time for fun.
 
As with a lot of people my age, I've got some hearing issues.  I've got mild tinnitus and suffer from allergies, which can affect hearing in my right ear.  I'll admit it, I'm not blessed with a pair of golden ears.  That said, I've been listening to portable gear for a long time and feel confident in assessing audio gear - just wanted to be transparent up front.


 
 
SPECS
  1. Driver: 15.4mm Single Dynamic 
  2. Rated Impedance: 320 Ω @ 1kHz
  3. Frequency Range: 15 ~ 23500 Hz (-10dB)
  4. Sensitivity: 106 dB @ 1mW
  5. Cable: 1.2m TPE-sheathed OFC
  6. Plug: 3.5mm gold-plated L-plug 
  7. MSRP: $148
 
 

PACKAGING & ACCESSORIES

Since this was an early review unit, I didn't receive final packaging. So what did I get? It's all in the picture below.
 
VEZen2.0-7.jpg

Zen 2.0, regular and donut foam covers, ear stabilizers, shirt clip, and clamshell case. Just a note that the foam covers included are the Heigi-style foams, which are thicker than the foam covers included with the original Zen earbuds. This has some ramifications on sound I'll mention later.
 
 

BUILD & ERGONOMICS

As usual, I'll walk you through the VEZen 2.0's build in pictorial format.
 
VE Zen 2.0 without covers
VEZen2.0-2.jpg
 
Hey, those look pretty sexy, don't they! Gone are the opaque white earpieces and cable of the original Zen earbuds. The earpieces are still the same shape and size, but they now come in a transparent smoked gray color. Each earpiece has the VE logo, which is their web address. So if you forget how to find out more about VE, just yank the buds out of your ears, take a peek, type 52VE.CN into your browser, and BAM! you're on the VE website. Of course there are also L/R markings on each earpiece, as well. To complete the transformation, the cable sheath is now transparent exposing the colorful red wiring underneath. I really like the new look, and I think you will, too!
 
 
Y-Splitter, Shirt Clip, 3.5mm L-Plug
VEZen2.0-8.jpg
 
With the Zen 2.0, VE did away with the chin cinch, which is honestly no big loss. In it's place, they now include a shirt clip. I prefer using shirt clips anyway, so for me this was a positive move. I'm sure some of you will pine for a chin cinch, though. Sorry. Pretty standard 3.5mm L-plug. No complaints there.
 
 
VE Zen 2.0 with Ear Stabilizers
VEZen2.0-6.jpg

While they look odd, the ear stabilizers actually do a really good job of maintaining a secure fit without resorting to using foam covers.
 
 
Here's a pic of the ear stabilizers in action!
IMG_0526.jpg
 
I know it looks weird, but it works. It really does. For me anyway. Some really dislike them, though. It all depends on ear anatomy and personal preference. All you can do is give them a try and see if they work for you. I've also used them naked, with the included foam covers, with the original Zen's foam covers, and with some rubber covers from my Yuin OK-series earbuds. They all change the Zen 2.0 different sound, some more dramatically than others.
 
So just to wrap up, you're getting pretty much everything you need to get up and running with the Zen 2.0. You get a couple foam covers to choose from and ear stabilizers to ensure you get a good fit and can fine-tune the sound to your liking. You get a solidly-built pair of earbuds. And you get a case to stash them in when they're not jammed in your ears. What more could you ask for? A remote? Mic? Nope, not for this guy. I'm not about compromising the cable's integrity with such accoutrements. I'm not very likely to use 320 Ohm earbuds with my smartphone anyway. Are you? 
 
 
SOUND
I listen to a lot of experimental electronic and metal and mainly used those genres to evaluate the VE Zen 2.0 earbuds. During my time with them, I've listened through many sources including my FiiO X5 DAP and Aune X1S Desktop DAC/Amp. I've also listened through a couple DAPs I've had in for testing. Just for kicks, I also gave them a listen out of my iPhone 5s (yes it can be done!). I'll go over what I thought of the sound and some brief thoughts on cover-rolling.
 
But first, a beauty shot with the Aune M2
VEZen2.0-1.jpg  
You can change an earbud's sound signature quite a bit by using them with or without different covers. For those of you who're new to earbuds, this is a bit like tip rolling kicked up a notch. I'll try my best to covey what like about them with different covers and wrap-up with a brief comparison with Zen 1.0. So, here we go...
 
In conversations with VE, I learned that Zen 2.0 are intended to be used naked. Yes, naked my friends. Take those covers off, and revel in the glorious balanced sound! In my experience, this is as good as it gets from an earbud. While it's not like a sub-woofer pounding away at your eardrums, you actually get good bass response. If you want more bass, you can experiment with covers. Using rubber rims will give you a bit more bass presence. Using foam covers will provide even more bass response, the level varying depending on foam thickness. Mids vary from very slightly forward naked or with rubber rims to slightly recessed with foam covers. Similarly, the upper end is nicely present, lively and engaging naked or with rubber rims. Throw on some foam covers, and the upper end is damped. So depending on the covers you use, you can get anything from a nicely balanced, detailed listening experience with a nice soundstage and good imaging to a warmer, darker, more intimate listening experience with thick foam covers. It really is a lot of fun to play around with different covers depending on your mood, the type of music you're listening to, and your source. As mentioned above, I listened to Zen 2.0 out of various sources. They're revealing enough to scale well with better sources, so please don't dismiss them just because they're earbuds. Play around with better sources and see how Zen 2.0 respond. I think you'll be as impressed as I was at how well they respond as you throw them at increasingly better sources.
 
It was interesting listening to these after falling in love with the original Zen earbuds. While I loved the originals, they were a bit more of a one trick pony. Throw on some foam covers, and they were great. Nicely balanced with great detail. Take the covers off, and they sounded very thin, cold, and overly bright. The new Zen are much more versatile. Since they were tuned to be nicely balanced without covers, you can really play around with the sound signature. It gives you more reasons to fall in love with Zen 2.0. Nice!
 
 
SUMMARY
I know they're derided, but I've always had a fondness for earbuds and just love what VE is doing. Along with other boutique earbud manufacturers like Blox and Yuin, VE is dead set on showcasing just how great earbuds can be. From their $5 Monk (Go! Buy!! Now!!!) to their mid-level Asura and on to their flagship Zen 2.0, each hand every one of VE earbuds are top-notch performers. The upgrade from Zen 1.0 to Zen 2.0 showcases just how fast VE is learning, iterating, and improving. I honestly can't wait to see what they'll bring us next!
 
If you're at all interested in Zen 2.0 but aren't ready to drop more than $100 for a pair of earbuds yet, please do yourself a favor and pick up a pair of VE Monk. Seriously. I mean it. It'll cost you less that $10. Try those and get a small taste of what you'll be getting with Zen 2.0. I think you'll be convinced to take the next step and try out Zen 2.0, in which case you'll have Monk as your beater buds and Zen 2.0 as the buds you keep for a more immersive listen.
 
I hope you found this useful and would like to give a hearty thanks to VE for giving me the opportunity to review the Zen 2.0. Keep cracking out awesome buds VE!
 
 
 
LINK
capnjack
capnjack
The Monks are incredible value, so much so, after speaking to Lee (he's a really nice guy) I went and got the Zen 2's. They arrived today and are even better than I expected ! So now to burn 'em in :sunglasses:
bolmeteus
bolmeteus
Great review, man! Anybody doing comparisons between stock cables vs balanced vs cardass 3.5 vs cardass XLR? ^^
likearake
likearake
How do the Zens sound with the ear stabilizer?
 
I note you say they sound best naked, but I can't get any kind of seal on my Monks without the ear stabilizer. Would the Zen still be good / worthwhile if used with stabilizers?

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Lightweight. Comfortable. Compact. Inexpensive. Deep, powerful bass. 2 year warranty.
Cons: Needs EQ. Deeper ear cups would be nice. Headband a bit on the big side. Volume slider could be smoother.
BrainwavzHM2-5.jpg

 
 

INTRODUCTION

Brainwavz is a company well-known on Head-Fi for budget-fi IEM with good sound, great accessories, and some quite unusual designs. I was introduced to Brainwavz when I purchased my FiiO X3 Classic from MP4Nation. The original S-series IEM, the S1, was included as a bonus with my X3 pre-order. With their unusual color scheme, flat cable, chunky strain reliefs and y-splitter, and all-metal housing, the S1 were quite different from most of the IEM I'd owned up to that point. I enjoyed them for a fun, v-shaped sound, although they were a bit ragged up top. Then along came the S5. I read pretty good things about those, so I picked them up. With big bass and a warm low end and plenty of sparkle up top, I enjoyed the S5 even more than the S1 as a fun, party-time IEM. Next came S0, which I also heard good things about. I picked it up, as well, knowing that they were taking the S-series in a new, darker direction. These weren't IEM I'd choose for fun, they're what I'd choose for relaxing in front of the fire - warm, dark, and smooth. Finally along came the S3, the most neutral (and seemingly controversial) member of the S-series. I mention all this as a prelude to my review of the HM2 just to give you a feel for my history with Brainwavz.
 
Of course, Brainwavz also makes headphones. The HM2 is the first headphone from Brainwavz I've had the opportunity to listen to. I'll just let you know right now that it isn't something I'd typically choose for myself, but when the review opportunity came up for a street style headphone with a smooth sound signature and good aesthetics came along. Well, I thought to myself, "Hmm, Nikolaus. You've been enjoying IEM with a smooth signature lately. You like headphones even though street style phones aren't typically your thing. Maybe Brainwavz made them more comfortable and sound better than other street style phones you've tried. And they do look good..." So, the deal was sealed, and I said yes.
 
If you're one of those types who can't sit trough a full review, let me just tell you some of the answers right now. The smooth sound signature was a little too bassy for my taste, and I found cutting a wide swath across the bass helped tremendously in enjoying these. Comfort level was good, allowing me to wear them for long periods even while wearing glasses. Isolation is okay. Aesthetics are pleasing, especially for street style phones in this price range, which can look pretty gaudy. This means I don't look like a goof wearing them out and about, which the sound signature is best suited for. Build quality is better than average, so they're not going to fall apart on you quickly. And finally, they fold up quite small and are well-protected in their hard case. So, if you're looking for a pair of street style phones to keep in your go-bag and don't mind a quite bassy sound signature, these might just be a good choice for you
 
Before we really dig into the review, here's a bit about Brainwavz from their About Us page:
 
Established in 2008 with a goal to bring real earphones to real users at realistic prices -A SMALL START WITH BIG RETURNS

Today the range spans across earphones and headphones, a new accessories line and the addition of inline controls for the booming smartphone markets

The future sees the BRAINWAVZ team expanding to more new products, from new designers with fresh ideas - WE ARE HERE TO STAY, so keep listening out for us!

At Brainwavz we have a simple mission, to produce innovative, high quality audio products with a dedicated focus on high-end sound at a realistic price. Our strength, success and product range is built on our unique relationship with our customers and users, a relationship that has produced a simple and obvious result. We give real-users real sound quality. 2014 will see Brainwavz pushing forward with an expanded product line, continuing with unique and innovative products, from earphones to headphones to audio accessories.



 
Brainwavz Website: LINK.
 
Dedicated Brainwavz HM2 thread: LINK.
 
 

DISCLAIMER

There is no financial incentive from Brainwavz for writing this review. I am in no way affiliated with Brainwavz, and this is my honest opinion of the HM2  I would like to thank Brainwavz for giving me a chance to test drive the HM2, and I hope my feedback proves useful for my fellow Head-Fi members as well as for Brainwavz.
 
 

ABOUT ME

I'm a 43 year old father who loves music. While I listen mostly to electronic and metal these days, I do listen to a wide variety of music - from electronic (Autechre, Boards of Canada) to modern/minimalist composition (John Cage, Philip Glass) to alternative rock (Flaming Lips, Radiohead) to jazz (John Coltrane and Miles Davis) to metal (Behemoth, King Diamond) to classic rock (Eagles, Rush).  
 
I'm primarily a portable audio enthusiast. My portable music journey started with the venerable Sony Cassette Walkman and then progressed to portable CD players, minidisc recorders (still have my Sharp DR7), and finally on to DAPs like the Rio Karma, iRiver IHP-1xx, iPod 5.5, iPhones, and the newer crop of DAPs from Fiio and iBasso. Being a portable audio enthusiast, I typically listen with IEMs but am enjoying listening with full-size headphones and desktop gear more and more.
 
As with a lot of people my age, I've got some hearing issues.  I've got mild tinnitus and suffer from allergies, which can affect hearing in my right ear. I'll admit it, I'm not blessed with a pair of golden eas.  That said, I've been listening to portable gear for a long time and feel confident in assessing audio gear - just wanted to be transparent up front.



 
 

SPECIFICATIONS

  1. Drivers: Dynamic, 40 mm
  2. Rated Impedance: 32 Ω
  3. Frequency Range: 10 Hz ~ 20 kHz
  4. Sensitivity: 104 dB at 1 mW
  5. Maximum Input Power: 100 mW
  6. Plug: 3.5 mm, gold-plated
  7. MSRP: $49.50


 

 

PACKAGING & ACCESSORIES



Typical Brainwavz packaging and accessories. 
 
Front
BrainwavzHM2-1.jpg
 
Rear
BrainwavzHM2-2.jpg
 
Hard Case Slips Out
BrainwavzHM2-3.jpg
 
Containing the HM2 & Accessories
BrainwavzHM2-4.jpg

Cables

BrainwavzHM2-12.jpg
 
In all, you get
  1. HM2 Headphones
  2. Hard Carrying Case
  3. 1.2 m Flat Cable
  4. 1.2 m Cable with In-Line Microphone

Some general thoughts on the accessories package. The hard case is nice and fairly compact, so you can throw it in your go-bag without taking up too much precious space. One nitpick is that the mesh pocket isn't very good at containing the cables. After carrying the case around, I typically find that the cables have made their way out of the mesh pocket and are floating around in the main compartment. Having two cables is nice. The round cable is my preference because I don't like anything in between my cans and source but wire. If you're into a remote, the flat cable is for you. It's one of those one-button remotes, so you'll be clicking it a lot to pause/play, ffwd/rew, and accept/end calls. An interesting choice was the inclusion of a builit-in volume attenuator. This means you can control volume from any source, since it doesn't rely on any communication with your source. The downside is that unlike the HM2 themselves, the volume slider isn't a smooth operator. It sticks a bit, making volume adjustment a bit jumpy. If you're anything like me, you'd probably rather just use the volume buttons on your source anyway. 
 
 

BUILD & ERGONOMICS

As usual, I'll walk through the various design and ergonomic features of the HM2 in pictorial format below, pointing out what I like and where I see room for improvement.
 
Folded, the HM2 are nice and compact, and I like the subtle chrome accent.
BrainwavzHM2-6.jpg
 
Unfolded, the HM2 are still a quite compact headphone.
BrainwavzHM2-13.jpg
 
So the main nitpick to point out in this photo is that the HM2 lacks any kind of headband padding. This isn't as big of a deal as it would normally be because the HM2 are mainly held in force by clamping force, allowing the headband to rest very lightly on your head. A little padding would be nice, though. And despite relying pretty much solely on clamping force for stability, they don't actually clamp hard enough to be bothersome. Besides the sound signature, I don't usually like street style phones very much because I wear glasses, and they usually put too much pressure on the arms of my glasses and cause discomfort. Not so with the HM2. They were surprisingly comfortable. My second quite minor nitpick is that I wish the jack for the cable were set just a bit higher up, as the connector tends to rub against my shoulder when I turn my head. This causes some microphonics of a sort that I find unpleasant (kind of like nails on chalkboard for me), so I'e learned to tilt my head up just a bit to avoid this when looking over my left shoulder. This is probably just a weird Nikolaus thing, so I'm not going to ding the HM2 for it.
 
So what do I like? As mentioned above, I find them quite comfortable especially when tooling about in a baseball cap. Even without a cap, they're comfortable enough for me to wear for extended periods despite the lack of padding. I also like the nicely toned-down street style aesthetics.
 
 
Close up of the hinge mechanism and the headband adjustment mechanism.
BrainwavzHM2-14.jpg
 
My one nitpick here is that I wish there were some markings on the headband to allow me to quickly get back to just the right size. Other than that, no complaints here.
 
 
Earcups
BrainwavzHM2-15.jpg
 
The cups fit my smallish ears okay. I prefer a larger cup, but these are pretty comfortable and thankfully don't heat up too much. My ears do touch the drivers, though. I'm sensitive to that, so this does start to bother me after listening for awhile. Deeper cups would be appreciated. The cups are secured to the headband with a ball and socket type joint, allowing them to swivel a bit in all directions. This allows them to automatically find the right fit for your head. 
 
All in all, these are a pretty darn good design for inexpensive street style phones. 
 
 
SOUND
FYI: I mainly listen to experimental electronic and metal and mainly used those genres to evaluate the HM2, along with a bit of classic rock thrown in for good measure. Since these are street style phones designed primarily for on the go listening, I just used my iPhone 5s for this review . No fancy-schmancy DAPs this time. 
 
Okay, the only sound descriptor Brainwavz provides for the HM2 is "smooth". That could mean different things to different people. Since they're street style phones, I was expecting a bass-enhanced sound with a smooth upper end and Brainwavz didn't disappoint there. These are definitely bass-enhanced. A bit too bass-enhanced, in my opinion. Bass-enhanced to the point where the bass starts to mask the upper end, preventing me from hearing as much as I'd like up top. I tried for several days to reconcile with this sound signature before deciding it just wasn't for me. Not only was the upper end masked, the bass was too slow and plodding. So, I eventually broke down and broke out the excellent Equalizer iPhone app and applied a very simple EQ adjustment that helped me enjoy the HM2 much more. For those of you who don't know the Equalizer app, it's basically a 7-point parametric EQ. My starting point for making these a clearer sounding headphone is to apply -5dB at 20Hz with Q=0.375. With this setting, the HM2 are still bass-emphasized but the upper end comes out to play making them sound more balanced and lively to my ears. If you want more bass but still not as much as the default sound, set the EQ to -2.dB. If you're more of a purist or are listening in quiet environment, you might want set the EQ a few dB lower. If you purchase the HM2, I highly recommend playing with the EQ to either knock down the low end or bump up the upper end or both, depending on your preference for a flatter or more v-shaped sound signature.
 
​So now that I've got the basic EQ applied, I've got a nice bass-enhanced sound signature with a clearer upper end. Soundstage is also opened up compared to the default sound signature, which felt a bit claustrophobic to my ears. It's a nice on the go sound signature, which is exactly what the HM2 are intended for.
 

ISOLATION: Average. It's horribly rainy right now in Portland, OR. I know, surprise, surprise, right? Anyway, it's not a good time to go out and walk around the neighborhood, so I tested out isolation by washing the dishes while my wife was wrangling my two wee yet surprisingly loud boys. If they were in the other room, they were nicely dulled. If they came in the room with me, I could hear they were talking to me but couldn't understand them until I paused the music.
 
POWER REQUIREMENTS: With the stock Music app on my iPhone, 50% volume was pretty darn loud.
 
 
SUMMARY
So what do I think of the HM2? My initial reaction was a mixed bag. I liked the design and aesthetics but wasn't enamored with the sound, which took the bass-enhanced sound signature just a wee bit far for my taste. After reigning that in with a bit of EQ, the HM2 became much more enjoyable for me. For those of you who like a lot of boom-boom, I can see you enjoying the HM2 for an inexpensive pair of on the go phones. For those of you who enjoy a little boom-boom, you'll need to break out the EQ. If you're after a reference signature, walk away now...
 
What would make these better? Throw at least a thin layer of memory foam on the headband, make the headband just a bit smaller, make the cups a bit deeper, and reign in the bass a bit. Make those changes, and I'll tack on another 1/2 to 1 star depending on the implementation.
 
I hope you found this useful and would like to give a hearty thanks to @Salsera at Brainwavz for giving several members of the Head-Fi community a chance to review the HM2. I'm a Brainwavz fan and look forward to seeing what they cook up for us in the future. Did someone say budget-fi planars? That would be awesome, Brainwavz. C'mon, just do it!
  • Like
Reactions: Brooko

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Dynamic sound. Good soundstage and separation. Powerful, yet IEM-friendly. Class A amp. Good aesthetics.
Cons: Plastic volume knob and switches don't fit overall aesthetics. Class A switch not recessed. No case / pouch or bands.
AuneB1v2-14.jpg
 
 
INTRODUCTION
I love it when manufacturers listen to feedback and respond quickly with positive changes! Take Aune, for example. I was lucky enough to take their B1 portable amp for a test drive earlier this year (LINK to review). It was a really good amp, but I wasn't exactly enamored with the sound signature and pointed out a few things I thought would improve the user experience. I know some of my fellow Head-Fi'ers pointed out similar opportunities for improvement. After the review I returned the B1 to its owner, and I honestly didn't think much about it - just went on with my typical Head-Fi life as usual. I mean, there's no way Aune would make the suggested changes so quickly, right? Well, I was recently contacted by my good Head-Fi friend @hakushondaimao about a revised B1 which took care of many of the nitpicks I had with the original B1. He asked if I'd like to try it, and I said "Yes, of course I'd like to try it!" So here I sit with the Aune B1 2016 Version. I'm actually listening to it right now in Class A mode with my HiFiMan HE400 as I type up this review. So what do I think? Read on to find out, but for you impatient types I'll just say that Aune is 95% of the way there. My most glaring nitpicks were addressed, and I've discovered a newfound appreciation for the B1's sound. All they need to do now is slap on some higher-quality switches and volume knob, and I'll give this baby top marks!
 
 
Before we start, here's a bit of information about Aune from the About Us section on their website:
 
About Aune
 
As Ao Lai Er Technology’s high quality HiFi brand, Aune has been devoted to developing and producing desktop, portable and car audio products. Founded in the year of 2004, Ao Lai Er owns the largest Chinese audio technology website - HIFIDIY.NET and high end audio brand TITANS. HIFIDIY.NET has 700 thousand members. It’s always been a platform for the most advanced HiFi technology communications and practice. We gained lots of experience from the long-term accumulation, and have released hundreds of kits and parts from independent R&D, which are well received around the world! Aune team is a group of audiophiles who only pursue the best. We use our products in daily life and we love each and every one of them! Superb sound is Aune’s goal; great user experience and satisfaction is what Aune pursues. We are striving to make Aune one of the world’s famous audio brands in the future!
 
In order to design a world-class audio products, aune include the formation of an excellent R & D team of professional designers at home and abroad, has a number of strong, serious and responsible work of professional and technical personnel in our team, as well as a love for music professional audio career employees, 100 percent have a college, doctoral, master's degree or above. The most important thing is that they have strong technical strength, for the sound development of a range of products, from the cd drive, speakers, amplifiers, decoders, and even the future of the player home audio and video so you can design the perfect product, and can get the industry the affirmation and recognition of consumers!
 
 
I usually like to provide link to a few reviews I found interesting, but I couldn't find any specifically for the new version. So, I think this is the first review this little guy gets. hopefully I do it justice!  
 
LINK to Aune B1 website, now updated for the 2016 version.
 
LINK to the dedicated Aune B1 thread.
 
 
DISCLAIMER
I was provided the B1 2016 Version as a review sample. There is no financial incentive from Aune in writing this review. I am in no way affiliated with Aune, and this is my honest opinion of the B1 2016 Version.  I'd like to sincerely thank @AuneAudio for providing me with the opportunity to take the new B1 2016 Version for a test drive!
 
 
ABOUT ME
I'm a 43 year old father who loves music.  From electronic (Autechre, Boards of Canada) to modern/minimalist composition (John Cage, Philip Glass) to alternative rock (Flaming Lips, Radiohead) to jazz (John Coltrane and Miles Davis) to metal (Behemoth, King Diamond) to classic rock (Eagles, Rush), I listen to a wide variety of genres and artists. 
 
My portable music journey started with the venerable Sony Cassette Walkman and then progressed to portable CD players, minidisc recorders (still have my Sharp DR7), and finally on to DAPs like the Rio Karma, iRiver IHP-1xx, iPod 5.5, iPhones, and the newer crop of DAPs from Fiio and iBasso. 
 
I typically listen with IEMs from my ever-growing collection from budget to mid-fi. Less often, I grab a pair of full-size cans.  Recently, I've been listening a lot with the FLC 8S (LINK1LINK2 + review coming soon!) and Sennheiser MOMENTUM In-Ear (LINK to review) IEM I have n for testing, as well as my good old HiFiMan HE400.  I do have a lot of other gear, though.  You can always check my profile for a reasonably up to date gear list. 
 
As with a lot of people my age, I've got some hearing issues.  I've got mild tinnitus and suffer from allergies, which often affect hearing in my right ear.  I'll admit it, I'm not blessed with a pair of golden ears.  That said, I've been listening to portable gear for a long time and feel confident in assessing audio gear. I just wanted to be transparent up front. 
 
 
SPECIFICATIONS
Aune's B1 page has a lot of information, so I'd suggest you look there for complete details. I'll list some of the important specs below for you, though.
  1. Recommended Impedance: 16 - 300 Ohm
  2. Output Impedance: 3 Ohm
  3. Typ THD+n: <0.0008% @ 1kHz, 600 Ohm, -0dB
  4. SNR: >124dBA @ 600 Ohm
  5. Flatness: +/-0.15dB @ 10Hz - 20kHz
  6. Crosstalk: <110dB @ 1kHz, 60 Ohm
  7. Output Power (Class A): 25mW @ 16 Ohm / 50mW @ 32 Ohm, 100mW @ 300 Ohm
  8. Gain: 5dB Low Gain, 15dB High Gain
  9. Current: 20mA A/B, 40mA Class A
  10. Power Supply: +/-9v
  11. Battery: 4000mAH lithium battery
  12. Battery Life: 10 hours A/B, 5 hours Class A
  13. Dimension: 65 x 110 x 18 mm
  14. Weight: 230g
  15. Price: $200 MSRP
 
 
PACKAGING & ACCESSORIES
As usual, I'll cover packaging and accessories in pictorial format below.
 
Front
AuneB1v2-1.jpg
 
 
Rear
AuneB1v2-2.jpg
 
 
Inside
AuneB1v2-3.jpg
 
 
Accessories
AuneB1v2-4.jpg
 
Classic clean Aune packaging. I wouldn't expect anything less!
 
Included
  1. B1 (2016 Version)
  2. USB Cable
  3. 3.5mm Interconnect
  4. Owner's Manual.
 
Missing:
  1. Storage pouch
  2. Bands
 
 
BUILD & ERGONOMICS
Again, I'll walk you through the new B1's build in pictorial format, commenting on what I like and what I think could be improved along the way.
 
Front
AuneB1v2-5.jpg
 
The front has 3.5mm input and output jacks and the volume knob. On the original B1, plugs slipped in smoothly without clicking in place. On the B1 2016 Version, they still slip in smoothly but I do get a click right at the end. The volume knob is still the same disappointing plastic, which feels cheap compared to the metal knobs some competitors use. But on a positive note, Aune responded to criticism that it was difficult to quickly and easily set the volume by painting on a volume indicator dot. Despite not being up to the overall quality and aesthetics of the B1, the volume knob has very smooth movement and allowed for easy fine-grained volume adjustment. So while not all of my concerns with the volume knob were addressed, the most critical concern was. Good job, Aune!
 
By the way, this is the only visible change made to the B1. All other changes are circuitry-related, and I'll go over those later.
 
 
Back
AuneB1v2-6.jpg
 
The only thing on the back is the micro USB port used for charging the B1.
 
 
Left
AuneB1v2-7.jpg
 
Just the battery indicator LED here. Push the small, flush button, and the number of times the LED flashes indicates the charge level. I would've preferred three or four LEDs instead of just one that flashes, but it gets the job done. Maybe next time...
 
 
Right
AuneB1v2-8.jpg
 
Here we see the Gain, Class A, and Power slider switches.  As with the volume knob, these plastic sliders don't fit with the rest of the B1's aesthetics, but at least they don't feel wobbly like the ones on the original tour B1 I tested. I think replacing them with metal switches would fit much better with the overall aesthetics and feel more solid. I'm disappointed that Aune didn't switch to a flush Class A switch with the B1 2016 Version. While I'd like to see this change made to all of the slider switches, it's particularly important with the Class A switch since it isn't supposed to be operated when the B1 is powered on. I'm hoping these changes are made in the next generation.
 
 
Top
AuneB1v2-9.jpg
 
Here you see two windows showing off the internals and two green LEDs that light up during operation. Although I'm still not a huge fan of the green lights because they can be distracting in dimly lit environments, I do have to admit that the design is growing on me. I wasn't a fan the first time around, but I've found that some things take time to appreciate. 
 
 
Bottom
AuneB1v2-10.jpg
 
On the bottom are the two black synthetic leather pads.  I quite like the look on the back with the white lettering on the black metal and black leather pads.  Very nice, and functional, too as the pads serve to protect the B1, as well as any surface you lay the B1 on, from getting scratched.  No need for those little silicone feet with the B1!
 
 
VS. Original B1 in Silver / Red
AuneB1v2-11.jpg
AuneB1v2-12.jpg
 
Here's a picture of the original silver/red B1 on the left and the black B1 2016 Version on the right. I'd like to strongly suggest that Aune use higher-contrast writing on the silver/red version. The current writing is very low-contrast and is hard to read unless in a well-lit environment. This is too bad, as I otherwise really like the aesthetics of the silver/red version!
 
 
VS. FiiO E12A
IMG_2336.jpg
 
How big is the B1? Here's a picture from my original review showing that it has the same footprint as the FiiO E12A but is about 1.5X thicker.
 
 
SOUND
Luckily for all you B1 lovers out there, Aune didn't alter the basic sound signature of the B1 with the new 2016 Version. I'm lucky enough to have both versions in house right now, and I don't think there's much difference between the two with respect to sound signature. If anything, I hear just a tad tighter bass and more definition up top, but it's certainly no night and day difference. Just a subtle difference I notice as I switch back and forth between the two. So, what is the sound signature? Well, when I first heard the original B1, I felt it was mid-centric. In between then and now, I've been very lucky to have listened to a lot of amps, DACs, and DAPs, and I've come to the conclusion that I was used to gear that had colored sound signatures. You know the type. Emphasized low end with a bit of sparkle added up top. Fun to be sure, but not neutral. Now that I've gotten to play with a lot more gear, I can really appreciate what Aune has done with the B1, both the original and the 2016 Version. This isn't the mid-centric amp I thought it was back when I first heard it. Instead, it's a neutral, transparent amp with very nice soundstage, separation, and imaging. Ok, so why the new version, then? I mean, I haven't shown you much in he way of differences so far, right? Ok, ok, let's get down to business! 
 
Aune implemented some really nice changes in the 2016 Version that I'm really happy with.  
  1. Lower output impedance. 3 Ohm for 2016 Version vs. 10 Ohm for the original version. That's a nice change right there. It's not less than 1 Ohm, but it's a lot better than before!
  2. Channel imbalance is improved. I retested this with the FLC 8S IEM (11 Ohm, 107dB/mW). With the original B1, I got channel imbalance at low listening levels. I could see myself listening with the FLC 8S at these levels in a very quiet environment, so this was disappointing. With the 2016 Version, I only got channel imbalance at very low listening levels. These were lower than I'd actually listen at, so I wasn't bothered by this.
  3. Less powerful Low Gain. I marked the original B1's volume knob with a dot in the same position as the one on the 2016 Version and volume matched with a 1kHz tone at comfortable (80dB) and loud (90dB) listening levels with the Sennheiser Momentum In-Ear (18 Ohm, 118dB/mW). At 80dB, I was at 9 o'clock with the original B1 and at 10 o'clock with the 2016 Version. At 90dB, I was at 10 o'clock with the original B1 and at 12 o'clock with the 2016 Version.
 
Those changes all make the B1 2016 Version a better choice for you IEM lovers out there. Nice! 
 
What didn't change was the high gain. Using my HE400, I'm able to set the volume knob on both the original B1 and the 2016 Version to the same spot and have comparable listening levels. Using them with the High Gain and Class A settings, 9 o'clock is a low listening level, 10 o'clock is a nice comfortable listening level, 11 o'clock is a loud listening level, and 12 o'clock is louder than I need, but I can see some of you listening that loud. So those of you who love using the B1 with your full-size cans won't be disappointed with the changes at all. This also made me happy. It's nice to have one portable amp that can handle both sensitive IEM and power-hungry full-size cans without blinking. Good job, Aune!
 
 
BATTERY LIFE
I found the battery life estimates Aune provides are very good.  It could go about 8-10 hours in A/B mode and 4-5 hours in A mode.
 
 
SUMMARY
The Aune B1 2016 Version took me by surprise. First of all, I really appreciated the sound much more this time around and am upgrading my rating for it accordingly by a half star. I'm really pleased that Aune slipstreamed this improved version into production so quickly. Very commendable responding so quickly to customer feedback and providing a better user experience for IEM lovers like me. That gets you another half star over the original, Aune. All that said, I do feel there are still some improvements to be made. Replacing the plastic volume knob and plastic switches with metal components would not only fit the overall aesthetics of the B1 better, it would also make it a more solid piece of gear. I also still feel that using multiple LEDs for the battery indicator would be an improvement over one blinking LED. And at this price point, there's really no excuse not to provide a case or pouch of some sort to protect the B1 on the go.
 
Thanks again to @AuneAudio for giving me the opportunity to give the B1 2016 Version a listen. Your ability to produce products with great price to performance ratio and a willingness to quickly respond to critical feedback has gained you a fan. Keep up the good work!
 
 
For those of you who made it this far, here's a sneak peek at an upcoming review or two...
AuneB1v2-15.jpg
Aune M2 + VE Zen 2.0
nmatheis
nmatheis
@steveww: 2016 Version should be in stock at Ingenious Ingenuity on Dec. 21st. I just got them to list it as a pre-order. Use coupon code HoHoHo for an additional 10% off. The makes the old version an absolute steal at $126 and then new a good deal at $180. Happy shopping!
 
@TimmyLangley: Box looks identical. The only physical difference is the indicator dot on the volume knob, which you can't see because it's packed away inside the box. Best bet is to order from an official distributor like Ingenious Ingenuity and specify which version you want.
 
@gearofwar: I don't have both on my hands to test and also don't have HD800, so everything I say will be pure conjecture. If you're okay with that, I think C5 will make HD800 warmer and more "fun". B1 will be more honest. Depends what you're looking for. FYI, though: HD800 is on the upper end of what Aune recommends (16-300 Ohms). I know C5 is an absolute beast when it comes to driving power. All that said, B1 drives my 300 Om VE Zen and HE400 planars very nicely. Pretty small drivers compared to those on the HD800, though...
Hi-Fi'er
Hi-Fi'er
@swannie007 what knob did you put on it? Where did you get it from?
H
haoyuan
Thanks for the specs. I was looking for whether Class A switch off the amp is A with lower power design or class A/B. You've answered my questions with your specs. Unfortunately Aune makes it so difficult to find such information.

nmatheis

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: Ergonomic design. Bass-enhanced without being boomy. Clear upper end without being sibilant. Good soundstage. 2 year warranty.
Cons: Recessed mids. Not over-ear friendly. No mic-free option.

square_louped_MOMENTUM_InEar_black_chrome_sq-01-sennheiser.jpg


Photo courtesy of Sennheiser
 
 

INTRODUCTION

We all know Sennheiser, right? The legendary German audio giant famous for high-quality headphones and microphones. Well, I'm a bit embarrassed to admit that I'm a Sennheiser newbie. I've tried a lot of audio gear since I started in this hobby but for some reason, but I just never got around to giving Sennheiser their day in the sun. Well, that's about to change because I recently got to take the MOMENTUM In-Ear for a test drive and was impressed with what I heard. Let's just cut to the chase, shall we?
 
Okay, I lied. Before we head off to the review, I'm going to give you a few links I found useful:
  1. Sennheiser's MOMENTUM In-Ear Website: LINK.
  2. Dedicated Sennheiser MOMENTUM In-Ear thread: LINK.
  3. THL's review: LINK
  4. @twister6's review: LINK
  5. @mark2410's review: LINK
 
If you're considering buying these, I'd recommend reading the other reviews I linked to for alternate points of view from reviewers I respect and trust.
 
 

DISCLAIMER

There is no financial incentive from Sennheiser for writing this review.  I am in no way affiliated with Sennheiser, and this is my honest opinion of the MOMENTUM In-Ear. I would like to thank Sennheiser for giving me a chance to review the MOMENTUM In-Ear, and I hope my feedback proves useful for my fellow Head-Fi members as well as for Sennheiser.
 
 

ABOUT ME

I'm a 43 year old father who loves music.  While I listen mostly to electronic and metal these days, I do listen to a wide variety of music - from electronic (Autechre, Boards of Canada) to modern/minimalist composition (John Cage, Philip Glass) to alternative rock (Flaming Lips, Radiohead) to jazz (John Coltrane and Miles Davis) to metal (Behemoth, King Diamond) to classic rock (Eagles, Rush).  
 
I'm primarily a portable audio enthusiast. My portable music journey started with the venerable Sony Cassette Walkman and then progressed to portable CD players, minidisc recorders (still have my Sharp DR7), and finally on to DAPs like the Rio Karma, iRiver IHP-1xx, iPod 5.5, iPhones, and the newer crop of DAPs from Fiio and iBasso.
 
Being a portable audio enthusiast, I typically listen with IEMs but am enjoying listening with full-size headphones more and more and tend to like u-shaped sound signatures, although I break out v-shaped IEM & HP from time to time for fun.
 
As with a lot of people my age, I've got some hearing issues.  I've got mild tinnitus and suffer from allergies, which can affect hearing in my right ear.  I'll admit it, I'm not blessed with a pair of golden ears.  That said, I've been listening to portable gear for a long time and feel confident in assessing audio gear - just wanted to be transparent up front.



 
 
SPECS
  1. Driver: Single Dynamic 
  2. Rated Impedance: 18Ω
  3. Frequency Range: 15Hz - 22kHz
  4. Sensitivity: 118dB at 1mW
  5. Cable: 1.3m cable
  6. Plug: 3.5mm gold-plated L-plug 
  7. Weight: 16g
  8. Warranty: 2 years
  9. MSRP: $100
 

 

PACKAGING & ACCESSORIES



As usual, I'll go over packaging in pictorial format below.
 
Front
SennheiserMomentumIn-Ear-1.jpg
 
 
Rear
SennheiserMomentumIn-Ear-2.jpg
 
 
Accessories: Safety Guide, Case, Tips
SennheiserMomentumIn-Ear-3.jpg
 
 
MOMENTUM In-Ear + Case Insert
SennheiserMomentumIn-Ear-13.jpg
 
 
Tips
SennheiserMomentumIn-Ear-6.jpg
 
In all, you get:
  1. MOMENTUM In-Ear
  2. S, MS, ML, L Silicone Tips
  3. Storage Case
  4. Manual

As this was my first experience with Sennheiser IEM, I didn't know what to expect. While the accessories package was adequate, I'd like to see a shirt clip and wider variety of silicone tip choices included. 
 
Why a shirt slip? As with most IEM, without a shirt clip microphonics were an issue. That is, unless I chose to wear them over ear, which the MOMENTUM In-Ear weren't exactly designed for. While out for walks, I could hear footfall noise and microphonics as the cable brushed against my clothes. Attaching a shirt clip just below the y-splitter negated the footfall nice and took care of most of the microphonics, as well. The only issue I cold see with including a shirt clip is that it won't really work with the case insert, so you need to leave that behind and stash the IEM directly in the now insert-less case. No big deal. A very good trade-off for getting rid of microphonics in my opinion!
 
Why more tips? Because tips aren't a "one type fits all" solution, and fit is so important for achieving proper isolation and, consequently, good sound. Offering a couple of bore sizes and/or lengths would also allow the owner to optimize the sound a bit. For me, the MS and ML tips both worked well, providing a secure fit, good isolation, and also good sound. However, in the end I found I preferred SpinFit tips. The fit wasn't as secure and they weren't quite as isolating, but the SpinFits gave me a bit more soundstage which made the MOMENTUM In-Ear that much more enjoyable.
 
 

BUILD & ERGONOMICS

Again, I'll walk you through the MOMENTUM In-Ear's build in pictorial format, commenting on what I like and what I think could be improved along the way.
 
MOMENTUM In-Ear Without Tips
SennheiserMomentumIn-Ear-7.jpg
 
Hey, those don't look like MOMENTUM In-Ears, you say. They're supposed to be a flashy red color. Well, my friends, this is the MOMENTUM In-Ear all grown up. Personally, I prefer the Black Chrome look to the original red, but that's just me. Unless there's gorgeous wood involved, I prefer a nice, dark color scheme - preferably black. Check!
 
What else do we see here? The unusual shape, to be sure. I've seen pictures of these around and just didn't get the shape. Now that I've gotten to take them for a nice, long test drive, I totally get it. Sennheiser obviously dug out their ear anatomy & physiology studies when designing these because their shape fits my ears like a glove. To get a nice comfortable and secure fit, I just inserted them with a slight twist. No further fiddling required! I've tried a lot of IEM, and this was literally the fastest I've ever been able to achieve a good fit. Furthermore, because they don't have any sharp edges or unusual pressure points, I have no problem wearing them for extended listening sessions. 
 
The strain reliefs are quite unusual, as well. I've seen this style used by Chord & Major, as well, but this is my first experience with it. My only concern here would be that the strain relief Chord & Major uses is metal, whereas this is plastic. I haven't experienced any issues with it so far, and I've treated these roughly, just throwing them in my shoulder bag without storing them in the case. I typically have a portable amp, a DAP, and some other IEM in my bag, and the MOMENTUM In-Ear have been jostling around in there for the past couple weeks without any signs of wear & tear. So any concerns about the strain reliefs are probably unfounded. Ending on a positive note, Sennheiser integrated three raised dots on the left strain relief for easy blind recognition. You can just see it where the strain relief meets up with the shell on the left earpiece in the picture above. I always like it when manufacturers include these small features.
 
Sennheiser used Stainless Steel sound tubes to cut down on resonance. The shells are plastic, though. Seems like a good compromise between optimizing sound quality with a rigid sound tube and keeping the weight down with the plastic shells.
 
Final thought here is that I'm used to seeing vent holes on IEM with dynamic drivers. There must be one, as I'm not experiencing any driver flex or vacuum issues but I can't find it. It might be integrated into a small hole where the two pieces of the plastic shell are joined together. When for ear down, that would place the vent hole right on the top, exposed part of the shell. With that placement, I'd expect a lot of wind noise, however I get absolutely no wind noise with these. Not sure what the Sennheiser design team did here, but it works a treat. I get good isolation, no wind noise, no driver flex, and no vacuum issues. Nice!
 
And finally, the one thing I'd change if I were on the design team... The holographic Sennheiser S logo on the "faceplate". Totally not my style. I'd prefer it to be a little less bling-bling, but that's a minor nitpick. Other than that, there's a lot to like here!
 
 
Remote, Y-Splitter + Cinch, 3.5mm L-Plug
SennheiserMomentumIn-Ear-14.jpg
 
I'm an iDevice user, so the MOMENTUM In-Ear I received is the iOS-compatible model. I honestly don't use remotes much, as I primarily use DAPs that aren't compatible with remotes, but I have to admit that it's handy to have when I do plug into my iPhone to listen to some streaming music or an audiobook or podcast. The remote has the standard Play/Pause, Skip Back/Forward functionality and also has Volume controls. I like that. Im not a fan of remotes that don't have built-in Volume controls. And because Sennheiser manufactures separate Android and iOS models, you can get an Android-specific version with fully-functioning Volume controls. Nice! I never explicitly test microphone functionality because, as I mentioned earlier, I'm primarily a DAP user. I rarely have IEM plugged in when I get a call. But just as I was sitting down to write this review, my dad called. The mic worked just fine. I was loud and clear. My only issue was that I get such a good seal with the MOMENTUM In-Ear that I had to remove one earpiece because I just couldn't tell how loud I was talking.
 
I've got no concerns about the Y-splitter or cinch. They're there, and they work. Again, if I were on the design team, I'd vote for losing the holographic "faceplate" on the cinch. It's not that apparent in the low-key photo I took, but it's pretty darn sparkly and bling-bling. Just not my style. Very minor nitpick, though.
 
And finally, the 3.5mm L-plug. Again no major concerns with this. It's pretty low-profile and fits into my smartphone case. I do wish the strain relief was a little more flexible, though. While it has some flex, it might be better if it had a bit of notching or taper near the outlet for even more flex. Probably not a major concern, though. And I wouldn't complain if Sennheiser incorporated an even lower-profile L-plug like the one on the NuForce NE800M I just tested. It sat nearly flush with my smartphone case, which was really nice.
 
Did you notice the cable, by the way? It's not quite round yet not flat. It's a flattened oval cable. It's interesting, although I'm not sure it really achieves any major functional goals.
 
 
Sennheiser MOMENTUM In-Ear Ready To Rock!
SennheiserMomentumIn-Ear-11.jpg
 
 
Worn Down
MomentumIn-EarDown.jpg
 
Sennheiser quite obviously designed the MOMENTUM In-Ear to be worn down. My ears are a bit on the small side, and even so the MOMENTUM In-Ear nestle into my ear very nicely. Once you settle them in your ears, the attention to ergonomic design really becomes apparent. The curves, constrictions, and angles all "just worked" for me. There aren't many IEM I don't have to fiddle with fairly often due to some weird ear canal angles - to the point were I've thought about giving up on universal IEM and just going the CIEM route. Not with these. Other reviews have commented on the large size. They may be a bit large, but they're certainly not as large as some other IEM I've used. Moreover, people routinely tell me I've got small ears and I've had absolutely no problems with these.
 
 
Worn Over Ear
MomentumIn-EarUp.jpg
 
As with a lot of IEM intended to be worn down, yes, you can do it but it won't be as ergonomic as just wearing them down. But then again, I'm a wear 'em down kinda guy. If you're an over ear person just know you can do it. Who knows, you might even find them more comfortable. However, the one big sticking point is that when worn over ear, the remote/mic module hangs just about an inch below my ear. This is compared with just below my jawline when worn down. For those of you with larger ears, this means the remote module might come close to touching your ears. Not so good! Me? I'll be sticking with wearing them down, thank you very much!
 
Last thought... Either a remote/mic-free version of moving remote/mic module down the cable a bit would be nice for people who prefer over ear use.
 
 
SOUND
I listen to a lot of experimental electronic and metal and mainly used those genres to evaluate the MOMENTUM In-Ear. As usual, I used them as my sole IEM for a week. During that time, I mainly listened to them out of the Soundaware M1 Esther Analog DAP (LINK) I've got in for testing. I've also given it a listen out of my iPhone 5s with music, as well as audiobooks and podcasts. I also gave them a listen through the updated Aune B1 2016 Version portable amp (review coming soon!) stacked with the M1 Esther. I'll go over what I thought of the overall sound signature, some very brief thoughts on tip-rolling, and a brief comparison with a couple other IEM you might be familiar with around the same price point.
 
But first, a beauty shot with the Soundaware M1 Esther Analog in Silver.
SennheiserMomentumIn-Ear-12.jpg  
 
Sound Signature
As you might've figured out from the Pros & Cons section, the MOMENTUM In-Ear has a v-shaped sound signature. Bass is enhanced but has a good balance of sub-bass and mid-bass to keep them from sounding bloated, boomy, and slow. Electronic music like Richard Devine, Ueno Masaaki, and Vaetxh benefited from the well-extended, impactful bass. The bass also passed my Candlemass test for all you classic Doom Metal fans out there. Blastbeat kick drums in Black and Death Metal sounded pretty good, I didn't hear much smearing which can be a major problem with bass-enhanced IEM. Older albums with with leaner mastering like Black Sabbath, Fleetwood Mac, and Rush also benefited from the enhanced bass, giving them a bit of extra warmth. Mids are recessed, making vocals seem more intimate than usual. I found this to be more apparent with female vocals. Electric guitar could use more bite. The upper end is well-controlled and relatively smooth. Some reviewers noted sharp treble which is prone to sibilance. This has not been my experience. In fact, I found these quite an easy listen, only getting sibilance in recordings where I know it's a mastering problem. Soundstage, imaging, and separation are all good but not outstanding. 
 
If I were given the chance to retune these, I'd reduce the bass just slightly, bring the upper mids forward a bit, and and give them a bit more sparkle up top. I wouldn't recommend major changes because I get and can appreciate what Sennheiser is going for here. My aim would be to keep them on the full, fun side of things while balancing out the overall sound signature just a bit more. I think this would make them an even better all-around IEM that would have broader appeal amongst those starting down the audiophile path.
 
Adventures In Tip Rolling
If the manufacturer supplies different tips, I always start out with the stock silicone tips and then work my way through the rest of the supplied tips. However, Sennheiser only supplies one type of tip with the MOMENTUM In-Ear. I guess they're confident they made the right choice! And yes, the stock tips worked well for me. I did waver between the MS and ML size tips and finally settled on the ML tips for a more shallow fit. The MS fit in a bit deeper, but I felt like they weren't sealing quite as well so I abandoned them and just stuck with the ML tips. In fact, I enjoyed the stock tips so much I didn't play with other tips for quite some time. When I did, I didn't want to go the narrow bore hybrid route with these because I was afraid it would make them overly bassy. I have a hard time getting a good seal with Heir style tips, so even though I could see there being some benefit to a wide bore tip on these I didn't go that route, either. I did try SpinFit tips on them, as I've found that with bass-enhanced IEM the SpinFit tips expand the soundstage. This was no exception, with the MOMENTUM In-Ear's soundstage benefiting from the SpinFit tips. However, the SpinFits did make the fit less stable, so when out and about I'd recommend the stock tips for a more secure fit and better isolation. When stationary, I'd definitely recommend swapping out for SpinFit tips. Or if your ears get along with Heir-style tips, give those a try because I think you'd get similar benefits from those.
 
Comparisons
I gave these a volume matched listen vs. Brainwavz S5 and Trinity Delta, which I think a lot of you are familiar with. They're all around the same price and are variants on a fun, v-shaped sound signature. So, what did I think?
 
Brainwavz S5: S5 has greater bass quantity with more mid-bass, making the bass sound looser and slower in comparison. S5 has more upper mids and lower treble, making female vocals a little livelier and giving electric guitars more bite, but also making cymbals splashier and emphasizing sibilance. Soundstage is comparable, but I'd give MOMENTUM In-Ear the upper hand for imaging and separation. Overall, I'd take MOMENTUM In-Ear here for a more "audiophile" take on a bass-enhanced sound signature. S5 are slightly easier to drive than MOMENTUM In-Ear. 6/16 was a comfortable listening volume with S5 + iPhone 5s, whereas I had to crank the iPhone up to 8/16 to get a comparable volume. 
 
Trinity Delta + Gunmetal Filter: These two have more differences, so I'm going to go into more details here. Delta has similar bass levels but has more emphasis on mid-bass, which makes it sound a bit more impactful and quicker. Delta has less recessed mids and quite a bit more upper mid and lower treble energy, which gives guitars bite and makes female vocals sound much more forward. In fact, in comparison with MOMENTUM In-Ear, Delta makes female vocals sound a bit shouty. On the same Fleetwood Mac song, Stevie Nicks sounds aggressive with Delta whereas with MOMENTUM In-Ear it seems like she's singing breathily in my ear. I preferred the MOMENTUM In-Ear's approach here. However, with Bjork, Delta really makes her voice pop, whereas MOMENTUM In-Ear makes her sound a bit flat. In this case, I preferred Delta. I don't feel like either goes overboard on the upper end. Cymbals sound good and sibilance is well-controlled with both. While MOMENTUM In-Ear is no slouch, Delta clearly wins in the soundstage, separation and imaging departments. This is more of a toss-up for what I'd pick. I think something right between the bass, mids, upper mids, and lower treble levels of each of these would be killer - especially the upper mids and lower treble. 8/16 gives me a comfortable listening volume with both Delta and MOMENTUM In-Ear.
 

 
SUMMARY
So what do I think of the MOMENTUM In-Ear? I really didn't know what to expect going into these. I was just coming off listening to an even more bass-enhanced, v-shaped IEM in the NuForce NE800M, so these sounded a bit flat at first listen. After acclimating, I found that while still a fun IEM, the MOMENTUM In-Ear takes a more refined different approach. More linear bass, less upper mid / lower treble energy, a more balanced, smoother sound without sacrificing too much clarity. Make no doubt, these are not reference IEM. Don't go into an audition or purchase thinking that's what you'll be getting. What you'll be getting is a refined take on the v-shape that audiophiles can appreciate. I can see these being a complement to a more mid-focused, reference type IEM. My only tuning suggestions would be a touch less bass and slightly more forward upper mids and lower treble. 
 
Attention to details and ergonomics make these a very comfortable wear. These were hands-down the one of the easiest IEM to achieve a good fit with that I've encountered. Given the unusual shape, I didn't expect this. It's apparent that the design team really did their homework with these. The new color scheme is great, more sophisticated than the flashier red model, although I could do without the shiny, bling-bling Sennheiser S logo on the earpiece's faceplate and cinch. And while I love the case, I wish Sennheiser included some more tips and a shirt clip. More tips choices will help MOMENTUM In-Ear owners find just the right fit and sound tuning out of the box, and a shirt clip will greatly reduce footfall noises and microphonics.
 
I hope you found this useful and would like to give a hearty thanks to @Rosmadi Mahmood at Sennheiser for giving me the opportunity to review the MOMENTUM In-Ear. It was a very positive introduction to Sennheiser's IEM's, and I look forward to hearing more from them in the future.

voxie
voxie
Thank you for a great review. Very informative and articulate. Interesting your comparison v the deltas, just wondering... What filters where you using on the deltas? Thanks for sharing. :thumbsup:
nmatheis
nmatheis
Thanks for reminding me of that. I specified the filter in my notes but forgot to include it. It was the stock, gunmetal filter, and the review has been updated to reflect that.
Sennheiser
Sennheiser
Back
Top