AUSDOM M05 With APT-X WorldWide Review ------Reviewers Wanted !

Dec 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM Post #136 of 220
I could indicate what I've done - but it will be based on what I prefer, and not necessarily what the consensus might be on best fit for Ausdom.  I think at the nadir (going from memory) I was down about 6 dB.  Nick used only half of that.  So I guess somewhere in the middle might be OK.  I'll give you snapshots tonight of the EQ curve I used, and also the result on the overall signature I measured.
 
Dec 20, 2015 at 5:29 PM Post #138 of 220
Ok. The centre of the mid bass hump looks like it might be slightly higher than I thought. That would coincide with boom I mens' voices. Upper mids raised slightly as well and not higher up?

Kind of what I'm feeling about the sound.

I don't use EQ at all at home but I'll take a look on an iPad or iPod to see what it does via software. Funnily enough, in work situatuations, never without EQ!!

Thanks Nmatheis.

Ian.
 
Dec 21, 2015 at 6:37 AM Post #142 of 220
Sorry about the wait team - took much longer than I thought - especially when I lost my settings twice and had to restart.
 
First up - the equipment used:
 
Ausdom M05 - wired connection
 
Veritas measurement system with ARTA software, and a "unique" set-up to measure freq response which:
  1. is purely raw data
  2. is uncalibrated
  3. has no hrtf
  4. and for the the purposes of this exercise is just there to give me comparative data
 
Startech USB soundcard and audio interface (cheap and does the job)
E11K amplifier  - mainly for the low impedance
Equaliser APO system wide equaliser - so I could change and measure "on the fly"
 
Comparative data
So you get a rough idea of what other measurements look like on the same set-up - here is my HD600, AKG K553 and Brainwavz HM2.  Don't worry about the 4 kHz peak on the HD600 and AKG K553.  It seems to be a resonant peak in the measuring system - and I can't remove it unless I want to spend a lot of money on a proper dummy head.
 
One thing to note here is how smooth the response on the HD600 is compared to the other headphones.  Oh and click for larger images.
 

 

 

 
So that is on exactly the same equipment and will give you a reference point for the following measurement of the M05.  And here it is:
 

 
Note the huge bass hump.  That is why I suggested to Nick it needs to be cut.
 
So here are the settings I used:
 

 
In the end I used something pretty close to Nick's.  Personally, I'd use more reduction - but for Ausdom's probable target audience it would likely be too much.
 
Here's the new curve after EQ
 

 
It doesn't take a whole lot off - but the mid-range bleed is much reduced, and the whole signature is both cleaner and more defined.
 
For the final graph - I created a much bigger cut:
 

 
The aim here was to get closer to the HD600 - and at one stage before I lost the settings and started running out of time, I almost had it nailed.  They were pretty bass light though - or so I thought, until I noticed that the HD600 were too.  And herein lies the issue with spending 4 hours trying to EQ these.  it is too easy to get used to the bass - even if it is miles above neutral (or natural).  And once your brain is accustomed to the sound, it is really hard to "cleanse your palate" before restarting.
 
Anyway - the M05 is still a heck of a headphone.  My recommendation to Ausdom would be to start with the small cut to the mid-bass.  It really cleans up the sound.
 
And I haven't posted the CSDs because in the end there was little point.  They're not accurate enough to give meaningful data (too many reflections).
 
If you guys want a giggle over the holidays, I'll hopefully get around to showing you my crude full sized measuring system 
wink.gif

 
And sorry Grace - I know my review should be up by now. It's well over haf complete - but tonight's exercise stopped me finishing it.  Before Xmas - I promise. 
 
Dec 21, 2015 at 7:34 AM Post #143 of 220
Presumeably, the peak at 4-5kHz is the ringing?

Thanks Brooko. Kind of what I'm hearing, but hadn't realised how much the bass hump was. With the bigger cut, was it better once you'd cleared your bass memory!! That's kind of what I think I'm getting from the ANC7 with the noise cancellation switched on. It sounds comparatively thin when you first switch, but after a while, you realise that the bass is still there and it's a lot clearer up top.

Mine's a proto though so the sound may be altered before release.

The M05 has quite an overall downward slope so somewhat 'Senn like' tonally. It is also dropping away rapidly in the treble. In fact, if the 10khz peak wasn't there, then extension isn't that high.

At least it's reassuring to me because that's what I originally fed back to Ausdom.
 
Dec 21, 2015 at 11:48 AM Post #145 of 220
Wow! Another idea I suggested to Ausdom was to change pads. I wondered whether deeper pads might help the sound. They look great and even better, improved sound!! I was wondering about the HM5 pads. Got me thinking about that now.
 
Dec 21, 2015 at 11:57 AM Post #147 of 220
Wow! Another idea I suggested to Ausdom was to change pads. I wondered whether deeper pads might help the sound. They look great and even better, improved sound!! I was wondering about the HM5 pads. Got me thinking about that now.

 
These pads are actually significantly smaller and shallower. I was expecting to get a horrible seal, but it worked out pretty well. They are also a pleather/fabric hybrid which I didn't realize till now.
 
*Left M05, right S600* 
 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top